ClickCease
+1-915-850-0900 [email protected]
Select Page
Neuroinflammation And Psychiatric Illness

Neuroinflammation And Psychiatric Illness

Neuroinflammation:

Abstract

Multiple lines of evidence support the pathogenic role of neuroinflammation in psychiatric illness. While systemic autoimmune diseases are well-documented causes of neuropsychiatric disorders, synaptic autoimmune encephalitides with psychotic symptoms often go under-recognized. Parallel to the link between psychiatric symptoms and autoimmunity in autoimmune diseases, neuroimmunological abnormalities occur in classical psychiatric disorders (for example, major depressive, bipolar, schizophrenia, and obsessive-compulsive disorders). Investigations into the pathophysiology of these conditions traditionally stressed dysregulation of the glutamatergic and monoaminergic systems, but the mechanisms causing these neurotransmitter abnormalities remained elusive. We review the link between autoimmunity and neuropsychiatric disorders, and the human and experimental evidence supporting the pathogenic role of neuroinflammation in selected classical psychiatric disorders. Understanding how psychosocial, genetic, immunological and neurotransmitter systems interact can reveal pathogenic clues and help target new preventive and symptomatic therapies.

Keywords:

  • Neuroinflammation,
  • Psychoneuroimmunology,
  • Astrocyte,
  • Microglia,
  • Cytokines,
  • Oxidative stress,
  • Depression,
  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder,
  • Bipolar disorder, Schizophrenia

Introduction

As biological abnormalities are increasingly identified among patients with psychiatric disorders, the distinction between neurological and psychiatric illness fades. In addition to systemic autoimmune diseases associated with psychiatric manifestations (for example, lupus) [1], more recently, patients with acute isolated psychosis were identified with synaptic autoimmune encephalitides (Table 1) [2-6]. These patients are often erroneously diagnosed with refractory primary psych- otic disorders, delaying initiation of effective immune therapy (Table 1). Additionally, growing evidence supports the pathogenic role of anti-neuronal antibodies in neuropsychiatric disorders [7].

neuroinflammation table-1-3.jpg

Separation of neurological and psychiatric disorders, supported by Descartes�s conception of the �mind� as an ontologically distinct entity and by the reproducibility of neuropathological abnormalities, dominated medicine in�the 19th and early 20th centuries [8]. Since then, an expanding collection of reproducible biological causes, from neurosyphilis, head trauma, stroke, tumor, demyelination and many others caused symptom complexes that overlapped with classic psychiatric disorders [9-11]. More recently, neuroinflammatory and immunological abnormalities have been documented in patients with classical psychiatric disorders.

Peripheral immune modulators can induce psychiatric symptoms in animal models and humans [12-19]. Healthy animals injected with pro-inflammatory IL-1? and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-?) cytokines demonstrate �sick- ness behavior� associated with social withdrawal [12]. In humans, injections of low-dose endotoxin deactivate the ventral striatum, a region critical for reward processing, producing anhedonia a debilitating depressive symptom [14]. Approximately 45% of non-depressed hepatitis C and cancer patients treated with IFN-? develop depressive symptoms associated with increased serum IL-6 levels [12,15,17,18].

Medical conditions associated with chronic inflammatory and immunological abnormalities, including obesity, diabetes, malignancies, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis, are risk factors for depression and bipolar disorder [10,12,13,15,17,18]. The positive�correlation between these medical conditions and psychiatric illness suggests the presence of a widespread underlying inflammatory process affecting the brain among other organs [10,19,20]. A 30-year population- based study showed that having an autoimmune disease or a prior hospitalization for serious infection increased the risk of developing schizophrenia by 29% and 60%, respectively [16]. Further, herpes simplex virus, Toxoplasma gondii, cytomegalovirus, and influenza during pregnancy increase the risk of developing schizophrenia [16].

Peripheral cellular [21,22] (Table 2), and humoral immunological abnormalities [13,21-23] are more prevalent in psychiatric patients relative to healthy controls. In both pilot (n = 34 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), n = 43 healthy controls) and replication studies (n = 36 MDD, n = 43 healthy controls), a serum assay comprising nine serum biomarkers distinguished MDD subjects from healthy controls with 91.7% sensitivity and 81.3% specificity; significantly elevated biomarkers for neuropsychiatric symptoms were the immunological molecules alpha 1 antitrypsin, myeloperoxidase, and soluble TNF-? receptor II [23].

neuroinflammation table 2We first review the association between autoimmunity and neuropsychiatric disorders, including: 1) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as a prototype of systemic auto- immune disease; 2) autoimmune encephalitides associated with serum anti-synaptic and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) autoantibodies; and 3) pediatric neuropsychiatric autoimmune disorders associated with streptococcal infections (PANDAS) and pure obsessive-compulsive dis- order (OCD) associated with anti-basal ganglia/thalamic autoantibodies. We then discuss the role of innate inflammation/autoimmunity in classical psychiatric disorders, including MDD, bipolar disorder (BPD), schizophrenia, and OCD.

Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated With Autoimmunity

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Between 25% to 75% of SLE patients have central nervous system (CNS) involvement, with psychiatric symptoms typically occurring within the first two years of disease on- set. Psychiatric symptoms may include anxiety, mood and psychotic disturbances [97]. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is normal in approximately 42% of neuropsychiatric SLE cases [97]. Microangiopathy and blood� brain barrier (BBB) breakdown may permit entry of autoantibodies into the brain [97]. These antibodies include anti-ribosomal P (positive in 90% of psychotic SLE patients) [1], anti-endothelial cell, anti-ganglioside, anti- dsDNA, anti-2A/2B subunits of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) and anti-phospholipid antibodies [97]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines�principally IL-6 [97], S100B�[97], intra-cellular adhesion molecule 1 [97] and matrix- metalloproteinase-9 [98] are also elevated in SLE. Psychiatric manifestations of SLE, Sjo?gren�s disease, Susac�s syndrome, CNS vasculitis, CNS Whipple�s disease, and Behc?et�s disease were recently reviewed [1].

Neuropsychiatric Autoimmune Encephalitides Associated With Serum Anti-Synaptic & Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase

Autoantibodies

Autoimmune encephalitides are characterized by an acute onset of temporal lobe seizures, psychiatric features, and cognitive deficits [2,3,99-108]. The pathophysiology is typically mediated by autoantibodies targeting synaptic or intracellular autoantigens in association with a paraneo plastic or nonparaneoplastic origin [3]. Anti-synaptic autoantibodies target NR1 subunits of the NMDAR [100,108,109], voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC) complexes (Kv1 subunit, leucine-rich glioma inactivated (LGI1) and contactin associated protein 2 (CASPR2)) [101,102,106], GluR1 and GluR2 subunits of the amino-3- hydroxy-5-methyl-l-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) [6,110,111] and B1 subunits of the ?-aminobu- tyric acid B receptors (GABABR) [3,99,103]. Anti-intracellular autoantibodies target onconeuronal and GAD-65 autoantigens [2,3].

The inflammation associated with anti-synaptic autoantibodies, particularly NMDAR-autoantibodies, is typically much milder than that associated with GAD-autoantibodies or anti-neuronal autoantibodies related to systemic auto- immune disorders or paraneoplastic syndromes [2,107].

Although neurological symptoms eventually emerge, psychiatric manifestations, ranging from anxiety [2,3] to psychosis mimicking schizophrenia [2-6], can initially dominate or precede neurological features. Up to two- thirds of patients with anti-NMDAR autoimmune encephalitis, initially present to psychiatric services [5]. Anti-synaptic antibodies-mediated autoimmune encephalitides must be considered in the differential of acute psychosis [2-6]. Psychiatric presentations can include normal brain MRI and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ana- lysis, without encephalopathy or seizures [2,3,5,6,107]. We reported a case of seropositive GAD autoantibodies associated with biopsy-proven neuroinflammation, despite normal brain MRI and CSF analyses, where the patient presented with isolated psychosis diagnosed as schizophrenia by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) criteria [2]. Further, seronegative autoimmune encephalitides can also present with prominent neuropsychiatric disturbances, making diagnosis more elusive [107,112,113]. Psychiatric and neurological features associated with anti- synaptic and GAD autoantibodies are summarized in Table 1 [1-6,99-108,114].

Serum anti-synaptic and GAD autoantibodies may occur in patients with pure psychiatric disorders [2,4,5,112,115-121]. In a prospective cohort of 29 subjects who met the DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, serum anti-NMDAR autoantibodies were found in three subjects, and anti-VGKC-complex autoantibodies were found in one subject [5]. Using more sensitive techniques to detect immunoglobulin G (IgG) NR1 auto- antibodies in 100 patients with definite schizophrenia, no autoantibodies were identified [122]. However, this study did not assess autoantibodies targeting the NR2 subunit of NMDAR. Other studies reported significantly increased odds of elevated (?90th percentile non-psychiatric control levels) NR2 antibody levels (odds ratio (OR) 2.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26 to 6.14, P = 0.012) among individuals with acute mania (n = 43), but not in chronic mania or schizophrenia [116].

PANDAS & Pure Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Associated With Anti-Basal Ganglia/Thalamic Autoantibodies

OCD often complicates neurological disorders involving the basal ganglia including Sydenham�s chorea, Huntington�s disease and Parkinson�s disease. Anti- basal ganglia antibodies are implicated in Sydenham�s chorea [123]. PANDAS is characterized by acute exacerbations of OCD symptoms and/or motor/phonic tics following a prodromal group A ?-hemolytic streptococcal infection. The pathophysiology is thought to involve cross-reactivity between anti-streptococcal antibodies and basal ganglia proteins [124]. The clinical overlap between the PANDAS and pure OCD suggests a common etiological mechanism [125].

Among a random cohort of 21 pure OCD patients, 91.3% had CSF anti-basal ganglia (P <0.05) and anti-thalamic autoantibodies (P <0.005) at 43 kDa [88], paralleling functional abnormalities in the cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortico circuitry of OCD subjects [84]. Another study documented that 42% (n = 21) of OCD pediatric and adolescent subjects had serum anti-basal ganglia autoantibodies at 40, 45, and 60 kDa compared to 2% to 10% of controls (P = 0.001) [7]. Anti�basal ganglia autoantibodies were detected in the sera of 64% of PANDAS subjects (n = 14), compared to only 9% (n = 2) of streptococcal-positive/OCD-negative controls (P <0.001) [126]. One study found no difference between the prevalence of anti-basal ganglia autoantibodies in OCD (5.4%, n = 4) versus MDD controls (0%) [127]; however, a limitation was the random use of rat cortex and bovine basal ganglia and cortex that might have limited the identification of seropositive cases.

The basal ganglia autoantigens are aldolase C (40 kDa), neuronal-specific/non-neuronal enolase (45 kDa doublet) and pyruvate kinase M1 (60 kDa)�neuronal glycolytic enzymes�involved in neurotransmission, neuronal metabolism

Page 3 of 24 and cell signaling [128]. These enzymes exhibit substantial structural homology to streptococcal proteins [129]. The latest study (96 OCD, 33 MDD, 17 schizophrenia subjects) tested patient serum against pyruvate kinase, aldolase C and enolase, specifically; a greater pro- portion of OCD subjects were sero-positive relative to controls (19.8% (n = 19) versus 4% [n = 2], P = 0.012) [130].

Yet, in the same study only one of 19 sero-positive OCD subjects also had positive anti-streptolysin O antibody ti- ters, suggesting that in pure OCD the anti-streptolysin O antibody seronegativity does not exclude the presence of anti-basal ganglia autoantibodies.

In pure OCD, sero-positivity for anti-basal ganglia/ thalamic antibodies is associated with increased levels of CSF glycine (P = 0.03) [88], suggesting that these anti- bodies contribute to hyperglutamatergia observed in OCD [84,88,131]. The improvement of infection-provoked OCD with immune therapies supports the pathogenicity of these autoantibodies [132]. A large NIH trial assessing the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for children with acute onset OCD and anti-streptococcal antibodies is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01281969). However, the finding of slightly higher CSF glutamate levels in OCD patients with negative CSF anti-basal ganglia/thalamic anti- bodies as compared to those with positive CSF antibodies suggests that non-immunological mechanisms may play role in OCD [84]. Other mechanisms, including cytokine- mediated inflammation (Table 2), are also hypothesized.

Psychiatric Disorders Associated With Innate Inflammation

Disorders of innate inflammation/autoimmunity occur in some patients with classical psychiatric disorders. We discuss innate inflammation-related CNS abnormalities� including glial pathology, elevated cytokines levels, cyclo-oxygenase activation, glutamate dysregulation, increased S100B levels, increased oxidative stress, and BBB dysfunction�in MDD, BPD, schizophrenia, and OCD. We also describe how innate inflammation may be mechanistically linked to the traditional monoaminergic and glutamatergic abnormalities reported in these disorders (Figures 1 and 2). The therapeutic role of antiinflammatory agents in psychiatric disorders is also reviewed.

neuroinflammation fig 1

neuroinflammation fig 2Astroglial & Oligodendroglial Histopathology

Astroglia and oligodendroglia are essential to neural metabolic homeostasis, behavior and higher cognitive functions [54-56,133-136]. Normal quiescent astroglia provide energy and trophic support to neurons, regulate synaptic neurotransmission (Figure 2), synaptogenesis, cerebral blood flow, and maintain BBB integrity [134,136,137]. Mature oligodendroglia provide energy and trophic support to neurons and maintain BBB integrity, and regulate axonal repair�and myelination of white matter tracts providing inter- and intra-hemispheric connectivity [54-56]. Both astroglia and oligodendroglia produce anti-inflammatory cytokines that can down-regulate harmful inflammation [52,55].

In MDD, astroglial loss is a consistent post-mortem finding in functionally relevant areas, including the anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and white matter [35-38,42-46,55,138-147], with few exceptions [42,43]. Post-mortem studies revealed reduced glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive astroglial density primarily in the prefrontal cortex [37,38] and amygdala [36]. A large proteomic analysis of frontal cortices from depressed patients showed significant reductions in three GFAP isoforms [39]. Although in one study that reported no significant glial loss, subgroup analysis revealed a significant decrease (75%) in GFAP-positive astroglial density among study subjects younger than 45 years of age [35]. A morphometric study similarly showed no changes in glial density in late-life MDD brains [148]. We hypothesize that the apparent absence of astroglial loss among older MDD patients may reflect secondary astrogliosis [35] that is associated with older age [42,50] rather than a true negative.

Animal studies are consistent with human studies showing astroglial loss in MDD. Wistar-Kyoto rats� known to exhibit depressive-like behaviors�revealed reduced astroglial density in the same areas as observed in humans [40]. Administration of the astroglial-toxic agent, L-alpha-aminoadipic acid, induces depressive- like symptoms in rats, suggesting that astroglial loss is pathogenic in MDD [41].

Post-mortem studies of MDD subjects documented reduced oligodendroglial density in the prefrontal cortex and amygdala [54-57,66], which may correlate with brain MRI focal white matter changes occasionally noted in some MDD patients [57]. However, microvascular abnormalities may also contribute to these changes [57].

In BPD, some studies demonstrate significant glial loss [138,143,149,150], while others do not [37,44-46]. These inconsistent findings may result from lack of control for: 1) treatment with mood stabilizers, because post-hoc ana- lysis reported by some studies showed significant reduction in glial loss only after controlling for treatment with lithium and valproic acid [46]; 2) familial forms of BPD, as glial loss is particularly prominent among BPD patients with a strong family history [143]; and/or, 3) the predominant state of depression versus mania, as glial loss is frequent in MDD [35-38,42-46,55,138-147]. Whether astroglia or oligodendroglia account for the majority of glial loss is unclear; while proteomic analysis revealed a significant decrease in one astroglial GFAP isoform [39], several other post-mortem studies found either unchanged [36,37] or reduced GFAP-positive astroglial expression in the orbitrofrontal cortex [47], or reduced oligodendroglial density [54-56,58,59].

In schizophrenia, astroglial loss is an inconsistent finding [48,150]. While some studies showed no significant astroglial loss [42,50,51], several others found reduced astroglial density [37,38,43,44,48,49,151] and significant reductions in two GFAP isoforms [39]. Inconsistent findings may result from: 1) MDD comorbidity, which is often associated with glial loss; 2) age variation, as older patients have increased GFAP-positive astroglia [35,42,50]; 3) regional [150] and cortical layer variability [48]; 4) treatment with antipsychotic drugs, as experimental studies show both reduced [152] and increased [153] astroglial-density related to chronic antipsychotic treatment [70]; and 5) disease state (for example, suicidal versus non-suicidal behavior) [154]. Post-mortem studies documented oligodendroglial loss [54,56,60-65,148,155,156], particularly in the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, and hippocampus [148]. Ultrastructural examination of the prefrontal region showed abnormally myelinated fibers in both gray and white matter; both age and duration of illness were positively correlated with the white matter abnormalities [157].

In contrast to neurodegenerative disorders that are commonly associated with astroglial proliferation [136], psychiatric disorders are instead associated with either reduced or unchanged astroglial density [138]. The lack of increased glial density in early-onset psychiatric disorders [44,138] may reflect the slower rate of degenerative progression in psychiatric illnesses [138].

We postulate that degenerative changes associated with psychiatric disorders are subtler and not severe enough to provoke astroglial intracellular transcription factors that positively regulate astrogliosis, including signal transducer activator of transcription 3 and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-?B) [136].

While the majority of post-mortem studies focused on the alteration of glial density in MDD, BPD, and schizophrenia, others described alteration of glial cell morphology, with mixed findings. In MDD and BPD, glial size is either increased or unchanged [55]. One study found reduced glial size in BPD and schizophrenia but not in MDD [43]. A post-mortem study of depressed patients who committed suicide found increased astroglial size in the anterior cingulate white matter but not in the cortex [158]. One study in schizophrenic subjects found markedly decreased astroglial size in layer V of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, notwithstanding that astroglial density is double that of controls in the same layer [48]. The mixed results may partially reflect earlier studies of glial alterations in psychiatric illnesses that did not specify astroglia versus oligodendroglia [148].

Glial loss in psychiatric illnesses may contribute to neuroinflammation through several mechanisms, including abnormal cytokine levels (see Cytokine section), dysregulated glutamate metabolism (see Glutamate section), elevated S100B protein (see S100B section),�and altered BBB function (see Blood brain barrier section), resulting in impaired cognition and behavior [44,45,54,133,159].

Microglial Histopathology

Microglia are the resident immune cells of the CNS. They provide ongoing immune surveillance and regulate developmental synaptic pruning [160,161]. CNS injury transforms ramified resting microglia into activated elongated rod-shaped and macrophage-like phagocytic amoeboid cells that proliferate and migrate towards the site of injury along chemotactic gradients (that is, micro- glial activation and proliferation (MAP)) [161]. Human microglial cells express NMDARs that may mediate MAP leading to neuronal injury [162].

In MDD, BPD and schizophrenia, the results of post- mortem studies investigating the presence of MAP are mixed. Post-mortem studies revealed elevated MAP in only one out of five MDD subjects [67]. In some BPD disorder patients, increased human leukocyte antigen-DR-positive microglia displaying thickened processes were documented in the frontal cortex [69]. In schizophrenia, while some studies reported elevated MAP relative to controls, others showed no difference between groups [22,67,70]. In a post-mortem study assessing MAP in MDD and BPD; quinolinic acid-positive microglial cell density was in- creased in the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex and anterior midcingulate cortex of MDD and BPD patients who committed suicide relative to controls [53]. Post-hoc ana- lysis revealed this increased MAP was solely attributable to MDD and not BPD, since the positive microglial immuno-staining in MDD subjects was significantly greater than that in the BPD subgroup in both the subgenual anterior cingulate and midcingulate cortices, and since the microglia density was similar in both BPD and control groups [53]. A study comparing all three disorders (nine MDD, five BPD, fourteen schizophrenia, ten healthy controls) demonstrated no significant difference in microglial density across the four groups [68].

These mixed results may be attributed to variable microglial immunological markers used among different studies [70] and/or the failure to control for disease severity [22,53,68]. Notably, three post-mortem studies of MDD and schizophrenic subjects documented a strong positive correlation between MAP and suicidality in the anterior cingulate cortex and mediodorsal thalamus, in- dependent of psychiatric diagnosis [22,53,68]. Thus, MAP may be a state rather than a trait marker for MDD and schizophrenia.

In OCD, animal models suggest that dysfunction and reduction of certain microglial phenotypes, such as those expressing the Hoxb8 gene, which encodes homeobox transcription factor, can cause OCD-like behavior [71,72].

Hoxb8 knockout mice exhibit excessive grooming behavior and anxiety in association with reduced microglial density [71,72]. This excessive grooming behavior resembles the behavioral characteristics of human OCD. Hoxb8 injection in adult Hoxb8 knockout mice reverses microglial loss and restores normal behavior [71,72]. The role of these specific microglial phenotypes in human OCD is unclear.

Experimental data suggest that MAP comprises distinctive harmful and neuroprotective phenotypes (Figure 2). Harmful microglia do not express major histocompatibility complex II (MHC-II) and, therefore, cannot act as antigen presenting cells (APC) [163,164]; they promote deleterious effects [17,69,165] through proinflammatory cytokine production, nitric oxide synthase signaling [17,166], promoting glial and BBB-pericyte/endothelial cyclooxygenase- 2 (COX-2) expression [167], inducing astroglial S100B secretion (see S100B section), and microglial glutamate release [17,136,168,169]. Harmful microglia also secrete prostaglandin E-2 (PGE-2) that promotes proinflammatory cytokines production, which in turn increases PGE-2 levels in a feed-forward cycle [29]. Further, PGE-2 stimulates COX-2 expression, which mediates the conversion of arachidonic acid to PGE-2, setting up another feed-forward cycle [29].

Neuroprotective microglia by contrast can: 1) express MHC-II in vivo and in vitro [163,166] and act as cognate APC (Figure 2) [163,164,166]; 2) facilitate healing and limit neuronal injury by promoting secretion of antiinflammatory cytokines [17], brain-derived neurotrophic factor [17], and insulin-like growth factor-1 [166]; and 3) express excitatory amino acid transporter-2 (EAAT2) that eliminates excess extracellular glutamate [163,166], and promotes neuroprotective T lymphocytic autoimmunity (Figure 2) [163,164]. However, more studies are needed to confirm the contributory role of neuroprotective microglia to neuropsychiatric disorders in humans.

 

In vitro animal studies suggest that the ratio of harmful versus neuroprotective microglia can be influenced by the net effect of inflammatory counter-regulatory mechanisms [15,74,164,166]. These mechanisms include the number of neuroprotective CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ T regulatory cells ((T regs) Figure 1) [15,74,164,166] and brain cytokine levels; low IFN-? levels may promote neuroprotective microglia (Figure 2) [166], whereas high levels can promote the harmful phenotype [166].

The Role Of Cytokines

Proinflammatory cytokines include IL-1?, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-? and IFN-?. They are secreted primarily by micro- glia, Th1 lymphocytes and M1 phenotype monocytes/ macrophages (Figure 1) [15,170]. They promote harmful inflammation. Antiinflammatory cytokines include IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10. They are primarily secreted by astroglia,�Th2 lymphocytes, T regs and M2 phenotype monocytes/ macrophages [15,52,74]. They can limit harmful inflammation [15,74] by converting the proinflammatory M1-pheno- type into the beneficial antiinflammatory M2-phenotype [15], and potentially by promoting the neuroprotective microglial phenotype [15,17,74,163,166]. The role of proinflammatory/antiinflammatory cytokines in psychiatric dis- orders is supported by several lines of evidence (Figure 1, Table 2) [15,17,29,52,74].

In MDD, the most recent meta-analysis (29 studies, 822 MDD, 726 healthy controls) of serum proinflammatory cytokines confirmed that soluble IL-2 receptor, IL-6 and TNF-? levels are increased in MDD (trait markers) [91], while, IL-1?, IL-2, IL-4, IL-8 and IL-10, are not statistically different from controls [91]. In a primary cytokine study comparing MDD subgroups (47 suicidal- MDD, 17 non-suicidal MDD, 16 health controls), both sera IL-6 and TNF-? were significantly higher, while IL-2 levels were significantly lower in MDD subjects who committed suicide relative to both other groups [96]. This finding suggests that IL-6 and TNF-? are also state markers of MDD [96]. The decrease of serum IL-2 levels associated with acute suicidal behavior may reflect increased binding to its upregulated receptor in the brain; parallel to the aforementioned meta-analysis showing increased soluble IL-2 receptor in MDD [91]. Studies investigating the clinical significance of cytokines in MDD showed that serum cytokine levels are elevated during acute depressive episodes [171,172] and normalized following successful, but not failed, treatment with antidepressants [17] and electro- convulsive therapy [29]; these findings suggest a possible pathogenic role for cytokines.

In BPD, serum cytokine alterations were summarized in a recent review; TNF-?, IL-6 and IL-8 are elevated during manic and depressive phases, whereas IL-2, IL-4 and IL-6 are elevated during mania [92]. Other studies showed that sera IL-1? and IL-1 receptor levels are not statistically different from healthy controls [92], although tissue studies documented increased levels of IL-1? and IL-1 receptor in the BPD frontal cortex [69].

In schizophrenia, results from studies investigating cytokine abnormalities are conflicting (Table 2). While some studies found both decreased serum proinflammatory (IL-2, IFN-?) and increased serum and CSF antiinflammatory cytokines (IL-10) [52], others found elevated serum pro- and antiinflammatory cytokines, with a proinflammatory type dominance [22,173,174]. One cytokine meta-analysis (62 studies, 2,298 schizophrenia, 858 healthy controls) showed increased levels of IL-1R antagonist, sIL-2R and IL-6 [174]. However, this study did not account for the use of antipsychotics, which is thought to enhance proinflammatory cytokine production [52]. A more recent cytokine meta-analysis (40 studies, 2,572 schizophrenics,�4,401 controls) that accounted for antipsychotics, found that TNF-?, IFN-?, IL-12 and sIL-2R are consistently elevated in chronic schizophrenia independent of disease activity (trait markers), while IL-1?, IL-6 and transforming growth factor beta positively correlate with disease activity (state markers)[173]. Cell cultures of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) obtained from schizophrenic patients produced higher levels of IL-8 and IL-1? spontaneously as well as after stimulation by LPS, suggesting a role for activated monocytes/macrophages in schizophrenia pathology [175].

In OCD, results from a random survey of sera and CSF cytokines, and LPS-stimulated PBMC studies, are inconsistent [93-95,176-179]. There is a correlation between OCD and a functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the TNF-? gene [34], although low-powered studies did not confirm this association [180]. Therefore, the mixed results from studies documenting either increased or decreased TNF-? cytokine levels [93,176-178] may reflect their variable inclusion of the subset of OCD subjects with this particular polymorphism in their cohorts.

Cytokine Response Polarization In Major Depression & Schizophrenia

Cytokine response phenotypes are classified as either proinflammatory Th1 (IL-2, IFN-?) or antiinflammatory Th2 (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10) according to the immune functions they regulate. While Th1 cytokines regulate cell-mediated immunity directed against intra-cellular antigens, Th2 cytokines regulate humoral immunity directed against extra- cellular antigens [29,52]. Th1 cytokines are produced by Th1 lymphocytes and M1 monocytes whereas Th2 cytokines are produced by Th2 lymphocytes and M2 monocytes [29,52]. In the brain, microglia predominantly secrete Th1 cytokines, whereas astroglia predominately secrete Th2 cytokines [29,52]. The reciprocal ratio of Th1:Th2 cytokines, henceforth �Th1-Th2 seesaw,� is influenced by the proportion of activated microglia (excess Th1) to astroglia (excess Th2) and the interplay between activated T cells and excessive CNS glutamate levels that we hypothesized to favor Th1 response (Figure 2) [29,163,166].

The Th1-Th2 seesaw imbalance can influence trypto- phan metabolism by altering its enzymes [21,52] thereby shifting tryptophan catabolism towards kynurenine (KYN) and KYN catabolism towards either of its two down- stream metabolites; microglia quinolinic acid that is Th1 response-mediated or astroglial kynurenic acid (KYNA) (Figure 1) that is Th2 response-mediated [21,29,170].

Tryptophan metabolism enzymes affected by Th1-Th2 seesaw include (Figure 1): indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) expressed by microglia and astroglia, the rate-limiting enzymes that mediate the conversion of trypto- phan to KYN and serotonin to 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid�[21,29]. Kynurenine 3-monooxygenase (KMO), solely expressed by microglia, is the rate-limiting enzyme that converts KYN to 3-hydroxykynurenine (3-OH-KYN), which is further metabolized to quinolinic acid [21,29]. Tryptophan-2,3-dioxygenase (TDO), expressed solely by astroglia, is the rate-limiting enzyme that converts�tryptophan to KYN [21,29]. Kynurenine aminotransferase (KAT), expressed primarily in astroglial processes, is the rate-limiting enzyme that mediates the conversion of KYN to KYNA [21,29].

Th1 cytokines activate microglial IDO and KMO, shifting microglial KYN catabolism towards quinolinic�acid (NMDAR agonist) synthesis, while Th2 cytokines in- activate microglial IDO and KMO, shifting astroglial KYN catabolism towards TDO- and KAT-mediated KYNA (NMDAR antagonist) synthesis (Figure 1) [21,29].

Th1 and Th2 predominant immunophenotypes have been proposed for MDD and schizophrenia, respectively, based on peripheral, rather than CNS, cytokines patterns [52,173]. We believe that peripheral cytokines patterns are unreliable surrogate markers of those in the CNS. Indeed, peripheral cytokine levels can be influenced by many extra-CNS variables, which are not consistently controlled for in several of the peripheral cytokines studies, including: 1) age, body mass index, psychotropic medications, smoking, stress and circadian fluctuations; 2) the influence of�disease activity/state on the production of selected cytokines synthesis [95,173]; and 3) the effects of psychotropic agents on cytokines production [52]. The short half-lives and the rapid turnover of serum cytokines [181] (for ex- ample, 18 minutes for TNF-? [182] versus 60 minutes for IL-10 [183]), may further limit the reliability of interpreting their levels measured from random sera sampling.

In MDD, there is a consensus that a proinflammatory Th1 immunophenotype response predominates (Table 2) [17,29]. High levels of quinolinic acid in post-mortem MDD brains [53], suggest the presence of an upregulated Th1 response (Figure 1) [21,29]. Elevated CNS quinolinic acid can promote calcium influx mediated apoptosis of human astroglia [184], which hypothetically may blunt the�astroglia-derived Th2 response [29], tipping Th1 versus Th2 seesaw balance in favor of the microglial Th1 response. CNS hyposerotonergia [29] adds further support to an excess Th1 response, which is shown to reduce CNS serotonin synthesis [185] and to increase its degradation (Figure 1) [21,29].

CNS hyperglutamatergia may also contribute to an excess Th1 response in the brain (Figure 2). An in vitro study suggests that the peripheral resting T lymphocytes constitutively express metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) [164], whose binding to glutamate inhibits lymphocytic IL-6 release, thereby downregulating auto- reactive T-effector cell proliferation [164]. Activated T lymphocytes, but not resting T lymphocytes, can cross the BBB [37].

Experimental data suggest that the interaction between T cell receptors of activated T lymphocytes and their cognate antigen presenting cells can downregulate mGluR5 and induce mGluR1 expressions [164]. In animal models, binding of excess glutamate to lymphocytic mGluR1 receptors promotes production of Th1 cytokines, including IFN-? [164].

We hypothesize that in some MDD patients, parallel to experimental data [164], the binding of excess CNS glutamate to induced lymphocytic mGluR1 receptors may contribute to an excess Th1 response, including IFN-? (Figure 2). We speculate that IFN-? in a small quantity, similar to its in vitro effects on microglia [166], may induce microglial expression of MHC-II and EAAT2 [163,166], allowing microglia to serve as cognate antigen presenting cells and to provide glutamate reuptake function [163,164,166], thereby transforming harmful microglia into neuroprotective phenotype [163,166] that participate in eliminating excess extracellular glutamate [163,164,166]. Therefore, we also hypothesize that excess Th1 response in subgroups of MDD patients is a double-edged sword, promoting harmful inflammation and serving as a beneficial counter- regulatory mechanism that may limit excess glutamate- related neuroexcitotoxicity (Figure 2).

In schizophrenia, while some peripheral cytokine studies suggest the predominance of an antiinflammatory Th2 immunophenotype/response [52], others refute this [173,174]. However, we agree with the authors who hypothesized that the Th2 response is the dominant phenotype in schizophrenia [52]. Elevated brain, CSF, and serum levels of KYNA [21,52] suggest downregulation of micro-glial IDO and KMO, which is a function of Th2 response that shifts astroglial KYN catabolism towards KYNA synthesis (Figure 1) [21,52]. Reduced KMO activity and KMO mRNA expression in post-mortem schizophrenic brains [73] is consistent with excess Th2 response (Figure 1). Increased prevalence of Th2-mediated humoral immunity abnormalities in subgroups of schizophrenia patients�as evidenced by increased B cell counts [21,76], increased�production of autoantibodies including antiviral antibodies [76] and increased immunoglobulin E [52]�adds further support to the Th2 response dominance hypothesis.

Neuroinflammation & CNS Glutamate Dysregulation

Glutamate mediates cognition and behavior [186]. Syn- aptic glutamate levels are regulated by high-affinity sodium-dependent glial and neuronal EAATs, namely, the XAG- system responsible for glutamate reuptake/ aspartate release [137,164] and the sodium-independent astroglial glutamate/cystine antiporter system (Xc-) responsible for glutamate release/cystine reuptake [164]. Astroglial EAAT1 and EAAT2 provide more than 90% of glutamate re-uptake [79].

Neuroinflammation can alter glutamate metabolism and the function of its transporters [15,29,187,188], producing cognitive, behavioral, and psychiatric impairments [15,21,29,79,186,188,189]. Abnormalities of EAATs function/expression and glutamate metabolism in MDD, BPD, schizophrenia, and OCD are summarized in Table 2.

In MDD, there is evidence for cortical hyperglutamatergia (Table 2). Cortical glutamate levels correlated positively with the severity of depressive symptoms, and a five-week course of antidepressants decreased serum glutamate concentrations [85,86]. A single dose of ketamine, a potent NMDAR antagonist, can reverse refractory MDD for a week [17,21,29,85]. Excess CNS glutamate levels can induce neurotoxicity-mediated inflammation [163,164,188], including a proinflammatory Th1 response (Figure 2) [164].

Limited in vitro evidence suggests that inflammation/ proinflammatory cytokines can increase CNS glutamate levels [188] in a feed-forward cycle through several potential mechanisms: 1) proinflammatory cytokines can inhibit [15,17,168] and reverse [45,137] astroglial EAAT-mediated glutamate reuptake function; 2) proinflammatory cytokines can enhance microglial quinolinic acid synthesis [53], which has been experimentally shown to promote synaptosomal glutamate release [15,17,29,190]; 3) increased COX-2/PGE-2 and TNF-? levels can induce calcium influx [137], which, based on in vitro data, may increase astroglial glutamate and D-serine release [191]; and 4) activated microglia can express excess Xc- antiporter systems that mediate glutamate release [164,192].

In schizophrenia, prefrontal cortical hypoglutamatergia [87,90,193,194] (Table 2) and reduced NMDAR functionality are found [5]. Recent H1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) meta-analysis (28 studies, 647 schizophrenia, 608 control) confirmed decreased glutamate and increased glutamine levels in the medial frontal cortex [90]. The contributory role of inflammation to hypoglutamatergia is not proven. Elevated KYNA synthesis in schizophrenia brains [21,52], typically a function of Th2 response (Figure 1), can inhibit NR1 subunit of NMDAR and alpha 7 nicotinic�acetylcholine receptor (?7nAchR) [195], leading to decreased NMDAR function and reduced ?7nAchR-mediated glutamate release [195].

In BPD and OCD, data suggest CNS cortical hyper- glutamatergia in both disorders (Table 2) [78,84,88,131]. The contribution of inflammation (BPD and OCD) and autoantibodies (OCD)[7,77,84,88,130] to increased CNS glutamate levels requires further investigation.

The Role Of S100B

S100B is a 10 kDa calcium-binding protein produced by astroglia, oligodendroglia, and choroid plexus ependymal cells [196]. It mediates its effects on the surrounding neurons and glia via the receptor for advanced glycation end-product [196]. Nanomolar extracellular S100B levels provide beneficial neurotrophic effects, limit stress-related neuronal injury, inhibit microglial TNF-? release, and increase astroglial glutamate reuptake [196]. Micromolar S100B concentrations, predominantly produced by activated astroglia and lymphocytes [196,197], have harmful effects transduced by receptor for advanced glycation end product that include neuronal apoptosis, production of COX-2/PGE-2, IL-1? and inducible nitric oxide species, and upregulation of monocytic/microglial TNF-? secretion [21,196,198].

Serum and, particularly, CSF and brain tissue S100B levels are indicators of glial (predominantly astroglial) activation [199]. In MDD and psychosis, serum S100B levels positively correlate with the severity of suicidality, independent of psychiatric diagnosis [200]. Post-mortem analysis of S100B showed decreased levels in the dorso- lateral prefrontal cortex of MDD and BPD, and in- creased levels in the parietal cortex of BPD [196].

Meta-analysis (193 mood disorder, 132 healthy controls) confirmed elevated serum and CSF S100B levels in mood disorders, particularly during acute depressive episodes and mania [201].

In schizophrenia, brain, CSF and serum S100B levels are elevated [199,202]. Meta-analysis (12 studies, 380 schizophrenia, 358 healthy controls) confirmed elevated serum S100B levels in schizophrenia [203]. In post-mortem brains of schizophrenia subjects, S100B-immunoreactive astroglia are found in areas implicated in schizophrenia, including anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex and hippocampi [154]. Elevated S100B levels correlate with paranoid [154] and negativistic psychosis [204], impaired cognition, poor therapeutic response and duration of illness [202]. Genetic polymorphisms in S100B [32] and receptor for advanced glycation end-product genes in schizophrenia cohorts (Table 2) [32,33,205] suggest these abnormalities are likely primary/ pathogenic rather than secondary/biomarkers. Indeed, the decrease in serum S100B levels following treatment with antidepressants [201] and antipsychotics [196] suggests�some clinical relevance of S100B to the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders.

Neuroinflammation & Increased Oxidative Stress

Oxidative stress is a condition in which an excess of oxidants damages or modifies biological macromolecules such as lipids, proteins and DNA [206-209]. This excess results from increased oxidant production, decreased oxidant elimination, defective antioxidant defenses, or some combination thereof [206-209]. The brain is particularly vulnerable to oxidative stress due to: 1) elevated amounts of peroxidizable polyunsaturated fatty acids; 2) relatively high content of trace minerals that induce lipid peroxidation and oxygen radicals (for example, iron, copper); 3) high oxygen utilization; and 3) limited anti-oxidation mechanisms [206,207].

Excess oxidative stress can occur in MDD [206], BPD [206,207], schizophrenia [207,209], and OCD [206,208]. Peripheral markers of oxidative disturbances include increased lipid peroxidation products (for example, malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal), increased nitric oxide (NO) metabolites, decreased antioxidants (for example, glutathione) and altered antioxidant enzyme levels [206,207].

In MDD, increased superoxide radical anion production correlates with increased oxidation-mediated neutrophil apoptosis [206]. Serum levels of antioxidant enzymes (for example, superoxide dismutase-1) are elevated during acute depressive episodes and normalize after selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) treatment [206]. This suggests that in MDD, serum antioxidant enzyme levels are a state marker, which may reflect a compensatory mechanism that counteracts acute increases in oxidative stress. [206]. In schizophrenia by contrast, CSF soluble superoxide dismutase-1 levels are substantially decreased in early-onset schizophrenic patients relative to chronic schizophrenic patients and healthy controls. This suggests that reduced brain antioxidant enzyme levels may contribute to oxidative damage in acute schizophrenia [210], though larger studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Several additional experimental and human studies examined in more detail the mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of increased oxidative stress in psychiatric disorders [206-262]. In animal models of depression, brain levels of glutathione are reduced while lipid peroxidation and NO levels are increased [206,262].

Postmortem studies show reduced brain levels of total glutathione in MDD, BPD [206] and schizophrenic subjects [206,207]. Fibroblasts cultured from MDD patients show increased oxidative stress independent of glutathione levels [262], arguing against a primary role of glutathione depletion as the major mechanism of oxidative stress in depression.

Microglial activation may increase oxidative stress through its production of proinflammatory cytokines and NO [206-209]. Proinflammatory cytokines and high NO levels may promote reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, which in turn accelerates lipid peroxidation, damaging membrane phospholipids and their membrane-bound monoamine neurotransmitter receptors and depleting endogenous antioxidants. Increased ROS products can enhance microglial activation and increase proinflammatory production via stimulating NF-?B [208], which in turn perpetuates oxidative injury [208], creating the potential for a pathological positive feedback loop in some psychiatric disorders [206-209]. Although neuroinflammation can increase brain glutamate levels [85,86], the role of glutamatergic hyperactivity as a cause of oxidative stress remains unsubstantiated [207].

Mitochondrial dysfunction may contribute to increased oxidative stress in MDD, BPD and schizophrenia [206]. Postmortem studies in these disorders reveal abnormalities in mitochondrial DNA, consistent with the high prevalence of psychiatric disturbances in primary mitochondrial disorders [206]. In vitro animal studies show that proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-?, can reduce mitochondrial density and impair mitochondrial oxidative metabolism [211,212], leading to increased ROS production [206,213]. These experimental findings may imply mechanistic links among neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress [206,213], meriting further investigation of these intersecting pathogenic pathways in human psychiatric disorders.

The vulnerability of neural tissue to oxidative damage varies among different psychiatric disorders based on the neuroanatomical, neurochemical and molecular pathways involved in the specific disorder [207]. Treatment effects may also be critical, as preliminary evidence suggests that antipsychotics, SSRIs and mood stabilizers possess antioxidant properties [206,207,262]. The therapeutic role of adjuvant antioxidants (for example, vitamins C and E) in psychiatric disorder remains to be substantiated by high- powered randomized clinical trials. N-acetylcysteine shows the most promising results to-date, with several randomized placebo-controlled trials demonstrating its efficacy in MDD, BPD and schizophrenia [207].

Blood�Brain Barrier Dysfunction

The BBB secures the brain�s immune-privileged status by restricting the entry of peripheral inflammatory mediators, including cytokines and antibodies that can impair neurotransmission [214,215]. The hypothesis of BBB breakdown and its role in some psychiatric patients [60,214,216,217] is consistent with the increased prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity in diseases associated with its dysfunction, including SLE [97], stroke [11],�epilepsy [218] and autoimmune encephalitides (Table 1). An elevated �CSF:serum albumin ratio� in patients with MDD and schizophrenia suggests increased BBB permeability [214].

In one study (63 psychiatric subjects, 4,100 controls), CSF abnormalities indicative of BBB-damage were detected in 41% of psychiatric subjects (14 MDD and BPD, 14 schizophrenia), including intrathecal synthesis of IgG, IgM, and/or IgA, mild CSF pleocytosis (5 to 8 cells per mm3) and the presence of up to four IgG oligoclonal bands [216]. One post-mortem ultrastructural study in schizophrenia revealed BBB ultrasructural abnormalities in the prefrontal and visual cortices, which included vacuolar degeneration of endothelial cells, astroglial-end-foot- processes, and thickening and irregularity of the basal lamina [60]. However, in this study, the authors did not comment on the potential contribution of postmortem changes to their findings. Another study investigating transcriptomics of BBB endothelial cells in schizophrenic brains identified significant differences among genes influencing immunological function, which were not detected in controls [217].

Oxidation-mediated endothelial dysfunction may con- tribute to the pathophysiology of BBB dysfunction in psychiatric disorders. Indirect evidence from clinical and experimental studies in depression [219] and, to a lesser extent, in schizophrenia [220] suggests that increased oxidation may contribute to endothelial dysfunction. Endothelial dysfunction may represent a shared mechanism accounting for the known association between depression and cardiovascular disease [219,221], which may be related to decreased levels of vasodilator NO [221-223]. Experimental studies suggest that reduced endothelial NO levels are mechanistically linked to the uncoupling of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) from its essential co-factor tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), shifting its substrate from L- arginine to oxygen [224-226]. Uncoupled eNOS promotes synthesis of ROS (for example, superoxide) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) (for example, peroxynitrite; a product of the interaction of superoxide with NO) [227] rather than NO, leading to oxidation-mediated endothelial dysfunction [224-226].

Animal data showed that SSRIs could restore deficient endothelial NO levels [219], suggesting that anti-oxidative mechanisms may contribute to their antidepressant effects. In humans, L-methylfolate may potentiate anti- depressant effects of SSRIs [228], putatively by increasing levels of BH4, which is an essential cofactor for eNOS re- coupling-mediated anti-oxidation [229], as well as for the rate-limiting enzymes of monoamine (that is, serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine) synthesis [228].

Taken together, both the recent work emphasizing the role of uncoupled eNOS-induced oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of vascular diseases [230,231] and the�epidemiological studies establishing depression as an in- dependent risk factor for vascular pathologies, such as stroke and heart disease [219,221], add further support to the clinical relevance of uncoupled eNOS-mediated endothelial oxidative damage in depression. Despite abundant evidence for cytokine abnormalities in human psychiatric illnesses and the experimental data showing that proinflammatory cytokines can reduce eNOS expression [212] and increase BBB permeability [215], human evidence that directly links excess proinflammatory cytokines to eNOS dysfunction and/or BBB impairment is lacking.

Imaging & Treating Inflammation In Psychiatric Illness

Imaging Neuroinflammation In Situ

Clinically, neuroinflammation imaging may prove to be crucial for identifying the subgroup of psychiatric patients with neuroinflammation who would be most likely to respond favorably to immunomodulatory therapies. Additionally, such imaging may allow clinicians to monitor neuroinflammation-related disease activity and its response to immune therapy in psychiatric patients. Imaging inflammation in the human brain has traditionally depended upon MRI or CT visualization of extravagated intravenous contrast agents, indicating localized breakdown of the BBB. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI occasionally demonstrates such breakdown in the limbic regions associated with emotional processing in patients with psychiatric dis- orders attributable to paraneoplastic or other encephalitides [107,109,113]. To our knowledge, however, abnormal enhancement has never been demonstrated in any classical psychiatric disorder [21,214,232], despite functional [214,216] and ultrastructural BBB abnormalities [60].

Whether or not subtler neuroinflammation can be visualized in vivo in classical psychiatric disorders remains unknown. One promising technique is positron emission tomography (PET) using radiotracers, such as C11- PK11195, which bind to the translocator protein, previously known as the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor, expressed by activated microglia [233,234].

Using this method, patients with schizophrenia were shown to have greater microglial activation throughout the cortex [235] and in the hippocampus during acute psychosis [236]. One study (14 schizophrenia, 14 controls) found no significant difference between [11C] DAA1106 binding in schizophrenia versus controls, but a direct correlation between [11C] DAA1106 binding and the severity of positive symptoms and illness duration in schizophrenia [236].

Investigators from our institution utilized C11-PK11195 PET to demonstrate bi-hippocampal inflammation in a patient with neuropsychiatric dysfunction, including psychotic MDD, epilepsy, and anterograde amnesia, associated with anti-GAD antibodies [237]. However, PK11195 PET has�low signal-to-noise properties and requires an on-site cyclotron.

Accordingly, research is being devoted to developing improved translocator protein ligands for PET and SPECT. Future high-powered post-mortem brain tissues studies utilizing protein quantification aimed at elucidating metabolic and inflammatory pathways, CNS cytokines and their binding receptors, in psychiatric disorders are needed to advance our understanding of the autoimmune pathophysiology.

Role Of Antiinflammatory Drugs In Psychiatric Disorders

Several human and animal studies suggest that certain antiinflammatory drugs may play an important adjunctive role in the treatment of psychiatric disorders (Table 3). Common drugs are cyclooxygenase inhibitors (Table 3) [238-245], minocycline (Table 3) [240-245], omega-3 fatty acids [246,247], and neurosteroids [248].

neuroinflammation table 3Several human studies showed that COX-2 inhibitors could ameliorate psychiatric symptoms of MDD, BPD, schizophrenia and OCD (Table 3) [248]. By contrast, adjunctive treatment with non-selective COX-inhibitors (that is, non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)) may reduce the efficacy of SSRIs [249,250]; two large trials reported that exposure to NSAIDs (but not to either selective COX-2 inhibitors or salicylates) was associated with a significant worsening of depression among a sub- set of study participants [249,250].

In the first trial, involving 1,258 depressed patients treated with citalopram for 12 weeks, the rate of remission was significantly lower among those who had taken NSAIDs at least once relative to those who had not (45% versus 55%, OR 0.64, P = 0.0002) [249]. The other trial, involving 1,545 MDD subjects, showed the rate of treatment- resistant depression was significantly higher among those taking NSAIDs (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.00) [231]. The worsening of depression in the NSAID groups may not be mechanistically linked to NSAID therapy but instead re- lated to co-existing chronic medical conditions [10,12-18] that necessitate long-term NSAIDs and which are known to be independently associated with increased risk of treatment-resistant depression [249,251]. Future studies investigating the impact of NSAIDs on depression and response to antidepressants in humans are needed.

In other experimental studies utilizing acute-stress paradigms to induce a depression-like state in mice, citalopram increased TNF-?, IFN-?, and p11 (molecular factor linked to depressive behavior in animals) in the frontal cortex, while the NSAID ibuprofen decreased these molecules; NSAIDs also attenuated the antidepressant effects of SSRIs but not other antidepressants [249]. These findings suggest that proinflammatory cytokines may paradoxically exert antidepressant effects despite overwhelming evidence from�human studies to the contrary (as reviewed above), which can be attenuated by NSAIDs [249]. At least two considerations may account for this apparent paradox: 1) under some experimental conditions, proinflammatory cytokines have been associated with a neuroprotective role, [251; (for�example, IFN-? in low levels can induce neuroprotective microglia (Figure 2) [163,166,251]); and 2) whether these responses observed in the context of an acute stress paradigm in an animal model are applicable to endogenous MDD in humans remains unclear [251].

The therapeutic effects of COX-2 inhibitors in psychiatric disorders may involve modulation of biosynthesis of COX-2-derived prostaglandins, including proinflammatory PGE2 and antiinflammatory 15-deoxy-?12,14-PGJ2 (15d- PGJ2) [252,253]. COX-2 inhibitors can reduce PGE2- mediated inflammation, which may contribute to the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders [252,253]. They may also alter the levels 15d-PGJ2, and the activity of its nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated nuclear receptor gamma (PPAR-?) [252,253].

Several studies suggest that 15d-PGJ2 and its nuclear receptor PPAR-? can serve as biological markers for schizophrenia [253]. In schizophrenic patients, serum PGE2 levels are increased, whereas serum levels of 15d- PGJ2 are decreased, as is the expression of its nuclear receptor PPAR-? in PBMC [252]. While COX-2 inhibitors may limit the potentially beneficial antiinflammatory effects of the COX-2�dependent �15d-PGJ2/PPAR-? path- way�, they may advantageously reduce its harmful effects, including 1) the increased risk for myocardial infarction and certain infections (for example, cytomegalovirus and Toxoplasma gondii) in schizophrenic patients [254] and 2) its pro-apoptotic effects observed in human and ani- mal cancer tissue [255]. Other potential mechanisms of COX-2 inhibitors therapeutic effects may involve their ability to reduce proinflammatory cytokine levels [163], limit quinolinic acid excitotoxicity (as in MDD) and de- crease KYNA levels (as in schizophrenia) [128].

Minocycline can be effective in psychiatric disorders (Table 3) [248]. In vitro data suggest that minocycline inhibits MAP, cytokine secretion,�COX-2/PGE-2 expression,� and inducible nitric oxide synthase [256]. Minocycline may also counteract dysregulated glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission [256].

Omega-3 fatty acid effectiveness in psychiatric disorders is unclear [248]. In a 2011 meta-analysis of 15 randomized- controlled trials (916 MDD), omega-3 supplements containing eicosapentaenoic acid ?60% (dose range 200 to 2,200 mg/d in excess of the docosahexaenoic acid dose) significantly decreased depressive symptoms as an adjunctive therapy to SRIs (P <0.001) [246]. A subsequent meta- analysis, however, concluded that there is no significant benefit of omega-3 fatty acids in depression and that the purported efficacy is merely a result of publication bias [247]. A 2012 meta-analysis of 5 randomized-controlled trials including 291 BPD participants found that depressive, but not manic, symptoms were significantly improved among those randomized to omega-3 fatty acids relative to those taking placebo (Hedges g 0.34, P = 0.025) [257]. In a randomized controlled trial of schizophrenic subjects followed up to 12 months, both positive and negative symptom scores were significantly decreased among the 66 participants randomized to long-chain omega-3 (1.2 g/day for 12 weeks; P = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively) [258]; the�authors concluded that omega-3 augmentation during the early course of schizophrenia can also prevent relapses and disease progression [258].

A 2012 meta-analysis of seven randomized-controlled trials assessing omega-3 augmentation in 168 schizo- phrenic patients found no benefit of treatment [259]. The authors of this meta-analysis specifically stated that no conclusion could be drawn regarding the relapse prevention or disease progression endpoints [259]. Experimental data suggest that eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid mediate their antiinflammatory effects by promoting synthesis of resolvins and protectins, which can inhibit leukocyte infiltration and reduce cytokine production [248].

Neurosteroids, including pregnenolone and its down- stream metabolite allopregnanolone, may have a beneficial role in some psychiatric disorders [248,260]. In MDD, several studies found decreased plasma/CSF allopregnanolone levels correlating with symptom severity, which normalized after successful treatment with certain antidepressants (for example, SSRIs), and electroconvulsive therapy [261]. In schizophrenia, brain pregnenolone levels can be altered [248] and serum allopregnanolone levels may increase after some antipsychotic drugs (for example, clozapine and olanzapine) [260]. In three randomized-controlled trials (100 schizophrenia (pooled); treatment duration, approximately nine weeks) positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms, as well as extrapyramidal side effects of antipsy- chotics were significantly improved in one or more trials among those randomized to pregnenolone relative to those receiving placebo [248]. In one trial, the improvement was sustained with long-term pregnenolone treatment [248]. Pregnenolone can regulate cognition and behavior by potentiating the function of NMDA and GABAA receptors [248]. Furthermore, allopregnanolone may exert neuroprotective and antiinflammatory effects [248]. More RCT studies are needed to confirm the beneficial role of neuroactive steroids in early-onset psychiatric disorders in humans.

We are awaiting the results of several ongoing clinical trials investigating the therapeutic effects of other anti-inflammatory agents, including salicylate, an inhibitor of NF-?B (NCT01182727); acetylsalicylic acid (NCT01320982); pravastatin (NCT1082588); and dextromethorphan, a non-competitive NMDAR antagonist that can limit inflammation-induced dopaminergic neuronal injury (NCT01189006).

Future Treatment Strategies

Although current immune therapies (for example, IVIG, plasmapheresis, corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents) are often effective for treating autoimmune encephalitides wherein inflammation is acute, intense and predominately of adaptive origin, their efficacy in classical psychiatric disorders wherein inflammation is chronic,�much milder, and predominately of innate origin, is limited [2]. Development of novel therapeutics should aim at reversing glial loss [46,138], down-regulating harmful MAP, while optimizing endogenous neuroprotective T regs and beneficial MAP, rather than indiscriminately sup- pressing inflammation as occurs with current immunosuppressive agents. Additionally, development of potent co-adjuvant antioxidants that would reverse oxidative injury in psychiatric disorders is needed.

Conclusions

Autoimmunity can cause a host of neuropsychiatric disorders that may initially present with isolated psychiatric symptoms. Innate inflammation/autoimmunity may be relevant to the pathogenesis of psychiatric symptoms in a subset of patients with classical psychiatric disorders. Innate inflammation may be mechanistically linked to the traditional monoaminergic and glutamatergic abnormalities and increased oxidative injury reported in psychiatric illnesses.

Souhel Najjar1,5*, Daniel M Pearlman2,5, Kenneth Alper4, Amanda Najjar3 and Orrin Devinsky1,4,5

Abbreviations

3-OH-KYN: 3-hydroxy-kynurenine; ?7nAchR: Alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors; AMPAR: Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-l-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors; APC: Antigen presenting cell; BBB: Blood�brain barrier;
BH4: Tetrahydrobiopterin; BPD: Bipolar disorder; CI: Confidence interval;
CNS: Central nervous system; COX-2: Cyclooxegenase-2; CSF: Cerebrospinal fluid; DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition; EAATs: Excitatory amino acid transporters; eNOS: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase; GABAB: Gamma aminobutyric acid-beta; GAD: Glutamic acid decarboxylase; GFAP: Glial fibrillary acidic protein; GLX: 1H MRS detectable glutamate, glutamine, gamma aminobutyric acid composite;
IDO: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; Ig: Immunoglobulin; IL: Interleukin; IL-1RA: Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist; IFN-?: Interferon gamma;
KAT: Kynurenine aminotransferase; KMO: Kynurenine 3-monooxygenase; KYN: Kynurenine; KYNA: Kynurenic acid; LE: Limbic encephalitis;
LPS: Lipopolysaccharide; MAP: Microglial activation and proliferation;
MDD: Major depressive disorder; mGluR: Metabotropic glutamate receptor; MHC: II Major histocompatibility complex class two; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; MRS: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; NF-?B: Nuclear factor kappa B; NMDAR: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor; NR1: Glycine site;
OCD: Obsessive-compulsive disorder; OR: Odds ratio; PANDAS: Pediatric neuropsychiatric autoimmune disorders associated with streptococcal infections; PBMC: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PET: Positron emission tomography; PFC: Prefrontal cortex; PGE-2: Prostaglandin E2; PPAR-
?: Peroxisome proliferator-activated nuclear receptor gamma; QA: Quinolinic acid; RNS: Reactive nitrogen species; ROS: Reactive oxygen species;
sIL: Soluble interleukin; SLE: Systemic lupus erythematosus; SRI: Serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TNF-?: Tumor necrosis factor alpha; T-regs: CD4+CD25 +FOXP3+ T regulatory cells; TDO: Tryptophan-2,3-dioxygenase; Th: T-helper; VGKC: Voltage-gated potassium channel; XAG-: Glutamate aspartate transporter; Xc-: Sodium-independent astroglial glutamate/cystine
antiporter system

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors��Contributions
SN and DMP performed an extensive literature review, interpreted data, prepared the manuscript, figures, and tables. KA prepared the section pertaining to oxidative mechanisms and contributed to the manuscript revisions. AN and OD critically-revised and improved the design and quality of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Drs. Josep Dalmau, MD, PhD, Tracy Butler, MD, and David Zazag, MD, PhD, for providing their expertise in autoimmune encephalitides, neuroinflammation imaging, and neuropathology, respectively.

Author�Details

1Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA. 2Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, 30 Lafayette Street, HB 7252, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. 3Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA. 4Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 5New York University Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Blank
References:

1. Kayser MS, Dalmau J: The emerging link between autoimmune disorders
and neuropsychiatric disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2011, 23:90�97.
2. Najjar S, Pearlman D, Zagzag D, Golfinos J, Devinsky O: Glutamic acid
decarboxylase autoantibody syndrome presenting as schizophrenia.
Neurologist 2012, 18:88�91.
3. Graus F, Saiz A, Dalmau J: Antibodies and neuronal autoimmune
disorders of the CNS. J Neurol 2010, 257:509�517.
4. Lennox BR, Coles AJ, Vincent A: Antibody-mediated encephalitis: a
treatable cause of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 2012, 200:92�94.
5. Zandi MS, Irani SR, Lang B, Waters P, Jones PB, McKenna P, Coles AJ, Vincent
A, Lennox BR: Disease-relevant autoantibodies in first episode
schizophrenia. J Neurol 2011, 258:686�688.
6. Bataller L, Kleopa KA, Wu GF, Rossi JE, Rosenfeld MR, Dalmau J:
Autoimmune limbic encephalitis in 39 patients: immunophenotypes and
outcomes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007, 78:381�385.
7. Dale RC, Heyman I, Giovannoni G, Church AW: Incidence of anti-brain
antibodies in children with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Br J Psychiatry
2005, 187:314�319.
8. Kendler KS: The dappled nature of causes of psychiatric illness: replacing
the organic-functional/hardware-software dichotomy with empirically
based pluralism. Mol Psychiatry 2012, 17:377�388.
9. Keskin G, Sunter G, Midi I, Tuncer N: Neurosyphilis as a cause of cognitive
decline and psychiatric symptoms at younger age. J Neuropsychiatry Clin
Neurosci 2011, 23:E41�E42.
10. Leboyer M, Soreca I, Scott J, Frye M, Henry C, Tamouza R, Kupfer DJ: Can
bipolar disorder be viewed as a multi-system inflammatory disease?
J Affect Disord 2012, 141:1�10.
11. Hackett ML, Yapa C, Parag V, Anderson CS: Frequency of depression after
stroke: a systematic review of observational studies. Stroke 2005, 36:1330�1340.
12. Dantzer R, O’Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW: From
inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system
subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9:46�56.
13. Laske C, Zank M, Klein R, Stransky E, Batra A, Buchkremer G, Schott K:
Autoantibody reactivity in serum of patients with major depression,
schizophrenia and healthy controls. Psychiatry Res 2008, 158:83�86.
14. Eisenberger NI, Berkman ET, Inagaki TK, Rameson LT, Mashal NM, Irwin MR:
Inflammation-induced anhedonia: endotoxin reduces ventral striatum
responses to reward. Biol Psychiatry 2010, 68:748�754.
15. Haroon E, Raison CL, Miller AH: Psychoneuroimmunology meets
neuropsychopharmacology: translational implications of the impact of
inflammation on behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012, 37:137�162.
16. Benros ME, Nielsen PR, Nordentoft M, Eaton WW, Dalton SO, Mortensen PB:
Autoimmune diseases and severe infections as risk factors for
schizophrenia: a 30-year population-based register study. Am J Psychiatry
2011, 168:1303�1310.
17. McNally L, Bhagwagar Z, Hannestad J: Inflammation, glutamate, and glia
in depression: a literature review. CNS Spectr 2008, 13:501�510.
18. Harrison NA, Brydon L, Walker C, Gray MA, Steptoe A, Critchley HD:
Inflammation causes mood changes through alterations in subgenual
cingulate activity and mesolimbic connectivity. Biol Psychiatry 2009,
66:407�414.19. Raison CL, Miller AH: Is depression an inflammatory disorder?
Curr Psychiatry Rep 2011, 13:467�475.
20. Raison CL, Miller AH: The evolutionary significance of depression in
Pathogen Host Defense (PATHOS-D). Mol Psychiatry 2013, 18:15�37.
21. Steiner J, Bogerts B, Sarnyai Z, Walter M, Gos T, Bernstein HG, Myint AM:
Bridging the gap between the immune and glutamate hypotheses of
schizophrenia and major depression: Potential role of glial NMDA
receptor modulators and impaired blood�brain barrier integrity. World J
Biol Psychiatry 2012, 13:482�492.
22. Steiner J, Mawrin C, Ziegeler A, Bielau H, Ullrich O, Bernstein HG, Bogerts B:
Distribution of HLA-DR-positive microglia in schizophrenia reflects
impaired cerebral lateralization. Acta Neuropathol 2006, 112:305�316.
23. Papakostas GI, Shelton RC, Kinrys G, Henry ME, Bakow BR, Lipkin SH, Pi B,
Thurmond L, Bilello JA: Assessment of a multi-assay, serum-based
biological diagnostic test for major depressive disorder: a pilot and
replication study. Mol Psychiatry 2013, 18:332�339.
24. Krishnan R: Unipolar depression in adults: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and
neurobiology. In UpToDate. Edited by Basow DS. Waltham, MA: UpToDate; 2013.
25. Stovall J: Bipolar disorder in adults: epidemiology and diagnosis. In
UpToDate. Edited by Basow DS. UpToDate: Waltham; 2013.
26. Fischer BA, Buchanan RW: Schizophrenia: epidemiology and pathogenesis.
In UpToDate. Edited by Basow DS. Waltham, MA: UpToDate; 2013.
27. Nestadt G, Samuels J, Riddle M, Bienvenu OJ 3rd, Liang KY, LaBuda M,
Walkup J, Grados M, Hoehn-Saric R: A family study of obsessivecompulsive
disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000, 57:358�363.
28. Stefansson H, Ophoff RA, Steinberg S, Andreassen OA, Cichon S, Rujescu D,
Werge T, Pietilainen OP, Mors O, Mortensen PB, Sigurdsson E, Gustafsson O,
Nyegaard M, Tuulio-Henriksson A, Ingason A, Hansen T, Suvisaari J,
Lonnqvist J, Paunio T, B�rglum AD, Hartmann A, Fink-Jensen A, Nordentoft
M, Hougaard D, Norgaard-Pedersen B, B�ttcher Y, Olesen J, Breuer R, M�ller
HJ, Giegling I, et al: Common variants conferring risk of schizophrenia.
Nature 2009, 460:744�747.
29. M�ller N, Schwarz MJ: The immune-mediated alteration of serotonin and
glutamate: towards an integrated view of depression. Mol Psychiatry
2007, 12:988�1000.
30. Galecki P, Florkowski A, Bienkiewics M, Szemraj J: Functional polymorphism
of cyclooxygenase-2 gene (G-765C) in depressive patients.
Neuropsychobiology 2010, 62:116�120.
31. Levinson DF: The genetics of depression: a review. Biol Psychiatry 2006,
60:84�92.
32. Zhai J, Cheng L, Dong J, Shen Q, Zhang Q, Chen M, Gao L, Chen X, Wang K,
Deng X, Xu Z, Ji F, Liu C, Li J, Dong Q, Chen C: S100B gene
polymorphisms predict prefrontal spatial function in both schizophrenia
patients and healthy individuals. Schizophr Res 2012, 134:89�94.
33. Zhai J, Zhang Q, Cheng L, Chen M, Wang K, Liu Y, Deng X, Chen X, Shen Q,
Xu Z, Ji F, Liu C, Dong Q, Chen C, Li J: Risk variants in the S100B gene,
associated with elevated S100B levels, are also associated with
visuospatial disability of schizophrenia. Behav Brain Res 2011, 217:363�368.
34. Cappi C, Muniz RK, Sampaio AS, Cordeiro Q, Brentani H, Palacios SA,
Marques AH, Vallada H, Miguel EC, Guilherme L, Hounie AG: Association
study between functional polymorphisms in the TNF-alpha gene and
obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2012, 70:87�90.
35. Miguel-Hidalgo JJ, Baucom C, Dilley G, Overholser JC, Meltzer HY,
Stockmeier CA, Rajkowska G: Glial fibrillary acidic protein
immunoreactivity in the prefrontal cortex distinguishes younger from
older adults in major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2000, 48:861�873.
36. Altshuler LL, Abulseoud OA, Foland Ross L, Bartzokis G, Chang S, Mintz J,
Hellemann G, Vinters HV: Amygdala astrocyte reduction in subjects with
major depressive disorder but not bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2010,
12:541�549.
37. Webster MJ, Knable MB, Johnston-Wilson N, Nagata K, Inagaki M, Yolken RH:
Immunohistochemical localization of phosphorylated glial fibrillary acidic
protein in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus from patients with
schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. Brain Behav Immun 2001,
15:388�400.
38. Doyle C, Deakin JFW: Fewer astrocytes in frontal cortex in schizophrenia,
depression and bipolar disorder. Schizophrenia Res 2002, 53:106.
39. Johnston-Wilson NL, Sims CD, Hofmann JP, Anderson L, Shore AD, Torrey
EF, Yolken RH: Disease-specific alterations in frontal cortex brain proteins
in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder, The
Stanley Neuropathology Consortium. Mol Psychiatry 2000, 5:142�149.
40. Gosselin RD, Gibney S, O’Malley D, Dinan TG, Cryan JF: Region specific
decrease in glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactivity in the brain of
a rat model of depression. Neuroscience 2009, 159:915�925.
41. Banasr M, Duman RS: Glial loss in the prefrontal cortex is sufficient to
induce depressive-like behaviors. Biol Psychiatry 2008, 64:863�870.
42. Cotter D, Hudson L, Landau S: Evidence for orbitofrontal pathology in
bipolar disorder and major depression, but not in schizophrenia.
Bipolar Disord 2005, 7:358�369.
43. Brauch RA, Adnan El-Masri M, Parker J Jr, El-Mallakh RS: Glial cell number
and neuron/glial cell ratios in postmortem brains of bipolar individuals.
J Affect Disord 2006, 91:87�90.
44. Cotter DR, Pariante CM, Everall IP: Glial cell abnormalities in major
psychiatric disorders: the evidence and implications. Brain Res Bull 2001,
55:585�595.
45. Cotter D, Mackay D, Landau S, Kerwin R, Everall I: Reduced glial cell density
and neuronal size in the anterior cingulate cortex in major depressive
disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001, 58:545�553.
46. Bowley MP, Drevets WC, Ong�r D, Price JL: Low glial numbers in the
amygdala in major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2002, 52:404�412.
47. Toro CT, Hallak JE, Dunham JS, Deakin JF: Glial fibrillary acidic protein and
glutamine synthetase in subregions of prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia
and mood disorder. Neurosci Lett 2006, 404:276�281.
48. Rajkowska G, Miguel-Hidalgo JJ, Makkos Z, Meltzer H, Overholser J,
Stockmeier C: Layer-specific reductions in GFAP-reactive astroglia in the
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2002, 57:127�138.
49. Steffek AE, McCullumsmith RE, Haroutunian V, Meador-Woodruff JH: Cortical
expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein and glutamine synthetase is
decreased in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2008, 103:71�82.
50. Damadzic R, Bigelow LB, Krimer LS, Goldenson DA, Saunders RC, Kleinman
JE, Herman MM: A quantitative immunohistochemical study of astrocytes in
the entorhinal cortex in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major
depression: absence of significant astrocytosis. Brain Res Bull 2001, 55:611�618.
51. Benes FM, McSparren J, Bird ED, SanGiovanni JP, Vincent SL: Deficits in
small interneurons in prefrontal and cingulate cortices of schizophrenic
and schizoaffective patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991, 48:996�1001.
52. M�ller N, Schwarz MJ: Immune system and schizophrenia. Curr Immunol
Rev 2010, 6:213�220.
53. Steiner J, Walter M, Gos T, Guillemin GJ, Bernstein HG, Sarnyai Z, Mawrin C,
Brisch R, Bielau H, Meyer Zu Schwabedissen L, Bogerts B, Myint AM: Severe
depression is associated with increased microglial quinolinic acid in
subregions of the anterior cingulate gyrus: evidence for an immunemodulated
glutamatergic neurotransmission? J Neuroinflammation 2011, 8:94.
54. Vostrikov VM, Uranova NA, Orlovskaya DD: Deficit of perineuronal
oligodendrocytes in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia and mood
disorders. Schizophr Res 2007, 94:273�280.
55. Rajkowska G, Miguel-Hidalgo JJ: Gliogenesis and glial pathology in
depression. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 2007, 6:219�233.
56. Uranova NA, Vostrikov VM, Orlovskaya DD, Rachmanova VI:
Oligodendroglial density in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia and
mood disorders: a study from the Stanley Neuropathology Consortium.
Schizophr Res 2004, 67:269�275.
57. Uranova N: Damage and loss of oligodendrocytes are crucial in the
pathogenesis of schizophrenia and mood disorders (findings form
postmortem studies). Neuropsychopharmacology 2004, 29:S33.
58. Uranova NA, Orlovskaya DD, Vostrikov VM, Rachmanova VI: Decreased
density of oligodendroglial satellites of pyramidal neurons in layer III in
the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia and mood disorders. Schizophr Res
2002, 53:107.
59. Vostrikov VM, Uranova NA, Rakhmanova VI, Orlovskaia DD: Lowered
oligodendroglial cell density in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia.
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2004, 104:47�51.
60. Uranova NA, Zimina IS, Vikhreva OV, Krukov NO, Rachmanova VI, Orlovskaya
DD: Ultrastructural damage of capillaries in the neocortex in
schizophrenia. World J Biol Psychiatry 2010, 11:567�578.
61. Hof PR, Haroutunian V, Friedrich VL Jr, Byne W, Buitron C, Perl DP, Davis KL:
Loss and altered spatial distribution of oligodendrocytes in the superior
frontal gyrus in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2003, 53:1075�1085.
62. Davis KL, Stewart DG, Friedman JI, Buchsbaum M, Harvey PD, Hof PR,
Buxbaum J, Haroutunian V: White matter changes in schizophrenia:
evidence for myelin-related dysfunction. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003,
60:443�456.63. Flynn SW, Lang DJ, Mackay AL, Goghari V, Vavasour IM, Whittall KP, Smith
GN, Arango V, Mann JJ, Dwork AJ, Falkai P, Honer WG: Abnormalities of
myelination in schizophrenia detected in vivo with MRI, and postmortem
with analysis of oligodendrocyte proteins. Mol Psychiatry 2003,
8:811�820.
64. Uranova NA, Vostrikov VM, Vikhreva OV, Zimina IS, Kolomeets NS, Orlovskaya
DD: The role of oligodendrocyte pathology in schizophrenia. Int J
Neuropsychopharmacol 2007, 10:537�545.
65. Byne W, Kidkardnee S, Tatusov A, Yiannoulos G, Buchsbaum MS,
Haroutunian V: Schizophrenia-associated reduction of neuronal and
oligodendrocyte numbers in the anterior principal thalamic nucleus.
Schizophr Res 2006, 85:245�253.
66. Hamidi M, Drevets WC, Price JL: Glial reduction in amygdala in major
depressive disorder is due to oligodendrocytes. Biol Psychiatry 2004,
55:563�569.
67. Bayer TA, Buslei R, Havas L, Falkai P: Evidence for activation of microglia in
patients with psychiatric illnesses. Neurosci Lett 1999, 271:126�128.
68. Steiner J, Bielau H, Brisch R, Danos P, Ullrich O, Mawrin C, Bernstein HG,
Bogerts B: Immunological aspects in the neurobiology of suicide:
elevated microglial density in schizophrenia and depression is
associated with suicide. J Psychiatr Res 2008, 42:151�157.
69. Rao JS, Harry GJ, Rapoport SI, Kim HW: Increased excitotoxicity and
neuroinflammatory markers in postmortem frontal cortex from bipolar
disorder patients. Mol Psychiatry 2010, 15:384�392.
70. Bernstein HG, Steiner J, Bogerts B: Glial cells in schizophrenia:
pathophysiological significance and possible consequences for therapy.
Expert Rev Neurother 2009, 9:1059�1071.
71. Chen SK, Tvrdik P, Peden E, Cho S, Wu S, Spangrude G, Capecchi MR:
Hematopoietic origin of pathological grooming in Hoxb8 mutant mice.
Cell 2010, 141:775�785.
72. Antony JM: Grooming and growing with microglia. Sci Signal 2010, 3:jc8.
73. Wonodi I, Stine OC, Sathyasaikumar KV, Roberts RC, Mitchell BD, Hong LE,
Kajii Y, Thaker GK, Schwarcz R: Downregulated kynurenine 3-
monooxygenase gene expression and enzyme activity in schizophrenia
and genetic association with schizophrenia endophenotypes. Arch Gen
Psychiatry 2011, 68:665�674.
74. Raison CL, Lowry CA, Rook GA: Inflammation, sanitation, and
consternation: loss of contact with coevolved, tolerogenic
microorganisms and the pathophysiology and treatment of major
depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010, 67:1211�1224.
75. Drexhage RC, Hoogenboezem TH, Versnel MA, Berghout A, Nolen WA,
Drexhage HA: The activation of monocyte and T cell networks in patients
with bipolar disorder. Brain Behav Immun 2011, 25:1206�1213.
76. Steiner J, Jacobs R, Panteli B, Brauner M, Schiltz K, Bahn S, Herberth M,
Westphal S, Gos T, Walter M, Bernstein HG, Myint AM, Bogerts B: Acute
schizophrenia is accompanied by reduced T cell and increased B cell
immunity. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2010, 260:509�518.
77. Rotge JY, Aouizerate B, Tignol J, Bioulac B, Burbaud P, Guehl D: The
glutamate-based genetic immune hypothesis in obsessive-compulsive
disorder, An integrative approach from genes to symptoms.
Neuroscience 2010, 165:408�417.
78. Y�ksel C, Ong�r D: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies of
glutamate-related abnormalities in mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2010,
68:785�794.
79. Rao JS, Kellom M, Reese EA, Rapoport SI, Kim HW: Dysregulated glutamate
and dopamine transporters in postmortem frontal cortex from bipolar
and schizophrenic patients. J Affect Disord 2012, 136:63�71.
80. Bauer D, Gupta D, Harotunian V, Meador-Woodruff JH, McCullumsmith RE:
Abnormal expression of glutamate transporter and transporter
interacting molecules in prefrontal cortex in elderly patients with
schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2008, 104:108�120.
81. Matute C, Melone M, Vallejo-Illarramendi A, Conti F: Increased expression
of the astrocytic glutamate transporter GLT-1 in the prefrontal cortex of
schizophrenics. 2005, 49:451�455.
82. Smith RE, Haroutunian V, Davis KL, Meador-Woodruff JH: Expression of
excitatory amino acid transporter transcripts in the thalamus of subjects
with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2001, 158:1393�1399.
83. McCullumsmith RE, Meador-Woodruff JH: Striatal excitatory amino acid
transporter transcript expression in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder,
and major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002,
26:368�375.
84. Pittenger C, Bloch MH, Williams K: Glutamate abnormalities in obsessive
compulsive disorder: neurobiology, pathophysiology, and treatment.
Pharmacol Ther 2011, 132:314�332.
85. Hashimoto K: Emerging role of glutamate in the pathophysiology of
major depressive disorder. Brain Res Rev 2009, 61:105�123.
86. Hashimoto K, Sawa A, Iyo M: Increased levels of glutamate in brains from
patients with mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2007, 62:1310�1316.
87. Burbaeva G, Boksha IS, Turishcheva MS, Vorobyeva EA, Savushkina OK,
Tereshkina EB: Glutamine synthetase and glutamate dehydrogenase in
the prefrontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia. Prog
Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2003, 27:675�680.
88. Bhattacharyya S, Khanna S, Chakrabarty K, Mahadevan A, Christopher R,
Shankar SK: Anti-brain autoantibodies and altered excitatory
neurotransmitters in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Neuropsychopharmacology 2009, 34:2489�2496.
89. Sanacora G, Gueorguieva R, Epperson CN, Wu YT, Appel M, Rothman DL,
Krystal JH, Mason GF: Subtype-specific alterations of gammaaminobutyric
acid and glutamate in patients with major depression.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004, 61:705�713.
90. Marsman A, van den Heuvel MP, Klomp DW, Kahn RS, Luijten PR, Hulshoff
Pol HE: Glutamate in schizophrenia: a focused review and meta-analysis
of 1H-MRS studies. Schizophr Bull 2013, 39:120�129.
91. Liu Y, Ho RC, Mak A: Interleukin (IL)-6, tumour necrosis factor alpha
(TNF-alpha) and soluble interleukin-2 receptors (sIL-2R) are elevated in
patients with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis and metaregression.
J Affect Disord 2012, 139:230�239.
92. Brietzke E, Stabellini R, Grassis-Oliveira R, Lafer B: Cytokines in bipolar
disorder: recent findings, deleterious effects but promise for future
therapeutics. CNS Spectr 2011. http://www.cnsspectrums.com/aspx/
articledetail.aspx?articleid=3596.
93. Denys D, Fluitman S, Kavelaars A, Heijnen C, Westenberg H: Decreased
TNF-alpha and NK activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Psychoneuroendocrinology 2004, 29:945�952.
94. Brambilla F, Perna G, Bellodi L, Arancio C, Bertani A, Perini G, Carraro C, Gava
F: Plasma interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor concentrations in
obsessive-compulsive disorders. Biol Psychiatry 1997, 42:976�981.
95. Fluitman S, Denys D, Vulink N, Schutters S, Heijnen C, Westenberg H:
Lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine production in obsessivecompulsive
disorder and generalized social anxiety disorder. Psychiatry
Res 2010, 178:313�316.
96. Janelidze S, Mattei D, Westrin A, Traskman-Bendz L, Brundin L: Cytokine
levels in the blood may distinguish suicide attempters from depressed
patients. Brain Behav Immun 2011, 25:335�339.
97. Postal M, Costallat LT, Appenzeller S: Neuropsychiatric manifestations in
systemic lupus erythematosus: epidemiology, pathophysiology and
management. CNS Drugs 2011, 25:721�736.
98. Kozora E, Hanly JG, Lapteva L, Filley CM: Cognitive dysfunction in
systemic lupus erythematosus: past, present, and future.
Arthritis Rheum 2008, 58:3286�3298.
99. Lancaster E, Martinez-Hernandez E, Dalmau J: Encephalitis and antibodies to
synaptic and neuronal cell surface proteins. Neurology 2011, 77:179�189.
100. Dalmau J, Lancaster E, Martinez-Hernandez E, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon
R: Clinical experience and laboratory investigations in patients with antiNMDAR
encephalitis. Lancet Neurol 2011, 10:63�74.
101. Lai M, Huijbers MG, Lancaster E, Graus F, Bataller L, Balice-Gordon R, Cowell
JK, Dalmau J: Investigation of LGI1 as the antigen in limbic encephalitis
previously attributed to potassium channels: a case series. Lancet Neurol
2010, 9:776�785.
102. Lancaster E, Huijbers MG, Bar V, Boronat A, Wong A, Martinez-Hernandez E,
Wilson C, Jacobs D, Lai M, Walker RW, Graus F, Bataller L, Illa I, Markx S, Strauss
KA, Peles E, Scherer SS, Dalmau J: Investigations of caspr2, an autoantigen of
encephalitis and neuromyotonia. Ann Neurol 2011, 69:303�311.
103. Lancaster E, Lai M, Peng X, Hughes E, Constantinescu R, Raizer J, Friedman
D, Skeen MB, Grisold W, Kimura A, Ohta K, Iizuka T, Guzman M, Graus F,
Moss SJ, Balice-Gordon R, Dalmau J: Antibodies to the GABA(B) receptor in
limbic encephalitis with seizures: case series and characterisation of the
antigen. Lancet Neurol 2010, 9:67�76.
104. Lancaster E, Martinez-Hernandez E, Titulaer MJ, Boulos M, Weaver S, Antoine
JC, Liebers E, Kornblum C, Bien CG, Honnorat J, Wong S, Xu J, Contractor A,
Balice-Gordon R, Dalmau J: Antibodies to metabotropic glutamate
receptor 5 in the Ophelia syndrome. Neurology 2011, 77:1698�1701.105. Ances BM, Vitaliani R, Taylor RA, Liebeskind DS, Voloschin A, Houghton DJ,
Galetta SL, Dichter M, Alavi A, Rosenfeld MR, Dalmau J: Treatmentresponsive
limbic encephalitis identified by neuropil antibodies: MRI and
PET correlates. Brain 2005, 128:1764�1777.
106. Tofaris GK, Irani SR, Cheeran BJ, Baker IW, Cader ZM, Vincent A:
Immunotherapy-responsive chorea as the presenting feature of LGI1-
antibody encephalitis. Neurology 2012, 79:195�196.
107. Najjar S, Pearlman D, Najjar A, Ghiasian V, Zagzag D, Devinsky O:
Extralimbic autoimmune encephalitis associated with glutamic acid
decarboxylase antibodies: an underdiagnosed entity? Epilepsy Behav
2011, 21:306�313.
108. Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, Armangue T, Glaser C, Iizuka T, Honig
LS, Benseler SM, Kawachi I, Martinez-Hernandez E, Aguilar E, Gresa-Arribas N,
Ryan-Florance N, Torrents A, Saiz A, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R, Graus F,
Dalmau J: Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in
patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort
study. Lancet Neurol 2013, 12:157�165.
109. Dalmau J, Gleichman AJ, Hughes EG, Rossi JE, Peng X, Lai M, Dessain SK,
Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R, Lynch DR: Anti-NMDA-receptor
encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies.
Lancet Neurol 2008, 7:1091�1098.
110. Graus F, Boronat A, Xifro X, Boix M, Svigelj V, Garcia A, Palomino A, Sabater
L, Alberch J, Saiz A: The expanding clinical profile of anti-AMPA receptor
encephalitis. Neurology 2010, 74:857�859.
111. Lai M, Hughes EG, Peng X, Zhou L, Gleichman AJ, Shu H, Mata S, Kremens
D, Vitaliani R, Geschwind MD, Bataller L, Kalb RG, Davis R, Graus F, Lynch DR,
Balice-Gordon R, Dalmau J: AMPA receptor antibodies in limbic
encephalitis alter synaptic receptor location. Ann Neurol 2009, 65:424�434.
112. Najjar S, Pearlman D, Devinsky O, Najjar A, Nadkarni S, Butler T, Zagzag D:
Neuropsychiatric autoimmune encephalitis with negative VGKC-complex,
NMDAR, and GAD autoantibodies: a case report and literature review,
forthcoming. Cogn Behav Neurol. in press.
113. Najjar S, Pearlman D, Zagzag D, Devinsky O: Spontaneously resolving
seronegative autoimmune limbic encephalitis. Cogn Behav Neurol 2011,
24:99�105.
114. Gabilondo I, Saiz A, Galan L, Gonzalez V, Jadraque R, Sabater L, Sans A,
Sempere A, Vela A, Villalobos F, Vi�als M, Villoslada P, Graus F: Analysis of
relapses in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Neurology 2011, 77:996�999.
115. Barry H, Hardiman O, Healy DG, Keogan M, Moroney J, Molnar PP, Cotter
DR, Murphy KC: Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an important
differential diagnosis in psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 2011, 199:508�509.
116. Dickerson F, Stallings C, Vaughan C, Origoni A, Khushalani S, Yolken R:
Antibodies to the glutamate receptor in mania. Bipolar Disord 2012,
14:547�553.
117. O’Loughlin K, Ruge P, McCauley M: Encephalitis and schizophrenia: a
matter of words. Br J Psychiatry 2012, 201:74.
118. Parratt KL, Allan M, Lewis SJ, Dalmau J, Halmagyi GM, Spies JM: Acute
psychiatric illness in a young woman: an unusual form of encephalitis.
Med J Aust 2009, 191:284�286.
119. Suzuki Y, Kurita T, Sakurai K, Takeda Y, Koyama T: Case report of anti-NMDA
receptor encephalitis suspected of schizophrenia. Seishin Shinkeigaku
Zasshi 2009, 111:1479�1484.
120. Tsutsui K, Kanbayashi T, Tanaka K, Boku S, Ito W, Tokunaga J, Mori A,
Hishikawa Y, Shimizu T, Nishino S: Anti-NMDA-receptor antibody detected
in encephalitis, schizophrenia, and narcolepsy with psychotic features.
BMC Psychiatry 2012, 12:37.
121. Van Putten WK, Hachimi-Idrissi S, Jansen A, Van Gorp V, Huyghens L:
Uncommon cause of psychotic behavior in a 9-year-old girl: a case
report. Case Report Med 2012, 2012:358520.
122. Masdeu JC, Gonzalez-Pinto A, Matute C, Ruiz De Azua S, Palomino A, De
Leon J, Berman KF, Dalmau J: Serum IgG antibodies against the NR1
subunit of the NMDA receptor not detected in schizophrenia. Am J
Psychiatry 2012, 169:1120�1121.
123. Kirvan CA, Swedo SE, Kurahara D, Cunningham MW: Streptococcal mimicry
and antibody-mediated cell signaling in the pathogenesis of
Sydenham’s chorea. Autoimmunity 2006, 39:21�29.
124. Swedo SE: Streptoccocal infection, Tourette syndrome, and OCD: is there
a connection? Pandas: Horse or zebra? Neurology 2010, 74:1397�1398.
125. Morer A, Lazaro L, Sabater L, Massana J, Castro J, Graus F: Antineuronal
antibodies in a group of children with obsessive-compulsive disorder
and Tourette syndrome. J Psychiatr Res 2008, 42:64�68.
126. Pavone P, Bianchini R, Parano E, Incorpora G, Rizzo R, Mazzone L, Trifiletti RR:
Anti-brain antibodies in PANDAS versus uncomplicated streptococcal
infection. Pediatr Neurol 2004, 30:107�110.
127. Maina G, Albert U, Bogetto F, Borghese C, Berro AC, Mutani R, Rossi F,
Vigliani MC: Anti-brain antibodies in adult patients with obsessivecompulsive
disorder. J Affect Disord 2009, 116:192�200.
128. Brimberg L, Benhar I, Mascaro-Blanco A, Alvarez K, Lotan D, Winter C, Klein J,
Moses AE, Somnier FE, Leckman JF, Swedo SE, Cunningham MW, Joel D:
Behavioral, pharmacological, and immunological abnormalities after
streptococcal exposure: a novel rat model of Sydenham chorea and
related neuropsychiatric disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012,
37:2076�2087.
129. Dale RC, Candler PM, Church AJ, Wait R, Pocock JM, Giovannoni G:
Neuronal surface glycolytic enzymes are autoantigen targets in
post-streptococcal autoimmune CNS disease. J Neuroimmunol 2006,
172:187�197.
130. Nicholson TR, Ferdinando S, Krishnaiah RB, Anhoury S, Lennox BR, MataixCols
D, Cleare A, Veale DM, Drummond LM, Fineberg NA, Church AJ,
Giovannoni G, Heyman I: Prevalence of anti-basal ganglia antibodies in
adult obsessive-compulsive disorder: cross-sectional study. Br J Psychiatry
2012, 200:381�386.
131. Wu K, Hanna GL, Rosenberg DR, Arnold PD: The role of glutamate
signaling in the pathogenesis and treatment of obsessive-compulsive
disorder. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2012, 100:726�735.
132. Perlmutter SJ, Leitman SF, Garvey MA, Hamburger S, Feldman E, Leonard
HL, Swedo SE: Therapeutic plasma exchange and intravenous
immunoglobulin for obsessive-compulsive disorder and tic disorders in
childhood. Lancet 1999, 354:1153�1158.
133. Pereira A Jr, Furlan FA: Astrocytes and human cognition: modeling
information integration and modulation of neuronal activity.
Prog Neurobiol 2010, 92:405�420.
134. Barres BA: The mystery and magic of glia: a perspective on their roles in
health and disease. Neuron 2008, 60:430�440.
135. Verkhratsky A, Parpura V, Rodriguez JJ: Where the thoughts dwell: the
physiology of neuronal-glial “diffuse neural net”. Brain Res Rev 2011,
66:133�151.
136. Sofroniew MV: Molecular dissection of reactive astrogliosis and glial scar
formation. Trends Neurosci 2009, 32:638�647.
137. Hamilton NB, Attwell D: Do astrocytes really exocytose neurotransmitters?
Nat Rev Neurosci 2010, 11:227�238.
138. Rajkowska G: Postmortem studies in mood disorders indicate altered
numbers of neurons and glial cells. Biol Psychiatry 2000, 48:766�777.
139. Coupland NJ, Ogilvie CJ, Hegadoren KM, Seres P, Hanstock CC, Allen PS:
Decreased prefrontal Myo-inositol in major depressive disorder.
Biol Psychiatry 2005, 57:1526�1534.
140. Miguel-Hidalgo JJ, Overholser JC, Jurjus GJ, Meltzer HY, Dieter L, Konick L,
Stockmeier CA, Rajkowska G: Vascular and extravascular immunoreactivity
for intercellular adhesion molecule 1 in the orbitofrontal cortex of
subjects with major depression: age-dependent changes. J Affect Disord
2011, 132:422�431.
141. Miguel-Hidalgo JJ, Wei JR, Andrew M, Overholser JC, Jurjus G, Stockmeier
CA, Rajkowska G: Glia pathology in the prefrontal cortex in alcohol
dependence with and without depressive symptoms. Biol Psychiatry 2002,
52:1121�1133.
142. Stockmeier CA, Mahajan GJ, Konick LC, Overholser JC, Jurjus GJ, Meltzer HY,
Uylings HB, Friedman L, Rajkowska G: Cellular changes in the postmortem
hippocampus in major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2004, 56:640�650.
143. Ong�r D, Drevets WC, Price JL: Glial reduction in the subgenual prefrontal
cortex in mood disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:13290�13295.
144. Gittins RA, Harrison PJ: A morphometric study of glia and neurons in the
anterior cingulate cortex in mood disorder. J Affect Disord 2011,
133:328�332.
145. Cotter D, Mackay D, Beasley C, Kerwin R, Everall I: Reduced glial density
and neuronal volume in major depressive disorder and schizophrenia in
the anterior cingulate cortex [abstract]. Schizophrenia Res 2000, 41:106.
146. Si X, Miguel-Hidalgo JJ, Rajkowska G: GFAP expression is reduced in the
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in depression. In Society for Neuroscience; 2003.
Neuroscience Meeting Planne: New Orleans; 2003.
147. Legutko B, Mahajan G, Stockmeier CA, Rajkowska G: White matter astrocytes
are reduced in depression. In Society for Neuroscience. Neuroscience Meeting
Planner: Washington, DC; 2011.148. Edgar N, Sibille E: A putative functional role for oligodendrocytes in
mood regulation. Transl Psychiatry 2012, 2:e109.
149. Rajkowska G, Halaris A, Selemon LD: Reductions in neuronal and glial
density characterize the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in bipolar
disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2001, 49:741�752.
150. Cotter D, Mackay D, Chana G, Beasley C, Landau S, Everall IP: Reduced
neuronal size and glial cell density in area 9 of the dorsolateral
prefrontal cortex in subjects with major depressive disorder. Cereb Cortex
2002, 12:386�394.
151. Stark AK, Uylings HB, Sanz-Arigita E, Pakkenberg B: Glial cell loss in the
anterior cingulate cortex, a subregion of the prefrontal cortex, in
subjects with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2004, 161:882�888.
152. Konopaske GT, Dorph-Petersen KA, Sweet RA, Pierri JN, Zhang W, Sampson
AR, Lewis DA: Effect of chronic antipsychotic exposure on astrocyte and
oligodendrocyte numbers in macaque monkeys. Biol Psychiatry 2008,
63:759�765.
153. Selemon LD, Lidow MS, Goldman-Rakic PS: Increased volume and glial
density in primate prefrontal cortex associated with chronic
antipsychotic drug exposure. Biol Psychiatry 1999, 46:161�172.
154. Steiner J, Bernstein HG, Bielau H, Farkas N, Winter J, Dobrowolny H, Brisch R,
Gos T, Mawrin C, Myint AM, Bogerts B: S100B-immunopositive glia is
elevated in paranoid as compared to residual schizophrenia: a
morphometric study. J Psychiatr Res 2008, 42:868�876.
155. Carter CJ: eIF2B and oligodendrocyte survival: where nature and nurture
meet in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia? Schizophr Bull 2007,
33:1343�1353.
156. Hayashi Y, Nihonmatsu-Kikuchi N, Hisanaga S, Yu XJ, Tatebayashi Y:
Neuropathological similarities and differences between schizophrenia
and bipolar disorder: a flow cytometric postmortem brain study.
PLoS One 2012, 7:e33019.
157. Uranova NA, Vikhreva OV, Rachmanova VI, Orlovskaya DD: Ultrastructural
alterations of myelinated fibers and oligodendrocytes in the prefrontal
cortex in schizophrenia: a postmortem morphometric study.
Schizophr Res Treatment 2011, 2011:325789.
158. Torres-Platas SG, Hercher C, Davoli MA, Maussion G, Labonte B, Turecki
G, Mechawar N: Astrocytic hypertrophy in anterior cingulate white
matter of depressed suicides. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011,
36:2650�2658.
159. Pereira A Jr, Furlan FA: On the role of synchrony for neuron-astrocyte
interactions and perceptual conscious processing. J Biol Phys 2009,
35:465�480.
160. Kettenmann H, Hanisch UK, Noda M, Verkhratsky A: Physiology of
microglia. Physiol Rev 2011, 91:461�553.
161. Tremblay ME, Stevens B, Sierra A, Wake H, Bessis A, Nimmerjahn A: The role
of microglia in the healthy brain. J Neurosci 2011, 31:16064�16069.
162. Kaindl AM, Degos V, Peineau S, Gouadon E, Chhor V, Loron G, Le
Charpentier T, Josserand J, Ali C, Vivien D, Collingridge GL, Lombet A, Issa L,
Rene F, Loeffler JP, Kavelaars A, Verney C, Mantz J, Gressens P: Activation of
microglial N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors triggers inflammation and
neuronal cell death in the developing and mature brain. Ann Neurol
2012, 72:536�549.
163. Schwartz M, Shaked I, Fisher J, Mizrahi T, Schori H: Protective
autoimmunity against the enemy within: fighting glutamate toxicity.
Trends Neurosci 2003, 26:297�302.
164. Pacheco R, Gallart T, Lluis C, Franco R: Role of glutamate on T-cell
mediated immunity. J Neuroimmunol 2007, 185:9�19.
165. Najjar S, Pearlman D, Miller DC, Devinsky O: Refractory epilepsy associated
with microglial activation. Neurologist 2011, 17:249�254.
166. Schwartz M, Butovsky O, Bruck W, Hanisch UK: Microglial phenotype: is the
commitment reversible? Trends Neurosci 2006, 29:68�74.
167. Wang F, Wu H, Xu S, Guo X, Yang J, Shen X: Macrophage migration
inhibitory factor activates cyclooxygenase 2-prostaglandin E2 in cultured
spinal microglia. Neurosci Res 2011, 71:210�218.
168. Zhang XY, Xiu MH, Song C, Chenda C, Wu GY, Haile CN, Kosten TA, Kosten
TR: Increased serum S100B in never-medicated and medicated
schizophrenic patients. J Psychiatr Res 2010, 44:1236�1240.
169. Kawasaki Y, Zhang L, Cheng JK, Ji RR: Cytokine mechanisms of central
sensitization: distinct and overlapping role of interleukin-1beta,
interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in regulating synaptic and
neuronal activity in the superficial spinal cord. J Neurosci 2008,
28:5189�5194.
170. M�ller N, Schwarz MJ: The immunological basis of glutamatergic
disturbance in schizophrenia: towards an integrated view. J Neural
Transm Suppl 2007, 72:269�280.
171. Hestad KA, Tonseth S, Stoen CD, Ueland T, Aukrust P: Raised plasma levels
of tumor necrosis factor alpha in patients with depression: normalization
during electroconvulsive therapy. J ECT 2003, 19:183�188.
172. Kubera M, Kenis G, Bosmans E, Zieba A, Dudek D, Nowak G, Maes M:
Plasma levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and interleukin-1 receptor
antagonist in depression: comparison between the acute state and after
remission. Pol J Pharmacol 2000, 52:237�241.
173. Miller BJ, Buckley P, Seabolt W, Mellor A, Kirkpatrick B: Meta-analysis of
cytokine alterations in schizophrenia: clinical status and antipsychotic
effects. Biol Psychiatry 2011, 70:663�671.
174. Potvin S, Stip E, Sepehry AA, Gendron A, Bah R, Kouassi E: Inflammatory
cytokine alterations in schizophrenia: a systematic quantitative review.
Biol Psychiatry 2008, 63:801�808.
175. Reale M, Patruno A, De Lutiis MA, Pesce M, Felaco M, Di Giannantonio M, Di
Nicola M, Grilli A: Dysregulation of chemo-cytokine production in
schizophrenic patients versus healthy controls. BMC Neurosci 2011, 12:13.
176. Fluitman SB, Denys DA, Heijnen CJ, Westenberg HG: Disgust affects TNFalpha,
IL-6 and noradrenalin levels in patients with obsessive-compulsive
disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2010, 35:906�911.
177. Konuk N, Tekin IO, Ozturk U, Atik L, Atasoy N, Bektas S, Erdogan A: Plasma
levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 in obsessive
compulsive disorder. Mediators Inflamm 2007, 2007:65704.
178. Monteleone P, Catapano F, Fabrazzo M, Tortorella A, Maj M: Decreased
blood levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in patients with obsessivecompulsive
disorder. Neuropsychobiology 1998, 37:182�185.
179. Marazziti D, Presta S, Pfanner C, Gemignani A, Rossi A, Sbrana S, Rocchi V,
Ambrogi F, Cassano GB: Immunological alterations in adult obsessivecompulsive
disorder. Biol Psychiatry 1999, 46:810�814.
180. Zai G, Arnold PD, Burroughs E, Richter MA, Kennedy JL: Tumor necrosis
factor-alpha gene is not associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Psychiatr Genet 2006, 16:43.
181. Rodr�guez AD, Gonz�lez PA, Garc�a MJ, de la Rosa A, Vargas M, Marrero F:
Circadian variations in proinflammatory cytokine concentrations in acute
myocardial infarction. Rev Esp Cardiol 2003, 56:555�560.
182. Oliver JC, Bland LA, Oettinger CW, Arduino MJ, McAllister SK, Aguero SM,
Favero MS: Cytokine kinetics in an in vitro whole blood model following
an endotoxin challenge. Lymphokine Cytokine Res 1993, 12:115�120.
183. Le T, Leung L, Carroll WL, Schibler KR: Regulation of interleukin-10 gene
expression: possible mechanisms accounting for its upregulation and for
maturational differences in its expression by blood mononuclear cells.
Blood 1997, 89:4112�4119.
184. Lee MC, Ting KK, Adams S, Brew BJ, Chung R, Guillemin GJ:
Characterisation of the expression of NMDA receptors in human
astrocytes. PLoS One 2010, 5:e14123.
185. Myint AM, Kim YK, Verkerk R, Scharpe S, Steinbusch H, Leonard B:
Kynurenine pathway in major depression: evidence of impaired
neuroprotection. J Affect Disord 2007, 98:143�151.
186. Sanacora G, Treccani G, Popoli M: Towards a glutamate hypothesis of
depression: an emerging frontier of neuropsychopharmacology for
mood disorders. Neuropharmacology 2012, 62:63�77.
187. Saleh A, Schroeter M, Jonkmanns C, Hartung HP, Modder U, Jander S: In
vivo MRI of brain inflammation in human ischaemic stroke. Brain 2004,
127:1670�1677.
188. Tilleux S, Hermans E: Neuroinflammation and regulation of glial glutamate
uptake in neurological disorders. J Neurosci Res 2007, 85:2059�2070.
189. Helms HC, Madelung R, Waagepetersen HS, Nielsen CU, Brodin B: In vitro
evidence for the brain glutamate efflux hypothesis: brain endothelial
cells cocultured with astrocytes display a polarized brain-to-blood
transport of glutamate. 2012, 60:882�893.
190. Leonard BE: The concept of depression as a dysfunction of the immune
system. Curr Immunol Rev 2010, 6:205�212.
191. Labrie V, Wong AH, Roder JC: Contributions of the D-serine pathway to
schizophrenia. Neuropharmacology 2012, 62:1484�1503.
192. Gras G, Samah B, Hubert A, Leone C, Porcheray F, Rimaniol AC: EAAT
expression by macrophages and microglia: still more questions than
answers. Amino Acids 2012, 42:221�229.
193. Livingstone PD, Dickinson JA, Srinivasan J, Kew JN, Wonnacott S:
Glutamate-dopamine crosstalk in the rat prefrontal cortex is modulated by Alpha7 nicotinic receptors and potentiated by PNU-120596. J Mol
Neurosci 2010, 40:172�176.194. Kondziella D, Brenner E, Eyjolfsson EM, Sonnewald U: How do glialneuronal
interactions fit into current neurotransmitter hypotheses of
schizophrenia? Neurochem Int 2007, 50:291�301.
195. Wu HQ, Pereira EF, Bruno JP, Pellicciari R, Albuquerque EX, Schwarcz R: The
astrocyte-derived alpha7 nicotinic receptor antagonist kynurenic acid
controls extracellular glutamate levels in the prefrontal cortex. J Mol
Neurosci 2010, 40:204�210.
196. Steiner J, Bogerts B, Schroeter ML, Bernstein HG: S100B protein in
neurodegenerative disorders. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011, 49:409�424.
197. Steiner J, Marquardt N, Pauls I, Schiltz K, Rahmoune H, Bahn S, Bogerts B,
Schmidt RE, Jacobs R: Human CD8(+) T cells and NK cells express and
secrete S100B upon stimulation. Brain Behav Immun 2011, 25:1233�1241.
198. Shanmugam N, Kim YS, Lanting L, Natarajan R: Regulation of
cyclooxygenase-2 expression in monocytes by ligation of the receptor
for advanced glycation end products. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:34834�34844.
199. Rothermundt M, Ohrmann P, Abel S, Siegmund A, Pedersen A, Ponath G,
Suslow T, Peters M, Kaestner F, Heindel W, Arolt V, Pfleiderer B: Glial cell
activation in a subgroup of patients with schizophrenia indicated by
increased S100B serum concentrations and elevated myo-inositol.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2007, 31:361�364.
200. Falcone T, Fazio V, Lee C, Simon B, Franco K, Marchi N, Janigro D: Serum
S100B: a potential biomarker for suicidality in adolescents? PLoS One
2010, 5:e11089.
201. Schroeter ML, Abdul-Khaliq H, Krebs M, Diefenbacher A, Blasig IE: Serum
markers support disease-specific glial pathology in major depression.
J Affect Disord 2008, 111:271�280.
202. Rothermundt M, Ahn JN, Jorgens S: S100B in schizophrenia: an update.
Gen Physiol Biophys 2009, 28 Spec No Focus:F76�F81.
203. Schroeter ML, Abdul-Khaliq H, Krebs M, Diefenbacher A, Blasig IE: Neuronspecific
enolase is unaltered whereas S100B is elevated in serum of
patients with schizophrenia�original research and meta-analysis.
Psychiatry Res 2009, 167:66�72.
204. Rothermundt M, Missler U, Arolt V, Peters M, Leadbeater J, Wiesmann M,
Rudolf S, Wandinger KP, Kirchner H: Increased S100B blood levels in
unmedicated and treated schizophrenic patients are correlated with
negative symptomatology. Mol Psychiatry 2001, 6:445�449.
205. Suchankova P, Klang J, Cavanna C, Holm G, Nilsson S, Jonsson EG, Ekman A:
Is the Gly82Ser polymorphism in the RAGE gene relevant to
schizophrenia and the personality trait psychoticism? J Psychiatry Neurosci
2012, 37:122�128.
206. Scapagnini G, Davinelli S, Drago F, De Lorenzo A, Oriani G: Antioxidants as
antidepressants: fact or fiction? CNS Drugs 2012, 26:477�490.
207. Ng F, Berk M, Dean O, Bush AI: Oxidative stress in psychiatric disorders:
evidence base and therapeutic implications. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol
2008, 11:851�876.
208. Salim S, Chugh G, Asghar M: Inflammation in anxiety. Adv Protein Chem
Struct Biol 2012, 88:1�25.
209. Anderson G, Berk M, Dodd S, Bechter K, Altamura AC, Dell’osso B, Kanba S,
Monji A, Fatemi SH, Buckley P, Debnath M, Das UN, Meyer U, M�ller N,
Kanchanatawan B, Maes M: Immuno-inflammatory, oxidative and nitrosative
stress, and neuroprogressive pathways in the etiology, course and treatment
of schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2013, 42:1�42.
210. Coughlin JM, Ishizuka K, Kano SI, Edwards JA, Seifuddin FT, Shimano MA,
Daley EL, et al: Marked reduction of soluble superoxide dismutase-1
(SOD1) in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with recent-onset
schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 2012, 18:10�11.
211. Bombaci M, Grifantini R, Mora M, Reguzzi V, Petracca R, Meoni E, Balloni S,
Zingaretti C, Falugi F, Manetti AG, Margarit I, Musser JM, Cardona F, Orefici
G, Grandi G, Bensi G: Protein array profiling of tic patient sera reveals a
broad range and enhanced immune response against Group A
Streptococcus antigens. PLoS One 2009, 4:e6332.
212. Valerio A, Cardile A, Cozzi V, Bracale R, Tedesco L, Pisconti A, Palomba L,
Cantoni O, Clementi E, Moncada S, Carruba MO, Nisoli E: TNF-alpha
downregulates eNOS expression and mitochondrial biogenesis in fat
and muscle of obese rodents. J Clin Invest 2006, 116:2791�2798.
213. Ott M, Gogvadze V, Orrenius S, Zhivotovsky B: Mitochondria, oxidative
stress and cell death. Apoptosis 2007, 12:913�922.
214. Shalev H, Serlin Y, Friedman A: Breaching the blood�brain barrier as a gate
to psychiatric disorder. Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol 2009, 2009:278531.
215. Abbott NJ, Ronnback L, Hansson E: Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the
blood�brain barrier. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006, 7:41�53.
216. Bechter K, Reiber H, Herzog S, Fuchs D, Tumani H, Maxeiner HG:
Cerebrospinal fluid analysis in affective and schizophrenic spectrum
disorders: identification of subgroups with immune responses and
blood-CSF barrier dysfunction. J Psychiatr Res 2010, 44:321�330.
217. Harris LW, Wayland M, Lan M, Ryan M, Giger T, Lockstone H, Wuethrich I,
Mimmack M, Wang L, Kotter M, Craddock R, Bahn S: The cerebral
microvasculature in schizophrenia: a laser capture microdissection study.
PLoS One 2008, 3:e3964.
218. Lin JJ, Mula M, Hermann BP: Uncovering the neurobehavioural
comorbidities of epilepsy over the lifespan. Lancet 2012, 380:1180�1192.
219. Isingrini E, Belzung C, Freslon JL, Machet MC, Camus V: Fluoxetine effect on
aortic nitric oxide-dependent vasorelaxation in the unpredictable
chronic mild stress model of depression in mice. Psychosom Med 2012,
74:63�72.
220. Zhang XY, Zhou DF, Cao LY, Zhang PY, Wu GY, Shen YC: The effect of
risperidone treatment on superoxide dismutase in schizophrenia. J Clin
Psychopharmacol 2003, 23:128�131.
221. Lavoie KL, Pelletier R, Arsenault A, Dupuis J, Bacon SL: Association between
clinical depression and endothelial function measured by forearm
hyperemic reactivity. Psychosom Med 2010, 72:20�26.
222. Chrapko W, Jurasz P, Radomski MW, Archer SL, Newman SC, Baker G, Lara N,
Le Melledo JM: Alteration of decreased plasma NO metabolites and
platelet NO synthase activity by paroxetine in depressed patients.
Neuropsychopharmacology 2006, 31:1286�1293.
223. Chrapko WE, Jurasz P, Radomski MW, Lara N, Archer SL, Le Melledo JM:
Decreased platelet nitric oxide synthase activity and plasma nitric oxide
metabolites in major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2004, 56:129�134.
224. Stuehr DJ, Santolini J, Wang ZQ, Wei CC, Adak S: Update on mechanism
and catalytic regulation in the NO synthases. J Biol Chem 2004,
279:36167�36170.
225. Chen W, Druhan LJ, Chen CA, Hemann C, Chen YR, Berka V, Tsai AL, Zweier
JL: Peroxynitrite induces destruction of the tetrahydrobiopterin and
heme in endothelial nitric oxide synthase: transition from reversible to
irreversible enzyme inhibition. Biochemistry 2010, 49:3129�3137.
226. Chen CA, Wang TY, Varadharaj S, Reyes LA, Hemann C, Talukder MA, Chen
YR, Druhan LJ, Zweier JL: S-glutathionylation uncouples eNOS and
regulates its cellular and vascular function. Nature 2010, 468:1115�1118.
227. Szabo C, Ischiropoulos H, Radi R: Peroxynitrite: biochemistry,
pathophysiology and development of therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov
2007, 6:662�680.
228. Papakostas GI, Shelton RC, Zajecka JM, Etemad B, Rickels K, Clain A, Baer L,
Dalton ED, Sacco GR, Schoenfeld D, Pencina M, Meisner A, Bottiglieri T,
Nelson E, Mischoulon D, Alpert JE, Barbee JG, Zisook S, Fava M: Lmethylfolate
as adjunctive therapy for SSRI-resistant major depression:
results of two randomized, double-blind, parallel-sequential trials. Am J
Psychiatry 2012, 169:1267�1274.
229. Antoniades C, Shirodaria C, Warrick N, Cai S, de Bono J, Lee J, Leeson P,
Neubauer S, Ratnatunga C, Pillai R, Refsum H, Channon KM: 5-
methyltetrahydrofolate rapidly improves endothelial function and
decreases superoxide production in human vessels: effects on vascular
tetrahydrobiopterin availability and endothelial nitric oxide synthase
coupling. Circulation 2006, 114:1193�1201.
230. Masano T, Kawashima S, Toh R, Satomi-Kobayashi S, Shinohara M, Takaya T,
Sasaki N, Takeda M, Tawa H, Yamashita T, Yokoyama M, Hirata K: Beneficial
effects of exogenous tetrahydrobiopterin on left ventricular remodeling
after myocardial infarction in rats: the possible role of oxidative stress
caused by uncoupled endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circ J 2008,
72:1512�1519.
231. Alp NJ, Channon KM: Regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by
tetrahydrobiopterin in vascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004,
24:413�420.
232. Szymanski S, Ashtari M, Zito J, Degreef G, Bogerts B, Lieberman J:
Gadolinium-DTPA enhanced gradient echo magnetic resonance scans in
first episode of psychosis and chronic schizophrenic patients.
Psychiatry Res 1991, 40:203�207.
233. Butler T, Weisholtz D, Isenberg N, Harding E, Epstein J, Stern E, Silbersweig
D: Neuroimaging of frontal-limbic dysfunction in schizophrenia and
epilepsy-related psychosis: toward a convergent neurobiology.
Epilepsy Behav 2012, 23:113�122.234. Butler T, Maoz A, Vallabhajosula S, Moeller J, Ichise M, Paresh K, Pervez F,
Friedman D, Goldsmith S, Najjar S, Osborne J, Solnes L, Wang X, French J,
Thesen T, Devinsky O, Kuzniecky R, Stern E, Silbersweig D: Imaging
inflammation in a patient with epilepsy associated with antibodies to
glutamic acid decarboxylase [abstract]. In Am Epilepsy Society Abstracts,
Volume 2. Baltimore: American Epilepsy Society; 2011:191.
235. van Berckel BN, Bossong MG, Boellaard R, Kloet R, Schuitemaker A, Caspers
E, Luurtsema G, Windhorst AD, Cahn W, Lammertsma AA, Kahn RS:
Microglia activation in recent-onset schizophrenia: a quantitative (R)-
[11C]PK11195 positron emission tomography study. Biol Psychiatry 2008,
64:820�822.
236. Doorduin J, de Vries EF, Willemsen AT, de Groot JC, Dierckx RA, Klein HC:
Neuroinflammation in schizophrenia-related psychosis: a PET study.
J Nucl Med 2009, 50:1801�1807.
237. Takano A, Arakawa R, Ito H, Tateno A, Takahashi H, Matsumoto R, Okubo Y,
Suhara T: Peripheral benzodiazepine receptors in patients with chronic
schizophrenia: a PET study with [11C]DAA1106. Int J
Neuropsychopharmacol 2010, 13:943�950.
238. M�ller N, Schwarz MJ, Dehning S, Douhe A, Cerovecki A, Goldstein-Muller B,
Spellmann I, Hetzel G, Maino K, Kleindienst N, M�ller HJ, Arolt V, Riedel M:
The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib has therapeutic effects in
major depression: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo
controlled, add-on pilot study to reboxetine. Mol Psychiatry 2006,
11:680�684.
239. Akhondzadeh S, Jafari S, Raisi F, Nasehi AA, Ghoreishi A, Salehi B, MohebbiRasa
S, Raznahan M, Kamalipour A: Clinical trial of adjunctive celecoxib
treatment in patients with major depression: a double blind and
placebo controlled trial. Depress Anxiety 2009, 26:607�611.
240. Mendlewicz J, Kriwin P, Oswald P, Souery D, Alboni S, Brunello N:
Shortened onset of action of antidepressants in major depression using
acetylsalicylic acid augmentation: a pilot open-label study. Int Clin
Psychopharmacol 2006, 21:227�231.
241. Uher R, Carver S, Power RA, Mors O, Maier W, Rietschel M, Hauser J,
Dernovsek MZ, Henigsberg N, Souery D, Placentino A, Farmer A, McGuffin P:
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and efficacy of antidepressants in
major depressive disorder. Psychol Med 2012, 42:2027�2035.
242. M�ller N, Riedel M, Scheppach C, Brandstatter B, Sokullu S, Krampe K,
Ulmschneider M, Engel RR, Moller HJ, Schwarz MJ: Beneficial antipsychotic
effects of celecoxib add-on therapy compared to risperidone alone in
schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 2002, 159:1029�1034.
243. M�ller N, Riedel M, Schwarz MJ, Engel RR: Clinical effects of COX-2
inhibitors on cognition in schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
2005, 255:149�151.
244. M�ller N, Krause D, Dehning S, Musil R, Schennach-Wolff R, Obermeier M,
Moller HJ, Klauss V, Schwarz MJ, Riedel M: Celecoxib treatment in an early
stage of schizophrenia: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled
trial of celecoxib augmentation of amisulpride treatment.
Schizophr Res 2010, 121:118�124.
245. Sayyah M, Boostani H, Pakseresht S, Malayeri A: A preliminary randomized
double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of celecoxib as an adjunct in
the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res 2011,
189:403�406.
246. Sublette ME, Ellis SP, Geant AL, Mann JJ: Meta-analysis of the effects of
eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in clinical trials in depression. J Clin
Psychiatry 2011, 72:1577�1584.
247. Bloch MH, Hannestad J: Omega-3 fatty acids for the treatment of
depression: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry 2012,
17:1272�1282.
248. Keller WR, Kum LM, Wehring HJ, Koola MM, Buchanan RW, Kelly DL: A
review of anti-inflammatory agents for symptoms of schizophrenia.
J Psychopharmacol.
249. Warner-Schmidt JL, Vanover KE, Chen EY, Marshall JJ, Greengard P:
Antidepressant effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)
are attenuated by antiinflammatory drugs in mice and humans. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:9262�9267.
250. Gallagher PJ, Castro V, Fava M, Weilburg JB, Murphy SN, Gainer VS, Churchill
SE, Kohane IS, Iosifescu DV, Smoller JW, Perlis RH: Antidepressant response
in patients with major depression exposed to NSAIDs: a
pharmacovigilance study. Am J Psychiatry 2012, 169:1065�1072.
251. Shelton RC: Does concomitant use of NSAIDs reduce the effectiveness of
antidepressants? Am J Psychiatry 2012, 169:1012�1015.
252. Martinez-Gras I, Perez-Nievas BG, Garcia-Bueno B, Madrigal JL, AndresEsteban
E, Rodriguez-Jimenez R, Hoenicka J, Palomo T, Rubio G, Leza JC:
The anti-inflammatory prostaglandin 15d-PGJ2 and its nuclear receptor
PPARgamma are decreased in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2011,
128:15�22.
253. Garcia-Bueno B, Perez-Nievas BG, Leza JC: Is there a role for the nuclear
receptor PPARgamma in neuropsychiatric diseases? Int J
Neuropsychopharmacol 2010, 13:1411�1429.
254. Meyer U: Anti-inflammatory signaling in schizophrenia. Brain Behav
Immun 2011, 25:1507�1518.
255. Ramer R, Heinemann K, Merkord J, Rohde H, Salamon A, Linnebacher M,
Hinz B: COX-2 and PPAR-gamma confer cannabidiol-induced apoptosis
of human lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2013, 12:69�82.
256. Henry CJ, Huang Y, Wynne A, Hanke M, Himler J, Bailey MT, Sheridan JF,
Godbout JP: Minocycline attenuates lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced
neuroinflammation, sickness behavior, and anhedonia.
J Neuroinflammation 2008, 5:15.
257. Sarris J, Mischoulon D, Schweitzer I: Omega-3 for bipolar disorder: metaanalyses
of use in mania and bipolar depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2012,
73:81�86.
258. Amminger GP, Schafer MR, Papageorgiou K, Klier CM, Cotton SM, Harrigan
SM, Mackinnon A, McGorry PD, Berger GE: Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids
for indicated prevention of psychotic disorders: a randomized, placebocontrolled
trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010, 67:146�154.
259. Fusar-Poli P, Berger G: Eicosapentaenoic acid interventions in
schizophrenia: meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled studies.
J Clin Psychopharmacol 2012, 32:179�185.
260. Zorumski CF, Paul SM, Izumi Y, Covey DF, Mennerick S: Neurosteroids,
stress and depression: Potential therapeutic opportunities.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2013, 37:109�122.
261. Uhde TW, Singareddy R: Biological Research in Anxiety Disorders. In
Psychiatry as a Neuroscience. Edited by Juan Jose L-I, Wolfgang G, Mario M,
Norman S. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2002:237�286.
262. Gibson SA, Korado Z, Shelton RC: Oxidative stress and glutathione
response in tissue cultures from persons with major depression.
J Psychiatr Res 2012, 46:1326�1332.
263. Nery FG, Monkul ES, Hatch JP, Fonseca M, Zunta-Soares GB, Frey BN,
Bowden CL, Soares JC: Celecoxib as an adjunct in the treatment of
depressive or mixed episodes of bipolar disorder: a double-blind,
randomized, placebo-controlled study. 2008, 23:87�94.
264. Levine J, Cholestoy A, Zimmerman J: Possible antidepressant effect of
minocycline. 1996, 153:582.
265. Levkovitz Y, Mendlovich S, Riwkes S, Braw Y, Levkovitch-Verbin H, Gal G,
Fennig S, Treves I, Kron S: A double-blind, randomized study of
minocycline for the treatment of negative and cognitive symptoms in
early-phase schizohprenia. J Clin Psychiatry 2010, 71:138�149.
266. Miyaoka T, Yasukawa R, Yasuda H, Hayashida M, Inagaki T, Horiguchi J:
Possible antipsychotic effect of minocycline in patients with
schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2007, 31:304�307.
267. Miyaoka J, Yasukawa R, Yasuda H, Hayashida M, Inagaki T, Horiguchi J:
Minocycline as adjunctive therapy for schizophrenia: an open-label
study. 2008, 31:287�292.
268. Rodriguez CI, Bender J Jr, Marcus SM, Snape M, Rynn M, Simpson HB:
Minocycline augmentation of pharmacotherapy in obsessive-compulsive
disorder: an open-label trial. 2010, 71:1247�1249.
doi:10.1186/1742-2094-10-43

Cite this article as: Najjar et al.: Neuroinflammation and psychiatric
illness. Journal of Neuroinflammation 2013 10:43.

Close Accordion
Why Is The Thyroid So Prone To Autoimmune Disease?

Why Is The Thyroid So Prone To Autoimmune Disease?

Thyroid & Autoimmune Disease:

Key Words:

  • Autoimmune thyroid disease
  • Smoking
  • Environmental factors
  • Endogenous factors
  • Accelerator hypothesis
  • Selenium intake
  • Iodine intake

Abstract

The thyroid gland plays a major role in the human body; it produces the hormones necessary for appropriate energy levels and an active life. These hormones have a critical impact on early brain development and somatic growth. At the same time, the thyroid is highly vulnerable to autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITDs). They arise due to the complex inter- play of genetic, environmental, and endogenous factors, and the specific combination is required to initiate thyroid autoimmunity. When the thyroid cell becomes the target of autoimmunity, it interacts with the immune system and appears to affect disease progression. It can produce different growth factors, adhesion molecules, and a large array of cytokines. Preventable environmental factors, including high iodine intake, selenium deficiency, and pollutants such as tobacco smoke, as well as infectious diseases and certain drugs, have been implicated in the development of AITDs in genetically predisposed individuals. The susceptibility of the thyroid to AITDs may come from the complexity of hormonal synthesis, peculiar oligoelement requirements, and specific capabilities of the thyroid cell�s defense system. An improved understanding of this interplay could yield novel�treatment pathways, some of which might be as simple as identifying the need to avoid smoking or to control the in- take of some nutrients.

Introduction

The thyroid gland is important in the human body because of its ability to produce hormones necessary for appropriate energy levels and an active life. These molecules have pleiotropic effects, playing critical roles in early brain development, somatic growth, bone maturation, and the mRNA synthesis of more than 100 proteins that constantly regulate each and every bodily function.

At the same time, the thyroid is highly vulnerable to autoimmune diseases. The incidence of chronic autoimmune thyroiditis (CAT) and Graves� disease (GD) has in- creased dramatically over the past few decades, afflicting up to 5% of the general population. In children, CAT is the most common cause of acquired hypothyroidism in non-endemic goiter areas.

Initial studies on the association between early fetal nutrition and the pathogenesis of autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITDs) resulted in controversial data. In twin studies, Phillips et al. [1] found that among monozygotic twins the smaller twin had higher levels of thyroid per- oxidase (TPO) antibodies. However, these data were not�confirmed in another twin study in which a larger cohort was analyzed [2]. The �accelerator hypothesis� and the influence of rapid childhood growth due to energy-dense food and adipokine imbalance have not been investigated in childhood AITDs. In both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, the accelerator hypothesis proposes a critical influence of obesity as an exogenous factor contributing to disease; even in a population of children with type 1 diabetes, the fattest presented with disease the earliest (evidence of true acceleration) [3]. With regard to AITDs, other accelerators in addition to obesity include low selenium (Se) and a high iodine intake. Obese children are hyperleptinemic, and leptin, with its numerous functions including the promotion of cell-mediated immune responses, is a good candidate for contributing to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Obese children have been found to have increased interferon (IFN)- -secreting T helper cells and altered thyroid structure and hormonal status [4�8].

Autoimmunity is generally considered to be only a cause of disease; nevertheless, human T cell repertoires naturally comprise autoimmune lymphocytes. Autoimmune T cells can help heal damaged tissues, indicating that natural autoimmunity can also contribute to health and benefit self-maintenance [9]. The immune system makes its decisions and acts by integrating multiple signals in an ongoing dialog with tissues. It is likely that the tissue itself provides signals that trigger the type of inflammation that is required for tissue self-maintenance and repair [9, 10].

thyroid Fig 1Autoimmune disorders result from a complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and endogenous factors (fig. 1), and a combination of these factors is required to initiate thyroid autoimmunity [11, 12]. Recent advances in genome-wide studies have made it possible to efficient- ly identify complex disease-associated genes. Using both the candidate gene approach and whole-genome linkage studies, 6 AITD susceptibility genes have been identified and confirmed; the first group includes the immunomodulatory gene products HLA-DR, CD40, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated factor (CTLA-4), and protein tyrosine phosphatase 22 (PTPN22), and the second group includes the thyroid-specific gene products thyroglobulin (Tg) and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR). Genetic factors predominate, accounting for approximately 80% of the likelihood of developing AITDs, whereas at least 20% is due to environmental factors (fig. 1). In recent years, a number of excellent reviews have been published on the genetic background of AITDs [13, 14].

An increased frequency of AITDs is reported in Turner syndrome (TS) and in other nondisjunctional chromosomal disorders such as Down and Klinefelter syndromes. The theory that maternal autoimmunity may lead to the preferential survival of a fetus with chromosomal aneuploidy is attractive but remains unproven [15]. The most prevalent autoimmune disorder in TS appears to be CAT, with a reported thyroid autoantibody incidence of 30� 50%. Hypothyroidism of autoimmune origin is so common in TS that almost every other TS woman will prob- ably develop hypothyroidism, and it increases with age [16, 17].

We know more about the minor details of AITDs, but the main question remains unanswered: why is the thyroid so prone to autoimmune disease? This review seeks to emphasize the role of the thyroid cell per se in AITDs and to focus attention on preventable exogenous factors.

Thyroid Cell Specificity

The thyroid cell produces a variety of immunologically active factors (table 1) and has complex nutrient requirements for hormonal synthesis and function (table 2), both of which influence susceptibility to AITDs. Thus, the thyroid cell is not just the innocent victim of an�unchecked and disordered immune system. It is increasingly obvious that the target cells interact with the immune system, often in ways that seem defensive and protective, yet they can go awry and exacerbate autoimmunity under particular circumstances [11].

thyroid Tabel 1

thyroid Table 2In most human autoimmune diseases, the events that trigger autoimmunity remain elusive. Most importantly, it is unclear whether autoimmunity results primarily from an immune defect, is secondary to target organ alterations, or both. The thyroid shows increased iodine uptake and oxidation prior to lymphocytic infiltration concomitant with decreased thyroid epithelial cell proliferation in vitro. Modifying thyroid function influences the development of thyroid autoimmunity [18]. The thyroid cell, unlike other epithelial cells in the endocrine system, is unique because it releases hormonal products on its basal surface instead of its apical surface, thus allowing for the trafficking of precious iodine twice across the cell.

Thyroid cells are capable of producing different factors (table 1), including IGF I, IGF II, and EGF, that can stimulate angiogenesis. The half-life of these molecules is short and they induce only local (non-systemic) effects. Stimulated thyroid follicular cells secrete several growth factors [19]. The expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and lymphocyte function-associated antigen-3 (LFA-3) by thyroid cells is enhanced by IFN- , tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and interleukin (IL)-1. Thyroid cells express CD44, which acts as a homing receptor for hyaluronan, mediates leukocyte rolling (the first step in tissue homing), and may (like ICAM-1) induce lymphocyte activation under certain circumstances. Thyroid cells are now known to produce many cytokines (especially after stimulation with IL-1), including IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-13, and IL-15 [11]. Activated lymphocytes can produce TSH, which could have a variety of implications [20].

Low dose tolerance can easily be broken, and the thyroid is not well tolerated by the immune system. Auto- antigens in AITDs, as in other autoimmune endocrine diseases, include tissue-specific membrane receptors, enzymes, and secreted hormones. Mixed cellular and anti- body autoimmune responses are likely pathogenic to some degree. Circulating anti-Tg autoantibodies are also found in GD and CAT, as are autoantibodies to triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4). The human (h) TSHR is the primary antigenic target in autoimmune hyperthyroidism [21]. The TPO autoantibody seems unlikely to have much pathogenic importance as it has limited access to TPO in vivo due to its location inside the cell. Further- more, anti-TPO autoantibodies do not inhibit the activity�of the enzyme. Thus, their clinical value is principally to document thyroid gland autoimmunity. However, TPO may act as a hidden antigen because it is not adjacent to the vasculature.

In humans, excess thyroid hormone results in the attenuation of natural killer (NK) cell activity, which in theory could lead to the continuation of an autoimmune disorder. Upon return to a euthyroid status and the resulting normalization of NK activity, a reversion to control of the abnormal immune reaction would occur with perpetuation of GD. Additionally, an anti-idiotype might function as an agonist for the original antigen. Thus, an antibody to an antibody (anti-idiotype) to TSH might bind to the TSHR and stimulate the thyroid [22]. A more likely hypothesis is that anti-idiotypic antibodies are rarely produced at a detectable level. Hodkinson et al. [23] recently found a positive association between thyroid hormone concentration and NK-like T cells in the elderly. This relationship has not been investigated in young patients.

Antigen Presentation By The Thyroid Cell

Bottazzo et al. [24] first suggested that antigen presentation by HLA-DR-expressing thyroid cells may be a critical aspect of thyroid autoimmune disease. It quickly became apparent that the only stimulus able to induce MHC class II expression on thyroid cells was the T cell cytokine IFN- . Normal cells respond exactly the same as AITD thyroid cells to IFN- , and in animal models of AITDs class II expression on thyroid cells is always followed by the appearance of lymphocytes in the gland. In addition to inducing MHC class II expression, IFN- increases MHC class I expression on thyroid cells, thus allowing potential for the recognition of thyroid cells by cytotoxic CD8+ T cells [11].

It is possible that direct antigen presentation by the thyroid cell itself may occur in individuals who inherit thyroid-reactive T cells; such a circumstance would effectively bypass the classical macrophage-processing mechanism. The HLA-DR antigen-expressing thyroid cell may be as effective as the macrophage at presenting thyroid- specific antigens to the immune system [25], but the thyroid cell is incapable of supplying the costimulatory signals that professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) do [11]. Any stimulus that causes increased DR expression on thyrocytes, such as IFN- produced by T cells in response to infection, combined with increased TSH stimulation may allow thyrocytes to function as APCs. Although thyroid cells may perform this function poorly, they are numerous and localized in one area, therefore allowing for increased production of the already established normally occurring low levels of antibodies [12].

Environmental Factors

A number of environmental factors have been implicated in the development of AITD in genetically predisposed individuals, including high iodine intake, Se deficiency, pollutants such as tobacco smoke, infectious dis- eases, certain drugs, and physical and emotional stress [26�30]. Herein, we focus on these preventable triggers. Individual susceptibility suggests that, in addition to genetics, some endogenous factors are also important to the development of AITDs, such as growth spurts in childhood, puberty, pregnancy, menopause, aging, and gender (fig. 1, 2).

thyroid Fig 2Iodine

Dietary iodine plays an important role in the expression of AITDs. Epidemiological studies have suggested that AITDs are more common in areas of iodine sufficiency than in areas of iodine deficiency and that general increases in AITDs occur in parallel with increases in dietary iodine. CAT is less common in countries with a low iodine intake [27].

The thyroid requires the right amount of iodine. Either too much or too little causes problems. Too little io- dine brings all of the adaptive immune mechanisms of the thyroid into play, but despite these responses iodine deficiency disorders may still result. Too much iodine also affects the thyroid. Protective mechanisms include diminished trapping of iodide by the thyroid and de- creased iodide organification. In experimental thyroiditis several types of Tg epitopes have been found, including some containing iodine and/or hormones as well as some conformational epitopes. Experimentally increasing the iodination of Tg makes the protein more antigen- ic [28, 31]. Optimally, the iodine intake of a population should be kept within a relatively narrow interval that prevents iodine disorders, but not higher [29].

The mechanism of action of iodine in contributing to thyroid autoimmunity is not clear. Iodine may stimulate B lymphocytes to increase the production of immunoglobulin and thus induce AITDs by enhancing the activity of lymphocytes that have been primed by thyroid- specific antigens [30]. Iodine may enhance the antigen- presenting capabilities of macrophages, resulting in increased macrophage activity and enhanced lymphocyte stimulation. In addition, a high iodine intake in- creases the iodine content of the Tg molecule, which may increase its immunogenicity [31]. Lastly, iodine may provoke thyroid follicular cells to become APCs and thus potentiate AITDs by turning genetically predisposed normal thyrocytes into antigen-presenting thyrocytes.

Table 2 shows several minerals and trace elements that are essential for normal thyroid hormone metabolism. The role of these elements in childhood AITDs has not been well investigated.

Selenium

The second factor that has been strongly implicated in the development of autoimmune thyroiditis is the trace element Se. Se is a constituent of selenoproteins (SePs), in which it is incorporated as selenocysteine. Relevant actions of Se and SePs include antioxidant effects, appropriate functioning of the immune system, antiviral effects, influence on fertility, and a beneficial effect on mood [32]. Se deficiency is thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune thyroiditis by lengthening the duration and exacerbating the severity of the disease; these effects may occur via reduced activity of the SeP glutathione peroxidase, which leads to an increased production of hydrogen peroxide. Another important class of SePs are the iodothyronine selenodeiodonases D1 and D2, which are responsible for producing biologically active T3 via 5 -deiodination in extrathyroidal tissues [33, 34].

Combined Se and iodine deficiencies lead to myxedematous cretinism. Adequate Se nutrition supports efficient thyroid hormone synthesis and metabolism and protects the thyroid gland from damage from excessive iodine exposure. In regions having severe combined deficiencies of iodine and Se, it is mandatory to normalize the Se supply before the initiation of iodine supplementation to prevent hypothyroidism [35].

In celiac disease, the inability to absorb Se may modulate SeP gene expression and promote intestinal mucosal damage, and this deficiency could additionally predispose to complications such as AITDs [34, 36].

Derumeaux et al. [37] discovered an inverse association between Se status and thyroid volume and echo- structure in French adults and concluded that Se may protect against AITDs. Duntas et al. [38] found beneficial effects when treating patients with autoimmune thyroiditis with selenomethionine for 6 months due to its ability to reduce anti-TPO antibodies. In the group treat- ed with LT4 combined with Se, these effects were very prominent in the first 3 months and were further sustained after 6 months of treatment. A striking majority of the patients reported an improvement in mood and well-being.

Environmental Pollutants

Various environmental toxins and pollutants have been implicated in the induction of AITDs.

Polyhalogenated biphenyls are commonly used com- pounds with a wide variety of industrial applications. Polybrominated biphenyls are flame retardant, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are used as lubricants, adhesives, inks, and plasticizers. PCBs are known to accumulate in lakes and rivers and subsequently in the adipose tissue of fish and humans [27]. These compounds might trigger AITDs by interfering with iodide transport and inducing oxidative stress. There is evidence that peri- natal PCB exposure decreases thyroid hormone levels in rat pups. In adults, adolescents, and children from highly PCB-exposed areas, the concentration of PCBs in blood samples negatively correlated with levels of circulating thyroid hormones [39, 40]. Populations with long-term exposure to PCBs have increased prevalences of anti-TPO antibodies, which is probably related to the immunomodulatory effects of PCBs. Pollutants from car emissions and heavy industry as well as coal pollution and agricultural fungicides are also implicated in AITD development [26, 27].

Smoking is associated with an increased risk of developing GD and with a reduced remission rate after thionamide treatment. Even more striking is the effect of smoking on Graves� orbitopathy, which tends to be more severe in smokers [32, 41]. Smoking might contribute to the pathogenesis of GD by altering the structure of the thyrotropin receptor, making it more immunogenic and leading to the production of thyrotropin receptor-stimulating antibodies that react strongly with retroorbital tissue [41]. Smoking induces the polyclonal activation of B and T cells and increases presentation of antigens by damaged cells. Hypoxia may play a role in Graves� orbitopathy because retrobulbar fibroblasts show a significant increase in proliferation and glycosaminoglycan production when cultured under hypoxic conditions [42, 43]. The effects of parental smoking on thyroid function in fetuses or 1-year-old infants [44] provide additional insight into the interrelationship between smoking and thyroid dysfunction. The latter study found that infants whose mothers and fathers smoked had higher cord serum concentrations of Tg and thiocyanate than did infants whose parents did not smoke. The clinical picture observed in adolescents exposed to passive smoking could be due to direct stimulation of sympathetic nervous activity by nicotine in addition to the smoking-induced increase in thyroid hormone secretion [45].

The association of smoking with CAT is less well defined. Although a relationship with autoimmune hypothyroidism or postpartum thyroiditis has been reported, this finding was not supported by meta-analysis of the published papers [32, 45].

Infections

In some individuals, autoimmunity is the price that must be paid for the eradication of an infectious agent. Infections have been implicated in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune, endocrine, and non-endocrine diseases. Either viral or bacterial infections might represent a risk factor for the development of AITDs. Viruses have long been suspected as etiological agents in many auto- immune diseases, including AITDs; moreover, a viral cause of AITDs, infecting either the thyroid or immune cells, has been demonstrated in an avian model. Although viruses may be likely etiological agents in human AITDs, this possibility remains unproven [25, 27, 30].

An increased frequency of antibodies to the influenza B virus has been observed in a group of patients with thyrotoxicosis. In addition, virus-like particles have been found in the thyroids of chickens with autoimmune thyroiditis, with similar particles detected in the thyroids of humans. Serological evidence of prior staphylococcal and streptococcal illnesses has been described in a few patients with AITDs [27].

Some of the strongest evidence linking infectious agents to the induction of AITDs has been the association of Yersinia enterocolitica infection with thyroid disease. This Gram-negative coccobacillus commonly causes diarrhea along with a variety of abnormalities that suggest autoimmune disease, including arthralgias, arthritis, erythema nodosum, carditis, glomerulonephritis, and iritis. Weiss et al. [46] demonstrated that Y. enterocolitica had a saturable, hormone-specific binding site for the mammalian TSH that resembled the receptor for TSH in the human thyroid gland.

An immune response against a viral antigen that shares homology with the TSHR may be the inductive event that ultimately leads to TSHR autoimmunity [21]. A significant association between hepatitis C and AITDs has been found. Anti-TPO antibody titers have been shown to increase at the end of treatment with IFN- in patients with the hepatitis C virus, and these patients were more susceptible to AITDs than were hepatitis B patients. These patients should be screened for autoimmune thyroiditis before and after IFN treatment [47, 48].

Infection might induce an autoimmune response by various mechanisms, such as molecular mimicry, polyclonal T cell activation by microbial superantigens, and increased thyroid expression of human leukocyte anti- gens [49]. Inflammation induced by viral infections or by pollutants can modify cell signaling pathways and influence T cell activity and cytokine secretion profiles [26].

Drugs

Several drugs have been implicated in the pathogenesis of AITDs. Amiodarone is an iodine-containing drug with diverse effects on thyroid function. Serum titers of TPO antibodies are elevated in approximately half of the patients who develop amiodarone-induced hypothyroid- ism. Amiodarone has also been shown to affect T cell function [27]. Thyroid antibodies disappeared from the circulation 6 months after amiodarone discontinuation [32].

Lithium, a psychopharmaceutical and well-known goitrogen, has been shown to inhibit thyroid hormone release. Antithyroid antibodies are found more frequently in psychiatric patients on lithium therapy than in similar psychiatric patients treated with other drugs. Lithium-induced increases in serum TSH concentrations might enhance autoantigen expression on the surface of thyrocytes, thereby exacerbating autoimmune responses [32, 50].

Other agents involved in thyroid autoimmunity are IL-2 (thyroid autoimmune phenomena with or without hypothyroidism), IFN- (thyroid dysfunction, hypothyroidism, and occurrence of thyroid autoantibodies), highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART; possible occurrence of thyroid autoimmune phenomena and dysfunction), and Campath-1H, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the CD52 antigen on lymphocytes and monocytes that is used after transplantation (occurrence of GD) [32].

Stress

Although numerous anecdotal reports have associated the onset of AITDs, and particularly GD, with stressful events, objective evidence has been difficult to obtain. Both psychological stress, such as bereavement, and physical stress, such as trauma or major illness, have been implicated [27].

Neuroendocrine immune mechanisms responsible for the putative effects of stress on the onset and course of GD are poorly defined, but they might include activation of the HPA axis (although this should cause immunosuppression) and a shift from a Th1 (cell-mediated) immune response to a Th2 (humoral) immune response [32, 51].

Additionally, heat shock proteins (HSPs), which are well-known stress proteins, could share epitopes with the TSHR. Heufelder et al. [52] found that high levels of HSP- 72 expression in AITDs may reflect a state of chronic cellular stress, but this finding could also indicate an immunomodulatory function of HSP-72 in AITDs. HSPs are ubiquitous, highly conserved proteins that are expressed in response to a wide variety of physiological and environmental insults. They allow cells to survive otherwise lethal conditions. HSPs have been postulated to be critical antigens in both autoimmune diseases and experimental models of autoimmunity [53, 54].

Improving stress by the prolonged use of bromazepam has been shown to increase the remission rate of hyper- thyroidism after a thionamide course [55]. The relation- ship between stress and CAT is less evident. Graves� patients might be stressed because of hyperthyroidism and not hyperthyroid because of stress, whereas CAT patients are not stressed because they are euthyroid or hypothyroid [32]. Whatever the mechanism of action, stress may cause decompensation in a genetically susceptible individual and lead to the induction or exacerbation of an AITD.

Pregnancy And Postpartum

AITDs tend to be more frequent in women. The reason for this gender-related difference is not clear and is not explained by the additional X chromosome in females [42]. The possibility that genes responsible for immune responses are located on the X chromosome has been considered but not confirmed. Sex steroids could modify immune responses by acting directly on immune cells. Estrogens are well-known stimulators of TSH secretion, which could enhance HLA-DR expression. Parity per se does not seem to play a significant role [32, 56].

The accumulation of fetal cells in the maternal thyroid gland during pregnancy (painless postpartum thyroiditis) may induce autoimmune thyroiditis [57]. Pregnancy is accompanied by a suppression of the immune system with a shift in the Th1/Th2 balance towards Th2 immunity, a process that is aimed at protecting the fetus. A possible link between pregnancy and the postpartum occurrence of AITDs might be represented by fetal microchimerism. Fetal cells pass into the maternal circulation and may persist in the maternal blood. Microchimerism of presumed fetal origin has been shown in thyroid tissue specimens of women with previous pregnancies, particularly in those with AITDs. The persistence of activated�intrathyroidal fetal cells might influence thyroid autoimmunity in genetically susceptible women by modulating or even initiating maternal immune responses in a graft- versus-host reaction upon termination of pregnancy-re- lated immune suppression. It cannot presently be ruled out, however, that intrathyroidal fetal cells are only innocent bystanders and do not participate in triggering or exacerbating thyroid autoimmune responses [32, 54, 58]. Mothers who have given birth to sons have thyroidal Y chromosome-positive cells more frequently if they are affected by either CAT or GD than if they have thyroid adenomas [59].

The presence of elevated TPO antibodies in about 10% of pregnant women is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage, gestational thyroid dysfunction, and postpartum thyroiditis [48]. Maternal-to-fetal transfer of TSHR antibodies with polyclonal activity and a different half-life can lead to a transient perinatal thyroid dysfunction, opposite to a maternal one [60].

Conclusion

A rapidly growing body of evidence on the interplay between genetic, environmental, and endogenous factors has expanded our knowledge of the complex etiopathogenesis of AITDs. Autoimmune thyroid disorders are examples of common diseases in which immunogenetic factors play an important role.

The thyroid cell itself appears to play a major role in disease progression by interacting with the immune system. The complexity of hormonal synthesis, unique oligoelement requirements, and the specific capabilities of the thyroid cell defense system probably make the thyroid prone to AITDs. The initial insult to the human thyroid gland that activates the onset of AITDs remains un- known and seems to be strongly individual. Understand- ing more about the interaction between genes and the environment could yield entirely novel pathways, some of which might be as simple as identifying the need to avoid smoking or to control the intake of particular nutrients. Evidence for many causal agents is, however, scarce, and more data are certainly required. We believe that it is particularly important to draw attention to this problem in pediatric patients. Lessons learned from the enigmatic questions raised in AITD studies could clarify the pathogenesis of other organ-specific autoimmune disorders.

L. Saranac S. Zivanovic B. Bjelakovic H. Stamenkovic M. Novak B. Kamenov Pediatric Clinic, University Clinical Center, Nis, Serbia

Blank
References:

1 Phillips DI, Osmond C, Baird J, Huckle A,
Rees-Smith B: Is birthweight associated with
thyroid autoimmunity? A study in twins.
Thyroid 2002;12:377�380.
2 Brix TH, Hansen PS, Rudbeck AB, Hansen
JB, Skythe A, Kyvik KO, Hegedus L: Low
birth weight is not associated with thyroid
autoimmunity: a population-based twin
study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:
3499�3502.
3 Wilkin TJ: The great weight gain experiment,
accelerators and their implications for
autoantibodies in diabetes. Arch Dis Child
2006;91:456�458.
4 Matarese G, La Cava A, Sanna V, Lord MG,
Lechler RI, Fontana S, Zappacosta S: Balancing
susceptibility to infection and autoimmunity:
a role of leptin? Trends Immunol
2002;23:182�187.
5 Radetti G, Kleon W, Buzi F, Crivellero C,
Pappalardo L, Di Lorgi N, Maghnie M: Thyroid
structure and function are affected in
childhood obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2008;93:4749�4754.
6 Pacifico L, Di Renzo L, Anania C, Osborn JF,
Ippoliti F, Schiavo E, Chiesa C: Increased Thelper
interferon-gamma-secreting cells in
obese children. Eur J Endocrinol 2006;154:
691�697.
7 Marras V, Casini MR, Pilia S, Carta D, Civolani
P, Porcu M, Uccheddu AP, Loche S: Thyroid
function in obese children and adolescents.
Horm Res Paediatr 2010;73:193�197.
8 Saranac L, Zivanovic S, Novak M: High fT3
(free triiodothyronine), new syndrome or innocent
bystander. Endocr Abstracts Eur
Congr Endocrinol, Prague, 2010, p 771.
9 Schwartz M, Cohen IR: Autoimmunity can
benefit self-maintenance. Immunol Today
2000;21:265�268.
10 Cohen IR, Schwartz M: Autoimmune maintenance
and neuroprotection of the central
nervous system. J Neuroimmunol 1999;100:
111�114.
11 Weetman AP: Autoimmune thyroid disease:
propagation and progression. Eur J Endocrinol
2003;148:1�9.
12 Weetman AP: New aspects of thyroid autoimmunity.
Horm Res 1997;48(suppl 4):51�
54.
13 Jacobson EM, Tomer Y: The CD40, CTLA-4,
thyroglobulin, TSH receptor, and PTPN22
gene quintet and its contribution to thyroid
autoimmunity: back to the future. J Autoimmun
2007;28:85�98.
14 Tomer Y, Huber A: The etiology of autoimmune
thyroid disease: a story of genes and
environment. J Autoimmun 2009;32:231�
239.
15 Saenger P: Turner syndrome; in Sperling MA
(ed): Pediatric Endocrinology, ed 3. Philadelphia,
Saunders Elsevier, 2008, pp 610�661.
16 El-Mansoury M, Bryman I, Berntorp K,
Hanson C, Wilhelmsen L, Landin-Wilhelmsen
K: Hypothyroidism is common in Turner
syndrome: results of a five-year follow up.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:2131�2135.
17 Mortensen KH, Cleemann L, Hjerrild BE,
Nexo E, Locht H, Jeppesen EM, Gravholt
CH: Increased prevalence of autoimmunity
in Turner syndrome � influence of age. Clin
Experim Immunol 2009;156:205�210.
18 Homo-Delarche F, Boitard C: Autoimmune
diabetes: the role of the islets of Langerhans.
Immunol Today 1996;17:456�460.
19 Denef JF, Ovaert C, Many MC: Experimental
goitrogenesis (in French). Ann Endocrinol
(Paris) 1989;50:1�15.
20 Fabry Z, Raine CS, Hart MN: Nervous tissue
as an immune compartment: the dialect of
the immune response in the CNS. Immunol
Today 1994;15:218�224.
21 Song YH, Li Y, Maclaren NK: The nature of
autoantigens targeted in autoimmune endocrine
diseases. Immunol Today 1996;17:232�
238.
22 Zakarija M, McKenzie JM: The spectrum
and significance of autoantibodies reacting
with the thyrotropin receptor. Endocrinol
Metab Clin North Am 1987;16:343�364.
23 Hodkinson CF, Simpson EEA, Beattie JH,
O�Conor JM, Campbell DJ, Strain JJ, Wallace
JM: Preliminary evidence of immune function
modulation by thyroid hormones in
healthy men and women aged 55�70 years. J
Endocrinol 2009;202:55�63.
24 Botazzo GF, Pujol-Borrell R, Hanafusa T,
Feldmann M: Role of aberrant HLA-DR expression
and antigen presentation in induction
of endocrine autoimmunity. Lancet
1983;2:1115�1119.
25 Davies TF, Piccini LA: Intrathyroidal MHC
class II antigen expression and thyroid autoimmunity.
Endocrinol Metab Clin North
Am 1987;16:247�268.
26 Duntas LH: Environmental factors and autoimmune
thyroiditis. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol
Metab 2008;4:454�460.
27 Safran M, Paul TL, Roti E, Braverman LE:
Environmental factors affecting autoimmune
thyroid disease. Endocrinol Metab
Clin North Am 1987;6:327�342.
28 Dunn JT: What is happening with our iodine?
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;3398�
3400.
29 Laurberg P, Cerqueira C, Ovesen L, Rasmusen
LB, Perrild H, Andersen S, Pedersen IB,
Carle A: Iodine intake as a determinant of
thyroid disorders in population. Best Pract
Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;24:13�27.
30 Weetman AP, McGregor AM: Autoimmune
thyroid disease: developments in our understanding.
Endocr Rev 1984;5:309�355.
31 Carayanniotis G, Rao VP: Searching for
pathogenic epitopes in thyroglobulin: parameters
and caveats. Immunol Today 1997;
18:83�88.
32 Bartalena L, Tanda ML, Piantanida E, Lai A,
Compri E, Lombardi V: Environment and
thyroid autoimmunity; in Wiersinga WM,
Drexhage HA, Weetman AP, et al (eds): The
Thyroid and Autoimmunity: Merck European
Thyroid Symposium Noordwijk 2006,
June 15�18. Stuttgart, Thieme, 2007 pp 60�
73.
33 Berry MJ, Bany L, Larsen PR: Type I iodothyronine
deiodinase is a selenocysteine-containing
enzyme. Nature 1991;349:438�440.
34 Duntas LH: Selenium and inflammation:
underlying anti-inflammatory mechanisms.
Horm Metab Res 2009;41:443�447.
35 Zimmerman MB, Kohrle J: The impact of
iron and selenium deficiencies on iodine and
thyroid metabolism: biochemistry and relevance
to public health. Thyroid 2002;12:
867�878.
36 Duntas LH: Does celiac disease trigger autoimmune
thyroiditis. Nat Rev Endocrinol
2009;5:190�191.
37 Derumeaux E, Valeix P, Castetbon K, Bensimon
M, Boutron-Ruault MC, Arnaud JH,
Hercberg S: Association of selenium with
thyroid volume and echostructure in 35- to
60-year-old French adults. Eur J Endocrinol
2003;148:309�315.
38 Duntas LH, Mantzou E, Koutras DA: Effects
of a six month treatment with selenomethionine
in patients with autoimmune thyroiditis.
Eur J Endocrinol 2003;148:389�393.
39 Meerts IA, Assink Y, Cenijn PH, Van Den
Berg JH, Weijers BM, Bergman A, Koeman
JH, Brouwer A: Placental transfer of a hydroxylated
polychlorinated biphenyl and effects
on fetal and maternal thyroid hormone
homeostasis in the rat. Toxicol Sci 2002;68:
361�372.
40 Boas M, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Skakkebaek
NE, Main KM: Environmental chemicals
and thyroid function. Eur J Endocrinol 2006;
154:599�611.
41 Utiger RD: Effects of smoking on thyroid
function. Eur J Endocrinol 1998;138:368�
369.
42 Prummel MF, Strieder T, Wiersinga WM:
The environment and autoimmune diseases.
Eur J Endocrinol 2004;150:605�618.
43 Pontikides N, Krassas GE: Influence of cigarette
smoking on thyroid function, goiter
formation and autoimmune thyroid disorders.
Hormones (Athens) 2002;1:91�98.
44 Gasparoni A, Autelli M, Ravagni-Probizer
MF, Bartoli A, Regazzi-Bonora M, Chirico
G, Rondini G: Effect of passive smoking on
thyroid function in infants. Eur J Endocrinol
1998;138:379�382.
45 Vestergaard P: Smoking and thyroid disorders
� a meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol
2002;146:153�161.
46 Weiss M, Ingbar SH, Winblad S, Kasper DL:
Demonstration of a saturable binding site for
thyrotropin in Yersinia enterocolitica . Science
1983;219:1331�1333.
47 Fernandez-Soto L, Gonzales A, Escobar-Jimenez
F, Vazquez R, Ocete E, Olea N, Salmeron
J: Increased risk of autoimmune thyroid
disease in hepatitis C vs B before, during and
after discontinuing interferon therapy. Arch
Intern Med 1998;158:1445�1448.
48 Testa A, Castaldi P, Fanti V, Fiore GF, Grieco
V, De Rosa A, Pazardjklian MG, De Rosa G:
Prevalence of HCV antibodies in autoimmune
thyroid disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol
Sci 2006;10:183�186.
49 Davies TF: Infection and autoimmune thyroid
disease. J Clin Enocrinol Metab 2008;93:
674�676.
50 Lazarus JH, John R, Bennie EH, Chalmers
RJ, Crockett G: Lithium therapy and thyroid
function: a long-term study. Psychol Med
1981;11:85�92.
51 Dayan CM: Stressful life events and Graves�
disease revisited. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
2001;55:13�14.
52 Heufelder AE, Goellner JR, Wenzel BE,
Bahn RS: Immunohistochemical detection
and localization of a 72-kilodalton heat
shock protein in autoimmune thyroid disease.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992;74:724�
731.
53 Parcellier A, Gurbuxani S, Schmitt E, Solary
E, Garrido C: Heat shock proteins, cellular
chaperones that modulates mitochondrial
cell death pathways. Biochem Biophys Res
Commun 2003;304:505�512.
54 Gaston JS: Are heat shock proteins involved
in autoimmunity? Int Clin Lab Res 1992;22:
90�94.
55 Benvenga S: Benzodiazepine and remission
of Graves� disease. Thyroid 1996;6:659�660.
56 Adams D: How the immune system works
and why it causes autoimmune diseases. Immunol
Today 1998;17:300�303.
57 Pierce EN, Farwel AP, Braverman LE: Thyroiditis.
N Engl J Med 2003;348:2646�2655.
58 Badenhoop K: Microchimerism and the
model of postpartum thyroiditis; in Wiersinga
WM, Drexhage HA, Weetman AP, et
al (eds): The Thyroid and Autoimmunity:
Merck European Thyroid Symposium
Noordwijk 2006, June 15�18. Stuttgart,
Thieme, 2007, pp 99�103.
59 Szabolcs I: Clinical relevance of thyroid peroxidase
autoantibodies in euthyroid individuals;
in Wiersinga WM, Drexhage HA,
Weetman AP, et al (eds): The Thyroid and
Autoimmunity: Merck European Thyroid
Symposium Noordwijk 2006, June 15�18.
Stuttgart, Thieme, 2007, pp 133�142.
60 Saranac L, Miljkovic M, Stamenkovic H, Mileusnic-Milenovic
R, Petrovic G, Kamenov
B: Late onset transient thyroid dysfunction
in children born to mothers with autoimmune
thyroid disease. Facta Univ Ser Med
Biol 2003;10:52�56.

Close Accordion
Genetic Testing In Integrative And Functional Medicine

Genetic Testing In Integrative And Functional Medicine

Genetic: Integrative and functional medicine came to the forefront for many medical practitioners and patients alike when they

1-genetic-testing-integrative-and-functional-medicine-32570

became dissatisfied with traditional medicine�s sole focus on what was considered �science-based� treatment approaches. Traditional medicine�s viewpoint of dealing with symptoms in isolation from the rest of a patient�s body, mind, and spirit can be too confining when it comes to certain conditions.

This evolution to a more function-centered approach as opposed to a disease-centered way of seeing the whole person has led to improved healthcare. It also looks at prevention, not simply illness and at living in a healthy state, not simply disease-free.

What Is Integrative & Functional Medicine?

Practitioners of integrative and functional medicine take into consideration genetic, environmental, and lifestyle issues when listening to their patients describe the symptoms plaguing them. Their inclusion of these issues makes the process more of a natural medicine approach.

With the dramatic increase in chronic illness conditions and the lack of training traditional physicians have in dealing with these conditions, the move into integrative and functional medicine is needed.

Many of these chronic illness conditions have a genetic component that, along with environmental and lifestyle factors, lead to serious limitations on people�s lives. This shows the importance of the individual biochemical and genetic aspects of each person on his or her health.

This other approach in medicine realizes the necessity of considering nutrition, exercise, diet, and genetics in evaluating and remediating chronic illness conditions. The use of genetic testing in integrative and functional medicine is one way to take all of these factors into account.

SNPs & Integrative & Functional Medicine

Upon completion of the mapping of the human genome, we know there are 20-25,000 genes in each genome. With this knowledge came the information that there are over 80 million variants in the human genome.

These variants are comprised in part of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and deletions or insertions in the genome. It is these SNPs that provide significant health information to providers of integrative and functional medicine to prevent or alleviate chronic illness conditions.

Knowing the presence of and placement of SNPs through genetic point mutation testing allows evaluation of the susceptibility to develop many of the chronic illness conditions that affect people today. In addition, this kind of testing helps pinpoint relevant SNPs and their corresponding metabolic markers in individuals.

Testing of this kind provides targeted interventions through the use of traditional medicine approaches as well as supplementation through integrative and functional medicine approaches. Monitoring of individuals� progress is also made easier with genetic testing by measuring metabolic markers found in the original tests over a period of time.

Individual monitoring of this type is necessary when this kind of personalized intervention and supplementation is used. If there is an overload of either medications or supplementations, there can be an impact on the performance of metabolic processes that can lead to side effects. These side effects can influence functions and responses, such as the immune response.

Individual SNPs will determine how well medications and supplements are working.

Genetic Testing In Relation To Diet & Weight Loss

Integrative and functional medicine practitioners not only deal with illness, they also provide health and wellness evaluations. Current research has shown how important a role genetics plays in the prevention of many chronic health conditions.

Genetic testing can show vulnerabilities to conditions and suggest options for individuals. This kind of testing can also provide valuable information concerning how individuals can respond to different attempts to live more healthy lives.

Genetic testing has been shown to be effective in several areas: diet, eating behavior traits, nutritional needs, exercise, body and weight, and metabolic health. For each of these areas, there are certain genetic markers that can provide information regarding how genetics will affect each of these areas.

Diet

2-weight-obsession-integrative-and-functional-medicine-32570People are seemingly obsessed with weight. How to lose it and keep it off, how to re-distribute it to look more attractive. Professionals in integrative and functional medicine are approached regularly for help in this area.

Everyone knows it�s hard for some people to lose weight on any kind of diet, while others can lose weight any time they want. It�s not just due to lack of willpower that people don�t lose the weight they want. It may also be due to genetics.

Research has shown about 88 percent of people have bodies that resist burning fat through low-intensity exercise. Most people will gain weight if they eat almost any carbs (about 45 percent of people) or almost any fat (about 39 percent of people).

The reason for this is a diet and type of exercise matched to specific genotype lead to weight loss. These diets and exercise types are not the same for everyone.

For example, let�s look at adrenoceptor Beta 3 (ADRB3) with an SNP on rs4994. There are different variations of this gene. If you are either an AA or TT genotype, you have what is called a genetic privilege and just about any kind of exercise will work for you. On the other hand, if you don�t have either of these AA or TT genotypes, this is a genetic disprivilege and only a high-intensity type exercise will help you lose weight.

Further analysis of other genes and SNPs can tell you the type of diet, either low carb or low fat, that will work best for you. In fact, using a diet matched to your genetics can result in a loss of two and half times as much weight as a diet not matched to genetics.

In addition to choosing the right diet to lose weight, choosing the right diet may also help you avoid developing a chronic health condition. Research has shown diet to be implicated in many chronic illness conditions, so genetic testing to determine your specific vulnerability to illnesses and your response to particular foods may help prevent them.

Knowing your predisposition to illnesses can lead to targeted dietary and lifestyle changes that may modify any existing conditions and help prevent future developments. Future research may bring more information regarding bioavailable components in foods that can aid in alleviating health issues.

COMT & CYP19 Genes

3-dna-test-integrative-and-functional-medicine-32570Research has identified certain genes that work together and appear to show that some people retain fat regardless of, or in spite of, exercise.

In one study, researchers found two genes, COMT and CYP19 that appeared to be involved in patterns of fat loss and exercise. Having one CYP19 gene and variants of that gene did not affect fat, intra-abdominal fat, or total fat. However, having two of these genes seemed to be related to slightly more decrease in body mass index and significantly more decrease in total fat and percentage of body fat.

The researchers also found that having one genotype of the COMT gene and one copy of the CYP19 gene seemed related to significant loss of BMI, total fat, and percentage of body fat.

Why and how these genes and combinations work isn�t known yet. More research is needed to determine this. Other research suggests women with a specific CYP19 variant may also have increased levels of estradiol and estrone which may make it harder for them to lose fat through exercise.

Environmental Factors

Weight loss or gain is not solely at the mercy of your genetics however. A combination of genetics and environment is likely behind your success or failure regarding your weight loss attempts.

The thinking of professionals is divided on the subject of genetics versus environment/lifestyle choices. One set of these professionals regards environment to be the telling component. They point to the teaching over the years that food is a reward for good performance at anything. This, combined with constant reminders about food that are around us all the time, makes it hard for some people to lose weight and/or keep it off.

Others believe losing weight and keeping it off are more related to biological functions. They have found people to be metabolically different after losing up to ten percent of their body weight. Their brains also seem to respond to food differently. The emotional response to food is greater, but the brain regions that deal with food restraint are less active. This sets up the person to regain the weight lost.

Further research into why people lose weight and maintain that loss will be needed. Some of that research has to be on the genetic basis of weight loss.

Eating Behavior

4-diet-study-integrative-and-functional-medicine-32570Integrative and functional medicine practitioners view eating behavior as important for overall health.�These behaviors include snacking behavior, feelings of satiety, craving for sweets, desire for food or certain foods, and the disinhibition of eating.

Nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics are two new fields of study related to how genes affect our diet and how our diet affects genes, respectively. Obesity, cancer, and heart disease are three of the health conditions most investigated in these two new fields.

One study involving these new fields showed the bitter taste gene receptor hTAS2R38 to be involved in tasting glucosinolates, found in some fruits and vegetables. Three genotypes in this gene receptor have been identified: PAV/PAV, PAV/AVI, and AVI/AVI.

Those individuals with PAV/PAV are said to be supertasters. They are very sensitive to bitter tastes in some foods and in some man-made compounds used in research. People with PAV/AVI are considered medium tasters. They can taste bitter in the research compounds, but not as much as the supertasters. Individuals with AVI/AVI are labeled non-tasters. They don�t taste bitter in the research compounds.

While it�s difficult to completely understand why these differences occur, it does appear they can make a difference in people�s diets. It could be that people who taste bitter greatly or somewhat will avoid certain vegetables that contain this bitter taste. Vegetables like kale and broccoli have this taste.

In this way, genetics have a significant influence on eating behavior.

5-kale-integrative-and-functional-medicine-32570Research indicates taste is only one of the ways genetics affects eating behavior. Caloric intake, meal size, and frequency of eating also appear to be affected. People�s desire for fats, carbohydrates, or proteins also may be influenced by genetics.

Research has found apolipoprotein A-II (APOA2) to be implicated in this kind of desire. Three variants in this gene, TT, TC, and CC, have been isolated as factors affecting the choice of fats, carbs, and proteins. One study showed both men and women who had the recessive CC chose more fat and protein and fewer carbs than either of the T alleles. The CC group ate about 200 more calories than the other group and tended to develop obesity more frequently.

It appears that APOA2 may affect not only food choices but also feelings of satiety.

Nontasters seem to prefer and seek out fats and flavors, so dieting may be more difficult for them to stick with and lose weight. Supertasters, on the other hand, enjoy a variety of foods, especially those that are spicy and robust. This may help them with diets.

Understanding the factors that appear to influence eating behaviors has gained importance with the tremendous increase in obesity in the U.S. and around the world, along with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Eating behavior must be seen as a complex inter-relationship among psychological, cultural, physical, and genetic factors that influence the choice of foods, the amount of food intake, caloric intake, and timing of meals.

Regulating Eating Behavior

Clearly, taste affects food choices as seen in the discussion above. Another of the bitter receptors, TAS2R5, may also assist in regulating eating behavior. Alcohol dependence has been associated with an SNP in this receptor, along with another receptor, TAS2R16. These research findings seem to indicate variants in the TAS2R gene to be associated with ingestive behavior.

Genetic influence over meal amounts, how often people eat, and the timing of meals is a new area of study and may involve digestive neuroendocrine hormones such as CCK, leptin, and ghrelin. Studies are underway investigating the effects of these hormones on pathways that influence eating behavior.

A gene with a strong association with the risk of obesity, FTO, appears to contribute to obesity by downregulating leptin production in adipocytes. Adiposity and satiety appear to be associated with a fairly common variant, rs9939609. One study showed the A allele of rs9939609 to influence post-meal feelings of satiety and possibly to influence the excess caloric intake seen in men and women with high BMIs.

A gene involved in the detoxification of nutrients during digestion, AKR1B10, also appears to play a role in influencing human eating behavior.

Nutritional Needs & Genetic Testing

Another area in which integrative and functional medicine practitioners use genetic testing is in�determining nutritional needs of their patients. As we have seen previously, genetic variants have an effect on taste and thus on nutrition. When people choose foods that �fit� their tastes but are short on nutrients, their health suffers. People also appear to have genetic responses to some supplements, such as some of the B vitamins and vitamin C.

The impact of nutrition is a lifetime factor, and practitioners of integrative and functional medicine evaluate nutritional needs closely. Any genetic variant that leads to abnormal nutritional requirements would likely be incompatible with survival. For example, miscarriage is more likely in a woman whose fetus has two alleles that negatively affect the use of any given nutrient than a woman whose fetus just has the common functional variants.

Several studies have isolated genes and alleles that affect nutrients and their utilization. For example, an SNP (Ala222Val) in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene leads to a significant alteration in folate metabolism, increasing the risk of neural tube defects (NTDs) and cardiovascular disease, but lowering the risk of colon cancer. Increasing folate intake lowers the risks of developing serious health conditions.

Research has found other SNPs that alter homocysteine metabolism and folate uptake and transport. SNPs in enzymes that affect utilization and metabolism of vitamin B12 seem to be associated with NTDs and the possible development of Down syndrome and colon cancer.

SNPs in the vitamin D receptor may be associated with asthma in both children and adults. Lipid pathways, alcohol metabolism, and lactose metabolism appear to be affected by SNPs in other genes, also. A beneficial effect of these SNPs in the ancestors of certain ethnic groups or ancestral subpopulations may have been present, even though they tend to carry the risk of an adverse outcome today.

Environmental changes have been shown to bring a previously silent allele into a role as a disease allele. The aldolase B enzyme metabolizes fructose and was silent even with a high number of polymorphisms. In recent times, when fructose was added to foods as a sweetener, the polymorphisms began presenting as disease alleles.

Integrative and functional medicine professionals can use this information to guide their patients into more healthy lives.

Genetic Testing & Exercise

6-fitness-test-integrative-and-functional-medicine-32570Integrative and functional medicine also uses genetic testing to determine the best types of exercise for different people and to explore the likelihood of injuries of several kinds in athletes. This latter area of research and clinical practice can help reduce the number and severity of athletic injuries for adult and child athletes.

While there have been some gene variants associated with athletic ability, none have been shown to be predictive to any degree. Research in this area is promising for decreasing serious injury in young athletes. But to date, little scientific information regarding a genetic variation in young athletes is available.

Genetic testing as a way of choosing which athlete to select for a particular sport is increasing. However, little evidence has been found to show it is more accurate than traditional ways of selecting candidates. The ethics of this kind of testing for young athletes has been brought into question.

ACE Genes

Two genes and the SNPs associated with them have been examined in several population samples and thus have robust findings. The ACE I/D polymorphism was first found to be associated with human performance several years ago. This gene is part of the renin-angiotensin system that controls blood pressure through its effect on the regulation of body fluid levels.

The ACE I allele lowers ACE activity in serum and tissue. The D allele increases ACE activity in serum and tissue. The ACE I/I genotype has been shown over and over again to indicate performance endurance and greater efficiency in exercise. The ACE DD genotype has been shown to indicate strength and power performance levels.

This ACE I/D genotype does not appear to have predictive ability in Kenyan athletes, suggesting the confounding influence of ethnicity or geography.

ACTN3 Gene

7-endurance-athletes-integrative-and-functional-medicine-32570The ACTN3 is strongly associated with the protein alpha-actinin-3. This protein is involved exclusively in fast type II muscle fibers that are used in explosive activities. SNP R577X indicates a stop codon at position 577 rather than an arginine (R). An R allele puts athletes at an advantage in power sports. A study of the ACTN3 R577X variant in elite European athletes showed those in power event to be 50 percent less likely to have the XX variant and those involved in endurance events to be 1.88 times more likely to have the XX variant. For world-class endurance athletes, the odds of having the XX variant were 3.7 times larger when compared with lower-level athletes. It appears the ACTN3 gene is more important at the upper levels of sports.

While research shows the effects of the ACTN3 gene on athletic performance, especially in higher class athletes, the effects in the general population were negligible. It is unclear just what the association of this gene in the general population and choice of athletic activities in this population might be.

Resistance to injury and the ability to recover from injuries are also very important factors not only in professional sports but also for the general population. The emphasis on physical activity currently seen in the culture increases the risk of injury and the need for information regarding recovery.

Concussions and tendinopathies have been studied fairly extensively. Information on these two growing areas of injury among young athletes has been valuable for integrative and functional medicine specialists.

These two areas are important due to the long-lasting effects of both on young athletes. Research and clinical practice have shown the effects of concussion to linger into old age where they can increase the cognitive decline normally seen at that time of life.

APOE4 Gene

A better understanding of the genetic aspects of injury and recovery can help practitioners of integrative and functional medicine to both protect those young athletes at risk for injury and to better treat those who suffer injuries.

Regarding concussion, the gene most studied is APOE and its three alleles. The APOE e4 allele has been implicated in the development of Alzheimer�s Disease. This allele has been studied recently to determine its association, if any, with concussion risk and outcomes of traumatic brain injury. To date, the results are not clear.

Some findings have shown people with the e4 allele to have less favorable outcomes from traumatic brain injuries and boxers with this allele had higher chronic brain injury scores. These findings are consistent with e4 being a risk allele. However, one study of college athletes with the e4 allele did not find them to be more likely to suffer a concussion. Another study showed the e4 allele was not associated with poorer head trauma outcomes in children.

Another APOE variant, G-219T, has been linked with increased risk of concussion in athletes. Those athletes with the TT genotype compared to those with the GG genotype had a risk of concussion three times larger. A weak association was found in that same study between the tSer53Pro polymorphism in MAPT, the tau-protein encoding gene, and risk of concussion.

Collagen Genes, Integrative &Functional Medicine

Collagen is the primary component of tendons and ligaments, thus it is connected very closely with research into tendinopathies. It is no surprise that two variants in genes coding for collagen (COL1A1 and COL5A1) have been shown to suggest increased risk of injury to tendons. MMP3, a gene associated with connective tissue wound repair and the gene encoding TNC, an extracellular matrix protein, have also been implicated in increased risk of tendinopathies.

These are preliminary studies that need replication and further study to validate the findings.

Genetic Testing & Metabolic Health

8-cardiovascular-integrative-and-functional-medicine-32570Metabolic syndrome and metabolic health have been studied extensively due to metabolic syndrome being a major risk factor for the development of diabetes mellitus 1 and cardiovascular disease. Genetic and environmental factors interrelate in a complex fashion to bring about this condition. A cluster of metabolic abnormalities, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, and impaired glucose tolerance make up metabolic syndrome.

All of the components of metabolic syndrome are highly heritable. Studies have shown links between metabolic syndrome and genes such as PPARg, adiponectin, CD36, and beta receptors.

There has been a considerable investigation into the heritability of metabolic syndrome. One study involved over 2,200 individuals in over 500 family groups. It was the first to identify major genes influencing metabolic syndrome.

Chromosome 3q27 was significantly linked to six factors involved in metabolic syndrome: weight, leptin, insulin, waist circumference, hip circumference, and insulin/glucose ratio. Chromosome 17p12 was strongly linked to plasma leptin levels.

Another study evaluated over 200 SNPs in 110 genes for their effects on coronary artery disease, highly implicated in metabolic syndrome. SNPs in eight of these genes showed association with metabolic syndrome: LDLR, GBE1, IL1R1, TGFB1, IL6, COL5A2, SELE and LIPC.

These genes are described below:

  • LDLR: Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor gene. It is strongly involved in the homeostasis of cholesterol. Hypercholesterolemia in families has been linked to mutations of this gene.
  • GBE1: Glycogen Branching Enzyme gene. It is involved in coding the glycogen branching enzyme which aids in glycogen synthesis. Branching of these chains allows a great number of glycosyl units to be stored in a molecule of glycogen.
  • IL1R1: Interleukin 1 Receptor, Type 1. Interleukin 1 is made up of two proteins, IL1-alpha and IL1-beta, and is a mediator of inflammation.
  • TGFB1: Transforming Growth Factor, Beta 1. This gene encodes the peptide involved in many functions in cells. Apoptosis may result due to dysregulation of the activation of this gene.
  • IL6: Interleukin 6 gene. It is a cytokine that regulates the immune response by activating a cell surface signaling assembly. Its production by neoplastic cells has been implicated in the growth of a number of cancers.
  • COL5A2: Collagen, Type V, Alpha 2. Mutations in the gene may bring on weakened connective tissue throughout the body.
    SELE: Selectin E gene. May be involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.

Some of the more common inherited metabolic conditions include:

  • Lysosomal storage disorders. These can result in the buildup of toxic substances inside lysosomes in the cells.
  • Glycogen storage conditions. Sugar storage problems can lead to weakness, low blood sugar, and muscle pain.
  • Mitochondrial disorders: Can lead to muscle damage.
  • Peroxisomal disorders: Can lead to a buildup of toxic products of metabolism.
  • Metal metabolism disorders: Special proteins control levels of trace metals in the blood. A malfunction in these proteins caused by genetic metabolism disorders can lead to toxic levels of metals in the body.

Symptoms of genetic metabolism disorders include:

  • Low energy levels
  • Decreased appetite
  • Abdominal pain
  • Weight loss
  • Jaundice
  • Seizures

From this list of symptoms, it�s easy to see the relationship�of metabolic syndrome and adrenal fatigue. Practitioners of integrative and functional medicine will be faced with patients who present with adrenal fatigue and these similar symptoms. This makes it important for them to understand at least the basics behind Adrenal Fatigue Syndrome (AFS).

Adrenal Fatigue Syndrome

9-lethargy-integrative-and-functional-medicine-32570Feelings of fatigue and lethargy are presented more and more frequently in health care professionals� offices. Combined with concentration difficulties, sleep problems, inability to lose weight, feeling your brain is in a fog, fatigue, and lethargy may point to AFS as the basic issue.

AFS is a constellation of many nonspecific symptoms that can become debilitating. The onset of the symptoms is slow and can be missed by traditionally trained professionals.

The symptoms of AFS result from�the body�s normal response to stress�from any source. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is set into motion, releasing hormones and other chemicals that are designed to deal with stress. At the end of the axis are the adrenal glands that secrete cortisol, the stress fighting hormone. The purpose of this hormone is to limit the effects of stress on the body.

In normal circumstances, once the stress ceases, the cortisol levels decline and the adrenals get a chance to recover. However, in our stress-filled culture, the stresses continue. This puts the demand on the adrenals at an extreme level. At some point, the adrenals are no longer able to secrete cortisol, which results in damage to the body from the effects of stress.

Levels of inflammation and an increased immune response results. Inflammation has been implicated in many chronic illness conditions. It is at this point that the body begins breaking down from the accumulation of symptoms such as fatigue, brain fog, insulin resistance, and increasing inflammation.

NeuroEndoMetabolic (NEM) Response

The traditional medical viewpoint of addressing individual symptoms and/or organs when working to alleviate illness conditions is simply too mechanistic. A more comprehensive viewpoint is needed in order to effectively deal with symptoms of AFS. The NEM model is such a viewpoint.

The model says it is important to consider organ systems operating in an interrelationship in which whatever affects one organ system affects others as well. In this regard, it is in line with�the integrative and functional medicine viewpoint.

The NEM model is a functional approach that looks at interactions between the individual�s environment and the gastrointestinal, endocrine, and metabolic organ systems, among others. This allows a healthcare practitioner to find the root causes, triggers, immediate causes, and genetic factors involved in a person�s illness condition.

This is a much more comprehensive approach to alleviating people�s symptoms and illness conditions.

10-endocrine-integrative-and-functional-medicine-32570Increasing and unrelenting stress is a part of our culture that is detrimental to the health of every individual. The metabolic component of the NEM model added to the neuroendocrine aspect helps professionals to see how localized organ-specific responses and systemic responses are necessary for successfully dealing with stress.

The metabolic component of our stress response is very subtle in the early stages. But the derangements of our metabolism worsen as time goes on and stress doesn�t stop. By the time the stress response reaches stage 3 or 4, these derangements can become debilitating. At the severe stage, they can lead to hypersensitivity to supplements and to paradoxical reactions.

Very significant and debilitating symptoms begin arising. Often, these lead the person to be bed-ridden due to their severity.

AFS & Genetics

A question integrative and functional medicine experts and those who suffer from AFS all want to know is: Can you inherit AFS?

Before answering that question, you need to understand even if you have a gene or several genes that are involved in a health condition like AFS, it doesn�t mean you will automatically get that condition. Before genes can do anything, either positive or negative, to your health, they have to get the signal to �switch on.�

One good thing about that signal is you have quite a bit of control over it. Scientists and researchers have discovered environment, choices you can make, exert significant control over whether genes are turned on or off. This is called gene expression.

Can you choose to switch specific genes on or off? That�s beyond us at this point. What you can do is make good lifestyle choices, good exercise choices, good diet choices and either activate or de-activate genes in this way. Genetic testing as seen in integrative and functional medicine practices is a way to determine your choices in many areas. Which diet works best for you and what exercises will best benefit you can be answered through this kind of testing.

Answering the specific question posed above, �Can you inherit AFS?�, is a complicated process.

Two genes with significant involvement in this answer are MTHFR and COMT. Both are involved with methylfolate. People with mutations in MTHFR don�t have enough methylfolate leading to less adrenaline because of interference in the methylation process. Methylation aids in the production of adrenaline and other hormones.

The other gene, COMT, is involved in the production of hormones and chemicals in the body. Low levels of methylfolate with this gene leads to lower levels of epinephrine and higher levels of norepinephrine.

The lack of methylfolate with both of these genes, especially MTHFR, leads to feelings of fatigue.

When your body is stricken by stress, both your adrenals and MTHFR are affected. This leads to the fatigue felt by those of you who suffer from AFS. The enzyme that produces dopamine and serotonin is also dependent on methylation to work right. Low levels of methylfolate can lead to low levels of both of these neurochemicals which can then lead to low energy and fatigue.

What Can You Do To Improve Energy Levels?

There are some things you can do to aid in increasing energy and improving the work of the two genes mentioned, MTHFR and COMT.

Balance your blood sugar levels by eating three or four small meals per day. These meals should include good grains like quinoa or rice, good carbs, and vegetables. You can add protein from fish or free-range chicken.

Supplements can help support your adrenal glands and the methylation process also. Vitamin B1, B2, and B6 will help. There are usually no side effects from vitamin B1, but if you should begin feeling any itching, notice any rashes, or have trouble breathing, contact your healthcare professional immediately.

Side effects from B2 are also rare. Very yellow urine will be seen, but this is not serious. If you do have any rashes, breathing trouble, or itching, contact your physician at once.

Taken in large doses for a long time, B6 can cause side effects. Headache, nausea, and drowsiness are enough to contact your healthcare professional at once.

Some people try taking methylfolate (5-MTHF), but this is a labor-intensive effort and could bring on some serious side effects if your body is not ready for it. If your body gets overwhelmed by the 5-MTHF, you can feel headaches, irritability, anxiety, and heart palpitations. Get medical help right away for these side effects.

Despite advance testing, it is important to remember that tests are simply data points of alert. A clinical decision should be made after a detailed consideration of the history and state of the body. A shotgun approach to treating abnormal laboratory values is a common clinical mistake and can lead to negative clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

11-genome-mapping-integrative-and-functional-medicine-32570The mapping of the human genome has provided an opportunity for researchers and clinicians alike to consider the roles genes play in health and wellness. Discovering the presence and effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) has increased not only our knowledge of how genes affect health, but also has given us tools to use in preventing and remediating many chronic illness conditions.

Integrative and functional medicine practitioners have been among the professionals to use this information in a practical sense. Whether AFS can be inherited is yet to be seen. Clinically, we do see a strong correlation from one generation to the next.

Genetic testing to examine the working of MTHFR and COMT may be of some help. Diet and supplements can also increase your chances of these two genes working correctly and alleviating some of the symptoms of AFS.

Because genetic testing is still in the very early phase of development, it is important to take all data points with the right perspective and refrain from treating abnormal laboratory numbers while the root cause of the problem can be masked.

read more button

� Copyright 2017 Michael Lam, M.D. All Rights Reserved.

Can A Gluten-Free Diet Relieve Joint Pain?

Can A Gluten-Free Diet Relieve Joint Pain?

Gluten Free: During a visit to my orthopedist I made a confession: �I stopped eating gluten and�this might sound a little crazy, but�a lot of my joint pain disappeared.

She smiled broadly and said, �You�re not the first person to say that.�

See�How Gluten Can Cause Joint Pain

gluten free continental-breakfast

Giving up gluten may be difficult, but it could lead to less joint pain.� Learn more:�What Are Anti-Inflammatory Foods?

I stopped eating gluten because couple of friends suggested it might relieve some unexplained symptoms I was experiencing, like fatigue and mild joint pain. I had strong doubts, but my primary care doctor and I had run out of ideas (I was waiting to see a specialist), so I figured I had nothing to lose.

See�Rheumatoid Arthritis and Fatigue

Within a week of going on a gluten-free diet, my fatigue, joint pain, and many other symptoms disappeared.

The Connection Between Gluten & Joint Pain

It turns out, researchers have long known that people with autoimmune forms of arthritis, such as�rheumatoid�

gluten free

arthritis�and�psoriatic arthritis, are at higher risk for celiac disease,1, 2�an autoimmune disorder triggered by gluten.

See�Inflammatory Arthritis

More recently, medical experts have begun to acknowledge the connection between gluten and joint pain described as non-pathologic (unrelated to disease).

Both my orthopedist and primary care provider agree that my gluten-free diet is probably keeping my joint pain and other

symptoms of inflammation in check.

See�An Anti-Inflammatory Diet for Arthritis

 

Wait, Don�t Go Gluten Free Yet�

Before you throw away your pasta and cereal in search of joint pain relief, consider these factors:

    • Going gluten free isn�t for everyone.�
      Whole grains are a recommended part of a healthy diet. No research suggests everyone should start eating a gluten free diet. But for people experiencing painful joint inflammation, eliminating gluten and other �pro-inflammatory� foods may be one treatment approach to consider.

      See�The Ins and Outs of an Anti-Inflammatory Diet

    • Food products labeled �gluten free� aren�t necessarily healthy.�
      It�s almost always better to eat whole foods as opposed to processed foods that are gluten-free, but still full of sugar or saturated fats. For example, skip the gluten-free sugar cereal and make yourself a bowl of gluten-free oatmeal or a fruit smoothie for breakfast.
    • Eating a gluten-free diet isn�t a magic bullet.�
      Adopting other healthy habits, such as making time for exercise, is essential to eliminating joint pain.

      See�Managing RA Fatigue Through Diet and Exercise

    • A health professional can help.It�s always a good idea to tell yourdoctor about lifestyle changes, including achange in diet. A doctor may refer you to a registered dietician who can recommend certain foods, helping ensure you get enough nutrients and fiber in your gluten-free diet.

See�Arthritis Treatment Specialists

  • You might experience gluten withdrawal.Many people report that their inflammatory symptoms initially got worse after starting their gluten free diet. This withdrawal stage can last days or even weeks, so you may not want to go gluten free right before a big event, like a vacation, holiday, or the start of a newjob.

No single treatment or lifestyle habit can eliminate the symptoms of arthritis, but going gluten-free may be an option worth trying as part of your overall treatment plan.

By�Jennifer Flynn

Learn More

Turmeric and Curcumin for Arthritis

Dietary Supplements for Treating Arthritis

References

  1. Rath, L. The Connection Between Gluten and Arthritis. The Arthritis Foundation.�http://www.arthritis.org/living-with-arthritis/arthritis-diet/anti-infla…Accessed August 20, 2015.
  2. Barton SH, Murray JA. Celiac disease and autoimmunity in the gut and elsewhere. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2008;37(2):411-28, vii.
Remedies For Joint Pain And Adrenal Fatigue

Remedies For Joint Pain And Adrenal Fatigue

Fatigue & Pain Of Unknown Origin (PUKO)

If you have fatigue and mysterious pain in your joints, muscles, and ligaments that seems to come out of nowhere, you are not alone: many people throughout the world face such issues, which are often disabling. Thousands of people per year visit their doctor in hopes of isolating the cause of such pain; most of them have tried traditional and over-the-counter remedies for joint pain to no avail.

Joint pain can be caused by a variety of accidents or existing conditions: it can be the consequence of a fall, structural issues, twisted ligaments, pulled muscles, or an underlying inflammatory condition, among other possibilities. These obvious causes are easily diagnosed by conventional methods. However, pain can also appear spontaneously, with no apparent cause and clean medical workup, making the etiology uncertain. Such pain can be associated with Adrenal Fatigue.

Migratory Pain

For those who suffer from Adrenal Fatigue, some of this pain might be migratory. Migratory pain is a type of pain that moves throughout the body with no discernible pattern. One day you may feel pain in the right side of your body, but the next day you may feel it in the left side. All too often, this type of mobile pain of unknown origin comes with underlying symptoms of Adrenal Fatigue and does not usually respond to typical remedies for joint pain, baffling doctors and many other medical practitioners.

After telling your doctor about the pain you are experiencing, he or she will likely perform a variety of tests, perhaps including an x-ray scan. More often than not, the results may seem perfectly normal, and yet the pain persists. Your doctor may decide that you have fibromyalgia, however, your pain may actually be due to Adrenal Fatigue. In those with Adrenal Fatigue Syndrome (AFS), the body is in a state of tiredness caused by advanced and chronic stress. This stress strains the adrenal glands and�disrupts the NeuroEndoMetabolic (NEM) stress response, which is the body�s main mechanism of dealing with stress.

NEM & Remedies For Joint Pain

lethargy-remedies-for-joint-pain-22589-2

The NEM stress response is a complex system in which organs and bodily systems work together to protect the body from excessive stress. The system includes six types of stress responses: inflammatory, neuro-active, cardiac, hormonal, metabolic, and detoxifying. Together, these responses work to restore the body�s normal function during times of heavy stress. It is important that remedies for joint pain do not disrupt this complex system.

The�adrenal glands are the main control�center for stress responses outside the nervous system. Your body has two adrenal glands, which are about the size of a walnut, located directly above the kidneys. They control your body�s responses by secreting cortisol, a hormone that helps your body cope with stress. Properly functioning adrenal glands are a keystone to overall health and wellbeing. Due to today�s high-stress society, however, this natural defense can easily become disrupted, allowing toxins to accumulate and do great damage to the body. Excessive and chronic stress can overburden the adrenal glands, inhibiting hormone output and causing the body�s natural coping mechanisms to fail.

As stress and fatigue advance, new symptoms and ailments associated with Adrenal Fatigue will emerge. Early stage symptoms include low blood pressure, insomnia, and lethargy; advanced stage symptoms include anxiety, panic disorders, heart palpitations, low libido, hypersensitivities to medication, and food sensitivities. All of these symptoms can negatively affect your daily life. Eventually, as the NEM stress response fails, even the smallest bodily stresses can seem unbearable because your body�s natural coping mechanisms have been slowed and overloaded.

The Detoxification & Inflammation Circuits

The liver is�the body�s primary detoxification organ, aided by the extracellular matrix. A buildup of toxins and metabolites will therefore occur when the liver slows down to conserve energy. This is the body�s way of conserving the nutritional reserves it has left. As your body slows down, your liver becomes more sluggish and levels of toxins and metabolites increase, often leading to inflammation. These toxins accumulate and are not eliminated efficiently. This accumulation causes many other problems because the blood circulates these metabolites throughout the body constantly and rapidly, with a one-minute cycle.

Some of these metabolites can be quite toxic to the body. These metabolites may trigger inflammation, which in turn can trigger pain. Upon reaching the joints, these metabolites may become �stuck,� meaning they are slow to move through the joints and muscles. If your joints or muscles are already inflamed, the toxins and metabolites will further irritate the muscles, causing additional inflammation.

The Inflammation Circuit consists of the gut, microbiome, and immune system.�The gastrointestinal tract and microbiome�play an important role in breaking down and absorbing metabolites. If you are constantly eating unhealthy foods that your body can�t handle, you may trigger inflammatory responses. If you are constipated, and food is rotting in your intestines for long periods of time, then you are at higher risk of inflammation. This inflammation causes pain in random places because of the buildup of metabolites in the bloodstream. This also slows the immune system, because it has to deal with the extra toxins, compounding the inflammation.

If you experience migrating pain, this is an important clue that the cause of the pain may be metabolic, rather than structural (such as the strain of a ligament or muscle, which is usually more confined to a certain area). If you experience a dull to slightly severe pain of unknown origin that seems to migrate throughout the body and no one can seem to give you a direct answer as to the cause, you may be suffering from Adrenal Fatigue Syndrome. Consider metabolites, examine your stress levels, and investigate your diet, including supplements. In rare cases, some medications and supplements�even those often used as a remedies for joint pain�can trigger inflammation that is fundamentally caused by Adrenal Fatigue.�Pain medications may help temporarily, but they tend to hide the underlying condition, and can cause collateral damage. Remember, pain is a sign of an underlying problem. Suppressing or ignoring pain can cause long-term damage if the cause is not addressed.

Remedies For Joint Pain: Conclusion

physiotherapy-remedies-for-joint-pain-22589-3Joint pain of unknown origin can cause a myriad of debilitating problems, including the additional stress of trying to find effective remedies for joint pain. It can be a scary and confusing time, especially when test results show no abnormalities and your doctor can�t figure out what�s wrong. It�s important to find and address the cause of the inflammation. If you experience other concurring symptoms similar to those of Adrenal Fatigue, find a practitioner who can support your NEM stress response. Proper restorative strategies will help your body cope with both the stress and the pain.

By:�Dr. Michael Lam, MD, MPH;�Justin Lam, ABAAHP, FMNM

read more button

� Copyright 2016 Michael Lam, M.D. All Rights Reserved.

The Health Risks Of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods

The Health Risks Of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods

GMOs: We all know stories of tobacco, asbestos, and DDT. Originally declared safe, they caused widespread death and disease. Although their impact was vast, most of the population was spared. The same cannot be said for sweeping changes in the food supply. Everyone eats; everyone is affected. The increase in several diseases in North America may be due to the profound changes in our diet. The most radical change occurred a little over a decade ago when genetically modified (GM) crops were introduced. Their influence on health has been largely ignored, but recent studies show serious problems. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been linked to thousands of toxic or allergic-type reactions, thousands of sick, sterile, and dead livestock, and damage to virtually every organ and system studied in lab animals.1 Nearly every independent animal feeding safety study shows adverse or unexplained effects.

GM foods were made possible by a technology developed in the 1970s whereby genes from one species are forced into the DNA of other species. Genes produce proteins, which in turn can generate characteristics or traits. The promised traits associated with GMOs have been sky high�vegetables growing in the desert, vitamin fortified grains, and highly productive crops feeding the starving millions. None of these are available. In fact, the only two traits that are found in nearly all commericialized GM plants are herbicide tolerance and/or pesticide production.

Herbicide tolerant soy, corn, cotton, and canola plants are engineered with bacterial genes that allow them to survive otherwise deadly doses of herbicides. This gives farmers more flexibility in weeding and gives the GM seed company lots more profit. When farmers buy GM seeds, they sign a contract to buy only that seed producer�s brand of herbicide. Herbicide tolerant crops comprise about 80% of all GM plants. The other 20% are corn and cotton varieties that produce a pesticide in every cell. This is accomplished due to a gene from a soil bacterium called Bacillus thuringiensis or Bt, which produces a natural insect-killing poison called Bt- toxin. In addition to these two traits, there are also disease resistant GM Hawaiian papaya, zucchini and crook neck squash, which comprise well under 1% of GMO acreage.

GMOs: The FDA’s “Non-Regulation” Of GM Foods

GMOs Bell peppersRhetoric from the United States government since the early 1990s proclaims that GM foods are no different from their natural counterparts that have existed for centuries. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has labeled them �Generally Recognized as Safe,� or GRAS. This status allows a product to be commercialized without any additional testing. According to US law, to be considered GRAS the substance must be the subject of a substantial amount of peer-reviewed published studies (or equivalent) and there must be overwhelming consensus among the scientific community that the product is safe. GM foods had neither. Nonetheless, in a precedent-setting move in 1992 that some experts contend was illegal, the FDA declared that GM crops are GRAS as long as their producers say they are. Thus, the FDA does not require any safety evaluations or labeling of GMOs. A company can even introduce a GM food to the market without telling the agency.

Such a lenient approach was largely the result of the influence of large agricultural corporations According to Henry Miller, who had a leading role in biotechnology issues at the FDA from 1979 to 1994, �In this area, the US government agencies have done exactly what big agribusiness has asked them to do and told them to do.�2 The Ag biotech company with the greatest influence was clearly Monsanto. According to the New York Times, �What Monsanto wished for from Washington, Monsanto and, by extension, the biotechnology industry got. . . . When the company abruptly decided that it needed to throw off the regulations and speed its foods to market, the White House quickly ushered through an unusually generous policy of self-policing.�3

This policy was heralded by Vice President Dan Quayle on May 26, 1992. He chaired the Council on Competitiveness, which had identified GM crops as an industry that could boost US exports. To take advantage, Quayle announced �reforms� to �speed up and simplify the process of bringing� GM products to market without �being hampered by unnecessary regulation.�4 Three days later, the FDA policy on non-regulation was unveiled.

The person who oversaw its development was the FDA�s Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Michael Taylor, whose position had been created especially for him in 1991. Prior to that, Taylor was an outside attorney for both Monsanto and the Food Biotechnology Council. After working at the FDA, he became Monsanto�s vice president. The Obama administration has put Talyor back into the FDA as the US Food Safety Czar.

The FDA Covers Up Health Risks

GMOs FDA press conferenceTaylor�s GMO policy needed to create the impression that unintended effects from GM crops were not an issue. Otherwise their GRAS status would be undermined and they would need the extensive testing and labels that are normally required for food additives. But internal memos made public from a lawsuit showed that the overwhelming consensus among the agency scientists was that GM crops can have unpredictable, hard-to-detect side effects. Various departments and experts spelled these out in detail, listing allergies, toxins, nutritional effects, and new diseases as potential dangers. They urged superiors to require long-term safety studies.5 In spite of the warnings, according to public interest attorney Steven Druker who studied the FDA�s internal files, �References to the unintended negative effects of bioengineering were progressively deleted from drafts of the policy statement (over the protests of agency scientists).�6

FDA microbiologist Louis Pribyl, PhD, wrote about the policy, �What has happened to the scientific elements of this document? Without a sound scientific base to rest on, this becomes a broad, general, �What do I have to do to avoid trouble�-type document. . . . It will look like and probably be just a political document. . . . It reads very pro-industry, especially in the area of unintended effects.�7

The scientists� concerns were not only ignored, their very existence was denied. The official FDA policy stated, �The agency is not aware of any information showing that foods derived by these new methods differ from other foods in any meaningful or uniform way.�8 In sharp contrast, an internal FDA report stated, �The processes of genetic engineering and traditional breeding are different and according to the technical experts in the agency, they lead to different risks.�9 The FDA�s deceptive notion of no difference was coined �substantial equivalence� and formed the basis of the US government position on GMOs.

Many scientists and organizations have criticized the US position. The National Academy of Sciences and even the pro-GM Royal Society of London10 describe the US system as inadequate and flawed. The editor of the prestigious journal Lancet said, �It is astounding that the US Food and Drug Administration has not changed their stance on genetically modified food adopted in 1992. . . . The policy is that genetically modified crops will receive the same consideration for potential health risks as any other new crop plant. This stance is taken despite good reasons to believe that specific risks may exist. . . . Governments should never have allowed these products into the food chain without insisting on rigorous testing for effects on health.�11 The Royal Society of Canada described substantial equivalence as �scientifically unjustifiable and inconsistent with precautionary regulation of the technology.� 12

GMOs Are Inherently Unsafe

safety signThere are several reasons why GM plants present unique dangers. The first is that the process of genetic engineering itself creates unpredicted alterations, irrespective of which gene is transferred. The gene insertion process, for example, is accomplished by either shooting genes from a �gene gun� into a plate of cells, or using bacteria to infect the cell with foreign DNA. Both create mutations in and around the insertion site and elsewhere.13 The �transformed� cell is then cloned into a plant through a process called tissue culture, which results in additional hundreds or thousands of mutations throughout the plants� genome. In the end, the GM plant�s DNA can be a staggering 2-4% different from its natural parent.14 Native genes can be mutated, deleted, or permanently turned on or off. In addition, the insertion process causes holistic and not-well-understood changes among large numbers of native genes. One study revealed that up to 5% of the natural genes altered their levels of protein expression as a result of a single insertion.

The Royal Society of Canada acknowledged that �the default prediction� for GM crops would include �a range of collateral changes in expression of other genes, changes in the pattern of proteins produced and/or changes in metabolic activities.�15 Although the FDA scientists evaluating GMOs in 1992 were unaware of the extent to which GM DNA is damaged or changed, they too described the potential consequences. They reported, �The possibility of unexpected, accidental changes in genetically engineered plants� might produce �unexpected high concentrations of plant toxicants.�16 GM crops, they said, might have �increased levels of known naturally occurring toxins,� and the �appearance of new, not previously identified� toxins.17 The same mechanism can also produce allergens, carcinogens, or substances that inhibit assimilation of nutrients.

Most of these problems would pass unnoticed through safety assessments on GM foods, which are largely designed on the false premise that genes are like Legos that cleanly snap into place. But even if we disregard unexpected changes in the DNA for the moment, a proper functioning inserted gene still carries significant risk. Its newly created GM protein, such as the Bt-toxin, may be dangerous for human health (see below). Moreover, even if that protein is safe in its natural organism, once it is transferred into a new species it may be processed differently. A harmless protein may be transformed into a dangerous or deadly version. This happened with at least one GM food crop under development, GM peas, which were destroyed before being commercialized.

FDA scientists were also quite concerned about the possibility of inserted genes spontaneously transferring into the DNA of bacteria inside our digestive tract. They were particularly alarmed at the possibility of antibiotic resistant marker (ARM) genes transferring. ARM genes are employed during gene insertion to help scientists identify which cells successfully integrated the foreign gene. These ARM genes, however, remain in the cell and are cloned into the DNA of all the GM plants produced from that cell. One FDA report wrote in all capital letters that ARM genes would be �A SERIOUS HEALTH HAZARD,� due to the possibility of that they might transfer to bacteria and create super diseases, untreatable with antibiotics.

Although the biotech industry confidently asserted that gene transfer from GM foods was not possible, the only human feeding study on GM foods later proved that it does take place. The genetic material in soybeans that make them herbicide tolerant transferred into the DNA of human gut bacteria and continued to function18. That means that long after we stop eating a GM crop, its foreign GM proteins may be produced inside our intestines. It is also possible that the foreign genes might end up inside our own DNA, within the cells of our own organs and tissues.

Another worry expressed by FDA scientists was that GM plants might gather �toxic substances from the environment� such as �pesticides or heavy metals,�19 or that toxic substances in GM animal feed might bioaccumulate into milk and meat products. While no studies have looked at the bioaccumulation issue, herbicide tolerant crops certainly have higher levels of herbicide residues. In fact, many countries had to increase their legally allowable levels�by up to 50 times�in order to accommodate the introduction of GM crops.

The overuse of the herbicides due to GM crops has resulted in the development of herbicide resistant weeds. USDA statistics show�that herbicide use is rapidly accelerating. Its use was up by 527 million pounds in the first 16 years of GM crops (1996-2011).�Glyphosate use per acre on Roundup Ready soybeans was up by 227% while use on non-GMO soy acreage decreased by 20% over�the same time period. The rate of application is accelerating due in large part to the emergence of herbicide tolerant weeds, now�found on millions of acres. According to a study by Charles Benbrook, the incremental increase per year was 1.5 million pounds in�1999, 18 million in 2003, 79 million in 2009, and about 90 million in 2011. And as Roundup becomes less effective, farmers are�now using more toxic herbicides, such as 2-4D.

The pesticide-producing Bt crops do reduce the amount of sprayed on insecticides, but the total amount produced by the crops is far�greater than the amount of displaced spray. For example, Bt corn that kills the corn rootworm produces one to two pounds of Bt�toxin per acre, but reduces sprayed insecticides by only about 0.19 pounds. SmartStax corn with eight genes produces 3.7 pounds of�Bt toxin per acre, but displaces only 0.3 pounds of sprayed insecticides. 20

All of the above risks associated with GM foods are magnified for high-risk groups, such as pregnant women, children, the sick, and the elderly. The following section highlights some of the problems that have been identified.

GM Diet Shows Toxic Reactions In The Digestive Tract

gmos digestive abdomenThe very first crop submitted to the FDA�s voluntary consultation process, the FlavrSavr tomato, showed evidence of toxins. Out of 20 female rats fed the GM tomato, 7 developed stomach lesions.21 The director of FDA�s Office of Special Research Skills wrote that the tomatoes did not demonstrate a �reasonable certainty of no harm,�22 which is their normal standard of safety. The Additives Evaluation Branch agreed that �unresolved questions still remain.�23 The political appointees, however, did not require that the tomato be withdrawn.1

According to Arpad Pusztai, PhD, one of the world�s leading experts in GM food safety assessments, the type of stomach lesions linked to the tomatoes �could lead to life-endangering hemorrhage, particularly in the elderly who use aspirin to prevent [blood clots].�24 Dr. Pusztai believes that the digestive tract, which is the first and largest point of contact with foods, can reveal various reactions to toxins and should be the first target of GM food risk assessment. He was alarmed, however, to discover that studies on the FlavrSavr never looked passed the stomach to the intestines. Other studies that did look found problems.

Mice fed potatoes engineered to produce the Bt-toxin developed abnormal and damaged cells, as well as proliferative cell growth in the lower part of their small intestines (ileum).25 Rats fed potatoes engineered to produce a different type of insecticide (GNA lectin from the snowdrop plant) also showed proliferative cell growth in both the stomach and intestinal walls (see photos).26 Although the guts of rats fed GM peas were not examined for cell growth, the intestines were mysteriously heavier; possibly as a result of such growth.27 Cell proliferation can be a precursor to cancer and is of special concern.

GMOs Rat GM Potato InfoGM Diets Cause Liver Damage

The state of the liver�a main detoxifier for the body�is another indicator of toxins.

  • Rats fed the GNA lectin potatoes described above had smaller and partially atrophied livers.28
  • Rats fed Monsanto�s Mon 863 corn, engineered to produce Bt-toxin, had liver lesions and other indications of toxicity.29
  • Rabbits fed GM soy showed altered enzyme production in their livers as well as higher metabolic activity.30
  • The livers of rats fed Roundup Ready canola were 12%�16% heavier, possibly due to liver disease or inflammation.31
  • Microscopic analysis of the livers of mice fed Roundup Ready soybeans revealed altered gene expression and structural and functional changes (see photos).32 Many of these changes reversed after the mice diet was switched to non-GM soy, indicating that GM soy was the culprit. The findings, according to molecular geneticist Michael Antoniou, PhD, �are not random and must reflect some �insult� on the liver by the GM soy.� Antoniou, who does human gene therapy research in King�s College London, said that although the long-term consequences of the GM soy diet are not known, it �could lead to liver damage and consequently general toxemia.�33
  • Rats fed Roundup Ready soybeans also showed structural changes in their livers. 34

GMOs Liver Cells Soy Fed Mice

GMOs Livers Soy Fed RatsGM Fed Animals Had Higher Death Rates & Organ Damage

In the FlavrSavr tomato study, a note in the appendix indicated that 7 of 40 rats died within two weeks and were replaced.35 In another study, chickens fed the herbicide tolerant �Liberty Link� corn died at twice the rate of those fed natural corn.36 But in these two industry-funded studies, the deaths were dismissed without adequate explanation or follow-up.

In addition, the cells in the pancreas of mice fed Roundup Ready soy had profound changes and produced significantly less digestive enzymes;37 in rats fed a GM potato, the pancreas was enlarged.38 In various analyses of kidneys, GM-fed animals showed lesions, toxicity, altered enzyme production or inflammation.39,40 Enzyme production in the hearts of rabbits was altered by GM soy.41 And GM potatoes caused slower growth in the brain of rats.42 A team of independent scientists re-analyzed the raw data in three Monsanto 90-day rat feeding studies and saw signs of toxicity in the liver and kidneys, as well as effects in the heart, adrenal glands, spleen, and blood.43 In one of the only long-term feeding studies, rats fed Roundup Ready corn for three years for 24 months (or even just low concentrations of Roundup in their drinking water) suffered significant damage to their kidneys, livers, and pituitary glands. They also died prematurely and had many massive tumors�as large as 25% of their body weight.44

Reproductive Failures & Infant Mortality

The testicles of both mice and rats fed Roundup Ready soybeans showed dramatic changes. In rats, the organs were dark blue instead of pink (see photos on next page).45 In mice, young sperm cells were altered.46 Embryos of GM soy-fed mice also showed temporary changes in their DNA function, compared to those whose parents were fed non-GM soy.47�Female rats fed GM soy showed changes in their uterus, ovaries, and hormonal balance.48 By the third generation, most hamsters fed GM soy were unable to have babies. The infant mortality was 4-5 times greater than controls, and many of the GMO-fed third generation had hair growing in their mouths.49

GMOs Testicles of Rats

An Austrian government study showed that mice fed GM corn (Bt and Roundup Ready) had fewer babies and smaller babies.50 More dramatic results were discovered by a leading scientist at the Russian National Academy of sciences. Female rats were fed GM soy, starting two weeks before they were mated.

  • Over a series of three experiments, 51.6 percent of the offspring from the GM-fed group died within the first three weeks, compared to 10 percent from the non-GM soy group, and 8.1 percent for non-soy controls.
  • �High pup mortality was characteristic of every litter from mothers fed the GM soy flour.�51
  • The average size and weight of the GM-fed offspring was quite a bit smaller (see photo on next page).52
  • In a preliminary study, the GM-fed offspring were unable to conceive.53After the three feeding trials, the supplier of rat food used at the Russian laboratory began using GM soy in their formulation. Since all the rats housed at the facility were now eating GM soy, no non-GM fed controls were available for subsequent GM feeding trials; follow-up studies were canceled. After two months on the GM soy diet, however, the infant mortality rate of rats throughout the facility had skyrocketed to 55.3 percent (99 of 179).54
GMOs 20 Day old rat 19 day old rat

Farmers Report Livestock Sterility & Deaths

gmos pigsAbout two dozen farmers reported that their pigs had reproductive problems when fed certain varieties of Bt corn. Pigs were sterile, had false pregnancies, or gave birth to bags of water. Cows and bulls also became sterile. Bt corn was also implicated by farmers in the deaths of cows, horses, water buffaloes, and chickens.55

When Indian shepherds let their sheep graze continuously on Bt cotton plants, within 5-7 days, one out of four sheep died. There was an estimated 10,000 sheep deaths in the region in 2006, with more reported in 2007. Post mortems on the sheep showed severe irritation and black patches in both intestines and liver (as well as enlarged bile ducts). Investigators said preliminary evidence �strongly suggests that the sheep mortality was due to a toxin. . . . most probably Bt-toxin.�56 In a small feeding study, 100% of sheep fed Bt cotton died within 30 days. Those fed natural plants had no symptoms.

Buffalo that grazed on natural cotton plants for years without incident react to the Bt variety. In one village in Andhra Pradesh, for example, 13 buffalo grazed on Bt cotton plants for a single day. All died within 3 days.57 Investigators in the state of Haryana, India, report that most buffalo that ate GM cottonseed had reproductive complications such as premature deliveries, abortions, infertility, and prolapsed uteruses. Many young calves and adult buffaloes died.

GM Crops Trigger Immune Reactions & May Cause Allergies

gmos cropsAllergic reactions occur when the immune system interprets something as foreign, different, and offensive, and reacts accordingly. All GM foods, by definition, have something foreign and different. And several studies show that they provoke reactions. Rats fed Monsanto�s GM corn, for example, had a significant increase in blood cells related to the immune system.58 GM potatoes caused the immune system of rats to respond more slowly.59 And GM peas provoked an inflammatory response in mice, suggesting that it might cause deadly allergic reactions in people.60

It might be difficult to identify whether GM foods were triggering allergic responses in the population, since very few countries conduct regular studies or keep careful records. One country that does have an annual evaluation is the UK. Soon after GM soy was introduced into the British diet, researchers at the York Laboratory reported that allergies to soy had skyrocketed by 50% in a single year.61 Although no follow-up studies were conducted to see if GM soy was the cause, there is evidence showing several ways in which it might have contributed to the rising incidence of allergies:

  • The only significant variety of GM soy is Monsanto�s �Roundup Ready� variety, planted in 89% of US soy acres. A foreign gene from bacteria (with parts of virus and petunia DNA) is inserted, which allows the plant to withstand Roundup herbicide. The protein produced by the bacterial gene has never been part of the human food supply. Because people aren�t usually allergic to a food until they have eaten it several times, it would be difficult to know in advance if the protein was an allergen. Without a surefire method to identify allergenic GM crops, the World Health Organization (WHO) and others recommend examining the properties of the protein to see if they share characteristics with known allergens. One method is to compare the amino acid sequence of the novel protein with a database of allergens. If there is a match, according to the WHO, the GM crop should either not be commercialized or additional testing should be done. Sections of the protein produced in GM soy are identical to shrimp and dust mite allergens,62 but the soybean was introduced before WHO criteria were established and the recommended additional tests were not conducted. If the protein does trigger reactions, the danger is compounded by the finding that the Roundup Ready gene transfers into the DNA of human gut bacteria and may continuously produce the protein from within our intestines.63
  • In addition to the herbicide tolerant protein, GM soybeans contain a unique, unexpected protein, which likely came about from the changes incurred during the genetic engineering process. Scientists found that this new protein was able to bind with IgE antibodies, suggesting that it may provoke dangerous allergic reactions. The same study revealed that one human subject showed a skin prick immune response only to GM soy, but not to natural soy.64 These results must be considered preliminary,�as the non-GM soy was a wild type and not necessarily comparable to the GM variety. Another study showed that the levels of one known soy allergen, called trypsin inhibitor, were as much as seven times higher in cooked GM soy compared to a non-GM control.65 This was Monsanto�s own study, and did use comparable controls.
  • GM soy also produces an unpredicted side effect in the pancreas of mice�the amount of digestive enzymes produced is dramatically reduced.66 If a shortage of enzymes caused food proteins to breakdown more slowly, then they have more time to trigger allergic reactions. Thus, digestive problems from GM soy might promote allergies to a wide range of proteins, not just soy.
  • The higher amount of Roundup herbicide residues on GM soy might create reactions in consumers. In fact, many of the symptoms identified in the UK soy allergy study are among those related to glyphosate exposure. [The allergy study identified irritable bowel syndrome, digestion problems, chronic fatigue, headaches, lethargy, and skin complaints, including acne and eczema, all related to soy consumption. Symptoms of glyphosate exposure include nausea, headaches, lethargy, skin rashes, and burning or itchy skin. It is also possible that glyphosate�s breakdown product aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), which accumulates in GM soybeans after each spray, might contribute to allergies.]

It is interesting to note that in the five years immediately after GM soy was introduced, US peanut allergies doubled. It is known that a protein in natural soybeans cross-reacts with peanut allergies, i.e. soy may trigger reactions in some people who are allergic to peanuts.67 Given the startling increase in peanut allergies, scientists should investigate whether this cross-reactivity has been amplified in GM soy.

Roundup, tumors, etc.

BT-Toxin, Produced In GM Corn & Cotton, May Cause Allergies

gmos Bt-toxin-crystalsFor years, organic farmers and others have sprayed crops with solutions containing natural Bt bacteria as a method of insect control. The toxin creates holes in their stomach and kills them. Genetic engineers take the gene that produces the toxin in bacteria and insert it into the DNA of crops so that the plant does the work, not the farmer. The fact that we consume that toxic pesticide in every bite of Bt corn is hardly appetizing.

Biotech companies claim that Bt-toxin has a history of safe use, is quickly destroyed in our stomach, and wouldn�t react with humans or mammals in any event. Studies verify, however, that natural Bt-toxin is not fully destroyed during digestion and does react with mammals. Mice fed Bt-toxin, for example, showed an immune response as potent as cholera toxin, 68, became immune sensitive to formerly harmless compounds,69 and had damaged and altered cells in their small intestines.70 A 2008 Italian government study found that Bt corn provoked immune responses in mice.71 Moreover, when natural Bt was sprayed over areas around Vancouver and Washington State to fight gypsy moths, about 500 people reported reactions�mostly allergy or flu-like symptoms.72,73 Farm workers and others also report serious reactions7475767778 and authorities have long acknowledged that �people with compromised immune systems or preexisting allergies may be particularly susceptible to the effects of Bt.�79

The Bt-toxin produced in GM crops is �vastly different from the bacterial [Bt-toxins] used in organic and traditional farming and forestry.�80 The plant produced version is designed to be more toxic than natural varieties,81 and is about 3,000-5,000 times more concentrated than the spray form. And just like the GM soy protein, the Bt protein in GM corn varieties has a section of its amino acid sequence identical to a known allergen (egg yolk). The Bt protein also fails other allergen criteria recommended by the WHO, i.e. the protein is too resistant to break down during digestion and heat.

A 2011 study published in the Journal of Applied Toxicology showed that when Bt-toxin derived from Monsanto�s corn was exposed to human cells, the toxin disrupts the membrane in just 24 hours, causing certain fluid to leak through the cell walls. The authors specifically note, �This may be due to pore formation like in insect cells.� In other words, the toxin may be creating small holes in human cells in the same manner that it kills insects. The researchers �documented that modified Bt toxins [from GM plants] are not inert on human cells, but can exert toxicity.�82 A 2011 Canadian study conducted at Sherbrooke Hospital discovered that�93% of the pregnant women they tested had Bt-toxin from Monsanto�s corn in their blood. And so did 80% of their unborn�fetuses. 83

If Bt-toxin causes allergies, then gene transfer carries serious ramifications. If Bt genes relocate to human gut bacteria, our intestinal flora may be converted into living pesticide factories, possibly producing Bt-toxin inside of us year after year. The UK Joint Food Safety and Standards Group also described gene transfer from a different route. They warned that genes from inhaled pollen might transfer into the DNA of bacteria in the respiratory system.84 Although no study has looked into that possibility, pollen from a Bt cornfield appears to have been responsible for allergic-type reactions.

In 2003, during the time when an adjacent Bt cornfield was pollinating, virtually an entire Filipino village of about 100 people was stricken by mysterious skin, respiratory, and intestinal reactions.85 The symptoms started with those living closest to the field and spread to those further away. Blood samples from 39 individuals showed antibodies in response to Bt-toxin, supporting�but not proving�a link. When the same corn was planted in four other villages the following year, however, the symptoms returned in all four areas�only during the time of pollination.86

Bt-toxin might also trigger reactions by skin contact. In 2005, a medical team reported that hundreds of agricultural workers in India are developing allergic symptoms when exposed to Bt cotton, but not when
axposed to natural varieties.87 They say reactions come from picking the cotton, cleaning it in factories, loading it onto trucks, or even leaning against it. Their symptoms are virtually identical to those described by the 500 people in Vancouver and Washington who were sprayed with Bt.

Government Evaluations Miss Most Health Problems

gmos Example FDA Decision Making ProcessAlthough the number of safety studies on GM foods is quite small, it has validated the concerns expressed by FDA scientists and others. Unfortunately, government safety assessments worldwide are not competent to even identify most of the potential health problems described above, let alone protect its citizens from the effects.88

A 2000 review of approved GM crops in Canada by professor E. Ann Clark, PhD, for example, reveals that 70% (28 of 40) �of the currently available GM crops . . . have not been subjected to any actual lab or animal toxicity testing, either as refined oils for direct human consumption or indirectly as feedstuffs for livestock. The same finding pertains to all three GM tomato decisions, the only GM flax, and to five GM corn crops.� In the remaining 30% (12) of the other crops tested, animals were not fed the whole GM feed. They were given just the isolated GM protein that the plant was engineered to produce. But even this protein was not extracted from the actual GM plant. Rather, it was manufactured in genetically engineered bacteria. This method of testing would never identify problems associated with collateral damage to GM plant DNA, unpredicted changes in the GM protein, transfer of genes to bacteria or human cells, excessive herbicide residues, or accumulation of toxins in the food chain, among others. Clark asks, �Where are the trials showing lack of harm to fed livestock, or that meat and milk from livestock fed on GM feedstuffs are safe?�89

Epidemiologist and GM safety expert Judy Carman, PhD, MPH, shows that assessments by Food Safety Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) also overlook serious potential problems, including cancer, birth defects, or long-term effects of nutritional deficiencies. 90

�A review of twelve reports covering twenty-eight GM crops – four soy, three corn, ten potatoes, eight canola, one sugar beet and two cotton�revealed no feeding trials on people. In addition, one of the GM corn varieties had gone untested on animals. Some seventeen foods involved testing with only a single oral gavage (a type of forced-feeding), with observation for seven to fourteen days, and only of the substance that had been genetically engineered to appear [the GM protein], not the whole food. Such testing assumes that the only new substance that will appear in the food is the one genetically engineered to appear, that the GM plant- produced substance will act in the same manner as the tested substance that was obtained from another source [GM bacteria], and that the substance will create disease within a few days. All are untested hypotheses and make a mockery of GM proponents� claims that the risk assessment of GM foods is based on sound science. Furthermore, where the whole food was given to animals to eat,�sample sizes were often very low�for example, five to six cows per group for Roundup Ready soy�and they were fed for only four weeks.�91

Dr. Carman points out that GM �experiments used some very unusual animal models for human health, such as chickens, cows, and trout. Some of the measurements taken from these animals are also unusual measures of human health, such as abdominal fat pad weight, total de-boned breast meat yield, and milk production.� In her examination of the full range of submittals to authorities in Australia and New Zealand, she says that there was no proper evaluation of �biochemistry, immunology, tissue pathology, and gut, liver, and kidney function.�92 Writing on behalf of the Public Health Association of Australia, Dr. Carman says, �The effects of feeding people high concentrations of the new protein over tens of years cannot be determined by feeding 20 mice a single oral gavage of a given high concentration of the protein and taking very basic data for 13-14 days.�93

The FDA’s Fake Safety Assessments

gmos Safety assessmentSubmissions to the US Food and Drug Administraion (FDA) may be worse than in other countries, since the agency doesn�t actually require any data. Their policy says that biotech companies can determine if their own foods are safe. Anything submitted is voluntary and, according to former Environmental Protection Agency scientist Doug Gurian-Sherman, PhD, �often lack[s] sufficient detail, such as necessary statistical analyses needed for an adequate safety evaluation.� Using Freedom of Information Requests, Dr. Gurian-Sherman analyzed more than a fourth of the data summaries (14 of 53) of GM crops reviewed by the FDA. He says, �The FDA consultation process does not allow the agency to require submission of data, misses obvious errors in company- submitted data summaries, provides insufficient testing guidance, and does not require sufficiently detailed data to enable the FDA to assure that GE crops are safe to eat.�94 Similarly, a Friends of the Earth review of company and FDA documents concluded:

�If industry chooses to submit faulty, unpublishable studies, it does so without consequence. If it should respond to an agency request with deficient data, it does so without reprimand or follow-up. . . . If a company finds it disadvantageous to characterize its product, then its properties remain uncertain or unknown. If a corporation chooses to ignore scientifically sound testing standards . . . then faulty tests are conducted instead, and the results are considered legitimate. In the area of genetically engineered food regulation, the �competent� agencies rarely if ever (know how to) conduct independent research to verify or supplement industry findings.� 95

At the end of the consultation, the FDA doesn�t actually approve the crops. Rather, they issue a letter that includes a statement such as the following:

�Based on the safety and nutritional assessment you have conducted, it is our understanding that Monsanto has concluded that corn products derived from this new variety are not materially different in composition, safety, and other relevant parameters from corn currently on the market, and that the genetically modified corn does not raise issues that would require premarket review or approval by FDA. . . . As you are aware, it is Monsanto�s responsibility to ensure that foods marketed by the firm are safe, wholesome and in compliance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements.�96

Company Research Is Secret, Inadequate & Flawed

GMOs FDA health inspectorsThe unpublished industry studies submitted to regulators are typically kept secret based on the claim that it is �confidential business information.� The Royal Society of Canada is one of many organizations that condemn this practice. They wrote:

�In the judgment of the Expert Panel, the more regulatory agencies limit free access to the data upon which their decisions are based, the more compromised becomes the claim that the regulatory process is �science based.� This is due to a simple but well- understood requirement of the scientific method itself�that it be an open, completely transparent enterprise in which any and all aspects of scientific research are open to full review by scientific peers. Peer review and independent corroboration of research findings are axioms of the scientific method, and part of the very meaning of the objectivity and neutrality of science.�97

Whenever private submissions are made public through lawsuits or Freedom of Information Act Requests, it becomes clear why companies benefit from secrecy. The quality of their research is often miserable, incompetent, and unacceptable for peer-review. In 2000, for example, after the potentially allergenic StarLink corn was found to have contaminated the food supply, the corn�s producer, Aventis CropScience, presented wholly inadequate safety data to the EPA�s scientific advisory panel. One frustrated panel member, Dean Metcalfe, MD,�the government�s top allergist�said during a hearing, �Most of us review for a lot of journals. And if this were presented for publication in the journals that I review for, it would be sent back to the authors with all of these questions. It would be rejected.�98

Unscientific Assumptions Are The Basis Of Approvals

Professor Clark, who analyzed submissions to Canadian regulators, concluded, �Most or all of the conclusions of food safety for individual GM crops are based on inferences and assumptions, rather than on actual testing.� For example, rather than actually testing to see if the amino acid sequence produced by their inserted gene is correct, �the standard practice,� according to research analyst William Freese, �is to sequence just 5 to 25 amino acids,�99 even if the protein has more than 600 in total. If the short sample matches what is expected, they assume that the rest are also fine. If they are wrong, however, a rearranged protein could be quite dangerous.

Monsanto�s submission to Australian regulators on their high lysine GM corn provides an excellent example of overly optimistic assumptions used in place of science. The gene inserted into the corn produces a protein that is naturally found in soil. Monsanto claimed that since people consume small residues of soil on fruits and vegetables, the protein has a history of safe consumption. Based on the amount of GM corn protein an average US citizen would consume (if all their corn were Monsanto�s variety), they would eat up to 4 trillion times the amount normally consumed through soil. In other words, �for equivalent exposure� of the protein from soil �people would have to eat . . . nearly as much as 10,000kg [22,000 pounds, every] second 24 hours a day seven days a week.�100

Studies Are Rigged To Avoid Finding Problems

gmos analysis microsopeIn addition, to relying on untested assumptions, industry-funded research is often designed specifically to force a conclusion of safety. In the high lysine corn described above, for example, the levels of certain nutritional components (i.e. protein content, total dietary fiber, acid detergent fiber, and neutral detergent fiber) were far outside the normal range for corn. Instead of comparing their corn to normal controls, which would reveal this disparity, Monsanto compared it to obscure corn varieties that were also substantially outside the normal range on precisely these values. Thus, their study found no statistical differences by design.

When Monsanto learned that independent researchers were to publish a study in July 1999 showing that GM soy contains 12%-14% less cancer-fighting phytoestrogens, the company responded with its own study, concluding that soy�s phytoestrogen levels vary too much to even carry out a statistical analysis. Researchers failed to disclose, however, that they had instructed the laboratory to use an obsolete method of detection�one that had been prone to highly variable results.101

When Aventis prepared samples to see if the potential allergen in StarLink corn remained intact after cooking, instead of using the standard 30-minute treatment, they heated corn for two hours.102

To show that pasteurization destroyed bovine growth hormone in milk from cows treated with rbGH, scientists pasteurized the milk 120 times longer than normal. Unable to destroy more than 19%, they then spiked the milk with a huge amount of the hormone and repeated the long pasteurization, destroying 90%.103 (The FDA reported that pasteurization destroys 90% of the hormone.104) To demonstrate that injections of rbGH did not interfere with cow�s fertility, Monsanto apparently added cows to the study that were pregnant prior to injection.105

And in order to prove that the protein from their GM crops breaks down quickly during simulated digestion, biotech companies used thousands of times the amount of digestive enzymes and a much stronger acid compared to that recommended by the World Health Organization.106

Other methods used to hide problems are varied and plentiful. For example, researchers:

  • Use highly variable animal starting weights to hinder detection of food-related changes
  • Keep feeding studies short to miss long-term impacts
  • Test effects of Roundup Ready soybeans that have not been sprayed with Roundup
  • Avoid feeding animals the actual GM crop, but give them instead a single dose of the GM protein that was produced inside GM bacteria
  • Use too few subjects to derive statistically significant results
  • Use poor statistical methods or simply leave out essential methods, data, or statistics
  • Use irrelevant control groups, and employ insensitive evaluation techniques

Roundup Ready Soybeans: Case Study Of Flawed Research

gmos soybeansMonsanto�s 1996 Journal of Nutrition studies on Roundup Ready soybeans107,108 provide plenty of examples of scientific transgressions. Although the study has been used often by the industry as validation for safety claims, experts working in the field were not impressed. For example, Dr. Arpad Pusztai was commissioned at the time by the UK government to lead a 20 member consortium in three institutions to develop rigorous testing protocols on GM foods�protocols that were never implemented. Dr. Pusztai, who had published several studies in that same nutrition journal, said the Monsanto paper was not �up to the normal journal standards.� He said, �It was obvious that the study had been designed to avoid finding any problems. Everybody in our consortium knew this.� Some of the flaws include:

  • Researchers tested GM soy on mature animals, not young ones. Young animals use protein to build their muscles, tissues, and organs. Problems with GM food could therefore show up in organ and body weight. But adult animals use the protein for tissue renewal and energy. �With a nutritional study on mature animals,� says Dr. Pusztai, �you would never see any difference in organ weights even if the food turned out to be anti-nutritional. The animals would have to be emaciated or poisoned to show anything.�
  • If there were an organ development problem, the study wouldn�t have picked it up since the researchers didn�t even weigh the organs.
  • In one of the trials, researchers substituted only one tenth of the natural protein with GM soy protein. In two others, they diluted their GM soy six- and twelve-fold. 109 Scientists Ian Pryme, PhD, of Norway and Rolf Lembcke, PhD, of Denmark wrote, the �level of the GM soy was too low, and would probably ensure that any possible undesirable GM effects did not occur.�
  • Pryme and Lembcke, who published a paper in Nutrition and Health that analyzed all published peer-reviewed feeding studies on GM foods (10 as of 2003), also pointed out that the percentage of protein in the feed used in the Roundup Ready study was �artificially too high.� This �would almost certainly mask, or at least effectively reduce, any possible effect of the [GM soy].� They said it was �highly likely that all GM effects would have been diluted out.� 110
  • Proper compositional studies filter out effects of weather or geography by comparing plants grown at the same time in the same location. Monsanto, however, pooled data from several locations, which makes it difficult for differences to be statistically significant. Nonetheless, the data revealed significant differences in the ash, fat, and carbohydrate content. Roundup Ready soy meal also contained 27% more trypsin inhibitor, a potential allergen. Also, cows fed GM soy produced milk with a higher fat content, demonstrating another disparity between the two types of soy.
  • One field trial, however, did grow GM and non-GM plants next to each other, but this data was not included in the paper. Years after the study appeared, medical writer Barbara Keeler recovered the data that had been omitted. It showed that Monsanto�s GM soy had significantly lower levels of protein, a fatty acid, and phenylalanine, an essential amino acid. Also, toasted GM soy meal contained nearly twice the amount of a lectin�a substance that may interfere with the body�s ability to assimilate other nutrients. And the amount of trypsin inhibitor in cooked GM soy was as much as seven times higher than in a cooked non-GM control.
  • The study also omitted many details normally required for a published paper. According to Pryme and Lembcke, �No data were given for most of the parameters.�
  • And when researchers tested the effects of Roundup Ready protein on animals, they didn�t extract the protein from the soybeans. Instead, they derived it from GM bacteria, claiming the two forms of protein were equivalent. There are numerous ways, however, in which the protein in the soy may be different. In fact, nine years after this study was published, another study showed that the gene inserted into the soybeans produced unintended aberrant RNA strands, meaning that the protein may be quite different than what was intended.111

In Pryme and Lembcke�s analysis, it came as no surprise that this Monsanto study, along with the other four peer-reviewed animal feeding studies that were �performed more or less in collaboration with private companies,� reported no negative effects of the GM diet. �On the other hand,� they wrote, �adverse effects were reported (but not explained) in [the five] independent studies.� They added, �It is remarkable that these effects have all been observed after feeding for only 10�14 days.�112

Toxic GM Foods Could Have Been Approved

Two GM foods whose commercialization was stopped because of negative test results give a chilling example of what may be getting through. Rats fed GM potatoes had potentially precancerous cell growth in the stomach and intestines, less developed brains, livers, and testicles, partial atrophy of the liver, and damaged immune systems.113 GM peas provoked an inflammatory response in mice, suggesting that the peas might trigger a deadly anaphylactic shock in allergic humans.114 Both of these dangerous crops, however, could easily have been approved. The problems were only discovered because the researchers used advanced tests that were never applied to GM crops already on the market. Both would have passed the normal tests that companies typically use to get their products approved.

Ironically, when Monsanto was asked to comment on the pea study, their spokesperson said it demonstrated that the regulatory system works. He failed to disclose that none of his company�s GM crops had been put through such rigorous tests.

Rampant, Unrelenting Industry Bias

Industry-funded research that favors the funders is not new. Bias has been identified across several industries. In pharmaceuticals, for example, positive results are four times more likely if the drug�s manufacturer funds the study.115 When companies pay for the economic analyses of their own cancer drugs, the results are eight times more likely to be favorable.116 Compared to drug research, the potential for industry manipulation in GM crop studies is considerably higher. Unlike pharmaceutical testing, GM research has no standardized procedures dictated by regulators. GM studies are not usually published in peer-reviewed journals and are typically kept secret by companies and governments. There is little money available for rigorous independent research, so company evidence usually goes unchallenged and unverified. Most importantly, whereas drugs can show serious side-effects and still be approved, GM food cannot. There is no tolerance for adverse reactions; feeding trials must show no problems.

Thus, when industry studies show problems (in spite of their efforts to avoid them), serious adverse reactions and even deaths among GM-fed animals are ignored or dismissed as �not biologically significant� or due to �natural variations.� In the critical arena of food safety research, the biotech industry is without accountability, standards, or peer-review. They�ve got bad science down to a science.

Promoting & Regulating Don’t Mix

While such self-serving behavior may be expected from corporations, how come government bodies let such blatant scientific contortions pass without comment? One reason is that several regulatory agencies are also charged with promoting the interests of biotechnology. This is the official position of the FDA and other US government bodies, for example. Suzanne Wuerthele, PhD, a US EPA toxicologist, says, �This technology is being promoted, in the face of concerns by respectable scientists and in the face of data to the contrary, by the very agencies which are supposed to be protecting human health and the environment. The bottom line in my view is that we are confronted with the most powerful technology the world has ever known, and it is being rapidly deployed with almost no thought whatsoever to its consequences.�117

Canadian regulators are similarly conflicted. The Royal Society of Canada reported that, �In meetings with senior managers from the various Canadian regulatory departments . . . their responses uniformly stressed the importance of maintaining a favorable climate for the biotechnology industry to develop new products and submit them for approval on the Canadian market. . . . The conflict of interest involved in both promoting and regulating an industry or technology . . . is also a factor in the issue of maintaining the transparency, and therefore the scientific integrity, of the regulatory process. In effect, the public interest in a regulatory system that is �science based�. . . is significantly compromised when that openness is negotiated away by regulators in exchange for cordial and supportive relationships with the industries being regulated.�118

Many scientists on the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) GMO Panel are personally aligned with biotech interests. According to Friends of the Earth (FOE), �One member has direct financial links with the biotech industry and others have indirect links, such as close involvement with major conferences organized by the biotech industry. Two members have even appeared in promotional videos produced by the biotech industry. . . . Several members of the Panel, including the chair Professor Kuiper, have been involved with the EU-funded ENTRANSFOOD project. The aim of this project was to agree [to] safety assessment, risk management, and risk communication procedures that would �facilitate market introduction of GMOs in Europe, and therefore bring the European industry in a competitive position.� Professor Kuiper, who coordinated the ENTRANSFOOD project, sat on a working group that also included staff from Monsanto, Bayer CropScience, and Syngenta.� In a statement reminiscent of the deceptive policy statement by the FDA, the FOE report concludes that EFSA is �being used to create a false impression of scientific agreement when the real situation is one of intense and continuing debate and uncertainty.�119

The pro-GM European Commission repeats the same ruse. According to leaked documents obtained by FOE, while they privately appreciate �the uncertainties and gaps in knowledge that exist in relation to the safety of GM crops, . . . the Commission normally keeps this uncertainty concealed from the public whilst presenting its decisions about the safety of GM crops and foods as being certain and scientifically based.� For example, the Commission privately condemned the submission information for one crop as �mixed, scarce, delivered consecutively all over years, and not convincing.� They said there is �No sufficient experimental evidence to assess the safety.�120

With an agenda to promote GM foods, regulators regularly violate their own laws. In Europe, the law requires that when EFSA and member states have different opinions, they �are obliged to co-operate with a view to either resolving the divergence or preparing a joint document clarifying the contentious scientific issues and identifying the relevant uncertainties in the data.�121 According to FOE, in the case of all GM crop reviews, none of these legal obligations were followed.122 The declaration of GRAS status by the FDA also deviated from the Food and Cosmetic Act and years of legal precedent. Some violations are more blatant. In India, one official tampered with the report on Bt cotton to increase the yield figures to favor Monsanto.123 In Mexico, a senior government official allegedly threatened a University of California professor, implying �We know where your children go to school,� trying to get him not to publish incriminating evidence that would delay GM approvals.124 In Indonesia, Monsanto gave bribes and questionable payments to at least 140 officials, attempting to get their genetically modified (GM) cotton approved.125

Manipulation Of Public Opinion

gmos manipulationWhen governments fail in their duty to keep corporations in check, the �protector� role should shift to the media, which acts as a watchdog to expose public dangers and governmental shortcomings. But mainstream media around the world has largely overlooked the serious problems associated with GM crops and their regulation. The reason for this oversight is varied and includes contributions from an aggressive public relations and disinformation campaign by the biotech industry, legal threats by biotech companies, and in some cases, the fear of losing advertising accounts. This last reason is particularly prevalent among the farm press, which receives much of its income from the biotech industry.

Threatening letters from Monsanto�s attorneys have resulted in the cancellation of a five-part news series on their genetically engineered bovine growth hormone scheduled for a Fox TV station in Florida, as well as the cancellation of a book critical of Monsanto�s GMO products. A printer also shredded 14,000 copies of the Ecologist magazine issue entitled �The Monsanto Files,� due to fear of a Monsanto lawsuit. (See the chapter �Muscling the Media� in Seeds of Deception126 for more examples.)

The methods that biotech advocates use to manipulate public opinion research has become an art form. Consumer surveys by the International Food Information Council (IFIC), for example,whose supporters include the major biotech seed companies, offers conclusions such as �A growing majority of Americans support the benefits of food biotechnology as well as the US Food and Drug Administration�s (FDA) labeling policy.� But communications professor James Beniger, who was past president of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, described the surveys as �so biased with leading questions favoring positive responses that any results are meaningless.�127 The 2003 survey, for example, included gems such as:

�All things being equal, how likely would you be to buy a variety of produce, like tomatoes or potatoes, if it had been modified by biotechnology to taste better or fresher?� and

�Biotechnology has also been used to enhance plants that yield foods like cooking oils. If cooking oil with reduced saturated fat made from these new plants was available, what effect would the use of biotechnology have on your decision to buy this cooking oil?�128

A similar tactic was used at a December 11, 2007 focus group in Columbus, Ohio �designed� to show that consumers wanted to make it illegal for dairies to label their milk as free from Monsanto�s genetically engineered bovine hormone rBST. The facilitator said, �All milk contains hormones. There is no such thing as hormone-free milk. The composition of both types of milk is the same in all aspects. Now what do you think of a label that says �no added hormones?� Don�t you think it is deceiving and inappropriate to put �rBST-free� on labels?� Not only was the facilitator �leading the witness,� he presented false information. Milk from cows treated with rBST has substantially higher levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1,129 which has been linked to higher risk of cancer,130 and higher incidence of fraternal twins.131 It also has higher levels of bovine growth hormone, pus, and in some cases, antibiotics.

Another example of manipulated consumer opinion was found in a 2004 article in the British Food Journal, authored by four advocates of genetically modified (GM) foods.132 According to the peer-reviewed paper, when shoppers in a Canadian farm store were confronted with an informed and unbiased choice between GM corn and non-GM corn, most purchased the GM variety. This finding flew in the face of worldwide consumer resistance to GM foods, which had shut markets in Europe, Japan, and elsewhere. It also challenged studies that showed that the more information on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) consumers have, the less they trust them.133 The study, which was funded by the biotech-industry front group, Council for Biotechnology Information and the industry�s trade association, the Crop Protection Institute of Canada (now Croplife Canada), was given the Journal�s prestigious Award for Excellence for the Most Outstanding Paper of 2004 and has been cited often by biotech advocates.

Stuart Laidlaw, a reporter from Canada�s Toronto Star, visited the farm store several times during the study and described the scenario in his book Secret Ingredients. Far from offering unbiased choices, key elements appeared rigged to favor GM corn purchases. The consumer education fact sheets were entirely pro-GMO, and Doug Powell, the lead researcher, enthusiastically demonstrated to Laidlaw how he could convince shoppers to buy the GM varieties. He confronted a farmer who had already�purchased non-GM corn. After pitching his case for GMOs, Powell proudly had the farmer tell Laidlaw that he had changed his opinion and would buy GM corn in his next shopping trip.

Powell�s interference with shoppers� �unbiased� choices was nothing compared to the effect of the signs placed over the corn bins. The sign above the non-GM corn read, �Would you eat wormy sweet corn?� It further listed the chemicals that were sprayed during the season. By contrast, the sign above the GM corn stated, �Here�s What Went into Producing Quality Sweet Corn.� It is no wonder that 60% of shoppers avoided the �wormy corn.� In fact, it may be a testament to people�s distrust of GMOs that 40% still went for the �wormy� option.

Powell and his colleagues did not mention the controversial signage in their study. They claimed that the corn bins in the farm store were �fully labelled��either �genetically engineered Bt sweet corn� or �Regular sweet corn.� When Laidlaw�s book came out, however, Powell�s �wormy� sign was featured in a photograph,134 exposing what was later described by Cambridge University�s Dr. Richard Jennings as �flagrant fraud.� Jennings, who is a leading researcher on scientific ethics, says, �It was a sin of omission by failing to divulge information which quite clearly should have been disclosed.�135

In his defence, Powell claimed that his signs merely used the language of consumers and was �not intended to manipulate consumer purchasing patterns.� He also claimed that the �wormy� corn sign was only there for the first week of the trial and was then replaced by other educational messages. But eye witnesses and photographs demonstrate the presence of the sign long after Powell�s suggested date of replacement.136

Several scientists and outraged citizens say the paper should be withdrawn, but the Journal refused. In fact, the Journal�s editor has not even agreed to reconsider its Award for Excellence. A blatant propaganda exercise still stands validated as exemplary science.

Critics & Independent Scientists Are Attacked

gmos scientistOne of the most troubling aspects of the biotech debate is the attack strategy used on GMO critics and independent scientists. Not only are adverse findings by independent scientists often suppressed, ignored, or denied, researchers that discover problems from GM foods have been fired, stripped of responsibilities, deprived of tenure, and even threatened. Consider Dr. Pusztai, the world�s leading scientist in his field, who inadvertently discovered in 1998 that unpredictable changes in GM crops caused massive damage in rats. He went public with his concerns, was a hero at his prestigious institute for two days, and then, after the director received two phone calls allegedly from the UK Prime Minister�s office, was fired after 35 years and silenced with threats of a lawsuit. False statements were circulated to trash his reputation, which are recited by GMO advocates today.

After University of California Professor Ignacio Chapela, PhD, published evidence that GM corn contaminated Mexico�s indigenous varieties, two fictitious internet characters created by Monsanto�s PR firm, the Bivings Group, initiated a brutal internet smear campaign, lying about Dr. Chapela and his research.

Irina Ermakova, PhD, a leading scientist at the Russian National Academy of Sciences, fed female rats GM soy and was stunned to discover that more than half their offspring died within three weeks�compared to only 10% from mothers fed non-GM soy. Without funding to extend her analysis, she labeled her work �preliminary,� published it in a Russian journal, and implored the scientific community to repeat the study. Two years later, no one has repeated it, but advocates use false or irrelevant arguments to divert attention from the shocking results and have tried to vilify Dr. Ermakova.

A New Zealand MP testified at the 2001 Royal Commission of Inquiry on Genetic Modification, �I have been contacted by telephone and e-mail by a number of scientists who have serious concerns . . . but who are convinced that if they express these fears publicly. . . or even if they asked the awkward and difficult questions, they will be eased out of their institution.� Indeed in 2007, after Professor Christian Velot, PhD, raised the difficult questions on GMOs at public conferences, his 2008 research funds were confiscated, his student assistants were re-assigned, and his position at the University of Paris-Sud faces early termination.

We Are The Guinea Pigs

gmos family eatingSince GM foods are not properly tested before they enter the market, consumers are the guinea pigs. But this doesn�t even qualify as an experiment. There are no controls and no monitoring. Given the mounting of evidence of harm, it is likely that GM foods are contributing to the deterioration of health in the United States, Canada, and other countries where it is consumed. But without post- marketing surveillance, the chances of tracing health problems to GM food are low. The incidence of a disease would have to increase dramatically before it was noticed, meaning that millions may have to get sick before a change is investigated. Tracking the impact of GM foods is even more difficult in North America, where the foods are not labeled.

Regulators at Health Canada announced in 2002 that they would monitor Canadians for health problems from eating GM foods. A spokesperson said, �I think it�s just prudent and what the public expects, that we will keep a careful eye on the health of Canadians.� But according to CBC TV news, Health Canada �abandoned that research less than a year later saying it was �too difficult to put an effective surveillance system in place.�� The news anchor added, �So at this point, there is little research into the health effects of genetically modified food. So will we ever know for sure if it�s safe?�137

Not with the biotech companies in charge. Consider the following statement in a report submitted to county officials in California by pro-GM members of a task force. �[It is] generally agreed that long-term monitoring of the human health risks of GM food through epidemiological studies is not necessary because there is no scientific evidence suggesting any long-term harm from these foods.�138 Note the circular logic: Because no long-term epidemiological studies are in place, we have no evidence showing long- term harm. And since we don�t have any evidence of long-term harm, we don�t need studies to look for it.

What are these people thinking? Insight into the pro-GM mindset was provided by Dan Glickman, the US Secretary of Agriculture under President Clinton.

�What I saw generically on the pro-biotech side was the attitude that the technology was good, and that it was almost immoral to say that it wasn�t good, because it was going to solve the problems of the human race and feed the hungry and clothe the naked. . . . And there was a lot of money that had been invested in this, and if you�re against it, you�re Luddites, you�re stupid. That, frankly, was the side our government was on. Without thinking, we had basically taken this issue as a trade issue and they, whoever �they� were, wanted to keep our product out of their market. And they were foolish, or stupid, and didn�t have an effective regulatory system. There was rhetoric like that even here in this department. You felt like you were almost an alien, disloyal, by trying to present an open-minded view on some of the issues being raised. So I pretty much spouted the rhetoric that everybody else around here spouted; it was written into my speeches.�139

Fortunately, not everyone feels that questioning GM foods is disloyal. On the contrary, millions of people around the world are unwilling to participate in this uncontrolled experiment. They refuse to eat GM foods. Manufacturers in Europe and Japan have committed to avoid using GM ingredients. And the US natural foods industry, not waiting for the government to test or label GMOs, is now engaged in removing all remaining GM ingredients from their sector using a third party verification system. The Campaign for Healthier Eating in America will circulate non-GMO shopping guides in stores nationwide so that consumers have clear, healthy non-GMO choices. With no governmental regulation of biotech corporations, it is left to consumers to protect ourselves.

For a guide to avoiding GMOs, go to www.NonGMOShoppingGuide.com.

International bestselling author and independent filmmaker Jeffrey M. Smith is the Executive Director of the Institute for Responsible Technology and a leading spokesperson on the health dangers of GMOs. His first book, Seeds of Deception, is the world�s bestselling book on the subject. His second, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, identifies 65 risks of GMOs and demonstrates how superficial government approvals are not competent to find most of them. Mr. Smith has pioneered the Campaign for Healthier Eating in America, designed to create the tipping point of consumer rejection against GMOs. See www.ResponsibleTechnology.org, www.NonGMOShoppingGuide.com.

Blank
References:

1 Jeffrey M. Smith, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA USA 2007
2 Kurt Eichenwald, et al, New York Times, �Biotechnology Food: From the Lab to a Debacle,� January 25, 2001
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/25/business/25FOOD.html?pagewanted=all
3 Kurt Eichenwald, et al, New York Times, �Biotechnology Food: From the Lab to a Debacle,� January 25, 2001
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/25/business/25FOOD.html?pagewanted=all
4 Dan Quayle, �Speech in the Indian Treaty Room of the Old Executive Office Building,� May 26, 1992.
5 For copies of FDA memos, see The Alliance for Bio-Integrity, www.biointegrity.org
6 Steven M. Druker, �How the US Food and Drug Administration approved genetically engineered foods despite the deaths one had caused and
the warnings of its own scientists about their unique risks,� Alliance for Bio-Integrity, http://www.biointegrity.org/ext-summary.html
7 Louis J. Pribyl, �Biotechnology Draft Document, 2/27/92,� March 6, 1992, www.biointegrity.org
http://www.biointegrity.org/FDAdocs/04/view1.html
8 �Statement of Policy: Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties,� Federal Register 57, no. 104 (May 29, 1992): 22991.
9 Linda Kahl, Memo to James Maryanski about Federal Register Document �Statement of Policy: Foods from Genetically Modified Plants,�
Alliance for Bio-Integrity(January 8, 1992) http://www.responsibletechnology.org/fraud/fda-quotes
10 See for example, �Good Enough To Eat?� New Scientist (February 9, 2002), 7.
11 �Health risks of genetically modified foods,� editorial, Lancet, 29 May 1999.
12 �Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada; An Expert Panel Report on the Future of
Food Biotechnology prepared by The Royal Society of Canada at the request of Health Canada Canadian Food Inspection Agency and
Environment Canada� The Royal Society of Canada, January 2001.
13 J. R. Latham, et al., �The Mutational Consequences of Plant Transformation,� The Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2006, Article ID
25376: 1-7; see also Allison Wilson, et. al., �Transformation-induced mutations in transgenic plants: Analysis and biosafety implications,�
Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews � Vol. 23, December 2006.
14 P. H. Bao, S. Granata, S. Castiglione, G. Wang, C. Giordani, E. Cuzzoni, G. Damiani, C. Bandi, S. K. Datta, K. Datta, I. Potrykus, A.
Callegarin and F. Sala, “Evidence for genomic changes in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) recovered from protoplasts” Transgen Res 5 (1996):
97-103.; M. Labra, C. Savini, M. Bracale, N. Pelucchi, L. Colombo, M. Bardini and F. Sala, “Genomic changes in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.)
plants produced by infecting calli with Agrobacterium tumefaciens,” Plant Cell Rep 20 (2001): 325-330.
15 �Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada; An Expert Panel Report on the Future of
Food Biotechnology prepared by The Royal Society of Canada at the request of Health Canada Canadian Food Inspection Agency and
Environment Canada� The Royal Society of Canada, January 2001.
16 Edwin J. Mathews, Ph.D., in a memorandum to the Toxicology Section of the Biotechnology Working Group. Subject: Analysis of the Major
Plant Toxicants. Dated October 28, 1991
17 Division of Food Chemistry and Technology and Division of Contaminants Chemistry, �Points to Consider for Safety Evaluation of
Genetically Modified Foods: Supplemental Information,� November 1, 1991, http://www.responsibletechnology.org/fraud/fda-quotes
18 Netherwood et al, �Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract,� Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004): 2.
19 Division of Food Chemistry and Technology and Division of Contaminants Chemistry, �Points to Consider for Safety Evaluation of
Genetically Modified Foods: Supplemental Information,� November 1, 1991, www.biointegrity.org
20 Charles Benbrook, �Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the U.S. � the first sixteen years,� ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
EUROPE, Vol. 24:24 doi:10.1186/2190-4715-24-24, 28 September 2012. http://www.enveurope.com/content/24/1/24/abstract.
21 Department of Veterinary Medicine, FDA, correspondence June 16, 1993. As quoted in Fred A. Hines, Memo to Dr. Linda Kahl. �Flavr Savr
Tomato: . . . Pathology Branch�s Evaluation of Rats with Stomach Lesions From Three Four-Week Oral (Gavage) Toxicity Studies . . . and an
Expert Panel�s Report,� Alliance for Bio-Integrity (June 16, 1993) http://www.biointegrity.org/FDAdocs/17/view1.html
22 Robert J. Scheuplein, Memo to the FDA Biotechnology Coordinator and others, �Response to Calgene Amended Petition,� Alliance for BioIntegrity
(October 27, 1993) http://www.responsibletechnology.org/fraud/fda-quotes
23 Carl B. Johnson to Linda Kahl and others, �Flavr Savr� Tomato: Significance of Pending DHEE Question,� Alliance for Bio-Integrity
(December 7, 1993) http://www.responsibletechnology.org/fraud/fda-quotes
24 Arpad Pusztai, �Genetically Modified Foods: Are They a Risk to Human/Animal Health?� June 2001 Action Bioscience
www.actionbioscience.org/biotech/pusztai.html
25 Nagui H. Fares, Adel K. El-Sayed, �Fine Structural Changes in the Ileum of Mice Fed on Endotoxin Treated Potatoes and Transgenic
Potatoes,� Natural Toxins 6, no. 6 (1998): 219�233.
26 Stanley W. B. Ewen and Arpad Pusztai, �Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat
small intestine,� Lancet, 1999 Oct 16; 354 (9187): 1353-4.
27 Arpad Pusztai, �Facts Behind the GM Pea Controversy: Epigenetics, Transgenic Plants & Risk Assessment,� Proceedings of the Conference,
December 1st 2005 (Frankfurtam Main, Germany: Literaturhaus, 2005). http://www.oeko.de/oekodoc/277/2006-002-en.pdf
28 Arpad Pusztai, �Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food,� Nutrition and Health, 2002, Vol 16 Pp 73-84.
29 John M. Burns, �13-Week Dietary Subchronic Comparison Study with MON 863 Corn in Rats Preceded by a 1-Week Baseline Food
Consumption Determination with PMI Certified Rodent Diet #5002,� December 17, 2002
http://www.monsanto.com/pdf/products/fullratstudy863.pdf
30 R. Tudisco, P. Lombardi, F. Bovera, D. d�Angelo, M. I. Cutrignelli, V. Mastellone, V. Terzi, L. Avallone, F. Infascelli, �Genetically Modified
Soya Bean in Rabbit Feeding: Detection of DNA Fragments and Evaluation of Metabolic Effects by Enzymatic Analysis,� Animal Science 82
(2006): 193�199.
31 Comments to ANZFA about Applications A346, A362 and A363 from the Food Legislation and Regulation Advisory Group (FLRAG) of the
Public Health Association of Australia (PHAA) on behalf of the PHAA, �Food produced from glyphosate-tolerant canola line GT73.�
32 M. Malatesta, C. Caporaloni, S. Gavaudan, M. B. Rocchi, S. Serafini, C. Tiberi, G. Gazzanelli, �Ultrastructural Morphometrical and
Immunocytochemical Analyses of Hepatocyte Nuclei from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,� Cell Struct Funct. 27 (2002): 173�180
33 Jeffrey M. Smith, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA USA 2007
34 Irina Ermakova, �Experimental Evidence of GMO Hazards,� Presentation at Scientists for a GM Free Europe, EU Parliament, Brussels, June
12, 2007
35 Arpad Pusztai, �Can Science Give Us the Tools for Recognizing Possible Health Risks for GM Food?� Nutrition and Health 16 (2002): 73�84.
36 S. Leeson, �The Effect of Glufosinate Resistant Corn on Growth of Male Broiler Chickens,� Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences,
University of Guelph, Report No. A56379, July 12, 1996.
37 Malatesta, et al, �Ultrastructural Analysis of Pancreatic Acinar Cells from Mice Fed on Genetically modified Soybean,� J Anat. 2002
November; 201(5): 409�415; see also M. Malatesta, M. Biggiogera, E. Manuali, M. B. L. Rocchi, B. Baldelli, G. Gazzanelli, �Fine Structural
Analyses of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Nuclei from Mice Fed on GM Soybean,� Eur J Histochem 47 (2003): 385�388.
38 Arpad Pusztai, �Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food,� Nutrition and Health, 2002, Vol 16 Pp 73-84
39 R. Tudisco, P. Lombardi, F. Bovera, D. d�Angelo, M. I. Cutrignelli, V. Mastellone, V. Terzi, L. Avallone, F. Infascelli, �Genetically Modified
Soya Bean in Rabbit Feeding: Detection of DNA Fragments and Evaluation of Metabolic Effects by Enzymatic Analysis,� Animal Science 82
(2006): 193�199.
40 John M. Burns, �13-Week Dietary Subchronic Comparison Study with MON 863 Corn in Rats Preceded by a 1-Week Baseline Food
Consumption Determination with PMI Certified Rodent Diet #5002,� December 17, 2002
http://www.monsanto.com/pdf/products/fullratstudy863.pdf
41 R. Tudisco, P. Lombardi, F. Bovera, D. d�Angelo, M. I. Cutrignelli, V. Mastellone, V. Terzi, L. Avallone, F. Infascelli, �Genetically Modified
Soya Bean in Rabbit Feeding: Detection of DNA Fragments and Evaluation of Metabolic Effects by Enzymatic Analysis,� Animal Science 82
(2006): 193�199.
42 Arpad Pusztai, �Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food,� Nutrition and Health, 2002, Vol 16 Pp 73-84
43 de Vend�mois JS, Roullier F, Cellier D, S�ralini GE. A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health. Int J
Biol Sci 2009; 5:706-726. Available from http://www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm
44 S�ralini, G.-E., et al. Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food
Chem. Toxicol. (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005
45 Irina Ermakova, �Experimental Evidence of GMO Hazards,� Presentation at Scientists for a GM Free Europe, EU Parliament, Brussels, June
12, 2007
46 L. Vecchio et al, �Ultrastructural Analysis of Testes from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,� European Journal of Histochemistry
48, no. 4 (Oct�Dec 2004):449�454.
47 Oliveri et al., �Temporary Depression of Transcription in Mouse Pre-implantion Embryos from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,�
48th Symposium of the Society for Histochemistry, Lake Maggiore (Italy), September 7�10, 2006.
48 Fl�via Bittencourt Brasil, et al, �The Impact of Dietary Organic and Transgenic Soy on the Reproductive System of Female Adult Rat,� The
Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology Volume 292, Issue 4, pages 587-594, April 2009
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.20878/abstract
49 Jeffrey M. Smith, �Genetically Modified Soy Linked to Sterility, Infant Mortality,� based on correspondence with study authors and press
reports, Institute for Responsible Technology http://www.responsibletechnology.org/article-gmo-soy-linked-to-sterility
50 Alberta Velimirov and Claudia Binter, �Biological effects of transgenic maize NK603xMON810 fed in long term reproduction studies in
mice,� Forschungsberichte der Sektion IV, Band 3/2008. Report-Federal Ministry of Health, Family and Youth. 2008.
http://www.biosicherheit.de/pdf/aktuell/zentek_studie_2008.pdf
51 I.V.Ermakova, �Genetically Modified Organisms and Biological Risks,� Proceedings of International Disaster Reduction Conference (IDRC)
Davos, Switzerland August 27th � September 1st, 2006: 168�172. http://eco-irina-ermakova.narod.ru/eng/art/art16.html
52 Irina Ermakova, �Genetically modified soy leads to the decrease of weight and high mortality of rat pups of the first generation. Preliminary
studies,� Ecosinform 1 (2006): 4�9.
53 Irina Ermakova, �Experimental Evidence of GMO Hazards,� Presentation at Scientists for a GM Free Europe, EU Parliament, Brussels, June
12, 2007
54 I.V.Ermakova �GMO: Life itself intervened into the experiments,� Letter, EcosInform N2 (2006): 3�4.
55 Jeffrey M. Smith, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA USA 2007
56 �Mortality in Sheep Flocks after Grazing on Bt Cotton Fields�Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh� Report of the Preliminary Assessment,
April 2006, http://gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-news-items/6416-mortality-in-sheep-flocks-after-grazing-on-bt-cotton-fields-warangal-districtandhra-pradesh-2942006

57 Personal communication and visit by Jeffrey Smith with village members, near Warangal, Andhra Pradesh, January 2009.
58 John M. Burns, �13-Week Dietary Subchronic Comparison Study with MON 863 Corn in Rats Preceded by a 1-Week Baseline Food
Consumption Determination with PMI Certified Rodent Diet #5002,� December 17, 2002
http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto/content/sci_tech/prod_safety/fullratstudy.pdf, see also St�phane Foucart, �Controversy Surrounds a GMO,�
Le Monde, 14 December 2004; and Jeffrey M. Smith, �Genetically Modified Corn Study Reveals Health Damage and Cover-up,� Spilling the
Beans, June 2005, http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/Newsletter/June05GMCornHealthDangerExposed/index.cfm
59 Arpad Pusztai, �Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food,� Nutrition and Health, 2002, Vol 16 Pp 73-84
60 V. E. Prescott, et al, �Transgenic Expression of Bean r-Amylase Inhibitor in Peas Results in Altered Structure and
Immunogenicity,� Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry (2005): 53.
61 Yearly food sensitivity assessment of York Laboratory, as reported in Mark Townsend, �Why soya is a hidden destroyer,� Daily Express,
March 12, 1999.
62 G. A. Kleter and A. A. C. M. Peijnenburg, �Screening of transgenic proteins expressed in transgenic food crops for the presence of short amino
acid sequences indentical to potential, IgE-binding linear epitopes of allergens,� BMC Structural Biology 2 (2002): 8�19.
63 Netherwood et al, �Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract,� Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004): 2.
64 Hye-Yung Yum, Soo-Young Lee, Kyung-Eun Lee, Myung-Hyun Sohn, Kyu-Earn Kim, �Genetically Modified and Wild Soybeans: An
immunologic comparison,� Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 26, no. 3 (May�June 2005): 210-216(7).
65 Stephen R. Padgette et al, �The Composition of Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean Seeds Is Equivalent to That of Conventional Soybeans,� The
Journal of Nutrition 126, no. 4, (April 1996); including data in the journal archives from the same study; see also A. Pusztai and S. Bardocz,
�GMO in animal nutrition: potential benefits and risks,� Chapter 17, Biology of Nutrition in Growing Animals (Elsevier, 2005).
66 Manuela Malatesta, et al, �Ultrastructural Analysis of Pancreatic Acinar Cells from Mice Fed on Genetically modified Soybean,� Journal of
Anatomy 201, no. 5 (November 2002): 409; see also M. Malatesta, M. Biggiogera, E. Manuali, M. B. L. Rocchi, B. Baldelli, G. Gazzanelli, �Fine
Structural Analyses of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Nuclei from Mice Fed on GM Soybean,� Eur J Histochem 47 (2003): 385�388.
67 See for example, Scott H. Sicherer et al., �Prevalence of peanut and tree nut allergy in the United States determined by means of a random digit
dial telephone survey: A 5-year follow-up study,� Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, March 2003, vol. 112, n 6, 1203-1207); and Ricki
Helm et al., �Hypoallergenic Foods�Soybeans and Peanuts,� Information Systems for Biotechnology News Report, October 1, 2002.
68 Vazquez et al, “Intragastric and intraperitoneal administration of Cry1Ac protoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis induces systemic and mucosal
antibody responses in mice,” Life Sciences, 64, no. 21 (1999): 1897�1912; Vazquez et al, �Characterization of the mucosal and systemic immune
response induced by Cry1Ac protein from Bacillus thuringiensis HD 73 in mice,� Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 33 (2000):
147�155.
69 R. I. V�zquez, L. Moreno-Fierros, L. Neri-Baz�n, et al., �Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac Protoxin Is a Potent Systemic and Mucosal Adjuvant,�
Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 49 (1999): 578�84. See also Vazquez-Padron, RI. Et al. (2000b) Characterization of the mucosal and
systemic immune response induced by Cry1Ac protein from Bacillus thuringiensis HD 73 in mice. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological
Research 33, 147-155.
70 Nagui H. Fares, Adel K. El-Sayed, �Fine Structural Changes in the Ileum of Mice Fed on Endotoxin Treated Potatoes and Transgenic
Potatoes,� Natural Toxins 6, no. 6 (1998): 219�233.
71 Alberto Finamore, et al, �Intestinal and Peripheral Immune Response to MON810 Maize Ingestion in Weaning and Old Mice,� J. Agric. Food
Chem., 2008, 56 (23), pp 11533�11539, November 14, 2008
72 Washington State Department of Health, �Report of health surveillance activities: Asian gypsy moth control program,� (Olympia, WA:
Washington State Dept. of Health, 1993).
73 M. Green, et al., �Public health implications of the microbial pesticide Bacillus thuringiensis: An epidemiological study, Oregon, 1985-86,�
Amer. J. Public Health 80, no. 7(1990): 848�852.
74 M.A. Noble, P.D. Riben, and G. J. Cook, �Microbiological and epidemiological surveillance program to monitor the health effects of Foray
48B BTK spray� (Vancouver, B.C.: Ministry of Forests, Province of British Columbi, Sep. 30, 1992).
75 A. Edamura, MD, �Affidavit of the Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division. Dale Edwards and Citizens Against Aerial Spraying vs. Her
Majesty the Queen, Represented by the Minister of Agriculture,� (May 6, 1993); as reported in Carrie Swadener, �Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.),�
Journal of Pesticide Reform, 14, no, 3 (Fall 1994).
76 J. R. Samples, and H. Buettner, �Ocular infection caused by a biological insecticide,� J. Infectious Dis. 148, no. 3 (1983): 614; as reported in
Carrie Swadener, �Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.)�, Journal of Pesticide Reform 14, no. 3 (Fall 1994)
77 M. Green, et al., �Public health implications of the microbial pesticide Bacillus thuringiensis: An epidemiological study, Oregon, 1985-86,�
Amer. J. Public Health, 80, no. 7 (1990): 848�852.
78 A. Edamura, MD, �Affidavit of the Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division. Dale Edwards and Citizens Against Aerial Spraying vs. Her
Majesty the Queen, Represented by the Minister of Agriculture,� (May 6, 1993); as reported in Carrie Swadener, �Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.),�
Journal of Pesticide Reform, 14, no, 3 (Fall 1994).
79 Carrie Swadener, �Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.),� Journal of Pesticide Reform 14, no. 3 (Fall 1994).
80 Terje Traavik and Jack Heinemann, �Genetic Engineering and Omitted Health Research: Still No Answers to Ageing Questions, 2006. Cited in
their quote was: G. Stotzky, �Release, persistence, and biological activity in soil of insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis,� found in
Deborah K. Letourneau and Beth E. Burrows, Genetically Engineered Organisms. Assessing Environmental and Human Health Effects (cBoca
Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC, 2002), 187�222.
81 See for example, A. Dutton, H. Klein, J. Romeis, and F. Bigler, �Uptake of Bt-toxin by herbivores feeding on transgenic maize and
consequences for the predator Chrysoperla carnea,� Ecological Entomology 27 (2002): 441�7; and J. Romeis, A. Dutton, and F. Bigler, �Bacillus
thuringiensis toxin (Cry1Ab) has no direct effect on larvae of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae),�
Journal of Insect Physiology 50, no. 2�3 (2004): 175�183.
82 Mesnage R, Clair E, Gress S, Then C, Sz�k�cs A, S�ralini, GE. (2012). Cytotoxicity on human cells of Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac Bt insecticidal
toxins alone or with a glyphosate-based herbicide. J. Appl. Toxicol. doi: 10.1002/jat.2712
83 Aris A, Leblanc S. Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in Eastern Townships of Quebec, Canada.
Reprod Toxicol (2011), doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.02.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338670
84 N. Tomlinson of UK MAFF’s Joint Food Safety and Standards Group 4, December 1998 letter to the U.S. FDA, commenting on its draft
document, �Guidance for Industry: Use of Antibiotic Resistance Marker Genes in Transgenic Plants.�
85 Jeffrey M. Smith, �Bt-maize (corn) during pollination, may trigger disease in people living near the cornfield,� Press Release, February 2004,
http://www.responsibletechnology.org/gmo-dangers/health-risks/articles-about-risks-by-jeffrey-smith/Genetically-Engineered-Foods-May-CauseRising-Food-Allergies-Genetically-Engineered-Corn-June-2007;
and Allen V. Estabillo, �Farmer’s group urges ban on planting Bt corn; says it
could be cause of illnesses,� Mindanews, October 19, 2004 http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/43-2004/5635-farmers-group-urges-ban-onplanting-bt-corn-20102004
86 Mae-Wan Ho, �GM Ban Long Overdue, Dozens Ill & Five Deaths in the Philippines,� ISIS Press Release, June 2, 2006. http://www.isis.org.uk/GMBanLongOverdue.php
87 Ashish Gupta et. al., �Impact of Bt Cotton on Farmers� Health (in Barwani and Dhar District of Madhya Pradesh),� Investigation Report, Oct�
Dec 2005.
88 Jeffrey M. Smith, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA USA 2007
89 E. Ann Clark, �Food Safety of GM Crops in Canada: toxicity and allergenicity,� GE Alert, 2000.
http://www.plant.uoguelph.ca/research/homepages/eclark/safety.htm
90 FLRAG of the PHAA of behalf of the PHAA, �Comments to ANZFA about Applications A372, A375, A378 and A379.�
91 Judy Carman, �Is GM Food Safe to Eat?� in R. Hindmarsh, G. Lawrence, eds., Recoding Nature Critical Perspectives on Genetic Engineering
(Sydney: UNSW Press, 2004): 82�93.
92 Judy Carman, �Is GM Food Safe to Eat?� in R. Hindmarsh, G. Lawrence, eds., Recoding Nature Critical Perspectives on Genetic Engineering
(Sydney: UNSW Press, 2004): 82�93.
93 FLRAG, �Comments to ANZFA about Applications A346, A362 and A363,� http://www.iher.org.au/
94 Doug Gurian-Sherman, �Holes in the Biotech Safety Net, FDA Policy Does Not Assure the Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods,� Center
for Science in the Public Interest, http://www.cspinet.org/new/pdf/fda_report__final.pdf
95 Bill Freese, �The StarLink Affair, Submission by Friends of the Earth to the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel considering Assessment of
Additional Scientific Information Concerning StarLink Corn,� July 17�19, 2001.
96 FDA Letter, Letter from Alan M. Rulis, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, FDA to Dr. Kent Croon,
Regulatory Affairs Manager, Monsanto Company, Sept 25, 1996. See Letter for BNF No. 34 at
http://www.fda.gov/Food/Biotechnology/Submissions/ucm161107.htm
97 �Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada; An Expert Panel Report on the Future of
Food Biotechnology prepared by The Royal Society of Canada at the request of Health Canada Canadian Food Inspection Agency and
Environment Canada� The Royal Society of Canada, January 2001. http://www.canadians.org/food/documents/rsc_feb05.pdf
98 FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP), Open Meeting, July 17, 2001. http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/2001/july/julyfinal.pdf
99 Bill Freese, Crop testing, New Scientist, Letter to the Editor, issue 2530, December 17, 2005
100 M. Cretenet, J. Goven, J. A. Heinemann, B. Moore, and C. Rodriguez-Beltran, �Submission on the DAR for application A549 Food Derived
from High-Lysine Corn LY038: to permit the use in food of high-lysine corn, 2006, www.inbi.canterbury.ac.nz
101 Marc Lapp� and Britt Bailey, �ASA Response,� June 25, 1999, www.environmentalcommons.org/cetos/articles/asaresponse.html
102 Bill Freese, �The StarLink Affair, Submission by Friends of the Earth to the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel considering Assessment of
Additional Scientific Information Concerning StarLink Corn,� July 17-19, 2001
103 Paul P. Groenewegen, Brian W. McBride, John H. Burton, Theodore H. Elsasser. “Bioactivity of Milk from bST-Treated Cows.” J. Nutrition
120, 1990, pp. 514-519
104 Judith C. Juskevich and C. Greg Guyer. “Bovine Growth Hormone: Human Food Safety Evaluation.” Science, vol. 249. August 24, 1990, pp.
875-884
105 Pete Hardin, �rbGH: Appropriate Studies Haven�t Been Done,� The Milkweed, July 2000
106 See for example, Doug Gurian-Sherman, �Holes in the Biotech Safety Net, FDA Policy Does Not Assure the Safety of Genetically Engineered
Foods,� Center for Science in the Public Interest, http://www.cspinet.org/new/pdf/fda_report__final.pdf
107 S. R. Padgette, N. B.Taylor, D. L. Nida, M. R. Bailey, J. MacDonald, L. R. Holden, R. L. Fuchs, �The composition of glyphosate-tolerant
soybean seeds is equivalent to that of conventional soybeans,� J. Nutr. 126 (1996):702�716.
108 B. G. Hammond, J. L. Vicini, G. F. Hartnell, M. W. Naylor, C. D. Knight, E. H. Robinson, R. L. Fuchs, and S. R. Padgette, �The feeding
value of soybeans fed to rats, chickens, catfish, and dairy cattle is not altered by genetic incorporation of glyphosate tolerance,� J. Nutr. 126
(1996): 717�727.
109 A. Pusztai and S. Bardocz, �GMO in animal nutrition: potential benefits and risks,� Chapter 17, Biology of Nutrition in Growing Animals
(Elsevier, October 2005). earlier
110 Ian F. Pryme and Rolf Lembcke, �In Vivo Studies on Possible Health Consequences of Genetically Modified Food and Feed�with Particular
Regard to Ingredients Consisting of Genetically Modified Plan Materials,� Nutrition and Health 17(2003): 1�8.
111 Andreas Rang, et al, �Detection of RNA variants transcribed from the transgene in Roundup Ready soybean,� Eur Food
Res Technol 220 (2005): 438�443.
112 Ian F. Pryme and Rolf Lembcke, �In Vivo Studies on Possible Health Consequences of Genetically Modified Food and Feed�with Particular
Regard to Ingredients Consisting of Genetically Modified Plan Materials,� Nutrition and Health 17(2003): 1�8.
113 Arpad Pusztai, �Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food,� Nutrition and Health, 2002, Vol 16 Pp 73-84;
Stanley W. B. Ewen and Arpad Pusztai, �Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small
intestine,� Lancet, 1999 Oct 16; 354 (9187): 1353-4; Arpad Pusztai, �Genetically Modified Foods: Are They a Risk to Human/Animal Health?�
June 2001 Action Bioscience http://www.actionbioscience.org/biotech/pusztai.html; and A. Pusztai and S. Bardocz, �GMO in animal nutrition:
potential benefits and risks,� Chapter 17, Biology of Nutrition in Growing Animals, R. Mosenthin, J. Zentek and T. Zebrowska (Eds.) Elsevier,
October 2005
114 V. E. Prescott, et al, �Transgenic Expression of Bean r-Amylase Inhibitor in Peas Results in Altered Structure and Immunogenicity,� Journal
of Agricultural Food Chemistry (2005): 53.
115 J. Lexchin, L. A. Bero, B. Djulbegovic, and O. Clark, �Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic
review,� BMJ 326 (2003):1167�1176.
116 Mark Friedberg, et al, �Evaluation of Conflict of Interest in Economic Analyses of New Drugs Used in Oncology,� JAMA 282 (1999):1453�
1457.
117 Suzanne Wuerthele quoted here: http://archive.sare.org/sanet-mg/archives/html-home/23-html/0195.html
118 �Elements of Precaution,� The Royal Society of Canada, January 2001. http://www.canadians.org/food/documents/rsc_feb05.pdf
119 Friends of the Earth Europe, �Throwing Caution to the Wind: A review of the European Food Safety Authority and its work on genetically
modified foods and crops,� November 2004.
120 European Communities submission to World Trade Organization dispute panel, 28 January 2005, reported in Hidden uncertainties – risks of
GMOs, 23 April 2006, Friends of the Earth / Greenpeace http://www.non-gm-farmers.com/news_print.asp?ID=2731
121 EU Regulation 178/2002 (Article 30.4)
122 Friends of the Earth Europe, �Throwing Caution to the Wind: A review of the European Food Safety Authority and its work on genetically
modified foods and crops,� November 2004.
123 �Greenpeace exposes Government-Monsanto nexus to cheat Indian farmers: calls on GEAC to revoke BT cotton permission,� Press release,
March 3, 2005, http://www.greenpeace.org/india_en/news/details?item_id=771071
124 Jeffrey M. Smith, Seeds of Deception, (Iowa: Yes! Books, 2003), 224.
125 �Monsanto Bribery Charges in Indonesia by DoJ and USSEC,� Third World Network, Malaysia, Jan 27, 2005,
http://www.mindfully.org/GE/2005/Monsanto-Indonesia-Bribery27jan05.htm
126 Jeffrey M. Smith, Seeds of Deception, Yes! Books, Fairfield, Iowa 2003
127 Karen Charman, The Professor Who Can Read Your Mind, PR Watch Newsletter Fourth Quarter 1999, Volume 6, No. 4
128 http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/41-2002/3068-support-for-food-biotechnology-holds-in-the-us-
129 Estimates of increased IGF-1 levels vary considerably. In Mepham et al, �Safety of milk from cows treated with bovine somatotropin,� The
Lancet 2 (1994):197, IGF-1 levels were up to 10 times higher. The methods used may also underestimate IGF-1 levels considerably. See Samuel
S. Epstein, �Unlabeled Milk From Cows Treated With Biosynthetic Growth Hormones: A Case of Regulatory Abdication,� International Journal
of Health Services 26(1996): 173�185; and Samuel S. Epstein, What�s In Your Milk? (Victoria, British Columbia, Canada:Trafford Publishing,
2006), 197�204.
130 For a review of literature linking elevated levels of IGF-1 with increased risks of breast, colon and prostate cancers, see Samuel S. Epstein,
What�s In Your Milk?, 197�204.
131 Gary Steinman, �Mechanisms of Twinning VII. Effect of Diet and Heredity on the Human Twinning Rate,� Journal of Reproductive
Medicine, May 2006; S.E. Echternkamp et al, �Ovarian Follicular Development in Cattle Selected for Twin Ovulations and Births,� Journal of
Animal Science 82 no. 2 (2004): 459�471; and S. E. Echternkamp et al, �Concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I in blood and ovarian
follicular fluid of cattle selected for twins,� Biology of Reproduction, 43(1990): 8�14.
132 Powell D.A.; Blaine K.; Morris S.; Wilson J., Agronomic and consumer considerations for Bt and conventional sweet-corn, British Food
Journal, Volume: 105, Issue: 10, Page: 700-713 (Nov 2003)
133 GM Nation? The findings of the public debate, http://www.gmnation.org.uk/ut_09/ut_9_6.htm#summary
134 To see the Toronto Star photo in Laidlaw�s book, go to http://www.gmwatch.org/p1temp.asp?pid=72&page=1 or
http://www.powerbase.info/index.php/Shane_Morris
135 Corn Fakes, Private Eye, No. 1194, 28 September-11 October 2007 http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/46-2007/7525-award-winningpaper-qa-flagrant-fraudq-cambridge-expert-2692007
136 Tim Lambert, Would you eat wormy corn?, September 7 2007
http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2007/09/would_you_eat_wormy_sweet_corn.php
137 �Genetically modified foods, who knows how safe they are?� CBC News and Current Affairs, September 25, 2006.
138 Mike Zelina, et al., The Health Effects of Genetically Engineered Crops on San Luis Obispo County,� A Citizen Response to the SLO Health
Commission GMO Task Force Report, 2006.
139 Bill Lambrecht, Dinner at the New Gene Caf�, St. Martin’s Press, September 2001, pg 139
Photo credits
Stanley W. B. Ewen and Arpad Pusztai, �Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small
intestine,� Lancet, 1999 Oct 16; 354 (9187): 1353-4.
M. Malatesta, C. Caporaloni, S. Gavaudan, M. B. Rocchi, S. Serafini, C. Tiberi, G. Gazzanelli, �Ultrastructural Morphometrical and
Immunocytochemical Analyses of Hepatocyte Nuclei from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,� Cell Struct Funct. 27 (2002): 173�180
Irina Ermakova, �Experimental Evidence of GMO Hazards,� Presentation at Scientists for a GM Free Europe, EU Parliament, Brussels, June 12,
2007
Irina Ermakova, �Genetically modified soy leads to the decrease of weight and high mortality of rat pups of the first generation. Preliminary
studies,� Ecosinform 1 (2006): 4�9.

Close Accordion
Three Metabolic Energy Systems

Three Metabolic Energy Systems

Personal Training 101

energy personal trainer

How You Get Energy & How You Use It

energy asparagus eggs tomatos We usually talk of energy in general terms, as in �I don�t have a lot of energy today� or �You can feel the energy in the room.� But what really is energy? Where do we get the energy to move? How do we use it? How do we get more of it? Ultimately, what controls our movements? The three metabolic energy pathways are the�phosphagen system, glycolysis�and the�aerobic system.�How do they work, and what is their effect?

Albert Einstein, in his infinite wisdom, discovered that the total energy of an object is equal to the mass of the object multiplied by the square of the speed of light. His formula for atomic energy, E = mc2, has become the most recognized mathematical formula in the world. According to his equation, any change in the energy of an object causes a change in the mass of that object. The change in energy can come in many forms, including mechanical, thermal, electromagnetic, chemical, electrical or nuclear. Energy is all around us. The lights in your home, a microwave, a telephone, the sun; all transmit energy. Even though the solar energy that heats the earth is quite different from the energy used to run up a hill, energy, as the first law of thermodynamics tells us, can be neither created nor destroyed. It is simply changed from one form to another.

ATP Re-Synthesis

energyThe energy for all physical activity comes from the conversion of high-energy phosphates (adenosine�triphosphate�ATP) to lower-energy phosphates (adenosine�diphosphate�ADP; adenosine�monophosphate�AMP; and inorganic phosphate, Pi). During this breakdown (hydrolysis) of ATP, which is a water-requiring process, a proton, energy and heat are produced: ATP + H2O ��ADP + Pi�+ H+�+ energy + heat. Since our muscles don�t store much ATP, we must constantly resynthesize it. The hydrolysis and resynthesis of ATP is thus a circular process�ATP is hydrolyzed into ADP and Pi, and then ADP and Pi�combine to resynthesize ATP. Alternatively, two ADP molecules can combine to produce ATP and AMP: ADP + ADP ��ATP + AMP.

Like many other animals, humans produce ATP through three metabolic pathways that consist of many enzyme-catalyzed chemical reactions: the phosphagen system, glycolysis and the aerobic system. Which pathway your clients use for the primary production of ATP depends on how quickly they need it and how much of it they need. Lifting heavy weights, for instance, requires energy much more quickly than jogging on the treadmill, necessitating the reliance on different energy systems. However, the production of ATP is never achieved by the exclusive use of one energy system, but rather by the coordinated response of all energy systems contributing to different degrees.

1. Phosphagen System

energy woman sit-ups on machineDuring short-term, intense activities, a large amount of power needs to be produced by the muscles, creating a high demand for ATP. The phosphagen system (also called the ATP-CP system) is the quickest way to resynthesize ATP (Robergs & Roberts 1997). Creatine phosphate (CP), which is stored in skeletal muscles, donates a phosphate to ADP to produce ATP: ADP + CP ��ATP + C. No carbohydrate or fat is used in this process; the regeneration of ATP comes solely from stored CP. Since this process does not need oxygen to resynthesize ATP, it is anaerobic, or oxygen-independent. As the fastest way to resynthesize ATP, the phosphagen system is the predominant energy system used for all-out exercise lasting up to about 10 seconds. However, since there is a limited amount of stored CP and ATP in skeletal muscles, fatigue occurs rapidly.

2. Glycolysis

energyGlycolysis is the predominant energy system used for all-out exercise lasting from 30 seconds to about 2 minutes and is the second-fastest way to resynthesize ATP. During glycolysis, carbohydrate�in the form of either blood glucose (sugar) or muscle glycogen (the stored form of glucose)�is broken down through a series of chemical reactions to form pyruvate (glycogen is first broken down into glucose through a process called�glycogenolysis). For every molecule of glucose broken down to pyruvate through glycolysis, two molecules of usable ATP are produced (Brooks et al. 2000). Thus, very little energy is produced through this pathway, but the trade-off is that you get the energy quickly. Once pyruvate is formed, it has two fates: conversion to lactate or conversion to a metabolic intermediary molecule called acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA), which enters the mitochondria for oxidation and the production of more ATP (Robergs & Roberts 1997). Conversion to lactate occurs when the demand for oxygen is greater than the supply (i.e., during anaerobic exercise). Conversely, when there is enough oxygen available to meet the muscles� needs (i.e., during aerobic exercise), pyruvate (via acetyl-CoA) enters the mitochondria and goes through aerobic metabolism.

When oxygen is not supplied fast enough to meet the muscles� needs (anaerobic glycolysis), there is an increase in hydrogen ions (which causes the muscle pH to decrease; a condition called acidosis) and other metabolites (ADP, Pi�and potassium ions). Acidosis and the accumulation of these other metabolites cause a number of problems inside the muscles, including inhibition of specific enzymes involved in metabolism and muscle contraction, inhibition of the release of calcium (the trigger for muscle contraction) from its storage site in muscles, and interference with the muscles� electrical charges (Enoka & Stuart 1992; Glaister 2005; McLester 1997). As a result of these changes, muscles lose their ability to contract effectively, and muscle force production and exercise intensity ultimately decrease.

3. Aerobic System

energySince humans evolved for aerobic activities (Hochachka, Gunga & Kirsch 1998; Hochachka & Monge 2000), it�s not surprising that the aerobic system, which is dependent on oxygen, is the most complex of the three energy systems. The metabolic reactions that take place in the presence of oxygen are responsible for most of the cellular energy produced by the body. However, aerobic metabolism is the slowest way to resynthesize ATP. Oxygen, as the patriarch of metabolism, knows that it is worth the wait, as it controls the fate of endurance and is the sustenance of life. �I�m oxygen,� it says to the muscle, with more than a hint of superiority. �I can give you a lot of ATP, but you will have to wait for it.�

The aerobic system�which includes the�Krebs cycle�(also called the�citric acid cycle or TCA cycle) and the�electron transport chain�uses blood glucose, glycogen and fat as fuels to resynthesize ATP in the mitochondria of muscle cells (see the sidebar �Energy System Characteristics�). Given its location, the aerobic system is also called�mitochondrial respiration.�When using carbohydrate, glucose and glycogen are first metabolized through glycolysis, with the resulting pyruvate used to form acetyl-CoA, which enters the Krebs cycle. The electrons produced in the Krebs cycle are then transported through the electron transport chain, where ATP and water are produced (a process called�oxidative phosphorylation) (Robergs & Roberts 1997). Complete oxidation of glucose via glycolysis, the Krebs cycle and the electron transport chain produces 36 molecules of ATP for every molecule of glucose broken down (Robergs & Roberts 1997). Thus, the aerobic system produces 18 times more ATP than does anaerobic glycolysis from each glucose molecule.

energyFat, which is stored as triglyceride in adipose tissue underneath the skin and within skeletal muscles (called�intramuscular triglyceride), is the other major fuel for the aerobic system, and is the largest store of energy in the body. When using fat, triglycerides are first broken down into free fatty acids and glycerol (a process called�lipolysis). The free fatty acids, which are composed of a long chain of carbon atoms, are transported to the muscle mitochondria, where the carbon atoms are used to produce acetyl-CoA (a process called�beta-oxidation).

Following acetyl-CoA formation, fat metabolism is identical to carbohydrate metabolism, with acetyl-CoA entering the Krebs cycle and the electrons being transported to the electron transport chain to form ATP and water. The oxidation of free fatty acids yields many more ATP molecules than the oxidation of glucose or glycogen. For example, the oxidation of the fatty acid palmitate produces 129 molecules of ATP (Brooks et al. 2000). No wonder clients can sustain an aerobic activity longer than an anaerobic one!

Understanding how energy is produced for physical activity is important when it comes to programming exercise at the proper intensity and duration for your clients. So the next time your clients get done with a workout and think, �I have a lot of energy,� you�ll know exactly where they got it.

Energy System Characteristics
energy

Energy System Workouts

Have clients warm up and cool down before and after each workout.

Phosphagen System

An effective workout for this system is short, very fast sprints on the treadmill or bike lasting 5�15 seconds with 3�5 minutes of rest between each. The long rest periods allow for complete replenishment of creatine phosphate in the muscles so it can be reused for the next interval.

  • 2 sets of 8 x 5 seconds at close to top speed with 3:00 passive rest and 5:00 rest between sets
  • 5 x 10 seconds at close to top speed with 3:00�4:00 passive rest

Glycolysis

This system can be trained using fast intervals lasting 30 seconds to 2 minutes with an active-recovery period twice as long as the work period (1:2 work-to-rest ratio).

  • 8�10 x 30 seconds fast with 1:00 active recovery
  • 4 x 1:30 fast with 3:00 active recovery

Aerobic System

While the phosphagen system and glycolysis are best trained with intervals, because those metabolic systems are emphasized only during high-intensity activities, the aerobic system can be trained with both continuous exercise and intervals.

  • 60 minutes at 70%�75% maximum heart rate
  • 15- to 20-minute tempo workout at lactate threshold intensity (about 80%�85% maximum heart rate)
  • 5 x 3:00 at 95%�100% maximum heart rate with 3:00 active recovery

by�Jason Karp, PhD

read more button

References:

Brooks, G.A., et al. 2000.�Exercise Physiology: Human Bioenergetics and Its Applications.Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

Enoka, R.M., & Stuart, D.G. 1992. Neurobiology of muscle fatigue.�Journal of Applied Physiology, 72�(5), 1631�48.

Glaister, M. 2005. Multiple sprint work: Physiological responses, mechanisms of fatigue and the influence of aerobic fitness.�Sports Medicine, 35�(9), 757�77.

Hochachka, P.W., Gunga, H.C., & Kirsch, K. 1998. Our ancestral physiological phenotype: An adaptation for hypoxia tolerance and for endurance performance?�Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95,�1915�20.

Hochachka, P.W., & Monge, C. 2000. Evolution of human hypoxia tolerance physiology.�Advances in Experimental and Medical Biology, 475,�25�43.

McLester, J.R. 1997. Muscle contraction and fatigue: The role of adenosine 5′-diphosphate and inorganic phosphate.�Sports Medicine, 23�(5), 287�305.

Robergs, R.A. & Roberts, S.O. 1997.�Exercise Physiology: Exercise, Performance, and Clinical Applications.�Boston: William C. Brown.

Mastodon