ClickCease
+1-915-850-0900 spinedoctors@gmail.com
Select Page

Health

Back Clinic Health Team. The level of functional and metabolic efficiency of a living organism. In humans, it is the ability of individuals or communities to adapt and self-manage when facing physical, mental, psychological, and social changes in an environment. Dr.Alex Jimenez D.C., C.C.S.T, a clinical pain doctor who uses cutting-edge therapies and rehabilitation procedures focused on total health, strength training, and complete conditioning. We take a global functional fitness treatment approach to regain complete functional health.

Dr. Jimenez presents articles both from his own experience and from a variety of sources that pertain to a healthy lifestyle or general health issues. I have spent over 30+ years researching and testing methods with thousands of patients and understand what truly works. We strive to create fitness and better the body through researched methods and total health programs.

These programs and methods are natural and use the body’s own ability to achieve improvement goals, rather than introducing harmful chemicals, controversial hormone replacement, surgery, or addictive drugs. As a result, individuals live a fulfilled life with more energy, a positive attitude, better sleep, less pain, proper body weight, and education on maintaining this way of life.


Health, Wellness And Chiropractic | El Paso, TX.

Health, Wellness And Chiropractic | El Paso, TX.

Health Wellness: Chiropractic has been increasing in popularity over the last few years as the medical community is recognizing its value for treating many conditions as well as improving overall health wellness. There was a time when chiropractic was used to treat back pain, but studies are showing that it can be used to effectively treat a wide variety of health issues. This is due, at least in part, to chiropractic�s whole body approach to health care. It is much, much more than just spinal adjustments.

Health Wellness

Better Neck & Back Health

This is the most obvious and prevalent benefit of chiropractic care � what most people think of when they think about chiropractic care – but its merit goes deeper than may first meet the eye. The traditional spinal alignment is very beneficial for treating pain and improving mobility.

When the spine is aligned the neck and back is healthier which leads to a decrease in tension, better posture, reduced pain, and the central nervous system functions far more efficiently. When the central nervous system is working the way it should, overall health is improved and the body as a whole functions better.

Stronger Immune System

Regular chiropractic treatments have been linked to a stronger immune system. When the spine is in proper alignment, the central nervous system is able to function much more efficiently and effectively. This means that the body is better able to receive messages from the brain.

When the spine is out of alignment, the messages that that are sent and received by the central nervous system can�t complete their path like they should, leaving the organs and other parts of the body not operating as it should. This translates to a better functioning immune system, which means that you may find that you are sick as lot less often.

health wellness el paso tx.

More Effective Pain Management

Another benefit of a properly functioning central nervous system is better pain management. Chiropractic is an effective treatment for migraines, injuries, fibromyalgia, and pain caused by other conditions.

When the spine is out of alignment it can affect various nerves and conditions like sciatica may occur. Bringing the spine into alignment can relieve the compression of nerves, alleviating pain.

Chiropractic is regularly used to treat sports related injuries for pro athletes to weekend warriors � and everyone in between. Even more, there are many studies that show chiropractic is an effective form of pain management.

Improved Activity Level

A lesser known or recognized benefit of chiropractic that improves your overall health is its ability to improve your activity level. Pain management definitely plays a part in this, but regular treatments also help improve mobility and flexibility. This, in turn, helps to reduce your risk of injury, allowing you to be more active.

When you are more mobile you are better able to stay active which means it is easier to get the exercise that you need to maintain a healthy lifestyle. This is particularly important for older people. As we age, we tend to lose our mobility and flexibility. By starting chiropractic care early, it helps stave off some of those effects of aging. However, even elderly patients have noticed a marked improvement in just a few treatments.

Chiropractic care is a very good way to give your health wellness a great boost. When you make it a part of your regular routine, you are much more likely to enjoy fewer sick days, less pain, the ability to be more active, and a healthier neck and spine. The whole body approach means you will be exposed to not only spinal adjustments, but also recommendations on diet, supplements, exercise, and lifestyle changes that can definitely change your life.

Chiropractic Clinic Extra: Athletic Recovery & Rehabilitation

Allergy Sufferers, Chiropractic Can Help, In El Paso, TX.

Allergy Sufferers, Chiropractic Can Help, In El Paso, TX.

Allergy Sufferers!�As winter gives way to spring, seasonal allergies can really get you down. Whether you get a few sniffles and some sneezing or you are down for the count with every terrible allergy symptom known to man, it can make spring pretty unbearable.

There is no shortage of allergy medications on the market, but they come with their own issues. The majority of them cause drowsiness and other unpleasant side effects, leaving you barely able to function. Those that are made from a �non drowsy� formula sound great, but if you have certain health conditions, like high blood pressure, you are out of luck � and stuck either taking the ones that make you sleep sucking it up and dealing with your allergies sans medication.

That�s no way to live.

What Are Allergies?

When your immune produces histamines in response to an allergen that you encounter the physiological reaction that you experience is broadly referred to as allergies or hay fever. The allergens may be simple substances that normally do not affect people, but when your body is out of balance, it can cause a variety of problems.

Symptoms of allergies include:

  • Runny nose
  • Stuffy nose
  • Headache
  • Sneezing
  • Itchy eyes
  • Coughing or scratchy throat
  • Skin Rash or Hives
  • Swelling
  • Diarrhea
  • Nausea
  • Fatigue

Anaphylaxis, severe, life threatening allergies can include swelling of the airways, tongue, and throat, inability to breathe due to blocked airway, and other dangerous symptoms.

The allergens can be something you come in contact with, like poison ivy, something you breathe in, like mold or dust, or it can be something you ingest, like strawberries or peanuts. Different people will have different allergies, but those who are allergic to the same things may not have the same reaction. Often a doctor or allergist will diagnose your allergies.

allergy sufferers el paso tx.Chiropractic Care For Allergy Sufferers

Chiropractic treatments have been found to be very effective for relieving allergy symptoms and even stopping allergies at their source. It reduces the severity of allergy symptoms as well as the frequency of occurrence. It does not work like allergy medications which have an anti-histamine effect and only work as a short term fix for your allergy symptoms.

Chiropractic treatments help your body become more balanced so that it is better equipped for combating allergies at the source. When your spine is not aligned it can impact your nervous system leading to a variety of problems � including allergies. Your immune system can be affected, causing it to malfunction.

A chiropractor can help relieve the stress on your nervous system by aligning your spine. This takes the pressure off of nerves, allowing your immune system to function at a more optimal level. This makes it easier for your body to ward off infections while recognizing allergens as harmless.

When your immune system encounters allergens it doesn�t overreact to them. Instead, the reaction is much more subdued, or even nonexistent. Chiropractic has also been found to help asthma patients breathe easier. Asthma symptoms are diminished.

Chiropractic care is more than just spinal manipulation, though. It promotes whole body wellness. Patients are taught exercise, stress relief, and nutrition so that the entire system is treated. The whole body treatment plan for chiropractic patients will help you be allergy free in a short time.

It is important to follow your chiropractic plan thoroughly and consistently. Get plenty of rest and take time to destress. The more you can relax and take care of yourself, the healthier you will be overall. Chiropractic care can help so many health conditions; it can actually make you healthier. Allergy sufferers or if you are struggling with allergies for the first time, give chiropractic care a try you just might be surprised.

Chiropractic Clinic Extra: Migraine Treatment & Recovery

Improve Posture With Chiropractic | El Paso, TX.

Improve Posture With Chiropractic | El Paso, TX.

Improve Posture: Your mother always told you to stand up straight � and she was right. Good posture is very important. It is good for your health, your mood, and even how you are perceived by others. Good posture can help you stave off age related conditions and allow your vital organs plenty of room to do their job correctly.

Improve Posture With Chiropractic

A Word About Posture

Sometimes though things can happen that impact your posture. Maybe you sustain an injury and your body compensates by listing to one side or you hunch over in an effort to relieve the pain. Other times you may slouch in an effort to make yourself �invisible� in a crowd. Then there are those who just don�t give good posture its due and slouch because they simply don�t feel like standing up straight.

Whatever the case, poor posture can lead to back pain, headaches, increased risk of injury, decreased flexibility, and diminished mobility. It can actually cause you to age much faster. The good news is, in most cases even those with very poor posture can turn it around and stand a little taller. Chiropractic care has shown to help many people regain their youthful, straight, healthy posture that they�ve lost.

Postural Conditions That Chiropractic Care Can Help

improve posture el paso tx.

There are certain postural conditions that chiropractic care is particularly helpful is alleviating, including:

  • Hip or pelvis unleveling
  • Scoliosis
  • Damage to the low back, mid back, and neck that affects its normal curvature
  • Forward head posture (often associated with using mobile devices)
  • Kyphosis or hunchback

Chiropractic Treatment For Posture Problems

When you first visit your chiropractor, he or she will sit down with you and discuss the problems you are having, what your complaints are, when the problem started, and events that may have contributed to the problem. They will take a thorough medical history and observe the way you sit, walk, bend, and move.

Your chiropractor may request x-rays and will assess the alignment of your spine. You may also be asked to have neurological or orthopedic testing done to ensure that there is no underlying condition or injury that is causing your problem.

You will be asked to stand straight and the doctor will take measurements to determine if there is any visible deviation from your optimum posture. He or she will ask you to move and bend while they test your range of motion, mobility and flexibility as well as your muscle strength and length.

A Prescription For Perfect Posture

improve posture el paso tx.

Once your assessments are complete your chiropractor will discuss treatment options with you. He or she will walk you through the adjustments that will be done and other types of therapies they recommend. You will talk about the best course of action to relieve any pain that you are experiencing as well as get your spine back into alignment and improve your posture.

Your chiropractor will also likely talk to you about stretching exercises and things you can do at home in between appointments. They may discuss sleep positions, diet, work area adjustments, exercise, and weight loss. Chiropractic is a whole body treatment, addressing lifestyle changes that affect the entire body and getting it into optimal working order as a whole.

If you have poor posture you can change it, even if you are an older adult � or a senior. Often simple chiropractic adjustments can help improve posture within just a few sessions. Once your body is in alignment you will feel more energetic, healthier, and happier. Your body is an intricate machine and when one part isn�t functioning as it should, it affects all the other parts. Chiropractic can turn that around, helping your body function more effectively so you feel better.

Chiropractic Clinic Extra: Chiropractor (Recommended)

Respiratory Health And Nutrition

Respiratory Health And Nutrition

Respiratory Health Abstract: Diet and nutrition may be important modifiable risk factors for the development,
progression and management of obstructive lung diseases such as asthma and chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This review examines the relationship between
dietary patterns, nutrient intake and weight status in obstructive lung diseases, at different
life stages, from in-utero influences through childhood and into adulthood. In vitro and
animal studies suggest important roles for various nutrients, some of which are supported by
epidemiological studies. However, few well-designed human intervention trials are available
to definitively assess the efficacy of different approaches to nutritional management of
respiratory diseases. Evidence for the impact of higher intakes of fruit and vegetables is
amongst the strongest, yet other dietary nutrients and dietary patterns require evidence from
human clinical studies before conclusions can be made about their effectiveness.

Keywords: respiratory disease; asthma; COPD; dietary patterns; antioxidants; vitamin C;
vitamin E; flavonoids; vitamin D; obesity; adipokines; undernutrition

1. Introduction:�Respiratory Health

Diet and nutrition are increasingly becoming recognized as modifiable contributors to chronic disease development and progression. Considerable evidence has emerged indicating the importance of dietary intake in obstructive lung diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in both early life and disease development [1,2] and management of disease progression [3,4]. These�respiratory diseases are characterized by airway and systemic inflammation, airflow obstruction, deficits in lung function and significant morbidity and mortality, as well as being costly economic burdens [5,6]. Pharmacological management remains the mainstay for treatment of respiratory diseases, and while treatment options are advancing, dietary intake modification could be an important adjuvant to disease management and an important consideration for disease prevention. Dietary patterns as well as intake of individual nutrients have been evaluated in observational and experimental studies throughout life stages and disease stages to elucidate their role in respiratory diseases. This review concentrates on evidence regarding the role of dietary patterns, individual nutrients, weight status and adipokines in asthma and COPD.

2. Dietary Intake And Respiratory Diseases

2.1. Dietary Patterns:�Respiratory Health

Various dietary patterns have been linked to the risk of respiratory disease [7]. The Mediterranean diet has been found to have protective effects for allergic respiratory diseases in epidemiological studies [8]. This dietary pattern consists of a high intake of minimally processed plant foods, namely; fruit, vegetables, breads, cereals, beans, nuts and seeds, low to moderate intake of dairy foods, fish, poultry and wine and low intake of red meat. High intakes of olive oil result in a dietary composition that is low in saturated fat though still moderate in total fat. In children, several studies showed that adherence to the Mediterranean diet is inversely associated with atopy and has a protective effect on atopy, wheezing and asthma symptoms [9�11]. The Mediterranean diet may also be important for maternal diet, as a study in Spain found that a high Mediterranean diet score during pregnancy was protective for persistent wheeze and atopic wheeze in children at 6.5 years of age [12]. Though one cross-sectional study in Japan reported a strong association between the adherence to the Mediterranean diet and asthma control [13], there is less evidence available to support this dietary pattern in adults. The �western� dietary pattern, prevalent in developed countries, is characterised by high consumption of refined grains, cured and red meats, desserts and sweets, french fries, and high-fat dairy products [2,14]. This pattern of intake has been associated with increased risk of asthma in children [15,16]. Furthermore, in children, increased intake of fast food such as hamburgers and related eating behaviours, for example salty snack eating and frequent take away consumption, are correlated with the presence of asthma, wheezing and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) [17,18]. In adults, a western diet has been shown to be positively associated with increased frequency of asthma exacerbation [19], but not related to asthma risk. In addition, an acute challenge with a high fat fast food meal has been shown to worsen airway inflammation [20]. While this dietary pattern appears to be deleterious in children and adults with asthma, studies examining the effect of this dietary pattern in maternal diets have found no relationship with a consumption of a �western� style diet in pregnancy and risk of asthma in offspring [21]. Cross-sectional studies have also found that the �western� diet is associated with an increased risk of COPD [2]. In summary the Mediterranean diet appears to be protective in children, though there is less evidence for benefits in the maternal diet and in adults. There is evidence to suggest that a �western� style dietary pattern increases risk of asthma in children, has worse outcomes for adults with asthma and is related to COPD risk.

2.2. Fruit And Vegetables:�Respiratory Health

Fruit and vegetable intake has been investigated for potential benefits in association with respiratory conditions due to their nutrient profile consisting of antioxidants, vitamins, minerals, fibre and phytochemicals. The mechanisms by which the nutrients in fruit and vegetables exert beneficial effects in respiratory conditions are discussed in the sections below. Epidemiological evidence reviewed by Saadeh et al. [7] showed that fruit intake was associated with a low prevalence of wheezing and that cooked green vegetable intake was associated with a low prevalence of wheezing and asthma in school children aged 8�12 years old. Furthermore low vegetable intake in children was related to current asthma [7]. In adults, Grieger et al. [22] discusses the heterogeneous nature of the data describing fruit and vegetable intake and lung function, with one study showing no effect on lung function of higher fruit and vegetable intake over 10 years [23], yet in another study, increased fruit intake over 2 years was associated with increased FEV1 [23], while another study showed that a large decrease in fruit intake over 7 years was associated with decreased FEV1 [24]. We recently conducted an intervention in adults with asthma and found that subjects who consumed a high fruit and vegetable diet for 3 months, had a decreased risk of asthma exacerbation, compared to subjects who consumed a low fruit and vegetable diet [25]. A recent meta-analysis of adults and children, which analysed 12 cohorts, 4 population-based case-control studies, and 26 cross-sectional studies provides important new evidence showing that a high intake of fruit and vegetables reduces the risk of childhood wheezing, and that fruit and vegetable intake is negatively associated with asthma risk in adults and children [26]. While some studies of maternal diet have found no relationship with fruit and vegetable intake and asthma in children [27], other studies have found that increased fruit and vegetable intake were related to a decreased risk of asthma in children [21,28]. Increased fruit and vegetable intake may be protective against COPD development, with consumption of a �prudent� diet including increased fruit and vegetables being protective against lung function decline [3]. Two randomized controlled trials (RCT�s) manipulating fruit and vegetable intake have been conducted in COPD. A 12 week study showed no effect of a high fruit and vegetable intake on FEV1, systemic inflammation or airway oxidative stress [29]. However, a 3-year study in 120 COPD patients revealed an improvement in lung function in the high fruit and vegetable group compared to the control group [30], suggesting that longer term intervention is needed to provide a therapeutic effect. There is considerable evidence to suggest that a high intake of fruit and vegetables is favourable for all life stages of asthma and evidence is emerging which suggests the same in COPD.

2.3. Omega-3 Fatty Acids And Fish:�Respiratory Health

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) from marine sources and supplements have been shown to be anti-inflammatory through several cellular mechanisms including their incorporation into cellular membranes and resulting altered synthesis of eicosanoids [31]. Experimental studies have shown that long chain omega-3 PUFA�s decrease inflammatory cell production of pro-inflammatory prostaglandin (PG) E2, leukotriene (LT) B4 [32] and activity of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-?B), a potent inflammatory transcription factor [33]. Long chain omega-3 PUFA�s also down regulate pro-inflammatory cell cytokine production (interleukin-1? (IL-1?), tumor necrosis factor-? (TNF-?)) by monocytes and macrophages, decrease expression of cellular adhesion molecules on monocytes and endothelial cells and reduce�production of ROS in neutrophils [34]. Saddeh et al. [7] reported that the evidence describing the relationship between omega-3 PUFA�s or fish consumption and respiratory conditions in childhood is contradictory. Some observational studies show that intake of oily fish is negatively associated with AHR and asthma [35,36]. However, evidence from Japan suggests that frequency of fish consumption is positively related to asthma risk [37] and in Saudi Arabia fish intake was not related to the presence of asthma or wheezing at all [18]. Similarly in adults, the data is heterogeneous, with omega-3 PUFAs or fish being associated with improved lung function [38] and decreased risk of asthma [39], AHR [35] and wheeze [36] in some, but not all studies [40]. Maternal dietary intake of oily fish was found to be protective of asthma in children 5 years of age if born to mothers with asthma [41] and a recent systematic review of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation studies in women during pregnancy found that the risk of asthma development in children was reduced [42]. The data examining the possible benefits of dietary omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in asthma are heterogeneous and as summarized by a 2002 Cochrane review [43], to date there is insufficient evidence to recommend omega-3 PUFA supplementation in asthma. Omega-3 PUFA may have positive effects in COPD, as higher levels of DHA in serum were found to decrease the risk of developing COPD [44]. Experimental studies in humans with COPD including supplementation with omega-3 found lower levels of TNF-? [45] and improved rehabilitation outcomes [46], though no improvements were seen in FEV1. Several studies using omega-3 PUFA supplementation in COPD are currently underway and will provide important new information to inform the field [47�49]. Consumption of oily fish or supplementation with omega-3 PUFA�s may have positive effects in asthma and COPD, though strong evidence to support the experimental and epidemiological data is not yet available.

3. Nutrients And Respiratory Disease

3.1. Antioxidants And Oxidative Stress

Dietary antioxidants are an important dietary factor in protecting against the damaging effects of oxidative stress in the airways, a characteristic of respiratory diseases [50]. Oxidative stress caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS), is generated in the lungs due to various exposures, such as air pollution, airborne irritants and typical airway inflammatory cell responses [51]. Also, increased levels of ROS generate further inflammation in the airways via activation of NF-?B and gene expression of pro-inflammatory mediators [52]. Antioxidants including vitamin C, vitamin E, flavonoids and carotenoids are abundantly present in fruits and vegetables, as well as nuts, vegetable oils, cocoa, red wine and green tea. Dietary antioxidants may have beneficial effects on respiratory health, from influences of the maternal diet on the fetus, and intake in children through to adults and pregnant women with asthma and adults with COPD. ?-tocopherol is a form of vitamin E, which helps maintain integrity of membrane fatty acids, by inhibiting lipid peroxidation [22]. Carotenoids are plant pigments and include; ?- and ?-carotene, lycopene, lutein and ?-cryptoxanthin. This group of fat soluble antioxidants have been shown to benefit respiratory health due to their ability to scavenge ROS and reduce oxidative stress [22]. The antioxidant lycopene, present predominantly in tomatoes, may be beneficial in respiratory conditions, indeed lycopene intake has been positively correlated with FEV1 in both asthma and COPD [53] and an�intervention study in asthma showed that lycopene supplementation could suppress neutrophilic airway inflammation [54]. Antioxidants may also be important in asthma during pregnancy, as while oxidative stress commonly increases during normal pregnancies, in women with asthma oxidative stress is heightened [55]. During pregnancy there is a compensatory increase in circulating and placental antioxidants in asthma versus women without asthma, to protect the foetus against damaging effects of oxidative stress [55,56]. Improving antioxidant intake in pregnant women with asthma may be beneficial as poor fetal growth outcomes are associated with low levels of circulating antioxidants and dietary antioxidants are the first defense mechanism against ROS [22]. Maternal intake of vitamin E, vitamin D, milk, cheese and calcium during pregnancy are negatively associated, while vitamin C is positively associated, with wheezing in early childhood [57,58]. Antioxidants including lycopene appear to have positive influences in respiratory conditions, further detail is provided below on evidence for vitamin C, vitamin E and flavonoids and their role in the maternal diet, diets of children and adults with asthma and adults with COPD.

3.2. Vitamin C:�Respiratory Health

Vitamin C has been enthusiastically investigated for benefits in asthma and links to asthma prevention. In vitro data from endothelial cell lines showed that vitamin C could inhibit NF-?B activation by IL-1, TNF-? and block production of IL-8 via mechanisms not dependent on the antioxidant activity of vitamin C [59]. Anti-inflammatory and anti-asthmatic effects of vitamin C supplementation in vivo, have been shown through allergic mouse models of asthma. Jeong et al. [60] reported decreased AHR to methacholine and inflammatory cell infiltration of perivascular and peribronchiolar spaces when vitamin C was supplemented during allergen challenge. While Chang et al. [61] found that high dose Vitamin C supplementation in allergen challenged mice decreased eosinophils in BALF and increased the ratio of Th1/Th2 cytokine production shifting the inflammatory pattern to Th1 dominant. Observational studies in children showed consumption of fruit, a rich source of vitamin C, was related to reduced wheezing [62] and vitamin C intake was negatively associated with wheezing [63], while another study reported no relationship between vitamin C intake and lung function [64]. Grieger et al. [22] also reported conflicting evidence for effects of vitamin C intake in adults, with epidemiological studies showing a positive association between vitamin C intake and lung function in some [65], but not all studies [23,66]. Despite the observational data linking vitamin C to lung health, supplementation with vitamin C has not been shown to reduce the risk of asthma [66] which may be related to the interdependence of nutrients found in foods, resulting in lack of efficacy when supplementing with isolated nutrients. Evidence from experimental and observational studies suggests that Vitamin C might be important in COPD pathogenesis and management. Koike et al. [67] reported that in knock out mice unable to synthesize vitamin C, vitamin C supplementation was able to prevent smoke induced emphysema and also to restore damaged lung tissue and decrease oxidative stress caused by smoke induced emphysema. A case control study in Taiwan reported that subjects with COPD had lower dietary intake and lower serum levels of vitamin C than healthy controls [68]. Indeed an epidemiological study in the United Kingdom of over 7000 adults aged 45�74 years found that increased plasma vitamin C concentration was associated with a decreased risk of obstructive airways disease, suggestive of a protective effect [69]. Thus, in summary, while observational data has suggested that vitamin C is important for lung health, intervention trials�showing efficacy are lacking and it appears that supplementation with vitamin C-rich whole foods, such
as fruit and vegetables may be more effective.

3.3. Vitamin E:�Respiratory Health

The vitamin E family comprises of 4 tocopherols and 4 tocotrienols, with the most plentiful in the diet or in tissues being ?-tocopherol and ?-tocopherol [70]. Vitamin E works synergistically with vitamin C, as following neutralisation of ROS, oxidised vitamin E isoforms can be processed back into their reduced form by vitamin C [71]. Abdala-Valencia et al. [72] discuss the evidence for the roles of ?-tocopherol and ?-tocopherol in allergic lung inflammation in mechanistic animal studies and clinical trials. Supplementation of mice with ?-tocopherol reduced allergic airway inflammation and AHR [73], while ?-tocopherol was pro-inflammatory and augmented AHR, negating the positive effects of ?-tocopherol [74]. Other animal studies report that ?-tocopherol may assist in resolving inflammation caused by ozone exposure and endotoxin induced neutrophilic airway inflammation, owing to its ability to oxidize reactive nitrogen species [75,76]. A study in humans showed that both ? and ?-tocopherol may be effective in decreasing LPS induced neutrophilic inflammation [77]. The conflicting results from these supplementation studies are likely to be influenced by baseline tissue levels of vitamin E [72], with ?-tocopherol supplementation leading to improved lung function and wheeze in Europe, where ?-tocopherol levels are low [78�80], but not in the US, where ?-tocopherol intake is high due to soybean oil consumption [81�83]. As a result, meta-analysis of vitamin E effects on asthma outcomes is equivocal; it is likely that supplementation with physiological concentrations of ?-tocopherol in the context of a background diet low in ?-tocopherol, may be most beneficial in asthma and further research testing this hypothesis is required. In COPD, serum levels of vitamin E have been shown to be decreased during exacerbation, which suggests increased intake may be helpful to improve vitamin E concentrations [84]. Vitamin E has been shown to reduce biomarkers of oxidative stress in adults with COPD in one RCT [85], but not another [86]. In the Women�s Health Study (n = 38,597), the risk of developing chronic lung disease over a 10 year supplementation period was reduced by 10% in women using vitamin E supplements (600 IU on alternate days) [87]. Dietary intake of vitamin E lower than recommended dietary intakes has been reported in pregnant women with a family history of allergic disease [88] and recent work in animal models has highlighted ?-tocopherol may be important for allergic mothers in pregnancy. Allergic female mice were supplemented with ?-tocopherol prior to mating and following allergen challenge the offspring showed reduced response to allergen challenge with decreased eosinophils in BALF [89]. The offspring also showed reduced development of lung dendritic cells, necessary for producing allergic responses. Evidence from observational studies also suggests that reduced maternal dietary intake of vitamin E is related to an increased risk of childhood asthma and wheeze [90�92] and increased in vitro proliferative responses in cord blood mononuclear cells (CBMC) [93]. A mechanistic study by Wassall et al. [94] examined the effect of ?-tocopherol and vitamin C on CBMC and maternal peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). ?-tocopherol was mostly anti-inflammatory, although increased proliferation and increased TGF-? were seen with some allergens. However, the addition of vitamin C to the system had inflammatory actions, with increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, combined with reduced production of IL-10 and TGF-?. This study by Wassall et al. [94] demonstrates that supplementation�with these antioxidants does modulate immune responses in pregnancy, however several of the results are unexpected, highlighting the complex nature of the relationships between dietary nutrients and disease. In asthma the experimental data for vitamin E are compelling, yet supplementation benefits are not well described. In COPD there is currently not enough evidence to make conclusions about vitamin E supplementation.

3.4. Flavonoids:�Respiratory Health

Flavonoids are potent antioxidants and have anti-inflammatory as well as anti-allergic actions due in part, to their ability to neutralise ROS [95]. There are 6 classes of flavonoids including flavones, flavonols, flavanones, isoflavones and flavanols [96], which are widely distributed throughout the diet and found in fruit, vegetables, nuts, seeds, stems, flowers, roots, bark, dark chocolate, tea, wine and coffee [96]. Tanaka et al. [95] present the evidence for the benefits of dietary flavonoids in asthma development and progression. In addition to reducing oxidative stress, in vitro experiments have found that many individual flavonoids have inhibitory effects on IgE mediated immune responses such as histamine secretion by mast cells, shift in cytokine production from Th-2 to Th-1 production and decreased NF-?B activation and inhibition of TNF-? [97�100]. Experimental studies of flavonoids in animal models of allergic asthma have shown reduced airway and peripheral blood inflammation, decreased bronchoconstriction and AHR and lower eosinophils in BALF, blood and lung tissue [101�104]. In humans, evidence from a case control study in adults showed that apple and red wine consumption, rich sources of flavonoids, was associated with reduced asthma prevalence and severity [66]. However a follow-up study investigating intake of 3 subclasses of flavonoids did not find any associations with asthma prevalence or severity [105]. There are a limited number of experimental studies using flavonoid supplements in humans with asthma. Three RCT�s in adults with asthma using a product called pycnogenol, which contains a mixture of bioflavonoids, reported benefits including increased lung function, decreased symptoms and reduced need for rescue inhalers [106]. There is a paucity of evidence for the effects of flavonoids in the maternal diet and respiratory outcomes in children. One study which found a positive association of maternal apple intake and asthma in children at 5 years, suggests that the flavonoid content of apples may be responsible for the beneficial relationship [107]. Evidence for the effects of flavonoids in respiratory conditions is emerging and promising. Though like vitamin C, it may be difficult to disentangle the effects of flavonoids from other nutrients in flavonoid-rich foods. Supplementation of individual flavonoids in experimental animal studies has provided evidence to suggest that intervention trials in humans may be warranted.

3.5. Vitamin D:�Respiratory Health

Epidemiological studies show promising associations between vitamin D and lung health; however the mechanisms responsible for these effects are poorly understood. Vitamin D can be obtained from dietary sources or supplementation; however sun exposure is the main contributor to vitamin D levels [108]. While vitamin D has beneficial effects independent of UV exposure [109], it can be difficult to separate this potential confounder from direct effects of vitamin D on lung health [110]. The review by Foong and Zosky [111] presents the current evidence for the role of vitamin D deficiency in disease onset, progression and exacerbation in respiratory infections, asthma and COPD. Respiratory infections contribute to disease progression and exacerbation in both COPD and asthma. Vitamin D appears to have a protective role against the susceptibility to and severity of these infections [111], as active vitamin D (1,25 (OH)2D) modifies production of antimicrobial cathelicidins and defensins that kill bacteria and induce wound repair [112]. Activated vitamin D also decreases the expression of rhinovirus receptors in endothelial cell cultures and PBMC�s [113]. In vitro studies also support the link between vitamin D and airway remodelling as active vitamin D inhibits airway smooth muscle (ASM) cell proliferation [114] and deficiency impairs normal lung development [115]. Furthermore, animal models suggest that vitamin D can inhibit Th1 and Th2 cell cytokine production [116]. Epidemiological evidence links low levels of vitamin D with wheeze and respiratory infections, though evidence for the link with asthma onset is weak and inconsistent [111]. In children, low circulating vitamin D was related to lower lung function, increased corticosteroid use and exacerbation frequency [117]. Also in children with steroid resistant asthma, low vitamin D was related to increased ASM thickness [117]. Other observational studies report that in children, low levels of vitamin D are associated with asthma exacerbation [118]. Several observational studies support the role of vitamin D for protection against respiratory conditions in children. Zosky et al. [119] found that vitamin D deficiency at 18 weeks gestation was associated with lower lung function and current wheeze in children 6 years of age and an increased risk of asthma in boys. The role for vitamin D in enhancing steroid responsiveness suggested by observational studies [120] is supported by mechanistic studies [121], and in concert with the actions of vitamin D in infection, may explain the effect of vitamin D in reducing asthma exacerbations [111]. Only one intervention trial has been conducted using vitamin D in adults with asthma, which found that rate of first exacerbation was reduced in subjects who demonstrated an increase in circulating vitamin D3 following supplementation [122]. Data for the role of vitamin D in COPD onset is limited, though several cross-sectional studies have reported an association between low vitamin D levels, or deficiency, with COPD incidence [123]. Blood vitamin D levels have also been correlated with lung function in COPD patients [124,125]. Experimental data suggest that vitamin D may be important in COPD for its effect on normal lung growth and development, though human data to support this is not available. It is possible that COPD onset may also be impacted by cellular responses to cigarette smoke exposure which inhibits the protective immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D [126]. There is research suggesting a genetic link between vitamin D and COPD pathogenesis. In an observational study single nucleotide polymorphisms in the vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) predicted vitamin D levels in COPD patients and were found to be a risk factor for COPD [123]. The VDBP is also involved in macrophage activation as high levels of airway VDBP are related to increased macrophage activation, also high levels of serum VDBP were found to be related to lower lung function [127]. COPD progression may also be affected by vitamin D status through absence of the vitamin D receptor and parenchyma degradation [128]. COPD exacerbations are generally caused by viral or bacterial lung infections, and though vitamin D has a positive role in reducing infection, there is no evidence to support that vitamin D is associated with ameliorating exacerbations in COPD patients [129]. The extra-skeletal effects of vitamin D are well documented in both asthma and COPD, and deficiency is associated with negative respiratory and immune outcomes. At this stage however, more evidence from supplementation interventions is needed before widespread adoption of supplementation can be recommended.

3.6. Minerals:�Respiratory Health

Some minerals have also been found to be protective in respiratory conditions. In children, increased intake of magnesium, calcium and potassium is inversely related to asthma prevalence [7]. While several observational and experimental trials have been performed with conflicting results [130], a randomised controlled trial concluded that a low sodium diet had no therapeutic benefit for bronchial reactivity in adults with asthma [131]. Dietary magnesium may have beneficial bronchodilator effects in asthma [132]. Low dietary magnesium intake has been associated with negative effects on bronchial smooth muscle in severe asthma [133] and with lower lung function in children [134]. However further evidence of positive therapeutic effects are required before its importance in asthma and recommendations can be determined [135]. Dietary intake of selenium has been shown to be lower in asthmatics compared to non-asthmatics [136] and maternal plasma selenium levels were reported to be inversely associated with risk of asthma in children [137]. However case control studies in children have not found a relationship with selenium levels or intake with asthma related outcomes [18,138]. Furthermore, results from a large well designed RCT in adults with asthma showed no positive benefit of selenium supplementation [139]. Investigation of minerals in cord blood imply the importance of adequate intake during pregnancy, as levels of cord blood selenium were negatively associated with persistent wheeze, and levels of iron were negatively associated with later onset wheeze in children [140]. Studies on dietary intake of minerals and associations with COPD are sparse. A small study in Sweden found that in older subjects with severe COPD, intakes of folic acid and selenium were below recommended levels, and although intake of calcium was adequate, serum calcium levels were low, likely related to their vitamin D status as intake was lower than recommended [141]. Mineral intake may be important in respiratory diseases, yet evidence for supplementation is weak. It is likely that adequate intake of these nutrients in a whole diet approach is sufficient.

4. Obesity, Adipokines And Respiratory Disease

Overnutrition and resulting obesity are clearly linked with asthma, though the mechanisms involved are still under investigation. The review by Periyalil et al. [142] describes how immunometabolismadipose tissue derived immunological changes causing metabolic effects [143] contributes to the link between asthma and obesity. In the obese state dietary intake of lipids leads to increased circulating free fatty acids [144], which activate immune responses, such as activation of TLR4, leading to increased inflammation, both systemically and in the airways [20]. Adipose tissue also secretes adipokines and asthmatic subjects have higher concentrations of circulating leptin than healthy controls [14] which are further increased in females, though leptin is associated with BMI in both males and females [145]. Leptin receptors are present in the bronchial and alveolar epithelial cells and leptin has been shown to induce activation of alveolar macrophages [146] and have indirect effects on neutrophils [147]. Also leptin promotes Th1 proliferation inducing increased activation of neutrophils by TNF-? [148]. In vitro, leptin also activates alveolar macrophages taken from obese asthmatics, which induces airway inflammation through production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [149]. However, a causal role for leptin in the obese asthma relationship is yet to be established. Adiponectin, an anti-inflammatory adipokine, has beneficial effects in animal models of asthma [150], however, positive associations in human studies have only been seen in women [151]. In obesity, macrophage and mast cell infiltration into adipose tissue is upregulated [142]. Neutrophils also appear to dominate airway inflammation in the obese asthma phenotype [152], particularly in females [153], which may explain why inhaled corticosteroids are less effective in achieving control in obese asthma [154]. While the mechanisms are yet to be understood, a recent review reports that obesity in pregnancy is associated with higher odds of asthma in children, with increased risk as maternal BMI increases [155].

COPD is characterised not only by pulmonary deficits but also by chronic systemic inflammation and co-morbidities which may develop in response to the metabolic dysregulation that occurs with excess adipose tissue [156]. A recent meta-analysis of leptin levels in COPD reported a correlation with body mass index (BMI) and fat mass percent in stable COPD though absolute levels were not different to healthy controls [157]. During exacerbation, leptin levels increased and were positively associated with circulating TNF-? [157]. Bianco et al. [158] describes the role of adiponectin and its effect on inflammation in COPD. Adiponectin has anti-inflammatory effects and is present in high concentrations in serum of healthy subjects [159]. Adiponectin exists in several isoforms, which have varied biological effects [160] and interact with two receptors present in the lungs (AdipoR1 and AdipoR2) that have opposing effects on inflammation [161]. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the gene encoding adiponectin are associated with cardiovascular disease, obesity and the metabolic syndrome [162]. The role of adiponectin in COPD however is not well understood. In COPD, serum adiponectin is increased and directly relates to disease severity and lung function decline [163]. There is an alteration in the oligomerisation of adiponectin in COPD resulting in increased concentrations of the anti-inflammatory higher-molecular weight isoform [164], and the expression of adiponectin receptors in the lung is also altered in comparison to healthy subjects [165]. Animal models have shown anti-inflammatory effects of adiponectin in the lung through the increased expression of TNF-? in alveolar macrophages in adiponectin deficient mice [166]. Further mechanistic studies have also shown the anti-inflammatory potential of adiponectin by reducing the effects of TNF-?, IL-1? and NF-?B and increasing expression of IL-10 through interaction with AdipoR1 [161]. However under certain conditions in cell lines and animal models adiponectin has been shown to have pro-inflammatory effects [167,168]. As both detrimental and protective effects have been seen, the complex modulation of adiponectin isoforms and receptors in COPD requires further exploration. Obesity, the resulting systemic inflammation and alterations in adipokines have significant negative effects in both asthma and COPD. While work examining the mechanisms of effect is extensive, evidence for interventions to improve the course of disease are limited to weight loss interventions in asthma at this stage.

5. Undernutrition And Respiratory Disease

Though underweight has not been well studied in asthma, an observational study in Japan reported that subjects with asthma who were underweight had poorer asthma control than their normal weight counterparts [169]. While there is widespread acknowledgement that malnutrition in pregnant women adversely effects of the lung development of the fetus [170], a recent review reported that the offspring of mothers who were underweight did not have an increased risk of asthma. Amongst the obstructive lung diseases, undernutrition is most commonly recognized as a feature of COPD. Itoh et al. [171] present a review on undernutrition in COPD and the evidence for nutritional therapy in management�of the disease. Weight loss, low body weight and muscle wasting are common in COPD patients with advanced disease and are associated with reduced survival time and an increased risk of exacerbation [172]. The causes of undernutrition in COPD are multifactorial and include reduced energy intake due to decreased appetite, depression, lower physical activity and dyspnoea while eating [173]. In addition, resting energy expenditure is increased in COPD, likely due to higher energy demands from increased work of breathing [174]. Also, systemic inflammation which is a hallmark of COPD, may influence energy intake and expenditure [175]. Cigarette smoke may also have deleterious effects on body composition in addition to the systemic effects of COPD. Smoking causes muscle fibre atrophy and decreased muscle oxidative capacity shown in cohorts of non-COPD smokers [176,177] and in animal models of chronic smoke exposure [178,179]. The mechanisms underlying muscle wasting in COPD are complex and multifaceted [180]. Increased protein degradation occurs in the whole body, though it is enhanced in the diaphragm [181]. Protein synthesis pathways are altered, indeed insulin like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) which is essential for muscle synthesis is decreased in cachectic COPD patients [182] and is lower in COPD patients during acute exacerbation, compared to healthy controls [183]. Increased oxidative stress, due to increased mitochondrial ROS production, occurs both systemically and in muscle tissue in cachectic COPD patients and is negatively associated with fat free mass (FFM) and muscle strength in COPD patients [184]. Furthermore myostatin induces muscle atrophy by inhibiting proliferation of myoblasts and mRNA expression of myostain is increased in cachectic COPD patients and is related to muscle mass [185]. Systemic inflammatory mediators such as TNF-? and NF-?B are also implicated in COPD muscle atrophy [186,187]. Nutritional supplementation therapy in undernourished COPD patients has been shown to induce weight gain, increase fat free mass, increase grip strength and exercise tolerance as well as improve quality of life [188]. Further studies point out the importance of not only high energy content, but also macronutrient composition of the nutritional supplement and inclusion of low intensity respiratory rehabilitation exercise [189,190]. Other dietary nutrients have been investigated for the benefits in COPD. Creatinine, found in meat and fish, did not have additive effects to rehabilitation, while sulforaphane, found in broccoli and wasabi, and curcumin, the pigment in turmeric, may have beneficial antioxidant properties [191�193]. Branched chain amino acid supplementation in COPD is associated with positive results including increases in whole body protein synthesis, body weight, fat free mass and arterial blood oxygen levels [194,195]. Undernutrition is not a significant problem in asthma, though is a major debilitating feature of COPD. There is promising evidence that nutritional supplementation in COPD is important and can help to alleviate some of the adverse effects of the disease, particularly muscle wasting and weight loss.

6. Conclusions: Respiratory Health

Dietary intake appears to be important in both the development and management of respiratory diseases, shown through epidemiological and cross-sectional studies and supported by mechanistic studies in animal models. Although more evidence is needed from intervention studies in humans, there is a clear link for some nutrients and dietary patterns. The dietary patterns associated with benefits in respiratory diseases include high fruit and vegetable intake, Mediterranean style diet, fish and omega-3 intake, while fast food intake and westernized dietary�patterns have adverse associations. Figure 1 shows a diagrammatic representation of the relationships of nutrition and obstructive lung diseases.

respiratory

Respiratory Health

Though antioxidants are associated with positive effects on inflammation, clinical outcomes and respiratory disease prevention, intervention studies of individual antioxidants do not indicate widespread adoption of supplementation [196]. Differences in results from individual studies including whole foods such as fruit and vegetables and fish could be influenced by the nutritional profile owing to the region it was grown or produced. In considering studies using single nutrients it is also important to acknowledge that nutrients in the diet are consumed as whole foods that contain other micronutrients, fibre and compounds with both known and unknown anti and pro-inflammatory potential. Furthermore investigations of single nutrients should ideally control for other antioxidants and dietary sources of pro-inflammatory nutrients. While this limitation is common, it is a significant challenge to control for dietary intake of other nutrients in clinical trials. A whole foods approach to nutrient supplementation�for example, increasing intake of fruit and vegetables, has the benefit of increasing intake of multiple nutrients, including vitamin C, vitamin E, carotenoids and flavonoids and shows more promise in respiratory diseases in terms of reducing risk of COPD [3] and incidence of asthma exacerbations [25].

The evidence for mechanisms of vitamin D in lung development and immune function are yet to be fully established. It appears that vitamin D is important in respiratory diseases and infections, however the temporal role of vitamin D deficiency in disease onset, pathogenesis and exacerbations and whether supplementation is indicated is yet to be clarified.

Overnutrition in respiratory disease is clearly associated with adverse effects, highlighted by detrimental effects induced by immunometabolism. Further understanding of the relationship between mediators of immunometabolism and respiratory diseases and their mechanisms may provide therapeutic options. Undernutrition still poses risk in some respiratory conditions. Appropriate nutritional supplementation in advanced COPD is indicated, and several nutrients appear to be beneficial in COPD development and exacerbation.

The field of nutrition and respiratory disease continues to develop and expand, though further work is required in the form of randomized controlled dietary manipulation studies using whole foods to enable provision of evidence based recommendations for managing respiratory conditions.

Bronwyn S. Berthon and Lisa G. Wood *

Centre for Asthma and Respiratory Diseases, Level 2, Hunter Medical Research Institute,
University of Newcastle, Lot 1 Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia;
E-Mail: bronwyn.berthon@newcastle.edu.au

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: lisa.wood@newcastle.edu.au;
Tel.: +61-2-4042-0147; Fax: +61-2-4042-0046.

Author Contributions

Bronwyn Berthon and Lisa Wood contributed to the study concept and design and were both involved in the preparation and completion of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

� 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

blank
References:

1. Nurmatov, U.; Devereux, G.; Sheikh, A. Nutrients and foods for the primary prevention of asthma
and allergy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127,
724�733.e30.
2. Varraso, R.; Fung, T.T.; Barr, R.G.; Hu, F.B.; Willett, W.; Camargo, C.A.J. Prospective study of
dietary patterns and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among US women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
2007, 86, 488�495.
3. Shaheen, S.O.; Jameson, K.A.; Syddall, H.E.; Aihie Sayer, A.; Dennison, E.M.; Cooper, C.;
Robinson, S.M.; Hertfordshire Cohort Study Group. The relationship of dietary patterns with adult
lung function and COPD. Eur. Respir. J. 2010, 36, 277�284.
4. Scott, H.A.; Jensen, M.E.; Wood, L.G. Dietary interventions in asthma. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014,
20, 1003�1010.
5. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention
2012 (update). Available online: www.ginasthma.org (accessed on 30 July 2013).
6. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global Strategy for the
Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD. Available online: www.goldcopd.org/
(accessed on 3 December 2014).
7. Saadeh, D.; Salameh, P.; Baldi, I.; Raherison, C. Diet and allergic diseases among population aged
0 to 18 years: Myth or reality? Nutrients 2013, 5, 3399�3423.
8. Willett, W.C.; Sacks, F.; Trichopoulou, A.; Drescher, G.; Ferro-Luzzi, A.; Helsing, E.;
Trichopoulos, D. Mediterranean diet pyramid: A cultural model for healthy eating. Am. J. Clin.
Nutr. 1995, 61, 1402S�1406S.
9. Arvaniti, F.; Priftis, K.N.; Papadimitriou, A.; Papadopoulos, M.; Roma, E.; Kapsokefalou, M.;
Anthracopoulos, M.B.; Panagiotakos, D.B. Adherence to the Mediterranean type of diet is associated
with lower prevalence of asthma symptoms, among 10�12 years old children: The PANACEA
study. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2011, 22, 283�289.
10. Chatzi, L.; Kogevinas, M. Prenatal and childhood Mediterranean diet and the development of
asthma and allergies in children. Public Health Nutr. 2009, 12, 1629�1634.
11. De Batlle, J.; Garcia-Aymerich, J.; Barraza-Villarreal, A.; Ant�, J.M.; Romieu, I. Mediterranean
diet is associated with reduced asthma and rhinitis in Mexican children. Allergy 2008, 63,
1310�1316.
12. Chatzi, L.; Torrent, M.; Romieu, I.; Garcia-Esteban, R.; Ferrer, C.; Vioque, J.; Kogevinas, M.;
Sunyer, J. Mediterranean diet in pregnancy is protective for wheeze and atopy in childhood. Thorax
2008, 63, 507�513.
13. Barros, R.; Moreira, A.; Fonseca, J.; de Oliveira, J.F.; Delgado, L.; Castel-Branco, M.G.; Haahtela,
T.; Lopes, C.; Moreira, P. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and fresh fruit intake are associated
with improved asthma control. Allergy 2008, 63, 917�923.
14. Wood, L.G.; Gibson, P.G. Dietary factors lead to innate immune activation in asthma. Pharmacol.
Ther. 2009, 123, 37�53.
15. Carey, O.J.; Cookson, J.B.; Britton, J.; Tattersfield, A.E. The effect of lifestyle on wheeze, atopy,
and bronchial hyperreactivity in Asian and white children. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1996, 154,
537�540.
16. Huang, S.L.; Lin, K.C.; Pan, W.H. Dietary factors associated with physician-diagnosed asthma and
allergic rhinitis in teenagers: Analyses of the first Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan. Clin.
Exp. Allergy 2001, 31, 259�264.
17. Wickens, K.; Barry, D.; Friezema, A.; Rhodius, R.; Bone, N.; Purdie, G.; Crane, J. Fast foods�
Are they a risk factor for asthma? Allergy 2005, 60, 1537�1541.
18. Hijazi, N.; Abalkhail, B.; Seaton, A. Diet and childhood asthma in a society in transition: A study
in urban and rural Saudi Arabia. Thorax 2000, 55, 775�779.
19. Varraso, R.; Kauffmann, F.; Leynaert, B.; Le Moual, N.; Boutron-Ruault, M.C.; Clavel-Chapelon,
F.; Romieu, I. Dietary patterns and asthma in the E3N study. Eur. Respir. J. 2009, 33, 33�41.
20. Wood, L.G.; Garg, M.L.; Gibson, P.G. A high-fat challenge increases airway inflammation and
impairs bronchodilator recovery in asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127, 1133�1140.
21. Netting, M.J.; Middleton, P.F.; Makrides, M. Does maternal diet during pregnancy and lactation
affect outcomes in offspring? A systematic review of food-based approaches. Nutrition 2014, 30,
1225�1241.
22. Grieger, J.; Wood, L.; Clifton, V. Improving asthma during pregnancy with dietary antioxidants:
The current evidence. Nutrients 2013, 5, 3212�3234.
23. Butland, B.K.; Fehily, A.M.; Elwood, P.C. Diet, lung function, and lung function decline in
a cohort of 2512 middle aged men. Thorax 2000, 55, 102�108.
24. Carey, I.M.; Strachan, D.P.; Cook, D.G. Effects of changes in fresh fruit consumption on
ventilatory function in healthy British adults. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1998, 158, 728�733.
25. Wood, L.G.; Garg, M.L.; Smart, J.M.; Scott, H.A.; Barker, D.; Gibson, P.G. Manipulating
antioxidant intake in asthma: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 96, 534�543.
26. Seyedrezazadeh, E.; Moghaddam, M.P.; Ansarin, K.; Vafa, M.R.; Sharma, S.; Kolahdooz, F. Fruit
and vegetable intake and risk of wheezing and asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr.
Rev. 2014, 72, 411�428.
27. Erkkola, M.; Nwaru, B.I.; Kaila, M.; Kronberg-Kippil�, C.; Ilonen, J.; Simell, O.; Veijola, R.;
Knip, M.; Virtanen, S.M. Risk of asthma and allergic outcomes in the offspring in relation to
maternal food consumption during pregnancy: A Finnish birth cohort study. Pediatr. Allergy
Immunol. 2012, 23, 186�194.
28. Fitzsimon, N.; Fallon, U.; O�Mahony, D.; Loftus, B.G.; Bury, G.; Murphy, A.W.; Kelleher, C.C.;
Lifeways Cross Generation Cohort Study Steering Group. Mother�s dietary patterns during
pregnancy and risk of asthma symptoms in children at 3 years. Ir. Med. J. 2007, 100, 27�32.
29. Baldrick, F.R.; Elborn, J.S.; Woodside, J.V.; Treacy, K.; Bradley, J.M.; Patterson, C.C.;
Schock, B.C.; Ennis, M.; Young, I.S.; McKinley, M.C. Effect of fruit and vegetable intake on
oxidative stress and inflammation in COPD: A randomised controlled trial. Eur. Respir. J. 2012, 39,
1377�1384.
30. Keranis, E.; Makris, D.; Rodopoulou, P.; Martinou, H.; Papamakarios, G.; Daniil, Z.; Zintzaras, E.;
Gourgoulianis, K.I. Impact of dietary shift to higher-antioxidant foods in COPD: A randomised
trial. Eur. Respir. J. 2010, 36, 774�780.
31. Thies, F.; Miles, E.A.; Nebe-von-Caron, G.; Powell, J.R.; Hurst, T.L.; Newsholme, E.A.;
Calder, P.C. Influence of dietary supplementation with long-chain n-3 or n-6 polyunsaturated fatty
acids on blood inflammatory cell populations and functions and on plasma soluble adhesion
molecules in healthy adults. Lipids 2001, 36, 1183�1193.
32. Kelley, D.S.; Taylor, P.C.; Nelson, G.J.; Schmidt, P.C.; Ferretti, A.; Erickson, K.L.; Yu, R.;
Chandra, R.K.; Mackey, B.E. Docosahexaenoic acid ingestion inhibits natural killer cell activity
and production of inflammatory mediators in young healthy men. Lipids 1999, 34, 317�324.
33. Lo, C.J.; Chiu, K.C.; Fu, M.; Chu, A.; Helton, S. Fish oil modulates macrophage P44/P42 mitogenactivated
protein kinase activity induced by lipopolysaccharide. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2000, 24,
159�163.
34. Calder, P.C. n-3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids, inflammation, and inflammatory diseases. Am. J. Clin.
Nutr. 2006, 83, 1505S�1519S.
35. Peat, J.K.; Salome, C.M.; Woolcock, A.J. Factors associated with bronchial hyperresponsiveness
in Australian adults and children. Eur. Respir. J. 1992, 5, 921�929.
36. Tabak, C.; Wijga, A.H.; de Meer, G.; Janssen, N.A.; Brunekreef, B.; Smit, H.A. Diet and asthma
in Dutch school children (ISAAC-2). Thorax 2006, 61, 1048�1053.
37. Takemura, Y.; Sakurai, Y.; Honjo, S.; Tokimatsu, A.; Tokimatsu, A.; Gibo, M.; Hara, T.; Kusakari,
A.; Kugai, N. The relationship between fish intake and the prevalence of asthma: The Tokorozawa
childhood asthma and pollinosis study. Prev. Med. 2002, 34, 221�225.
38. De Luis, D.A.; Armentia, A.; Aller, R.; Asensio, A.; Sedano, E.; Izaola, O.; Cuellar, L. Dietary
intake in patients with asthma: A case control study. Nutrition 2005, 21, 320�324.
39. Laerum, B.N.; Wentzel-Larsen, T.; Gulsvik, A.; Omenaas, E.; Gislason, T.; Janson, C.; Svanes, C.
Relationship of fish and cod oil intake with adult asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2007, 37, 1616�1623.
40. McKeever, T.M.; Lewis, S.A.; Cassano, P.A.; Ocke, M.; Burney, P.; Britton, J.; Smit, H.A.
The relation between dietary intake of individual fatty acids, FEV1 and respiratory disease in Dutch
adults. Thorax 2008, 63, 208�214.
41. Salam, M.T.; Li, Y.F.; Langholz, B.; Gilliland, F.D. Maternal fish consumption during pregnancy
and risk of early childhood asthma. J. Asthma 2005, 42, 513�518.
42. Klemens, C.M.; Berman, D.R.; Mozurkewich, E.L. The effect of perinatal omega-3 fatty acid
supplementation on inflammatory markers and allergic diseases: A systematic review. BJOG 2011,
118, 916�925.
43. Thien, F.C.K.; Woods, R.; De Luca, S.; Abramson, M.J. Dietary marine fatty acids (fish oil) for
asthma in adults and children (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library; John Wiley & Sons,
Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2002 (updated 2010).
44. Shahar, E.; Boland, L.L.; Folsom, A.R.; Tockman, M.S.; McGovern, P.G.; Eckfeldt, J.H.
Docosahexaenoic acid and smoking-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir.
Crit. Care Med. 1999, 159, 1780�1785.
45. De Batlle, J.; Sauleda, J.; Balcells, E.; G�mez, F.P.; M�ndez, M.; Rodriguez, E.; Barreiro, E.;
Ferrer, J.J.; Romieu, I.; Gea, J.; et al. Association between ?3 and ?6 fatty acid intakes and serum
inflammatory markers in COPD. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2012, 23, 817�821.
46. Broekhuizen, R.; Wouters, E.F.; Creutzberg, E.C.; Weling-Scheepers, C.A.; Schols, A.M.
Polyunsaturated fatty acids improve exercise capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Thorax 2005, 60, 376�382.
47. Fulton, A.S.; Hill, A.M.; Williams, M.T.; Howe, P.R.; Frith, P.A.; Wood, L.G.; Garg, M.L.;
Coates, A.M. Feasibility of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation as an adjunct therapy for people
with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trials 2013, 14, 107.
48. Texas A&M University, USA. Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Protein Modulation to Induce Anabolism
in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Aim 2 NLM Identifier: NCT01624792.
Available online: clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01624792 (accessed on 29 September 2014).
49. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Columbia University, USA. The Chronic
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Fish Oil Pilot Trial (COD-Fish). Available online:
clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00835289 (accessed on 29 September 2014).
50. Wood, L.G.; Gibson, P.G.; Garg, M.L. Biomarkers of lipid peroxidation, airway inflammation and
asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2003, 21, 177�186.
51. Kelly, F.J. Vitamins and respiratory disease: Antioxidant micronutrients in pulmonary health and
disease. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2005, 64, 510�526.
52. Rahman, I. Oxidative stress, chromatin remodeling and gene transcription in inflammation and
chronic lung diseases. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003, 36, 95�109.
53. Ochs-Balcom, H.M.; Grant, B.J.; Muti, P.; Sempos, C.T.; Freudenheim, J.L.; Browne, R.W.;
McCann, S.E.; Trevisan, M.; Cassano, P.A.; Iacoviello, L.; et al. Antioxidants, oxidative stress,
and pulmonary function in individuals diagnosed with asthma or COPD. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 60,
991�999.
54. Wood, L.G.; Garg, M.L.; Powell, H.; Gibson, P.G. Lycopene-rich treatments modify
noneosinophilic airway inflammation in asthma: Proof of concept. Free Radic. Res. 2008, 42,
94�102.
55. Clifton, V.L.; Vanderlelie, J.; Perkins, A.V. Increased anti-oxidant enzyme activity and biological
oxidation in placentae of pregnancies complicated by maternal asthma. Placenta 2005, 26, 773�779.
56. McLernon, P.C.; Wood, L.G.; Murphy, V.E.; Hodyl, N.A.; Clifton, V.L. Circulating antioxidant
profile of pregnant women with asthma. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 31, 99�107.
57. Miyake, Y.; Sasaki, S.; Tanaka, K.; Hirota, Y. Dairy food, calcium and vitamin D intake in
pregnancy, and wheeze and eczema in infants. Eur. Respir. J. 2010, 35, 1228�1234.
58. Kumar, R. Prenatal factors and the development of asthma. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2008, 20,
682�687.
59. Bowie, A.G.; O�Neill, L.A. Vitamin C inhibits NF-kappa B activation by TNF via the activation
of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 7180�7188.
60. Jeong, Y.-J.; Kim, J.-H.; Kang, J.S.; Lee, W.J.; Hwang, Y. Mega-dose vitamin C attenuated lung
inflammation in mouse asthma model. Anat. Cell Biol. 2010, 43, 294�302.
61. Chang, H.-H.; Chen, C.-S.; Lin, J.-Y. High Dose Vitamin C Supplementation Increases the
Th1/Th2 Cytokine Secretion Ratio, but Decreases Eosinophilic Infiltration in Bronchoalveolar
Lavage Fluid of Ovalbumin-Sensitized and Challenged Mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57,
10471�10476.
62. Forastiere, F.; Pistelli, R.; Sestini, P.; Fortes, C.; Renzoni, E.; Rusconi, F.; Dell�Orco, V.; Ciccone,
G.; Bisanti, L. The SIDRIA Collaborative Group, I. Consumption of fresh fruit rich in vitamin C
and wheezing symptoms in children. Thorax 2000, 55, 283�288.
63. Emmanouil, E.; Manios, Y.; Grammatikaki, E.; Kondaki, K.; Oikonomou, E.; Papadopoulos, N.;
Vassilopoulou, E. Association of nutrient intake and wheeze or asthma in a Greek pre-school
population. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2010, 21, 90�95.
64. Cook, D.G.; Carey, I.M.; Whincup, P.H.; Papacosta, O.; Chirico, S.; Bruckdorfer, K.R.; Walker, M.
Effect of fresh fruit consumption on lung function and wheeze in children. Thorax 1997, 52,
628�633.
65. Schwartz, J.; Weiss, S.T. Relationship between dietary vitamin C intake and pulmonary function
in the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I). Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
1994, 59, 110�114.
66. Shaheen, S.O.; Sterne, J.A.; Thompson, R.L.; Songhurst, C.E.; Margetts, B.M.; Burney, P.G.
Dietary antioxidants and asthma in adults: Population-based case-control study. Am. J. Respir. Crit.
Care Med. 2001, 164, 1823�1828.
67. Koike, K.; Ishigami, A.; Sato, Y.; Hirai, T.; Yuan, Y.; Kobayashi, E.; Tobino, K.; Sato, T.; Sekiya,
M.; Takahashi, K.; et al. Vitamin C Prevents Cigarette Smoke�Induced Pulmonary Emphysema in
Mice and Provides Pulmonary Restoration. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2013, 50, 347�357.
68. Lin, Y.C.; Wu, T.C.; Chen, P.Y.; Hsieh, L.Y.; Yeh, S.L. Comparison of plasma and intake levels
of antioxidant nutrients in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and healthy people
in Taiwan: A case-control study. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 19, 393�401.
69. Sargeant, L.A.; Jaeckel, A.; Wareham, N.J. Interaction of vitamin C with the relation between
smoking and obstructive airways disease in EPIC Norfolk. European Prospective Investigation into
Cancer and Nutrition. Eur. Respir. J. 2000, 16, 397�403.
70. Brigelius-Flohe, R.; Traber, M.G. Vitamin E: Function and metabolism. FASEB J. 1999, 13,
1145�1155.
71. Huang, J.; May, J.M. Ascorbic acid spares ?-tocopherol and prevents lipid peroxidation in cultured
H4IIE liver cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2003, 247, 171�176.
72. Abdala-Valencia, H.; Berdnikovs, S.; Cook-Mills, J. Vitamin E isoforms as modulators of lung
inflammation. Nutrients 2013, 5, 4347�4363.
73. Mabalirajan, U.; Aich, J.; Leishangthem, G.D.; Sharma, S.K.; Dinda, A.K.; Ghosh, B. Effects of
vitamin E on mitochondrial dysfunction and asthma features in an experimental allergic murine
model. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 107, 1285�1292.
74. McCary, C.A.; Abdala-Valencia, H.; Berdnikovs, S.; Cook-Mills, J.M. Supplemental and highly
elevated tocopherol doses differentially regulate allergic inflammation: Reversibility of ?-tocopherol
and ?-tocopherol�s effects. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 3674�3685.
75. He, Y.; Franchi, L.; Nunez, G. The protein kinase PKR is critical for LPS-induced iNOS production
but dispensable for inflammasome activation in macrophages. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013, 43, 1147�1152.
76. Fakhrzadeh, L.; Laskin, J.D.; Laskin, D.L. Ozone-induced production of nitric oxide and TNF-?
and tissue injury are dependent on NF-kappaB p50. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2004,
287, L279�L285.
77. Hernandez, M.L.; Wagner, J.G.; Kala, A.; Mills, K.; Wells, H.B.; Alexis, N.E.; Lay, J.C.; Jiang, Q.;
Zhang, H.; Zhou, H.; et al. Vitamin E, ?-tocopherol, reduces airway neutrophil recruitment after
inhaled endotoxin challenge in rats and in healthy volunteers. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 60,
56�62.
78. Dow, L.; Tracey, M.; Villar, A.; Coggon, D.; Margetts, B.M.; Campbell, M.J.; Holgate, S.T. Does
dietary intake of vitamins C and E influence lung function in older people? Am. J. Respir. Crit.
Care Med. 1996, 154, 1401�1404.
79. Smit, H.A.; Grievink, L.; Tabak, C. Dietary influences on chronic obstructive lung disease and
asthma: A review of the epidemiological evidence. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1999, 58, 309�319.
80. Tabak, C.; Smit, H.A.; Rasanen, L.; Fidanza, F.; Menotti, A.; Nissinen, A.; Feskens, E.J.; Heederik,
D.; Kromhout, D. Dietary factors and pulmonary function: A cross sectional study in middle aged
men from three European countries. Thorax 1999, 54, 1021�1026.
81. Weiss, S.T. Diet as a risk factor for asthma. Ciba Found. Symp. 1997, 206, 244�257.
82. Troisi, R.J.; Willett, W.C.; Weiss, S.T.; Trichopoulos, D.; Rosner, B.; Speizer, F.E. A prospective
study of diet and adult-onset asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1995, 151, 1401�1408.
83. Devereux, G.; Seaton, A. Diet as a risk factor for atopy and asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immonol.
2005, 115, 1109�1117.
84. Tug, T.; Karatas, F.; Terzi, S.M. Antioxidant vitamins (A, C and E) and malondialdehyde levels in
acute exacerbation and stable periods of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin.
Investig. Med. 2004, 27, 123�128.
85. Daga, M.K.; Chhabra, R.; Sharma, B.; Mishra, T.K. Effects of exogenous vitamin E supplementation
on the levels of oxidants and antioxidants in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Biosci.
2003, 28, 7�11.
86. Wu, T.C.; Huang, Y.C.; Hsu, S.Y.; Wang, Y.C.; Yeh, S.L. Vitamin E and vitamin C supplementation
in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2007, 77,
272�279.
87. Agler, A.H.; Kurth, T.; Gaziano, J.M.; Buring, J.E.; Cassano, P.A. Randomised vitamin E
supplementation and risk of chronic lung disease in the Women�s Health Study. Thorax 2011, 66,
320�325.
88. West, C.E.; Dunstan, J.; McCarthy, S.; Metcalfe, J.; D�Vaz, N.; Meldrum, S.; Oddy, W.H.;
Tulic, M.K.; Prescott, S.L. Associations between maternal antioxidant intakes in pregnancy and
infant allergic outcomes. Nutrients 2012, 4, 1747�1758.
89. Abdala-Valencia, H.; Berdnikovs, S.; Soveg, F.W.; Cook-Mills, J.M. ?-Tocopherol Supplementation
of Allergic Female Mice Inhibits Development of CD11c+CD11b+ Dendritic Cells in Utero and
Allergic Inflammation in Neonates. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2014, 307, L482�L496.
90. Litonjua, A.A.; Rifas-Shiman, S.L.; Ly, N.P.; Tantisira, K.G.; Rich-Edwards, J.W.;
Camargo, C.A., Jr.; Weiss, S.T.; Gillman, M.W.; Gold, D.R. Maternal antioxidant intake in
pregnancy and wheezing illnesses in children at 2 year of age. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 84, 903�911.
91. Miyake, Y.; Sasaki, S.; Tanaka, K.; Hirota, Y. Consumption of vegetables, fruit, and antioxidants
during pregnancy and wheeze and eczema in infants. Allergy 2010, 65, 758�765.
92. Devereux, G.; Turner, S.W.; Craig, L.C.; McNeill, G.; Martindale, S.; Harbour, P.J.; Helms, P.J.;
Seaton, A. Low maternal vitamin E intake during pregnancy is associated with asthma in 5-year-old
children. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 174, 499�507.
93. Devereux, G.; Barker, R.N.; Seaton, A. Antenatal determinants of neonatal immune responses to
allergens. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2002, 32, 43�50.
94. Wassall, H.; Devereux, G.; Seaton, A.; Barker, R. Complex effects of vitamin E and vitamin C
supplementation on in vitro neonatal mononuclear cell responses to allergens. Nutrients 2013, 5,
3337�3351.
95. Tanaka, T.; Takahashi, R. Flavonoids and asthma. Nutrients 2013, 5, 2128�2143.
96. Manach, C.; Scalbert, A.; Morand, C.; Remesy, C.; Jimenez, L. Polyphenols: Food sources and
bioavailability. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 727�747.
97. Hirano, T.; Higa, S.; Arimitsu, J.; Naka, T.; Shima, Y.; Ohshima, S.; Fujimoto, M.; Yamadori, T.;
Kawase, I.; Tanaka, T. Flavonoids such as luteolin, fisetin and apigenin are inhibitors of
interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 production by activated human basophils. Int. Arch. Allergy
Immunol. 2004, 134, 135�140.
98. Kawai, M.; Hirano, T.; Higa, S.; Arimitsu, J.; Maruta, M.; Kuwahara, Y.; Ohkawara, T.; Hagihara,
K.; Yamadori, T.; Shima, Y.; et al. Flavonoids and related compounds as anti-allergic substances.
Allergol. Int. 2007, 56, 113�123.
99. Nair, M.P.; Mahajan, S.; Reynolds, J.L.; Aalinkeel, R.; Nair, H.; Schwartz, S.A.; Kandaswami, C.
The flavonoid quercetin inhibits proinflammatory cytokine (tumor necrosis factor alpha) gene
expression in normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells via modulation of the NF-kappa beta
system. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2006, 13, 319�328.
100. Nair, M.P.N.; Kandaswami, C.; Mahajan, S.; Chadha, K.C.; Chawda, R.; Nair, H.; Kumar, N.;
Nair, R.E.; Schwartz, S.A. The flavonoid, quercetin, differentially regulates Th-1 (IFN?) and Th-2
(IL4) cytokine gene expression by normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2002, 1593, 29�36.
101. Leemans, J.; Cambier, C.; Chandler, T.; Billen, F.; Clercx, C.; Kirschvink, N.; Gustin, P.
Prophylactic effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and luteolin on airway
hyperresponsiveness and inflammation in cats with experimentally-induced asthma. Vet. J.
2010, 184, 111�114.
102. Li, R.R.; Pang, L.L.; Du, Q.; Shi, Y.; Dai, W.J.; Yin, K.S. Apigenin inhibits allergen-induced
airway inflammation and switches immune response in a murine model of asthma.
Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2010, 32, 364�370.
103. Wu, M.Y.; Hung, S.K.; Fu, S.L. Immunosuppressive effects of fisetin in ovalbumin-induced
asthma through inhibition of NF-kB activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 10496�10504.
104. Rogerio, A.P.; Kanashiro, A.; Fontanari, C.; da Silva, E.V.G.; Lucisano-Valim, Y.M.; Soares, E.G.;
Faccioli, L.H. Anti-inflammatory activity of quercetin and isoquercitrin in experimental murine
allergic asthma. Inflamm. Res. 2007, 56, 402�408.
105. Garcia, V.; Arts, I.C.; Sterne, J.A.; Thompson, R.L.; Shaheen, S.O. Dietary intake of flavonoids
and asthma in adults. Eur. Respir. J. 2005, 26, 449�452.
106. Belcaro, G.; Luzzi, R.; Cesinaro di Rocco, P.; Cesarone, M.R.; Dugall, M.; Feragalli, B.;
Errichi, B.M.; Ippolito, E.; Grossi, M.G.; Hosoi, M.; et al. Pycnogenol improvements in asthma
management. Panminerva Med. 2011, 53, 57�64.
107. Willers, S.M.; Devereux, G.; Craig, L.C.A.; McNeill, G.; Wijga, A.H.; Abou El-Magd, W.; Turner,
S.W.; Helms, P.J.; Seaton, A. Maternal food consumption during pregnancy and asthma,
respiratory and atopic symptoms in 5-year-old children. Thorax 2007, 62, 773�779.
108. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 266�281.
109. Hart, P.H.; Lucas, R.M.; Walsh, J.P.; Zosky, G.R.; Whitehouse, A.J.O.; Zhu, K.; Allen, K.L.;
Kusel, M.M.; Anderson, D.; Mountain, J.A. Vitamin D in Fetal Development: Findings From
a Birth Cohort Study. Pediatrics 2014, doi:10.1542/peds.2014-1860.
110. Hart, P.H.; Gorman, S.; Finlay-Jones, J.J. Modulation of the immune system by UV radiation:
More than just the effects of vitamin D? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 584�596.
111. Foong, R.; Zosky, G. Vitamin D deficiency and the lung: Disease initiator or disease modifier?
Nutrients 2013, 5, 2880�2900.
112. Hiemstra, P.S. The role of epithelial ?-defensins and cathelicidins in host defense of the lung. Exp.
Lung Res. 2007, 33, 537�542.
113. Martinesi, M.; Bruni, S.; Stio, M.; Treves, C. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits tumor necrosis
factor-?-induced adhesion molecule expression in endothelial cells. Cell Biol. Int. 2006, 30,
365�375.
114. Song, Y.; Qi, H.; Wu, C. Effect of 1,25-(OH)2D3 (a vitamin D analogue) on passively sensitized
human airway smooth muscle cells. Respirology 2007, 12, 486�494.
115. Zosky, G.R.; Berry, L.J.; Elliot, J.G.; James, A.L.; Gorman, S.; Hart, P.H. Vitamin D deficiency
causes deficits in lung function and alters lung structure. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 183,
1336�1343.
116. Pichler, J.; Gerstmayr, M.; Szepfalusi, Z.; Urbanek, R.; Peterlik, M.; Willheim, M. 1?,25(OH)2D3
inhibits not only Th1 but also Th2 differentiation in human cord blood T cells. Pediatr. Res. 2002,
52, 12�18.
117. Gupta, A.; Sjoukes, A.; Richards, D.; Banya, W.; Hawrylowicz, C.; Bush, A.; Saglani, S.
Relationship between serum vitamin D, disease severity and airway remodeling in children with
asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 184, 1342�1349.
118. Brehm, J.M.; Schuemann, B.; Fuhlbrigge, A.L.; Hollis, B.W.; Strunk, R.C.; Zeiger, R.S.; Weiss,
S.T.; Litonjua, A.A. Serum vitamin D levels and severe asthma exacerbations in the Childhood
Asthma Management Program study. J. Allergy Clin. Immonol. 2010, 126, 52�58.
119. Zosky, G.R.; Hart, P.H.; Whitehouse, A.J.; Kusel, M.M.; Ang, W.; Foong, R.E.; Chen, L.; Holt, P.G.;
Sly, P.D.; Hall, G.L. Vitamin D deficiency at 16 to 20 weeks� gestation is associated with impaired
lung function and asthma at 6 years of age. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2014, 11, 571�577.
120. Searing, D.A.; Zhang, Y.; Murphy, J.R.; Hauk, P.J.; Goleva, E.; Leung, D.Y. Decreased serum
vitamin D levels in children with asthma are associated with increased corticosteroid use. J. Allergy
Clin. Immonol. 2010, 125, 995�1000.
121. Xystrakis, E.; Kusumakar, S.; Boswell, S.; Peek, E.; Urry, Z.; Richards, D.F.; Adikibi, T.;
Pridgeon, C.; Dallman, M.; Loke, T.K.; et al. Reversing the defective induction of IL-10 secreting
regulatory T cells in glucocorticoid-resistant asthma patients. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116,
146�155.
122. Castro, M.; King, T.S.; Kunselman, S.J.; Cabana, M.D.; Denlinger, L.; Holguin, F.; Kazani, S.D.;
Moore, W.C.; Moy, J.; Sorkness, C.A.; et al. Effect of vitamin D3 on asthma treatment failures in
adults with symptomatic asthma and lower vitamin D levels: The VIDA randomized clinical trial.
JAMA 2014, 311, 2083�2091.
123. Janssens, W.; Bouillon, R.; Claes, B.; Carremans, C.; Lehouck, A.; Buysschaert, I.; Coolen, J.;
Mathieu, C.; Decramer, M.; Lambrechts, D. Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in COPD
and correlates with variants in the vitamin D-binding gene. Thorax 2010, 65, 215�220.
124. Black, P.N.; Scragg, R. Relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and pulmonary function
survey. Chest 2005, 128, 3792�3798.
125. Persson, L.J.; Aanerud, M.; Hiemstra, P.S.; Hardie, J.A.; Bakke, P.S.; Eagan, T.M. Chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with low levels of vitamin D. PLoS One 2012,
7, e38934.
126. Uh, S.T.; Koo, S.M.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, K.U.; Park, S.W.; Jang, A.S.; Kim, D.J.; Kim, Y.H.;
Park, C.S. Inhibition of vitamin D receptor translocation by cigarette smoking extracts. Tuberc.
Respir. Dis. 2012, 73, 258�265.
127. Wood, A.M.; Bassford, C.; Webster, D.; Newby, P.; Rajesh, P.; Stockley, R.A.; Thickett, D.R.
Vitamin D-binding protein contributes to COPD by activation of alveolar macrophages. Thorax
2011, 66, 205�210.
128. Sundar, I.K.; Hwang, J.W.; Wu, S.; Sun, J.; Rahman, I. Deletion of vitamin D receptor leads to
premature emphysema/COPD by increased matrix metalloproteinases and lymphoid aggregates
formation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 406, 127�133.
129. Lehouck, A.; Mathieu, C.; Carremans, C.; Baeke, F.; Verhaegen, J.; Van Eldere, J.; Decallonne,
B.; Bouillon, R.; Decramer, M.; Janssens, W. High doses of vitamin D to reduce exacerbations in
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2012, 156, 105�114.
130. Baker, J.C.; Ayres, J.G. Diet and asthma. Respir. Med. 2000, 94, 925�934.
131. Pogson, Z.E.K.; Antoniak, M.D.; Pacey, S.J.; Lewis, S.A.; Britton, J.R.; Fogarty, A.W.
Does a low sodium diet improve asthma control? A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Respir.
Crit. Care Med. 2008, 178, 132�138.
132. Matthew, R.; Altura, B. The role of magnesium in lung diseases: Asthma, allergy, and pulmonary
hypertension. Magnes. Trace Elem. 1991, 10, 220�228.
133. Baker, J.; Tunnicliffe, W.; Duncanson, R.; Ayres, J. Dietary antioxidants in type 1 brittle asthma:
A case control study. Thorax 1999, 54, 115�118.
134. Gilliand, F.; Berhane, K.; Li, Y.; Kim, D.; Margolis, H. Dietary magnesium, potassium, sodium
and childrens lung function. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2002, 155, 125�131.
135. Kim, J.-H.; Ellwood, P.; Asher, M.I. Diet and asthma: Looking back, moving forward. Respir. Res.
2009, 10, 49�55.
136. Kadrabova, J.; Mad�aric, A.; Kovacikova, Z.; Podiv�nsky, F.; Ginter, E.; Gazd�k, F. Selenium
status is decreased in patients with intrinsic asthma. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1996, 52, 241�248.
137. Devereux, G.; McNeill, G.; Newman, G.; Turner, S.; Craig, L.; Martindale, S.; Helms, P.; Seaton,
A. Early childhood wheezing symptoms in relation to plasma selenium in pregnant mothers and
neonates. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2007, 37, 1000�1008.
138. Burney, P.; Potts, J.; Makowska, J.; Kowalski, M.; Phillips, J.; Gnatiuc, L.; Shaheen, S.; Joos, G.;
Van Cauwenberge, P.; van Zele, T.; et al. A case control study of the relation between plasma
selenium and asthma in European populations: A GAL2EN project. Allergy 2008, 63, 865�871.
139. Shaheen, S.O.; Newson, R.B.; Rayman, M.P.; Wong, A.P.; Tumilty, M.K.; Phillips, J.M.;
Potts, J.F.; Kelly, F.J.; White, P.T.; Burney, P.G. Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled
trial of selenium supplementation in adult asthma. Thorax 2007, 62, 483�490.
140. Shaheen, S.O.; Newson, R.B.; Henderson, A.J.; Emmett, P.M.; Sherriff, A.; Cooke, M.; Team, A.S.
Umbilical cord trace elements and minerals and risk of early childhood wheezing and eczema. Eur.
Respir. J. 2004, 24, 292�297.
141. Andersson, I.; Gr�nberg, A.; Slinde, F.; Bosaeus, I.; Larsson, S. Vitamin and mineral status in
elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin. Respir. J. 2007, 1, 23�29.
142. Periyalil, H.; Gibson, P.; Wood, L. Immunometabolism in obese asthmatics: Are we there yet?
Nutrients 2013, 5, 3506�3530.
143. Mathis, D.; Shoelson, S.E. Immunometabolism: An emerging frontier. Nat. Rev. Immunol.
2011, 11, 81.
144. Medzhitov, R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature 2008, 454, 428�435.
145. Berthon, B.S.; Macdonald-Wicks, L.K.; Gibson, P.G.; Wood, L.G. Investigation of the association
between dietary intake, disease severity and airway inflammation in asthma. Respirology 2013, 18,
447�454.
146. Procaccini, C.; Jirillo, E.; Matarese, G. Leptin as an immunomodulator. Mol. Aspects Med.
2012, 33, 35�45.
147. Caldefie-Chezet, F.; Poulin, A.; Vasson, M.P. Leptin regulates functional capacities of
polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Free Radic. Res. 2003, 37, 809�814.
148. Zarkesh-Esfahani, H.; Pockley, A.G.; Wu, Z.; Hellewell, P.G.; Weetman, A.P.; Ross, R.J.
Leptin indirectly activates human neutrophils via induction of TNF-alpha. J. Immunol. 2004, 172,
1809�1814.
149. Lugogo, N.L.; Hollingsworth, J.W.; Howell, D.L.; Que, L.G.; Francisco, D.; Church, T.D.;
Potts-Kant, E.N.; Ingram, J.L.; Wang, Y.; Jung, S.H.; et al. Alveolar macrophages from
overweight/obese subjects with asthma demonstrate a proinflammatory phenotype. Am. J. Respir.
Crit. Care Med. 2012, 186, 404�411.
150. Shore, S.A.; Terry, R.D.; Flynt, L.; Xu, A.; Hug, C. Adiponectin attenuates allergen-induced
airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in mice. J. Allergy Clin. Immonol. 2006, 118,
389�395.
151. Wood, L.G.; Gibson, P.G. Adiponectin: The link between obesity and asthma in women? Am. J.
Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 186, 1�2.
152. Wood, L.G.; Baines, K.J.; Fu, J.; Scott, H.A.; Gibson, P.G. The neutrophilic inflammatory
phenotype is associated with systemic inflammation in asthma. Chest 2012, 142, 86�93.
153. Scott, H.A.; Gibson, P.G.; Garg, M.L.; Wood, L.G. Airway inflammation is augmented by obesity
and fatty acids in asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2011, 38, 594�602.
154. Telenga, E.D.; Tideman, S.W.; Kerstjens, H.A.; Hacken, N.H.; Timens, W.; Postma, D.S.;
van den Berge, M. Obesity in asthma: More neutrophilic inflammation as a possible explanation
for a reduced treatment response. Allergy 2012, 67, 1060�1068.
155. Forno, E.; Young, O.M.; Kumar, R.; Simhan, H.; Celed�n, J.C. Maternal Obesity in Pregnancy,
Gestational Weight Gain, and Risk of Childhood Asthma. Pediatrics 2014, 134, e535�e546.
156. Franssen, F.M.; O�Donnell, D.E.; Goossens, G.H.; Blaak, E.E.; Schols, A.M. Obesity and the lung:
5. Obesity and COPD. Thorax 2008, 63, 1110�1117.
157. Zhou, L.; Yuan, C.; Zhang, J.; Yu, R.; Huang, M.; Adcock, I.M.; Yao, X. Circulating Leptin
Concentrations in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review
and Meta-Analysis. Respiration 2014, 86, 512�522.
158. Bianco, A.; Mazzarella, G.; Turchiarelli, V.; Nigro, E.; Corbi, G.; Scudiero, O.; Sofia, M.; Daniele,
A. Adiponectin: An attractive marker for metabolic disorders in chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD). Nutrients 2013, 5, 4115�4125.
159. Daniele, A.; de Rosa, A.; de Cristofaro, M.; Monaco, M.L.; Masullo, M.; Porcile, C.; Capasso, M.;
Tedeschi, G.; Oriani, G.; di Costanzo, A. Decreased concentration of adiponectin together with
a selective reduction of its high molecular weight oligomers is involved in metabolic complications
of myotonic dystrophy type 1. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2011, 165, 969�975.
160. Kadowaki, T.; Yamauchi, T. Adiponectin and adiponectin receptors. Endocr. Rev. 2005, 26,
439�451.
161. Nigro, E.; Scudiero, O.; Sarnataro, D.; Mazzarella, G.; Sofia, M.; Bianco, A.; Daniele, A.
Adiponectin affects lung epithelial A549 cell viability counteracting TNFa and IL-1? toxicity
through AdipoR1. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013, 45, 1145�1153.
162. Gable, D.R.; Matin, J.; Whittall, R.; Cakmak, H.; Li, K.W.; Cooper, J.; Miller, G.J.; Humphries, S.E.;
HIFMECH investigators. Common adiponectin gene variants show different effects on risk of
cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in European subjects. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2007, 71,
453�466.
163. Yoon, H.I.; Li, Y.; Man, S.F.; Tashkin, D.; Wise, R.A.; Connett, J.E.; Anthonisen, N.A.; Churg, A.;
Wright, J.L.; Sin, D.D. The complex relationship of serum adiponectin to COPD outcomes COPD
and adiponectin. Chest 2012, 142, 893�899.
164. Daniele, A.; de Rosa, A.; Nigro, E.; Scudiero, O.; Capasso, M.; Masullo, M.; de Laurentiis, G.;
Oriani, G.; Sofia, M.; Bianco, A. Adiponectin oligomerization state and adiponectin receptors
airway expression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 44,
563�569.
165. Petridou, E.T.; Mitsiades, N.; Gialamas, S.; Angelopoulos, M.; Skalkidou, A.; Dessypris, N.;
Hsi, A.; Lazaris, N.; Polyzos, A.; Syrigos, C.; et al. Circulating adiponectin levels and expression
of adiponectin receptors in relation to lung cancer: Two case-control studies. Oncology 2007, 73,
261�269.
166. Ajuwon, K.M.; Spurlock, M.E. Adiponectin inhibits LPS-induced NF-kappaB activation and
IL-6 production and increases PPARgamma2 expression in adipocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Regul.
Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2005, 288, R1220�R1225.
167. Cheng, X.; Folco, E.J.; Shimizu, K.; Libby, P. Adiponectin induces pro-inflammatory programs in
human macrophages and CD4+ T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 36896�36904.
168. Miller, M.; Pham, A.; Cho, J.Y.; Rosenthal, P.; Broide, D.H. Adiponectin-deficient mice are
protected against tobacco-induced inflammation and increased emphysema. Am. J. Physiol. Lung
Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2010, 299, L834�L842.
169. Furukawa, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Suzuki, K.; Koya, T.; Sakagami, T.; Youkou, A.; Kagamu, H.;
Arakawa, M.; Gejyo, F.; Narita, I.; et al. Influence of underweight on asthma control. Allergol. Int.
2012, 61, 489�496.
170. Harding, R.; Maritz, G. Maternal and fetal origins of lung disease in adulthood. Semin. Fetal.
Neonatal Med. 2012, 17, 67�72.
171. Itoh, M.; Tsuji, T.; Nemoto, K.; Nakamura, H.; Aoshiba, K. Undernutrition in patients with COPD
and its treatment. Nutrients 2013, 5, 1316�1335.
172. Hallin, R.; Koivisto-Hursti, U.K.; Lindberg, E.; Janson, C. Nutritional status, dietary energy intake
and the risk of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Respir. Med. 2006, 100, 561�567.
173. Gr�nberg, A.M.; Slinde, F.; Engstr�m, C.P.; Hulth�n, L.; Larsson, S. Dietary problems in patients
with severe chronic obstructive disease. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2005, 18, 445�452.
174. Wilson, D.O.; Donahoe, M.; Rogers, R.M.; Pennock, B.E. Metabolic rate and weight loss in
chronic obstructive lung disease. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 1990, 14, 7�11.
175. Gan, W.Q.; Man, S.F.; Senthilselvan, A.; Sin, D.D. Association between chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease and systemic inflammation: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Thorax
2004, 59, 574�580.
176. Orlander, J.; Kiessling, K.H.; Larsson, L. Skeletal muscle metabolism, morphology and function
in sedentary smokers and nonsmokers. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1979, 107, 39�46.
177. Kok, M.O.; Hoekstra, T.; Twisk, J.W.R. The Longitudinal Relation between Smoking and Muscle
Strength in Healthy Adults. Eur. Addict. Res. 2012, 18, 70�75.
178. Gosker, H.R.; Langen, R.C.J.; Bracke, K.R.; Joos, G.F.; Brusselle, G.G.; Steele, C.; Ward, K.A.;
Wouters, E.F.M.; Schols, A.M.W.J. Extrapulmonary Manifestations of Chronic Obstructive
Pulmonary Disease in a Mouse Model of Chronic Cigarette Smoke Exposure. Am. J. Respir. Cell
Mol. Biol. 2009, 40, 710�716.
179. Nakatani, T.; Nakashima, T.; Kita, T.; Ishihara, A. Effects of exposure to cigarette smoke at
different dose levels on extensor digitorum longus muscle fibres in Wistar-Kyoto and spontaneously
hypertensive rats. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2003, 30, 671�677.
180. Remels, A.H.; Gosker, H.R.; Langen, R.C.; Schols, A.M. The mechanisms of cachexia underlying
muscle dysfunction in COPD. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2013, 114, 1253�1262.
181. Caron, M.A.; Debigare, R.; Dekhuijzen, P.N.; Maltais, F. Comparative assessment of the
quadriceps and the diaphragm in patients with COPD. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2009, 107,
952�961.
182. Vogiatzis, I.; Simoes, D.C.; Stratakos, G.; Kourepini, E.; Terzis, G.; Manta, P.; Athanasopoulos, D.;
Roussos, C.; Wagner, P.D.; Zakynthinos, S. Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on muscle
remodelling in cachectic patients with COPD. Eur. Respir. J. 2010, 36, 301�310.
183. Kythreotis, P.; Kokkini, A.; Avgeropoulou, S.; Hadjioannou, A.; Anastasakou, E.; Rasidakis, A.;
Bakakos, P. Plasma leptin and insulin-like growth factor I levels during acute exacerbations of
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMC Pulm. Med. 2009, 9, 11.
184. Barreiro, E.; Rabinovich, R.; Marin-Corral, J.; Barbera, J.A.; Gea, J.; Roca, J. Chronic endurance
exercise induces quadriceps nitrosative stress in patients with severe COPD. Thorax 2009, 64,
13�19.
185. Plant, P.J.; Brooks, D.; Faughnan, M.; Bayley, T.; Bain, J.; Singer, L.; Correa, J.; Pearce, D.;
Binnie, M.; Batt, J. Cellular markers of muscle atrophy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010, 42, 461�471.
186. Langen, R.C.; Haegens, A.; Vernooy, J.H.; Wouters, E.F.; de Winther, M.P.; Carlsen, H.; Steele, C.;
Shoelson, S.E.; Schols, A.M. NF-kappaB activation is required for the transition of pulmonary
inflammation to muscle atrophy. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2012, 47, 288�297.
187. Sharma, R.; Anker, S.D. Cytokines, apoptosis and cachexia: The potential for TNF antagonism.
Int. J. Cardiol. 2002, 85, 161�171.
188. Ferreira, I.M.; Brooks, D.; White, J.; Goldstein, R. Nutritional supplementation for stable chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 12, CD000998.
189. Planas, M.; Alvarez, J.; Garc�a-Peris, P.A.; de la Cuerda, C.; de Lucas, P.; Castell�, M.; Canseco, F.;
Reyes, L. Nutritional support and quality of life in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD) patients. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 24, 433�441.
190. Sugawara, K.; Takahashi, H.; Kasai, C.; Kiyokawa, N.; Watanabe, T.; Fujii, S.; Kashiwagura, T.;
Honma, M.; Satake, M.; Shioya, T. Effects of nutritional supplementation combined with
low-intensity exercise in malnourished patients with COPD. Respir. Med. 2010, 104, 1883�1889.
191. Al-Ghimlas, F.; Todd, D.C. Creatine supplementation for patients with COPD receiving
pulmonary rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respirology 2010, 15, 785�795.
192. Morimitsu, Y.; Nakagawa, Y.; Hayashi, K.; Fujii, H.; Kumagai, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Osawa, T.;
Horio, F.; Itoh, K.; Iida, K.; et al. A sulforaphane analogue that potently activates the Nrf2-
dependent detoxification pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 3456�3463.
193. Meja, K.K.; Rajendrasozhan, S.; Adenuga, D.; Biswas, S.K.; Sundar, I.K.; Spooner, G.;
Marwick, J.A.; Chakravarty, P.; Fletcher, D.; Whittaker, P.; et al. Curcumin restores corticosteroid
function in monocytes exposed to oxidants by maintaining HDAC2. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
2008, 39, 312�323.
194. Engelen, M.P.; Rutten, E.P.; de Castro, C.L.; Wouters, E.F.; Schols, A.M.; Deutz, N.E.
Supplementation of soy protein with branched-chain amino acids alters protein metabolism in
healthy elderly and even more in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Clin.
Nutr. 2007, 85, 431�439.
195. Dal Negro, R.W.; Aquilani, R.; Bertacco, S.; Boschi, F.M.C.; Tognella, S. Comprehensive effects of
supplemented essential amino acids in patients with severe COPD and sarcopenia. Monaldi Arch.
Chest Dis. 2010, 73, 25�33.
196. Varraso, R. Nutrition and asthma. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2012, 12, 201�210.

Close Accordion
Stay Hydrated And Six Easy Ways To Do It

Stay Hydrated And Six Easy Ways To Do It

Stay Hydrated: Summer fun means outside activities in the warm sun, from strenuous pursuits like biking, hiking, and volleyball-playing, to more leisurely enjoyments like sunbathing on a float. No matter how you plan to enjoy the steamy summer months, maintaining hydration should be right up there with sunscreen on your list of important hot weather priorities.

Dehydration is a condition that ranges from mild to serious, and can happen quicker than you think. Right Diagnosis defines dehydration as “an abnormal condition in which the body’s cells are deprived of an adequate amount of water.” One of the main situations factoring into a person becoming dehydrated is heat.

Think you drink enough water and don’t need to worry about dehydration? Consider these points:

  • The ability to recognize thirst diminishes in individuals in their late 30’s or older.
  • A person’s body is made up of roughly 70% water.
  • When you lose 2% of the body’s water content, you are considered dehydrated.

Dehydration symptoms range from unpleasant confusion, muscle weakness, and fatigue to extremely dangerous ones like seizures, kidney failure, and death. The good news is that if you stay hydrated in the first place is relatively easy if you take a few precautions up front.

#1: Drink Plenty Of Water

Make it a habit of carrying water with you during the summer months, and sipping on it throughout the day, especially if you are planning on outside activities. Invest in a couple of BPA-free water bottles for yourself and your family to tote with them on their summer adventures.

Not a big fan of plain water? Try adding lemon, cucumber, and mint sprigs to liven it up! Mix up in a big pitcher the night before so the flavor has time to penetrate. Another option is flavor packets, which are individual packets of flavors like green tea, watermelon, and peach.

#2: Eat The Right Foods

Liquids aren’t the only way your body gets water. Avoid dehydration by eating foods with a high water content.

Choices like celery, watermelon, cucumbers, carrots, and citrus fruits all offer exceptional hydrating ability. Pack these as snacks for the pool or beach, or to enjoy before and after an outdoor workout.

#3: Steer Clear Of Certain Drinks

As yummy and refreshing as an icy beer or frosty margarita tastes, alcohol can contribute to dehydration. If you decide to indulge, limit yourself to one or two, and drink a large glass of water along with your beverage to counteract the alcohol’s effects.

stay hydrated#4: Avoid Overexertion

Exercise is a wonderfully healthy pursuit; however, keep an eye on the temperature. If it is going to be exceptionally hot and humid, choose to exercise either early in the morning, or after sunset, when temperatures are lower and the sun isn’t beaming.

#5: Wear Proper Attire

Dress in light, airy clothing in fabrics that breathe. Protect your head with a cap or hat that shades your face. Avoid black clothing, which tends to absorb the sun and make you hotter.

#6: Stay Hydrated & Be Prepared

Extreme heat makes everyday issues like a flat tire or dead battery life-threatening. Visit a mechanic to confirm your vehicle is in good shape to lessen the chances of getting stranded. Carry extra water or sports drinks in your vehicle, and keep your cell phone charged. If your car breaks down, either stay in your car to wait for help, or stand in the grass instead of on the sizzling pavement.

When you stay hydrated is essential for good health all the time, and during the summer in particular. Implement these easy tips into your daily routine so you and your family maintain hydration and enjoy hot weather outdoor fun.

Chiropractic Treatment For Concussions

This article is copyrighted by Blogging Chiros LLC for its Doctor of Chiropractic members and may not be copied or duplicated in any manner including printed or electronic media, regardless of whether for a fee or gratis without the prior written permission of Blogging Chiros, LLC.

3 Nutritional Tips To Boost The Immune System

3 Nutritional Tips To Boost The Immune System

In today�s fast-paced society, we�re bombarded with various forms of stress that can wreck havoc on our immune systems. Chiropractors are particularly interested in helping their chiropractic patients overcome these stressors in order to maintain a healthy and balanced life. Outside of the chiropractic adjustment, let�s take a look at three nutritional tips that will help chiropractic patients boost their immune system.

Chiropractic patients� immune systems run their best when subluxations, also know as vertebral misalignments, are corrected. However, a proper diet can�t be ignored. By combining both forces, your immune system is better equipped to ward off many contaminants that try to invade the body through normal day-to-day activity.

Immune System: Nutritional Tip #1 � Get Vitamin D

Vitamin D is known for strengthening bones and teeth by helping the body absorb calcium. People who get too little vitamin D may develop soft, thin, and brittle bones, a condition known as rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults.

But did you know that it is also known to offer sufficient protection against a wide range of illnesses and chronic diseases like cancer? In addition, it improve’s the body’s natural response to bacterial infections like tuberculosis and helps to increase the production of antimicrobial peptides which are very important in boosting the immunity.

Since each patient�s health situation is different, ask your chiropractor how much vitamin D you need for optimal health.

Nutritional Tip #2 � Get Your Veggies

In culinary terms, vegetables are edible plants or their parts, intended for cooking or eating raw. You can quickly find what foods are in the vegetable group by visiting ChooseMyPlate.gov.

Vegetables such as cauliflower, cabbage, broccoli and Brussels (all from the brassica family) produce chemicals that are know to inhibit the growth of cancer cells and boost the body’s immune system. One great way to make sure you�re getting all of your vegetables for the day is through juicing. If you�re new to juicing, check out this great resource on juicing vegetables.

Nutritional Tip #3 � Avoid Alcohol

Most chiropractic patients are health-conscious. However, new chiropractic patients may be oblivious to the entire concept since our society is geared more toward sickness care instead of true healthcare. Regardless, maintaining a healthy diet is absolutely essential to maintaining a strong immune system. One way to do this is by avoiding or reducing alcohol consumption.

Why? Because research has proven that alcohol can cause immunodeficiencies that, in return, can make you more susceptible to tuberculosis, bacterial pneumonia and many other communicable diseases.

In addition, the use of alcohol is linked to cancer. Although many people in our society consume it for recreational purposes, it is important to note that alcohol is a drug that can poison your body and deplete you of essentials vitamins and minerals. Therefore, zero alcohol consumption translates into a super strong immune system.

If you need even more convincing, simply visit the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism�s website to learn more about alcohol facts and statistics.

To discover more nutritional tips that will help you build a stronger immune system, make sure you talk to your chiropractor. If you�ve never been to one, give us a call. We�d love to help guide you toward a more healthy lifestyle through safe and effective chiropractic care!

This article is copyrighted by Blogging Chiros LLC for its Doctor of Chiropractic members and may not be copied or duplicated in any manner including printed or electronic media, regardless of whether for a fee or gratis without the prior written permission of Blogging Chiros, LLC.

The Health Risks Of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods

The Health Risks Of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods

GMOs: We all know stories of tobacco, asbestos, and DDT. Originally declared safe, they caused widespread death and disease. Although their impact was vast, most of the population was spared. The same cannot be said for sweeping changes in the food supply. Everyone eats; everyone is affected. The increase in several diseases in North America may be due to the profound changes in our diet. The most radical change occurred a little over a decade ago when genetically modified (GM) crops were introduced. Their influence on health has been largely ignored, but recent studies show serious problems. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been linked to thousands of toxic or allergic-type reactions, thousands of sick, sterile, and dead livestock, and damage to virtually every organ and system studied in lab animals.1 Nearly every independent animal feeding safety study shows adverse or unexplained effects.

GM foods were made possible by a technology developed in the 1970s whereby genes from one species are forced into the DNA of other species. Genes produce proteins, which in turn can generate characteristics or traits. The promised traits associated with GMOs have been sky high�vegetables growing in the desert, vitamin fortified grains, and highly productive crops feeding the starving millions. None of these are available. In fact, the only two traits that are found in nearly all commericialized GM plants are herbicide tolerance and/or pesticide production.

Herbicide tolerant soy, corn, cotton, and canola plants are engineered with bacterial genes that allow them to survive otherwise deadly doses of herbicides. This gives farmers more flexibility in weeding and gives the GM seed company lots more profit. When farmers buy GM seeds, they sign a contract to buy only that seed producer�s brand of herbicide. Herbicide tolerant crops comprise about 80% of all GM plants. The other 20% are corn and cotton varieties that produce a pesticide in every cell. This is accomplished due to a gene from a soil bacterium called Bacillus thuringiensis or Bt, which produces a natural insect-killing poison called Bt- toxin. In addition to these two traits, there are also disease resistant GM Hawaiian papaya, zucchini and crook neck squash, which comprise well under 1% of GMO acreage.

GMOs: The FDA’s “Non-Regulation” Of GM Foods

GMOs Bell peppersRhetoric from the United States government since the early 1990s proclaims that GM foods are no different from their natural counterparts that have existed for centuries. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has labeled them �Generally Recognized as Safe,� or GRAS. This status allows a product to be commercialized without any additional testing. According to US law, to be considered GRAS the substance must be the subject of a substantial amount of peer-reviewed published studies (or equivalent) and there must be overwhelming consensus among the scientific community that the product is safe. GM foods had neither. Nonetheless, in a precedent-setting move in 1992 that some experts contend was illegal, the FDA declared that GM crops are GRAS as long as their producers say they are. Thus, the FDA does not require any safety evaluations or labeling of GMOs. A company can even introduce a GM food to the market without telling the agency.

Such a lenient approach was largely the result of the influence of large agricultural corporations According to Henry Miller, who had a leading role in biotechnology issues at the FDA from 1979 to 1994, �In this area, the US government agencies have done exactly what big agribusiness has asked them to do and told them to do.�2 The Ag biotech company with the greatest influence was clearly Monsanto. According to the New York Times, �What Monsanto wished for from Washington, Monsanto and, by extension, the biotechnology industry got. . . . When the company abruptly decided that it needed to throw off the regulations and speed its foods to market, the White House quickly ushered through an unusually generous policy of self-policing.�3

This policy was heralded by Vice President Dan Quayle on May 26, 1992. He chaired the Council on Competitiveness, which had identified GM crops as an industry that could boost US exports. To take advantage, Quayle announced �reforms� to �speed up and simplify the process of bringing� GM products to market without �being hampered by unnecessary regulation.�4 Three days later, the FDA policy on non-regulation was unveiled.

The person who oversaw its development was the FDA�s Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Michael Taylor, whose position had been created especially for him in 1991. Prior to that, Taylor was an outside attorney for both Monsanto and the Food Biotechnology Council. After working at the FDA, he became Monsanto�s vice president. The Obama administration has put Talyor back into the FDA as the US Food Safety Czar.

The FDA Covers Up Health Risks

GMOs FDA press conferenceTaylor�s GMO policy needed to create the impression that unintended effects from GM crops were not an issue. Otherwise their GRAS status would be undermined and they would need the extensive testing and labels that are normally required for food additives. But internal memos made public from a lawsuit showed that the overwhelming consensus among the agency scientists was that GM crops can have unpredictable, hard-to-detect side effects. Various departments and experts spelled these out in detail, listing allergies, toxins, nutritional effects, and new diseases as potential dangers. They urged superiors to require long-term safety studies.5 In spite of the warnings, according to public interest attorney Steven Druker who studied the FDA�s internal files, �References to the unintended negative effects of bioengineering were progressively deleted from drafts of the policy statement (over the protests of agency scientists).�6

FDA microbiologist Louis Pribyl, PhD, wrote about the policy, �What has happened to the scientific elements of this document? Without a sound scientific base to rest on, this becomes a broad, general, �What do I have to do to avoid trouble�-type document. . . . It will look like and probably be just a political document. . . . It reads very pro-industry, especially in the area of unintended effects.�7

The scientists� concerns were not only ignored, their very existence was denied. The official FDA policy stated, �The agency is not aware of any information showing that foods derived by these new methods differ from other foods in any meaningful or uniform way.�8 In sharp contrast, an internal FDA report stated, �The processes of genetic engineering and traditional breeding are different and according to the technical experts in the agency, they lead to different risks.�9 The FDA�s deceptive notion of no difference was coined �substantial equivalence� and formed the basis of the US government position on GMOs.

Many scientists and organizations have criticized the US position. The National Academy of Sciences and even the pro-GM Royal Society of London10 describe the US system as inadequate and flawed. The editor of the prestigious journal Lancet said, �It is astounding that the US Food and Drug Administration has not changed their stance on genetically modified food adopted in 1992. . . . The policy is that genetically modified crops will receive the same consideration for potential health risks as any other new crop plant. This stance is taken despite good reasons to believe that specific risks may exist. . . . Governments should never have allowed these products into the food chain without insisting on rigorous testing for effects on health.�11 The Royal Society of Canada described substantial equivalence as �scientifically unjustifiable and inconsistent with precautionary regulation of the technology.� 12

GMOs Are Inherently Unsafe

safety signThere are several reasons why GM plants present unique dangers. The first is that the process of genetic engineering itself creates unpredicted alterations, irrespective of which gene is transferred. The gene insertion process, for example, is accomplished by either shooting genes from a �gene gun� into a plate of cells, or using bacteria to infect the cell with foreign DNA. Both create mutations in and around the insertion site and elsewhere.13 The �transformed� cell is then cloned into a plant through a process called tissue culture, which results in additional hundreds or thousands of mutations throughout the plants� genome. In the end, the GM plant�s DNA can be a staggering 2-4% different from its natural parent.14 Native genes can be mutated, deleted, or permanently turned on or off. In addition, the insertion process causes holistic and not-well-understood changes among large numbers of native genes. One study revealed that up to 5% of the natural genes altered their levels of protein expression as a result of a single insertion.

The Royal Society of Canada acknowledged that �the default prediction� for GM crops would include �a range of collateral changes in expression of other genes, changes in the pattern of proteins produced and/or changes in metabolic activities.�15 Although the FDA scientists evaluating GMOs in 1992 were unaware of the extent to which GM DNA is damaged or changed, they too described the potential consequences. They reported, �The possibility of unexpected, accidental changes in genetically engineered plants� might produce �unexpected high concentrations of plant toxicants.�16 GM crops, they said, might have �increased levels of known naturally occurring toxins,� and the �appearance of new, not previously identified� toxins.17 The same mechanism can also produce allergens, carcinogens, or substances that inhibit assimilation of nutrients.

Most of these problems would pass unnoticed through safety assessments on GM foods, which are largely designed on the false premise that genes are like Legos that cleanly snap into place. But even if we disregard unexpected changes in the DNA for the moment, a proper functioning inserted gene still carries significant risk. Its newly created GM protein, such as the Bt-toxin, may be dangerous for human health (see below). Moreover, even if that protein is safe in its natural organism, once it is transferred into a new species it may be processed differently. A harmless protein may be transformed into a dangerous or deadly version. This happened with at least one GM food crop under development, GM peas, which were destroyed before being commercialized.

FDA scientists were also quite concerned about the possibility of inserted genes spontaneously transferring into the DNA of bacteria inside our digestive tract. They were particularly alarmed at the possibility of antibiotic resistant marker (ARM) genes transferring. ARM genes are employed during gene insertion to help scientists identify which cells successfully integrated the foreign gene. These ARM genes, however, remain in the cell and are cloned into the DNA of all the GM plants produced from that cell. One FDA report wrote in all capital letters that ARM genes would be �A SERIOUS HEALTH HAZARD,� due to the possibility of that they might transfer to bacteria and create super diseases, untreatable with antibiotics.

Although the biotech industry confidently asserted that gene transfer from GM foods was not possible, the only human feeding study on GM foods later proved that it does take place. The genetic material in soybeans that make them herbicide tolerant transferred into the DNA of human gut bacteria and continued to function18. That means that long after we stop eating a GM crop, its foreign GM proteins may be produced inside our intestines. It is also possible that the foreign genes might end up inside our own DNA, within the cells of our own organs and tissues.

Another worry expressed by FDA scientists was that GM plants might gather �toxic substances from the environment� such as �pesticides or heavy metals,�19 or that toxic substances in GM animal feed might bioaccumulate into milk and meat products. While no studies have looked at the bioaccumulation issue, herbicide tolerant crops certainly have higher levels of herbicide residues. In fact, many countries had to increase their legally allowable levels�by up to 50 times�in order to accommodate the introduction of GM crops.

The overuse of the herbicides due to GM crops has resulted in the development of herbicide resistant weeds. USDA statistics show�that herbicide use is rapidly accelerating. Its use was up by 527 million pounds in the first 16 years of GM crops (1996-2011).�Glyphosate use per acre on Roundup Ready soybeans was up by 227% while use on non-GMO soy acreage decreased by 20% over�the same time period. The rate of application is accelerating due in large part to the emergence of herbicide tolerant weeds, now�found on millions of acres. According to a study by Charles Benbrook, the incremental increase per year was 1.5 million pounds in�1999, 18 million in 2003, 79 million in 2009, and about 90 million in 2011. And as Roundup becomes less effective, farmers are�now using more toxic herbicides, such as 2-4D.

The pesticide-producing Bt crops do reduce the amount of sprayed on insecticides, but the total amount produced by the crops is far�greater than the amount of displaced spray. For example, Bt corn that kills the corn rootworm produces one to two pounds of Bt�toxin per acre, but reduces sprayed insecticides by only about 0.19 pounds. SmartStax corn with eight genes produces 3.7 pounds of�Bt toxin per acre, but displaces only 0.3 pounds of sprayed insecticides. 20

All of the above risks associated with GM foods are magnified for high-risk groups, such as pregnant women, children, the sick, and the elderly. The following section highlights some of the problems that have been identified.

GM Diet Shows Toxic Reactions In The Digestive Tract

gmos digestive abdomenThe very first crop submitted to the FDA�s voluntary consultation process, the FlavrSavr tomato, showed evidence of toxins. Out of 20 female rats fed the GM tomato, 7 developed stomach lesions.21 The director of FDA�s Office of Special Research Skills wrote that the tomatoes did not demonstrate a �reasonable certainty of no harm,�22 which is their normal standard of safety. The Additives Evaluation Branch agreed that �unresolved questions still remain.�23 The political appointees, however, did not require that the tomato be withdrawn.1

According to Arpad Pusztai, PhD, one of the world�s leading experts in GM food safety assessments, the type of stomach lesions linked to the tomatoes �could lead to life-endangering hemorrhage, particularly in the elderly who use aspirin to prevent [blood clots].�24 Dr. Pusztai believes that the digestive tract, which is the first and largest point of contact with foods, can reveal various reactions to toxins and should be the first target of GM food risk assessment. He was alarmed, however, to discover that studies on the FlavrSavr never looked passed the stomach to the intestines. Other studies that did look found problems.

Mice fed potatoes engineered to produce the Bt-toxin developed abnormal and damaged cells, as well as proliferative cell growth in the lower part of their small intestines (ileum).25 Rats fed potatoes engineered to produce a different type of insecticide (GNA lectin from the snowdrop plant) also showed proliferative cell growth in both the stomach and intestinal walls (see photos).26 Although the guts of rats fed GM peas were not examined for cell growth, the intestines were mysteriously heavier; possibly as a result of such growth.27 Cell proliferation can be a precursor to cancer and is of special concern.

GMOs Rat GM Potato InfoGM Diets Cause Liver Damage

The state of the liver�a main detoxifier for the body�is another indicator of toxins.

  • Rats fed the GNA lectin potatoes described above had smaller and partially atrophied livers.28
  • Rats fed Monsanto�s Mon 863 corn, engineered to produce Bt-toxin, had liver lesions and other indications of toxicity.29
  • Rabbits fed GM soy showed altered enzyme production in their livers as well as higher metabolic activity.30
  • The livers of rats fed Roundup Ready canola were 12%�16% heavier, possibly due to liver disease or inflammation.31
  • Microscopic analysis of the livers of mice fed Roundup Ready soybeans revealed altered gene expression and structural and functional changes (see photos).32 Many of these changes reversed after the mice diet was switched to non-GM soy, indicating that GM soy was the culprit. The findings, according to molecular geneticist Michael Antoniou, PhD, �are not random and must reflect some �insult� on the liver by the GM soy.� Antoniou, who does human gene therapy research in King�s College London, said that although the long-term consequences of the GM soy diet are not known, it �could lead to liver damage and consequently general toxemia.�33
  • Rats fed Roundup Ready soybeans also showed structural changes in their livers. 34

GMOs Liver Cells Soy Fed Mice

GMOs Livers Soy Fed RatsGM Fed Animals Had Higher Death Rates & Organ Damage

In the FlavrSavr tomato study, a note in the appendix indicated that 7 of 40 rats died within two weeks and were replaced.35 In another study, chickens fed the herbicide tolerant �Liberty Link� corn died at twice the rate of those fed natural corn.36 But in these two industry-funded studies, the deaths were dismissed without adequate explanation or follow-up.

In addition, the cells in the pancreas of mice fed Roundup Ready soy had profound changes and produced significantly less digestive enzymes;37 in rats fed a GM potato, the pancreas was enlarged.38 In various analyses of kidneys, GM-fed animals showed lesions, toxicity, altered enzyme production or inflammation.39,40 Enzyme production in the hearts of rabbits was altered by GM soy.41 And GM potatoes caused slower growth in the brain of rats.42 A team of independent scientists re-analyzed the raw data in three Monsanto 90-day rat feeding studies and saw signs of toxicity in the liver and kidneys, as well as effects in the heart, adrenal glands, spleen, and blood.43 In one of the only long-term feeding studies, rats fed Roundup Ready corn for three years for 24 months (or even just low concentrations of Roundup in their drinking water) suffered significant damage to their kidneys, livers, and pituitary glands. They also died prematurely and had many massive tumors�as large as 25% of their body weight.44

Reproductive Failures & Infant Mortality

The testicles of both mice and rats fed Roundup Ready soybeans showed dramatic changes. In rats, the organs were dark blue instead of pink (see photos on next page).45 In mice, young sperm cells were altered.46 Embryos of GM soy-fed mice also showed temporary changes in their DNA function, compared to those whose parents were fed non-GM soy.47�Female rats fed GM soy showed changes in their uterus, ovaries, and hormonal balance.48 By the third generation, most hamsters fed GM soy were unable to have babies. The infant mortality was 4-5 times greater than controls, and many of the GMO-fed third generation had hair growing in their mouths.49

GMOs Testicles of Rats

An Austrian government study showed that mice fed GM corn (Bt and Roundup Ready) had fewer babies and smaller babies.50 More dramatic results were discovered by a leading scientist at the Russian National Academy of sciences. Female rats were fed GM soy, starting two weeks before they were mated.

  • Over a series of three experiments, 51.6 percent of the offspring from the GM-fed group died within the first three weeks, compared to 10 percent from the non-GM soy group, and 8.1 percent for non-soy controls.
  • �High pup mortality was characteristic of every litter from mothers fed the GM soy flour.�51
  • The average size and weight of the GM-fed offspring was quite a bit smaller (see photo on next page).52
  • In a preliminary study, the GM-fed offspring were unable to conceive.53After the three feeding trials, the supplier of rat food used at the Russian laboratory began using GM soy in their formulation. Since all the rats housed at the facility were now eating GM soy, no non-GM fed controls were available for subsequent GM feeding trials; follow-up studies were canceled. After two months on the GM soy diet, however, the infant mortality rate of rats throughout the facility had skyrocketed to 55.3 percent (99 of 179).54
GMOs 20 Day old rat 19 day old rat

Farmers Report Livestock Sterility & Deaths

gmos pigsAbout two dozen farmers reported that their pigs had reproductive problems when fed certain varieties of Bt corn. Pigs were sterile, had false pregnancies, or gave birth to bags of water. Cows and bulls also became sterile. Bt corn was also implicated by farmers in the deaths of cows, horses, water buffaloes, and chickens.55

When Indian shepherds let their sheep graze continuously on Bt cotton plants, within 5-7 days, one out of four sheep died. There was an estimated 10,000 sheep deaths in the region in 2006, with more reported in 2007. Post mortems on the sheep showed severe irritation and black patches in both intestines and liver (as well as enlarged bile ducts). Investigators said preliminary evidence �strongly suggests that the sheep mortality was due to a toxin. . . . most probably Bt-toxin.�56 In a small feeding study, 100% of sheep fed Bt cotton died within 30 days. Those fed natural plants had no symptoms.

Buffalo that grazed on natural cotton plants for years without incident react to the Bt variety. In one village in Andhra Pradesh, for example, 13 buffalo grazed on Bt cotton plants for a single day. All died within 3 days.57 Investigators in the state of Haryana, India, report that most buffalo that ate GM cottonseed had reproductive complications such as premature deliveries, abortions, infertility, and prolapsed uteruses. Many young calves and adult buffaloes died.

GM Crops Trigger Immune Reactions & May Cause Allergies

gmos cropsAllergic reactions occur when the immune system interprets something as foreign, different, and offensive, and reacts accordingly. All GM foods, by definition, have something foreign and different. And several studies show that they provoke reactions. Rats fed Monsanto�s GM corn, for example, had a significant increase in blood cells related to the immune system.58 GM potatoes caused the immune system of rats to respond more slowly.59 And GM peas provoked an inflammatory response in mice, suggesting that it might cause deadly allergic reactions in people.60

It might be difficult to identify whether GM foods were triggering allergic responses in the population, since very few countries conduct regular studies or keep careful records. One country that does have an annual evaluation is the UK. Soon after GM soy was introduced into the British diet, researchers at the York Laboratory reported that allergies to soy had skyrocketed by 50% in a single year.61 Although no follow-up studies were conducted to see if GM soy was the cause, there is evidence showing several ways in which it might have contributed to the rising incidence of allergies:

  • The only significant variety of GM soy is Monsanto�s �Roundup Ready� variety, planted in 89% of US soy acres. A foreign gene from bacteria (with parts of virus and petunia DNA) is inserted, which allows the plant to withstand Roundup herbicide. The protein produced by the bacterial gene has never been part of the human food supply. Because people aren�t usually allergic to a food until they have eaten it several times, it would be difficult to know in advance if the protein was an allergen. Without a surefire method to identify allergenic GM crops, the World Health Organization (WHO) and others recommend examining the properties of the protein to see if they share characteristics with known allergens. One method is to compare the amino acid sequence of the novel protein with a database of allergens. If there is a match, according to the WHO, the GM crop should either not be commercialized or additional testing should be done. Sections of the protein produced in GM soy are identical to shrimp and dust mite allergens,62 but the soybean was introduced before WHO criteria were established and the recommended additional tests were not conducted. If the protein does trigger reactions, the danger is compounded by the finding that the Roundup Ready gene transfers into the DNA of human gut bacteria and may continuously produce the protein from within our intestines.63
  • In addition to the herbicide tolerant protein, GM soybeans contain a unique, unexpected protein, which likely came about from the changes incurred during the genetic engineering process. Scientists found that this new protein was able to bind with IgE antibodies, suggesting that it may provoke dangerous allergic reactions. The same study revealed that one human subject showed a skin prick immune response only to GM soy, but not to natural soy.64 These results must be considered preliminary,�as the non-GM soy was a wild type and not necessarily comparable to the GM variety. Another study showed that the levels of one known soy allergen, called trypsin inhibitor, were as much as seven times higher in cooked GM soy compared to a non-GM control.65 This was Monsanto�s own study, and did use comparable controls.
  • GM soy also produces an unpredicted side effect in the pancreas of mice�the amount of digestive enzymes produced is dramatically reduced.66 If a shortage of enzymes caused food proteins to breakdown more slowly, then they have more time to trigger allergic reactions. Thus, digestive problems from GM soy might promote allergies to a wide range of proteins, not just soy.
  • The higher amount of Roundup herbicide residues on GM soy might create reactions in consumers. In fact, many of the symptoms identified in the UK soy allergy study are among those related to glyphosate exposure. [The allergy study identified irritable bowel syndrome, digestion problems, chronic fatigue, headaches, lethargy, and skin complaints, including acne and eczema, all related to soy consumption. Symptoms of glyphosate exposure include nausea, headaches, lethargy, skin rashes, and burning or itchy skin. It is also possible that glyphosate�s breakdown product aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), which accumulates in GM soybeans after each spray, might contribute to allergies.]

It is interesting to note that in the five years immediately after GM soy was introduced, US peanut allergies doubled. It is known that a protein in natural soybeans cross-reacts with peanut allergies, i.e. soy may trigger reactions in some people who are allergic to peanuts.67 Given the startling increase in peanut allergies, scientists should investigate whether this cross-reactivity has been amplified in GM soy.

Roundup, tumors, etc.

BT-Toxin, Produced In GM Corn & Cotton, May Cause Allergies

gmos Bt-toxin-crystalsFor years, organic farmers and others have sprayed crops with solutions containing natural Bt bacteria as a method of insect control. The toxin creates holes in their stomach and kills them. Genetic engineers take the gene that produces the toxin in bacteria and insert it into the DNA of crops so that the plant does the work, not the farmer. The fact that we consume that toxic pesticide in every bite of Bt corn is hardly appetizing.

Biotech companies claim that Bt-toxin has a history of safe use, is quickly destroyed in our stomach, and wouldn�t react with humans or mammals in any event. Studies verify, however, that natural Bt-toxin is not fully destroyed during digestion and does react with mammals. Mice fed Bt-toxin, for example, showed an immune response as potent as cholera toxin, 68, became immune sensitive to formerly harmless compounds,69 and had damaged and altered cells in their small intestines.70 A 2008 Italian government study found that Bt corn provoked immune responses in mice.71 Moreover, when natural Bt was sprayed over areas around Vancouver and Washington State to fight gypsy moths, about 500 people reported reactions�mostly allergy or flu-like symptoms.72,73 Farm workers and others also report serious reactions7475767778 and authorities have long acknowledged that �people with compromised immune systems or preexisting allergies may be particularly susceptible to the effects of Bt.�79

The Bt-toxin produced in GM crops is �vastly different from the bacterial [Bt-toxins] used in organic and traditional farming and forestry.�80 The plant produced version is designed to be more toxic than natural varieties,81 and is about 3,000-5,000 times more concentrated than the spray form. And just like the GM soy protein, the Bt protein in GM corn varieties has a section of its amino acid sequence identical to a known allergen (egg yolk). The Bt protein also fails other allergen criteria recommended by the WHO, i.e. the protein is too resistant to break down during digestion and heat.

A 2011 study published in the Journal of Applied Toxicology showed that when Bt-toxin derived from Monsanto�s corn was exposed to human cells, the toxin disrupts the membrane in just 24 hours, causing certain fluid to leak through the cell walls. The authors specifically note, �This may be due to pore formation like in insect cells.� In other words, the toxin may be creating small holes in human cells in the same manner that it kills insects. The researchers �documented that modified Bt toxins [from GM plants] are not inert on human cells, but can exert toxicity.�82 A 2011 Canadian study conducted at Sherbrooke Hospital discovered that�93% of the pregnant women they tested had Bt-toxin from Monsanto�s corn in their blood. And so did 80% of their unborn�fetuses. 83

If Bt-toxin causes allergies, then gene transfer carries serious ramifications. If Bt genes relocate to human gut bacteria, our intestinal flora may be converted into living pesticide factories, possibly producing Bt-toxin inside of us year after year. The UK Joint Food Safety and Standards Group also described gene transfer from a different route. They warned that genes from inhaled pollen might transfer into the DNA of bacteria in the respiratory system.84 Although no study has looked into that possibility, pollen from a Bt cornfield appears to have been responsible for allergic-type reactions.

In 2003, during the time when an adjacent Bt cornfield was pollinating, virtually an entire Filipino village of about 100 people was stricken by mysterious skin, respiratory, and intestinal reactions.85 The symptoms started with those living closest to the field and spread to those further away. Blood samples from 39 individuals showed antibodies in response to Bt-toxin, supporting�but not proving�a link. When the same corn was planted in four other villages the following year, however, the symptoms returned in all four areas�only during the time of pollination.86

Bt-toxin might also trigger reactions by skin contact. In 2005, a medical team reported that hundreds of agricultural workers in India are developing allergic symptoms when exposed to Bt cotton, but not when
axposed to natural varieties.87 They say reactions come from picking the cotton, cleaning it in factories, loading it onto trucks, or even leaning against it. Their symptoms are virtually identical to those described by the 500 people in Vancouver and Washington who were sprayed with Bt.

Government Evaluations Miss Most Health Problems

gmos Example FDA Decision Making ProcessAlthough the number of safety studies on GM foods is quite small, it has validated the concerns expressed by FDA scientists and others. Unfortunately, government safety assessments worldwide are not competent to even identify most of the potential health problems described above, let alone protect its citizens from the effects.88

A 2000 review of approved GM crops in Canada by professor E. Ann Clark, PhD, for example, reveals that 70% (28 of 40) �of the currently available GM crops . . . have not been subjected to any actual lab or animal toxicity testing, either as refined oils for direct human consumption or indirectly as feedstuffs for livestock. The same finding pertains to all three GM tomato decisions, the only GM flax, and to five GM corn crops.� In the remaining 30% (12) of the other crops tested, animals were not fed the whole GM feed. They were given just the isolated GM protein that the plant was engineered to produce. But even this protein was not extracted from the actual GM plant. Rather, it was manufactured in genetically engineered bacteria. This method of testing would never identify problems associated with collateral damage to GM plant DNA, unpredicted changes in the GM protein, transfer of genes to bacteria or human cells, excessive herbicide residues, or accumulation of toxins in the food chain, among others. Clark asks, �Where are the trials showing lack of harm to fed livestock, or that meat and milk from livestock fed on GM feedstuffs are safe?�89

Epidemiologist and GM safety expert Judy Carman, PhD, MPH, shows that assessments by Food Safety Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) also overlook serious potential problems, including cancer, birth defects, or long-term effects of nutritional deficiencies. 90

�A review of twelve reports covering twenty-eight GM crops – four soy, three corn, ten potatoes, eight canola, one sugar beet and two cotton�revealed no feeding trials on people. In addition, one of the GM corn varieties had gone untested on animals. Some seventeen foods involved testing with only a single oral gavage (a type of forced-feeding), with observation for seven to fourteen days, and only of the substance that had been genetically engineered to appear [the GM protein], not the whole food. Such testing assumes that the only new substance that will appear in the food is the one genetically engineered to appear, that the GM plant- produced substance will act in the same manner as the tested substance that was obtained from another source [GM bacteria], and that the substance will create disease within a few days. All are untested hypotheses and make a mockery of GM proponents� claims that the risk assessment of GM foods is based on sound science. Furthermore, where the whole food was given to animals to eat,�sample sizes were often very low�for example, five to six cows per group for Roundup Ready soy�and they were fed for only four weeks.�91

Dr. Carman points out that GM �experiments used some very unusual animal models for human health, such as chickens, cows, and trout. Some of the measurements taken from these animals are also unusual measures of human health, such as abdominal fat pad weight, total de-boned breast meat yield, and milk production.� In her examination of the full range of submittals to authorities in Australia and New Zealand, she says that there was no proper evaluation of �biochemistry, immunology, tissue pathology, and gut, liver, and kidney function.�92 Writing on behalf of the Public Health Association of Australia, Dr. Carman says, �The effects of feeding people high concentrations of the new protein over tens of years cannot be determined by feeding 20 mice a single oral gavage of a given high concentration of the protein and taking very basic data for 13-14 days.�93

The FDA’s Fake Safety Assessments

gmos Safety assessmentSubmissions to the US Food and Drug Administraion (FDA) may be worse than in other countries, since the agency doesn�t actually require any data. Their policy says that biotech companies can determine if their own foods are safe. Anything submitted is voluntary and, according to former Environmental Protection Agency scientist Doug Gurian-Sherman, PhD, �often lack[s] sufficient detail, such as necessary statistical analyses needed for an adequate safety evaluation.� Using Freedom of Information Requests, Dr. Gurian-Sherman analyzed more than a fourth of the data summaries (14 of 53) of GM crops reviewed by the FDA. He says, �The FDA consultation process does not allow the agency to require submission of data, misses obvious errors in company- submitted data summaries, provides insufficient testing guidance, and does not require sufficiently detailed data to enable the FDA to assure that GE crops are safe to eat.�94 Similarly, a Friends of the Earth review of company and FDA documents concluded:

�If industry chooses to submit faulty, unpublishable studies, it does so without consequence. If it should respond to an agency request with deficient data, it does so without reprimand or follow-up. . . . If a company finds it disadvantageous to characterize its product, then its properties remain uncertain or unknown. If a corporation chooses to ignore scientifically sound testing standards . . . then faulty tests are conducted instead, and the results are considered legitimate. In the area of genetically engineered food regulation, the �competent� agencies rarely if ever (know how to) conduct independent research to verify or supplement industry findings.� 95

At the end of the consultation, the FDA doesn�t actually approve the crops. Rather, they issue a letter that includes a statement such as the following:

�Based on the safety and nutritional assessment you have conducted, it is our understanding that Monsanto has concluded that corn products derived from this new variety are not materially different in composition, safety, and other relevant parameters from corn currently on the market, and that the genetically modified corn does not raise issues that would require premarket review or approval by FDA. . . . As you are aware, it is Monsanto�s responsibility to ensure that foods marketed by the firm are safe, wholesome and in compliance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements.�96

Company Research Is Secret, Inadequate & Flawed

GMOs FDA health inspectorsThe unpublished industry studies submitted to regulators are typically kept secret based on the claim that it is �confidential business information.� The Royal Society of Canada is one of many organizations that condemn this practice. They wrote:

�In the judgment of the Expert Panel, the more regulatory agencies limit free access to the data upon which their decisions are based, the more compromised becomes the claim that the regulatory process is �science based.� This is due to a simple but well- understood requirement of the scientific method itself�that it be an open, completely transparent enterprise in which any and all aspects of scientific research are open to full review by scientific peers. Peer review and independent corroboration of research findings are axioms of the scientific method, and part of the very meaning of the objectivity and neutrality of science.�97

Whenever private submissions are made public through lawsuits or Freedom of Information Act Requests, it becomes clear why companies benefit from secrecy. The quality of their research is often miserable, incompetent, and unacceptable for peer-review. In 2000, for example, after the potentially allergenic StarLink corn was found to have contaminated the food supply, the corn�s producer, Aventis CropScience, presented wholly inadequate safety data to the EPA�s scientific advisory panel. One frustrated panel member, Dean Metcalfe, MD,�the government�s top allergist�said during a hearing, �Most of us review for a lot of journals. And if this were presented for publication in the journals that I review for, it would be sent back to the authors with all of these questions. It would be rejected.�98

Unscientific Assumptions Are The Basis Of Approvals

Professor Clark, who analyzed submissions to Canadian regulators, concluded, �Most or all of the conclusions of food safety for individual GM crops are based on inferences and assumptions, rather than on actual testing.� For example, rather than actually testing to see if the amino acid sequence produced by their inserted gene is correct, �the standard practice,� according to research analyst William Freese, �is to sequence just 5 to 25 amino acids,�99 even if the protein has more than 600 in total. If the short sample matches what is expected, they assume that the rest are also fine. If they are wrong, however, a rearranged protein could be quite dangerous.

Monsanto�s submission to Australian regulators on their high lysine GM corn provides an excellent example of overly optimistic assumptions used in place of science. The gene inserted into the corn produces a protein that is naturally found in soil. Monsanto claimed that since people consume small residues of soil on fruits and vegetables, the protein has a history of safe consumption. Based on the amount of GM corn protein an average US citizen would consume (if all their corn were Monsanto�s variety), they would eat up to 4 trillion times the amount normally consumed through soil. In other words, �for equivalent exposure� of the protein from soil �people would have to eat . . . nearly as much as 10,000kg [22,000 pounds, every] second 24 hours a day seven days a week.�100

Studies Are Rigged To Avoid Finding Problems

gmos analysis microsopeIn addition, to relying on untested assumptions, industry-funded research is often designed specifically to force a conclusion of safety. In the high lysine corn described above, for example, the levels of certain nutritional components (i.e. protein content, total dietary fiber, acid detergent fiber, and neutral detergent fiber) were far outside the normal range for corn. Instead of comparing their corn to normal controls, which would reveal this disparity, Monsanto compared it to obscure corn varieties that were also substantially outside the normal range on precisely these values. Thus, their study found no statistical differences by design.

When Monsanto learned that independent researchers were to publish a study in July 1999 showing that GM soy contains 12%-14% less cancer-fighting phytoestrogens, the company responded with its own study, concluding that soy�s phytoestrogen levels vary too much to even carry out a statistical analysis. Researchers failed to disclose, however, that they had instructed the laboratory to use an obsolete method of detection�one that had been prone to highly variable results.101

When Aventis prepared samples to see if the potential allergen in StarLink corn remained intact after cooking, instead of using the standard 30-minute treatment, they heated corn for two hours.102

To show that pasteurization destroyed bovine growth hormone in milk from cows treated with rbGH, scientists pasteurized the milk 120 times longer than normal. Unable to destroy more than 19%, they then spiked the milk with a huge amount of the hormone and repeated the long pasteurization, destroying 90%.103 (The FDA reported that pasteurization destroys 90% of the hormone.104) To demonstrate that injections of rbGH did not interfere with cow�s fertility, Monsanto apparently added cows to the study that were pregnant prior to injection.105

And in order to prove that the protein from their GM crops breaks down quickly during simulated digestion, biotech companies used thousands of times the amount of digestive enzymes and a much stronger acid compared to that recommended by the World Health Organization.106

Other methods used to hide problems are varied and plentiful. For example, researchers:

  • Use highly variable animal starting weights to hinder detection of food-related changes
  • Keep feeding studies short to miss long-term impacts
  • Test effects of Roundup Ready soybeans that have not been sprayed with Roundup
  • Avoid feeding animals the actual GM crop, but give them instead a single dose of the GM protein that was produced inside GM bacteria
  • Use too few subjects to derive statistically significant results
  • Use poor statistical methods or simply leave out essential methods, data, or statistics
  • Use irrelevant control groups, and employ insensitive evaluation techniques

Roundup Ready Soybeans: Case Study Of Flawed Research

gmos soybeansMonsanto�s 1996 Journal of Nutrition studies on Roundup Ready soybeans107,108 provide plenty of examples of scientific transgressions. Although the study has been used often by the industry as validation for safety claims, experts working in the field were not impressed. For example, Dr. Arpad Pusztai was commissioned at the time by the UK government to lead a 20 member consortium in three institutions to develop rigorous testing protocols on GM foods�protocols that were never implemented. Dr. Pusztai, who had published several studies in that same nutrition journal, said the Monsanto paper was not �up to the normal journal standards.� He said, �It was obvious that the study had been designed to avoid finding any problems. Everybody in our consortium knew this.� Some of the flaws include:

  • Researchers tested GM soy on mature animals, not young ones. Young animals use protein to build their muscles, tissues, and organs. Problems with GM food could therefore show up in organ and body weight. But adult animals use the protein for tissue renewal and energy. �With a nutritional study on mature animals,� says Dr. Pusztai, �you would never see any difference in organ weights even if the food turned out to be anti-nutritional. The animals would have to be emaciated or poisoned to show anything.�
  • If there were an organ development problem, the study wouldn�t have picked it up since the researchers didn�t even weigh the organs.
  • In one of the trials, researchers substituted only one tenth of the natural protein with GM soy protein. In two others, they diluted their GM soy six- and twelve-fold. 109 Scientists Ian Pryme, PhD, of Norway and Rolf Lembcke, PhD, of Denmark wrote, the �level of the GM soy was too low, and would probably ensure that any possible undesirable GM effects did not occur.�
  • Pryme and Lembcke, who published a paper in Nutrition and Health that analyzed all published peer-reviewed feeding studies on GM foods (10 as of 2003), also pointed out that the percentage of protein in the feed used in the Roundup Ready study was �artificially too high.� This �would almost certainly mask, or at least effectively reduce, any possible effect of the [GM soy].� They said it was �highly likely that all GM effects would have been diluted out.� 110
  • Proper compositional studies filter out effects of weather or geography by comparing plants grown at the same time in the same location. Monsanto, however, pooled data from several locations, which makes it difficult for differences to be statistically significant. Nonetheless, the data revealed significant differences in the ash, fat, and carbohydrate content. Roundup Ready soy meal also contained 27% more trypsin inhibitor, a potential allergen. Also, cows fed GM soy produced milk with a higher fat content, demonstrating another disparity between the two types of soy.
  • One field trial, however, did grow GM and non-GM plants next to each other, but this data was not included in the paper. Years after the study appeared, medical writer Barbara Keeler recovered the data that had been omitted. It showed that Monsanto�s GM soy had significantly lower levels of protein, a fatty acid, and phenylalanine, an essential amino acid. Also, toasted GM soy meal contained nearly twice the amount of a lectin�a substance that may interfere with the body�s ability to assimilate other nutrients. And the amount of trypsin inhibitor in cooked GM soy was as much as seven times higher than in a cooked non-GM control.
  • The study also omitted many details normally required for a published paper. According to Pryme and Lembcke, �No data were given for most of the parameters.�
  • And when researchers tested the effects of Roundup Ready protein on animals, they didn�t extract the protein from the soybeans. Instead, they derived it from GM bacteria, claiming the two forms of protein were equivalent. There are numerous ways, however, in which the protein in the soy may be different. In fact, nine years after this study was published, another study showed that the gene inserted into the soybeans produced unintended aberrant RNA strands, meaning that the protein may be quite different than what was intended.111

In Pryme and Lembcke�s analysis, it came as no surprise that this Monsanto study, along with the other four peer-reviewed animal feeding studies that were �performed more or less in collaboration with private companies,� reported no negative effects of the GM diet. �On the other hand,� they wrote, �adverse effects were reported (but not explained) in [the five] independent studies.� They added, �It is remarkable that these effects have all been observed after feeding for only 10�14 days.�112

Toxic GM Foods Could Have Been Approved

Two GM foods whose commercialization was stopped because of negative test results give a chilling example of what may be getting through. Rats fed GM potatoes had potentially precancerous cell growth in the stomach and intestines, less developed brains, livers, and testicles, partial atrophy of the liver, and damaged immune systems.113 GM peas provoked an inflammatory response in mice, suggesting that the peas might trigger a deadly anaphylactic shock in allergic humans.114 Both of these dangerous crops, however, could easily have been approved. The problems were only discovered because the researchers used advanced tests that were never applied to GM crops already on the market. Both would have passed the normal tests that companies typically use to get their products approved.

Ironically, when Monsanto was asked to comment on the pea study, their spokesperson said it demonstrated that the regulatory system works. He failed to disclose that none of his company�s GM crops had been put through such rigorous tests.

Rampant, Unrelenting Industry Bias

Industry-funded research that favors the funders is not new. Bias has been identified across several industries. In pharmaceuticals, for example, positive results are four times more likely if the drug�s manufacturer funds the study.115 When companies pay for the economic analyses of their own cancer drugs, the results are eight times more likely to be favorable.116 Compared to drug research, the potential for industry manipulation in GM crop studies is considerably higher. Unlike pharmaceutical testing, GM research has no standardized procedures dictated by regulators. GM studies are not usually published in peer-reviewed journals and are typically kept secret by companies and governments. There is little money available for rigorous independent research, so company evidence usually goes unchallenged and unverified. Most importantly, whereas drugs can show serious side-effects and still be approved, GM food cannot. There is no tolerance for adverse reactions; feeding trials must show no problems.

Thus, when industry studies show problems (in spite of their efforts to avoid them), serious adverse reactions and even deaths among GM-fed animals are ignored or dismissed as �not biologically significant� or due to �natural variations.� In the critical arena of food safety research, the biotech industry is without accountability, standards, or peer-review. They�ve got bad science down to a science.

Promoting & Regulating Don’t Mix

While such self-serving behavior may be expected from corporations, how come government bodies let such blatant scientific contortions pass without comment? One reason is that several regulatory agencies are also charged with promoting the interests of biotechnology. This is the official position of the FDA and other US government bodies, for example. Suzanne Wuerthele, PhD, a US EPA toxicologist, says, �This technology is being promoted, in the face of concerns by respectable scientists and in the face of data to the contrary, by the very agencies which are supposed to be protecting human health and the environment. The bottom line in my view is that we are confronted with the most powerful technology the world has ever known, and it is being rapidly deployed with almost no thought whatsoever to its consequences.�117

Canadian regulators are similarly conflicted. The Royal Society of Canada reported that, �In meetings with senior managers from the various Canadian regulatory departments . . . their responses uniformly stressed the importance of maintaining a favorable climate for the biotechnology industry to develop new products and submit them for approval on the Canadian market. . . . The conflict of interest involved in both promoting and regulating an industry or technology . . . is also a factor in the issue of maintaining the transparency, and therefore the scientific integrity, of the regulatory process. In effect, the public interest in a regulatory system that is �science based�. . . is significantly compromised when that openness is negotiated away by regulators in exchange for cordial and supportive relationships with the industries being regulated.�118

Many scientists on the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) GMO Panel are personally aligned with biotech interests. According to Friends of the Earth (FOE), �One member has direct financial links with the biotech industry and others have indirect links, such as close involvement with major conferences organized by the biotech industry. Two members have even appeared in promotional videos produced by the biotech industry. . . . Several members of the Panel, including the chair Professor Kuiper, have been involved with the EU-funded ENTRANSFOOD project. The aim of this project was to agree [to] safety assessment, risk management, and risk communication procedures that would �facilitate market introduction of GMOs in Europe, and therefore bring the European industry in a competitive position.� Professor Kuiper, who coordinated the ENTRANSFOOD project, sat on a working group that also included staff from Monsanto, Bayer CropScience, and Syngenta.� In a statement reminiscent of the deceptive policy statement by the FDA, the FOE report concludes that EFSA is �being used to create a false impression of scientific agreement when the real situation is one of intense and continuing debate and uncertainty.�119

The pro-GM European Commission repeats the same ruse. According to leaked documents obtained by FOE, while they privately appreciate �the uncertainties and gaps in knowledge that exist in relation to the safety of GM crops, . . . the Commission normally keeps this uncertainty concealed from the public whilst presenting its decisions about the safety of GM crops and foods as being certain and scientifically based.� For example, the Commission privately condemned the submission information for one crop as �mixed, scarce, delivered consecutively all over years, and not convincing.� They said there is �No sufficient experimental evidence to assess the safety.�120

With an agenda to promote GM foods, regulators regularly violate their own laws. In Europe, the law requires that when EFSA and member states have different opinions, they �are obliged to co-operate with a view to either resolving the divergence or preparing a joint document clarifying the contentious scientific issues and identifying the relevant uncertainties in the data.�121 According to FOE, in the case of all GM crop reviews, none of these legal obligations were followed.122 The declaration of GRAS status by the FDA also deviated from the Food and Cosmetic Act and years of legal precedent. Some violations are more blatant. In India, one official tampered with the report on Bt cotton to increase the yield figures to favor Monsanto.123 In Mexico, a senior government official allegedly threatened a University of California professor, implying �We know where your children go to school,� trying to get him not to publish incriminating evidence that would delay GM approvals.124 In Indonesia, Monsanto gave bribes and questionable payments to at least 140 officials, attempting to get their genetically modified (GM) cotton approved.125

Manipulation Of Public Opinion

gmos manipulationWhen governments fail in their duty to keep corporations in check, the �protector� role should shift to the media, which acts as a watchdog to expose public dangers and governmental shortcomings. But mainstream media around the world has largely overlooked the serious problems associated with GM crops and their regulation. The reason for this oversight is varied and includes contributions from an aggressive public relations and disinformation campaign by the biotech industry, legal threats by biotech companies, and in some cases, the fear of losing advertising accounts. This last reason is particularly prevalent among the farm press, which receives much of its income from the biotech industry.

Threatening letters from Monsanto�s attorneys have resulted in the cancellation of a five-part news series on their genetically engineered bovine growth hormone scheduled for a Fox TV station in Florida, as well as the cancellation of a book critical of Monsanto�s GMO products. A printer also shredded 14,000 copies of the Ecologist magazine issue entitled �The Monsanto Files,� due to fear of a Monsanto lawsuit. (See the chapter �Muscling the Media� in Seeds of Deception126 for more examples.)

The methods that biotech advocates use to manipulate public opinion research has become an art form. Consumer surveys by the International Food Information Council (IFIC), for example,whose supporters include the major biotech seed companies, offers conclusions such as �A growing majority of Americans support the benefits of food biotechnology as well as the US Food and Drug Administration�s (FDA) labeling policy.� But communications professor James Beniger, who was past president of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, described the surveys as �so biased with leading questions favoring positive responses that any results are meaningless.�127 The 2003 survey, for example, included gems such as:

�All things being equal, how likely would you be to buy a variety of produce, like tomatoes or potatoes, if it had been modified by biotechnology to taste better or fresher?� and

�Biotechnology has also been used to enhance plants that yield foods like cooking oils. If cooking oil with reduced saturated fat made from these new plants was available, what effect would the use of biotechnology have on your decision to buy this cooking oil?�128

A similar tactic was used at a December 11, 2007 focus group in Columbus, Ohio �designed� to show that consumers wanted to make it illegal for dairies to label their milk as free from Monsanto�s genetically engineered bovine hormone rBST. The facilitator said, �All milk contains hormones. There is no such thing as hormone-free milk. The composition of both types of milk is the same in all aspects. Now what do you think of a label that says �no added hormones?� Don�t you think it is deceiving and inappropriate to put �rBST-free� on labels?� Not only was the facilitator �leading the witness,� he presented false information. Milk from cows treated with rBST has substantially higher levels of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1,129 which has been linked to higher risk of cancer,130 and higher incidence of fraternal twins.131 It also has higher levels of bovine growth hormone, pus, and in some cases, antibiotics.

Another example of manipulated consumer opinion was found in a 2004 article in the British Food Journal, authored by four advocates of genetically modified (GM) foods.132 According to the peer-reviewed paper, when shoppers in a Canadian farm store were confronted with an informed and unbiased choice between GM corn and non-GM corn, most purchased the GM variety. This finding flew in the face of worldwide consumer resistance to GM foods, which had shut markets in Europe, Japan, and elsewhere. It also challenged studies that showed that the more information on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) consumers have, the less they trust them.133 The study, which was funded by the biotech-industry front group, Council for Biotechnology Information and the industry�s trade association, the Crop Protection Institute of Canada (now Croplife Canada), was given the Journal�s prestigious Award for Excellence for the Most Outstanding Paper of 2004 and has been cited often by biotech advocates.

Stuart Laidlaw, a reporter from Canada�s Toronto Star, visited the farm store several times during the study and described the scenario in his book Secret Ingredients. Far from offering unbiased choices, key elements appeared rigged to favor GM corn purchases. The consumer education fact sheets were entirely pro-GMO, and Doug Powell, the lead researcher, enthusiastically demonstrated to Laidlaw how he could convince shoppers to buy the GM varieties. He confronted a farmer who had already�purchased non-GM corn. After pitching his case for GMOs, Powell proudly had the farmer tell Laidlaw that he had changed his opinion and would buy GM corn in his next shopping trip.

Powell�s interference with shoppers� �unbiased� choices was nothing compared to the effect of the signs placed over the corn bins. The sign above the non-GM corn read, �Would you eat wormy sweet corn?� It further listed the chemicals that were sprayed during the season. By contrast, the sign above the GM corn stated, �Here�s What Went into Producing Quality Sweet Corn.� It is no wonder that 60% of shoppers avoided the �wormy corn.� In fact, it may be a testament to people�s distrust of GMOs that 40% still went for the �wormy� option.

Powell and his colleagues did not mention the controversial signage in their study. They claimed that the corn bins in the farm store were �fully labelled��either �genetically engineered Bt sweet corn� or �Regular sweet corn.� When Laidlaw�s book came out, however, Powell�s �wormy� sign was featured in a photograph,134 exposing what was later described by Cambridge University�s Dr. Richard Jennings as �flagrant fraud.� Jennings, who is a leading researcher on scientific ethics, says, �It was a sin of omission by failing to divulge information which quite clearly should have been disclosed.�135

In his defence, Powell claimed that his signs merely used the language of consumers and was �not intended to manipulate consumer purchasing patterns.� He also claimed that the �wormy� corn sign was only there for the first week of the trial and was then replaced by other educational messages. But eye witnesses and photographs demonstrate the presence of the sign long after Powell�s suggested date of replacement.136

Several scientists and outraged citizens say the paper should be withdrawn, but the Journal refused. In fact, the Journal�s editor has not even agreed to reconsider its Award for Excellence. A blatant propaganda exercise still stands validated as exemplary science.

Critics & Independent Scientists Are Attacked

gmos scientistOne of the most troubling aspects of the biotech debate is the attack strategy used on GMO critics and independent scientists. Not only are adverse findings by independent scientists often suppressed, ignored, or denied, researchers that discover problems from GM foods have been fired, stripped of responsibilities, deprived of tenure, and even threatened. Consider Dr. Pusztai, the world�s leading scientist in his field, who inadvertently discovered in 1998 that unpredictable changes in GM crops caused massive damage in rats. He went public with his concerns, was a hero at his prestigious institute for two days, and then, after the director received two phone calls allegedly from the UK Prime Minister�s office, was fired after 35 years and silenced with threats of a lawsuit. False statements were circulated to trash his reputation, which are recited by GMO advocates today.

After University of California Professor Ignacio Chapela, PhD, published evidence that GM corn contaminated Mexico�s indigenous varieties, two fictitious internet characters created by Monsanto�s PR firm, the Bivings Group, initiated a brutal internet smear campaign, lying about Dr. Chapela and his research.

Irina Ermakova, PhD, a leading scientist at the Russian National Academy of Sciences, fed female rats GM soy and was stunned to discover that more than half their offspring died within three weeks�compared to only 10% from mothers fed non-GM soy. Without funding to extend her analysis, she labeled her work �preliminary,� published it in a Russian journal, and implored the scientific community to repeat the study. Two years later, no one has repeated it, but advocates use false or irrelevant arguments to divert attention from the shocking results and have tried to vilify Dr. Ermakova.

A New Zealand MP testified at the 2001 Royal Commission of Inquiry on Genetic Modification, �I have been contacted by telephone and e-mail by a number of scientists who have serious concerns . . . but who are convinced that if they express these fears publicly. . . or even if they asked the awkward and difficult questions, they will be eased out of their institution.� Indeed in 2007, after Professor Christian Velot, PhD, raised the difficult questions on GMOs at public conferences, his 2008 research funds were confiscated, his student assistants were re-assigned, and his position at the University of Paris-Sud faces early termination.

We Are The Guinea Pigs

gmos family eatingSince GM foods are not properly tested before they enter the market, consumers are the guinea pigs. But this doesn�t even qualify as an experiment. There are no controls and no monitoring. Given the mounting of evidence of harm, it is likely that GM foods are contributing to the deterioration of health in the United States, Canada, and other countries where it is consumed. But without post- marketing surveillance, the chances of tracing health problems to GM food are low. The incidence of a disease would have to increase dramatically before it was noticed, meaning that millions may have to get sick before a change is investigated. Tracking the impact of GM foods is even more difficult in North America, where the foods are not labeled.

Regulators at Health Canada announced in 2002 that they would monitor Canadians for health problems from eating GM foods. A spokesperson said, �I think it�s just prudent and what the public expects, that we will keep a careful eye on the health of Canadians.� But according to CBC TV news, Health Canada �abandoned that research less than a year later saying it was �too difficult to put an effective surveillance system in place.�� The news anchor added, �So at this point, there is little research into the health effects of genetically modified food. So will we ever know for sure if it�s safe?�137

Not with the biotech companies in charge. Consider the following statement in a report submitted to county officials in California by pro-GM members of a task force. �[It is] generally agreed that long-term monitoring of the human health risks of GM food through epidemiological studies is not necessary because there is no scientific evidence suggesting any long-term harm from these foods.�138 Note the circular logic: Because no long-term epidemiological studies are in place, we have no evidence showing long- term harm. And since we don�t have any evidence of long-term harm, we don�t need studies to look for it.

What are these people thinking? Insight into the pro-GM mindset was provided by Dan Glickman, the US Secretary of Agriculture under President Clinton.

�What I saw generically on the pro-biotech side was the attitude that the technology was good, and that it was almost immoral to say that it wasn�t good, because it was going to solve the problems of the human race and feed the hungry and clothe the naked. . . . And there was a lot of money that had been invested in this, and if you�re against it, you�re Luddites, you�re stupid. That, frankly, was the side our government was on. Without thinking, we had basically taken this issue as a trade issue and they, whoever �they� were, wanted to keep our product out of their market. And they were foolish, or stupid, and didn�t have an effective regulatory system. There was rhetoric like that even here in this department. You felt like you were almost an alien, disloyal, by trying to present an open-minded view on some of the issues being raised. So I pretty much spouted the rhetoric that everybody else around here spouted; it was written into my speeches.�139

Fortunately, not everyone feels that questioning GM foods is disloyal. On the contrary, millions of people around the world are unwilling to participate in this uncontrolled experiment. They refuse to eat GM foods. Manufacturers in Europe and Japan have committed to avoid using GM ingredients. And the US natural foods industry, not waiting for the government to test or label GMOs, is now engaged in removing all remaining GM ingredients from their sector using a third party verification system. The Campaign for Healthier Eating in America will circulate non-GMO shopping guides in stores nationwide so that consumers have clear, healthy non-GMO choices. With no governmental regulation of biotech corporations, it is left to consumers to protect ourselves.

For a guide to avoiding GMOs, go to www.NonGMOShoppingGuide.com.

International bestselling author and independent filmmaker Jeffrey M. Smith is the Executive Director of the Institute for Responsible Technology and a leading spokesperson on the health dangers of GMOs. His first book, Seeds of Deception, is the world�s bestselling book on the subject. His second, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, identifies 65 risks of GMOs and demonstrates how superficial government approvals are not competent to find most of them. Mr. Smith has pioneered the Campaign for Healthier Eating in America, designed to create the tipping point of consumer rejection against GMOs. See www.ResponsibleTechnology.org, www.NonGMOShoppingGuide.com.

Blank
References:

1 Jeffrey M. Smith, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA USA 2007
2 Kurt Eichenwald, et al, New York Times, �Biotechnology Food: From the Lab to a Debacle,� January 25, 2001
www.nytimes.com/2001/01/25/business/25FOOD.html?pagewanted=all
3 Kurt Eichenwald, et al, New York Times, �Biotechnology Food: From the Lab to a Debacle,� January 25, 2001
www.nytimes.com/2001/01/25/business/25FOOD.html?pagewanted=all
4 Dan Quayle, �Speech in the Indian Treaty Room of the Old Executive Office Building,� May 26, 1992.
5 For copies of FDA memos, see The Alliance for Bio-Integrity, www.biointegrity.org
6 Steven M. Druker, �How the US Food and Drug Administration approved genetically engineered foods despite the deaths one had caused and
the warnings of its own scientists about their unique risks,� Alliance for Bio-Integrity, www.biointegrity.org/ext-summary.html
7 Louis J. Pribyl, �Biotechnology Draft Document, 2/27/92,� March 6, 1992, www.biointegrity.org
www.biointegrity.org/FDAdocs/04/view1.html
8 �Statement of Policy: Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties,� Federal Register 57, no. 104 (May 29, 1992): 22991.
9 Linda Kahl, Memo to James Maryanski about Federal Register Document �Statement of Policy: Foods from Genetically Modified Plants,�
Alliance for Bio-Integrity(January 8, 1992) www.responsibletechnology.org/fraud/fda-quotes
10 See for example, �Good Enough To Eat?� New Scientist (February 9, 2002), 7.
11 �Health risks of genetically modified foods,� editorial, Lancet, 29 May 1999.
12 �Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada; An Expert Panel Report on the Future of
Food Biotechnology prepared by The Royal Society of Canada at the request of Health Canada Canadian Food Inspection Agency and
Environment Canada� The Royal Society of Canada, January 2001.
13 J. R. Latham, et al., �The Mutational Consequences of Plant Transformation,� The Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2006, Article ID
25376: 1-7; see also Allison Wilson, et. al., �Transformation-induced mutations in transgenic plants: Analysis and biosafety implications,�
Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews � Vol. 23, December 2006.
14 P. H. Bao, S. Granata, S. Castiglione, G. Wang, C. Giordani, E. Cuzzoni, G. Damiani, C. Bandi, S. K. Datta, K. Datta, I. Potrykus, A.
Callegarin and F. Sala, “Evidence for genomic changes in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) recovered from protoplasts” Transgen Res 5 (1996):
97-103.; M. Labra, C. Savini, M. Bracale, N. Pelucchi, L. Colombo, M. Bardini and F. Sala, “Genomic changes in transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.)
plants produced by infecting calli with Agrobacterium tumefaciens,” Plant Cell Rep 20 (2001): 325-330.
15 �Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada; An Expert Panel Report on the Future of
Food Biotechnology prepared by The Royal Society of Canada at the request of Health Canada Canadian Food Inspection Agency and
Environment Canada� The Royal Society of Canada, January 2001.
16 Edwin J. Mathews, Ph.D., in a memorandum to the Toxicology Section of the Biotechnology Working Group. Subject: Analysis of the Major
Plant Toxicants. Dated October 28, 1991
17 Division of Food Chemistry and Technology and Division of Contaminants Chemistry, �Points to Consider for Safety Evaluation of
Genetically Modified Foods: Supplemental Information,� November 1, 1991, www.responsibletechnology.org/fraud/fda-quotes
18 Netherwood et al, �Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract,� Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004): 2.
19 Division of Food Chemistry and Technology and Division of Contaminants Chemistry, �Points to Consider for Safety Evaluation of
Genetically Modified Foods: Supplemental Information,� November 1, 1991, www.biointegrity.org
20 Charles Benbrook, �Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the U.S. � the first sixteen years,� ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
EUROPE, Vol. 24:24 doi:10.1186/2190-4715-24-24, 28 September 2012. www.enveurope.com/content/24/1/24/abstract.
21 Department of Veterinary Medicine, FDA, correspondence June 16, 1993. As quoted in Fred A. Hines, Memo to Dr. Linda Kahl. �Flavr Savr
Tomato: . . . Pathology Branch�s Evaluation of Rats with Stomach Lesions From Three Four-Week Oral (Gavage) Toxicity Studies . . . and an
Expert Panel�s Report,� Alliance for Bio-Integrity (June 16, 1993) www.biointegrity.org/FDAdocs/17/view1.html
22 Robert J. Scheuplein, Memo to the FDA Biotechnology Coordinator and others, �Response to Calgene Amended Petition,� Alliance for BioIntegrity
(October 27, 1993) www.responsibletechnology.org/fraud/fda-quotes
23 Carl B. Johnson to Linda Kahl and others, �Flavr Savr� Tomato: Significance of Pending DHEE Question,� Alliance for Bio-Integrity
(December 7, 1993) www.responsibletechnology.org/fraud/fda-quotes
24 Arpad Pusztai, �Genetically Modified Foods: Are They a Risk to Human/Animal Health?� June 2001 Action Bioscience
www.actionbioscience.org/biotech/pusztai.html
25 Nagui H. Fares, Adel K. El-Sayed, �Fine Structural Changes in the Ileum of Mice Fed on Endotoxin Treated Potatoes and Transgenic
Potatoes,� Natural Toxins 6, no. 6 (1998): 219�233.
26 Stanley W. B. Ewen and Arpad Pusztai, �Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat
small intestine,� Lancet, 1999 Oct 16; 354 (9187): 1353-4.
27 Arpad Pusztai, �Facts Behind the GM Pea Controversy: Epigenetics, Transgenic Plants & Risk Assessment,� Proceedings of the Conference,
December 1st 2005 (Frankfurtam Main, Germany: Literaturhaus, 2005). www.oeko.de/oekodoc/277/2006-002-en.pdf
28 Arpad Pusztai, �Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food,� Nutrition and Health, 2002, Vol 16 Pp 73-84.
29 John M. Burns, �13-Week Dietary Subchronic Comparison Study with MON 863 Corn in Rats Preceded by a 1-Week Baseline Food
Consumption Determination with PMI Certified Rodent Diet #5002,� December 17, 2002
www.monsanto.com/pdf/products/fullratstudy863.pdf
30 R. Tudisco, P. Lombardi, F. Bovera, D. d�Angelo, M. I. Cutrignelli, V. Mastellone, V. Terzi, L. Avallone, F. Infascelli, �Genetically Modified
Soya Bean in Rabbit Feeding: Detection of DNA Fragments and Evaluation of Metabolic Effects by Enzymatic Analysis,� Animal Science 82
(2006): 193�199.
31 Comments to ANZFA about Applications A346, A362 and A363 from the Food Legislation and Regulation Advisory Group (FLRAG) of the
Public Health Association of Australia (PHAA) on behalf of the PHAA, �Food produced from glyphosate-tolerant canola line GT73.�
32 M. Malatesta, C. Caporaloni, S. Gavaudan, M. B. Rocchi, S. Serafini, C. Tiberi, G. Gazzanelli, �Ultrastructural Morphometrical and
Immunocytochemical Analyses of Hepatocyte Nuclei from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,� Cell Struct Funct. 27 (2002): 173�180
33 Jeffrey M. Smith, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA USA 2007
34 Irina Ermakova, �Experimental Evidence of GMO Hazards,� Presentation at Scientists for a GM Free Europe, EU Parliament, Brussels, June
12, 2007
35 Arpad Pusztai, �Can Science Give Us the Tools for Recognizing Possible Health Risks for GM Food?� Nutrition and Health 16 (2002): 73�84.
36 S. Leeson, �The Effect of Glufosinate Resistant Corn on Growth of Male Broiler Chickens,� Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences,
University of Guelph, Report No. A56379, July 12, 1996.
37 Malatesta, et al, �Ultrastructural Analysis of Pancreatic Acinar Cells from Mice Fed on Genetically modified Soybean,� J Anat. 2002
November; 201(5): 409�415; see also M. Malatesta, M. Biggiogera, E. Manuali, M. B. L. Rocchi, B. Baldelli, G. Gazzanelli, �Fine Structural
Analyses of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Nuclei from Mice Fed on GM Soybean,� Eur J Histochem 47 (2003): 385�388.
38 Arpad Pusztai, �Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food,� Nutrition and Health, 2002, Vol 16 Pp 73-84
39 R. Tudisco, P. Lombardi, F. Bovera, D. d�Angelo, M. I. Cutrignelli, V. Mastellone, V. Terzi, L. Avallone, F. Infascelli, �Genetically Modified
Soya Bean in Rabbit Feeding: Detection of DNA Fragments and Evaluation of Metabolic Effects by Enzymatic Analysis,� Animal Science 82
(2006): 193�199.
40 John M. Burns, �13-Week Dietary Subchronic Comparison Study with MON 863 Corn in Rats Preceded by a 1-Week Baseline Food
Consumption Determination with PMI Certified Rodent Diet #5002,� December 17, 2002
www.monsanto.com/pdf/products/fullratstudy863.pdf
41 R. Tudisco, P. Lombardi, F. Bovera, D. d�Angelo, M. I. Cutrignelli, V. Mastellone, V. Terzi, L. Avallone, F. Infascelli, �Genetically Modified
Soya Bean in Rabbit Feeding: Detection of DNA Fragments and Evaluation of Metabolic Effects by Enzymatic Analysis,� Animal Science 82
(2006): 193�199.
42 Arpad Pusztai, �Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food,� Nutrition and Health, 2002, Vol 16 Pp 73-84
43 de Vend�mois JS, Roullier F, Cellier D, S�ralini GE. A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health. Int J
Biol Sci 2009; 5:706-726. Available from www.biolsci.org/v05p0706.htm
44 S�ralini, G.-E., et al. Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food
Chem. Toxicol. (2012), dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005
45 Irina Ermakova, �Experimental Evidence of GMO Hazards,� Presentation at Scientists for a GM Free Europe, EU Parliament, Brussels, June
12, 2007
46 L. Vecchio et al, �Ultrastructural Analysis of Testes from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,� European Journal of Histochemistry
48, no. 4 (Oct�Dec 2004):449�454.
47 Oliveri et al., �Temporary Depression of Transcription in Mouse Pre-implantion Embryos from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,�
48th Symposium of the Society for Histochemistry, Lake Maggiore (Italy), September 7�10, 2006.
48 Fl�via Bittencourt Brasil, et al, �The Impact of Dietary Organic and Transgenic Soy on the Reproductive System of Female Adult Rat,� The
Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology Volume 292, Issue 4, pages 587-594, April 2009
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.20878/abstract
49 Jeffrey M. Smith, �Genetically Modified Soy Linked to Sterility, Infant Mortality,� based on correspondence with study authors and press
reports, Institute for Responsible Technology www.responsibletechnology.org/article-gmo-soy-linked-to-sterility
50 Alberta Velimirov and Claudia Binter, �Biological effects of transgenic maize NK603xMON810 fed in long term reproduction studies in
mice,� Forschungsberichte der Sektion IV, Band 3/2008. Report-Federal Ministry of Health, Family and Youth. 2008.
www.biosicherheit.de/pdf/aktuell/zentek_studie_2008.pdf
51 I.V.Ermakova, �Genetically Modified Organisms and Biological Risks,� Proceedings of International Disaster Reduction Conference (IDRC)
Davos, Switzerland August 27th � September 1st, 2006: 168�172. eco-irina-ermakova.narod.ru/eng/art/art16.html
52 Irina Ermakova, �Genetically modified soy leads to the decrease of weight and high mortality of rat pups of the first generation. Preliminary
studies,� Ecosinform 1 (2006): 4�9.
53 Irina Ermakova, �Experimental Evidence of GMO Hazards,� Presentation at Scientists for a GM Free Europe, EU Parliament, Brussels, June
12, 2007
54 I.V.Ermakova �GMO: Life itself intervened into the experiments,� Letter, EcosInform N2 (2006): 3�4.
55 Jeffrey M. Smith, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA USA 2007
56 �Mortality in Sheep Flocks after Grazing on Bt Cotton Fields�Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh� Report of the Preliminary Assessment,
April 2006, gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-news-items/6416-mortality-in-sheep-flocks-after-grazing-on-bt-cotton-fields-warangal-districtandhra-pradesh-2942006

57 Personal communication and visit by Jeffrey Smith with village members, near Warangal, Andhra Pradesh, January 2009.
58 John M. Burns, �13-Week Dietary Subchronic Comparison Study with MON 863 Corn in Rats Preceded by a 1-Week Baseline Food
Consumption Determination with PMI Certified Rodent Diet #5002,� December 17, 2002
www.monsanto.com/monsanto/content/sci_tech/prod_safety/fullratstudy.pdf, see also St�phane Foucart, �Controversy Surrounds a GMO,�
Le Monde, 14 December 2004; and Jeffrey M. Smith, �Genetically Modified Corn Study Reveals Health Damage and Cover-up,� Spilling the
Beans, June 2005, www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/Newsletter/June05GMCornHealthDangerExposed/index.cfm
59 Arpad Pusztai, �Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food,� Nutrition and Health, 2002, Vol 16 Pp 73-84
60 V. E. Prescott, et al, �Transgenic Expression of Bean r-Amylase Inhibitor in Peas Results in Altered Structure and
Immunogenicity,� Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry (2005): 53.
61 Yearly food sensitivity assessment of York Laboratory, as reported in Mark Townsend, �Why soya is a hidden destroyer,� Daily Express,
March 12, 1999.
62 G. A. Kleter and A. A. C. M. Peijnenburg, �Screening of transgenic proteins expressed in transgenic food crops for the presence of short amino
acid sequences indentical to potential, IgE-binding linear epitopes of allergens,� BMC Structural Biology 2 (2002): 8�19.
63 Netherwood et al, �Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract,� Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004): 2.
64 Hye-Yung Yum, Soo-Young Lee, Kyung-Eun Lee, Myung-Hyun Sohn, Kyu-Earn Kim, �Genetically Modified and Wild Soybeans: An
immunologic comparison,� Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 26, no. 3 (May�June 2005): 210-216(7).
65 Stephen R. Padgette et al, �The Composition of Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean Seeds Is Equivalent to That of Conventional Soybeans,� The
Journal of Nutrition 126, no. 4, (April 1996); including data in the journal archives from the same study; see also A. Pusztai and S. Bardocz,
�GMO in animal nutrition: potential benefits and risks,� Chapter 17, Biology of Nutrition in Growing Animals (Elsevier, 2005).
66 Manuela Malatesta, et al, �Ultrastructural Analysis of Pancreatic Acinar Cells from Mice Fed on Genetically modified Soybean,� Journal of
Anatomy 201, no. 5 (November 2002): 409; see also M. Malatesta, M. Biggiogera, E. Manuali, M. B. L. Rocchi, B. Baldelli, G. Gazzanelli, �Fine
Structural Analyses of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Nuclei from Mice Fed on GM Soybean,� Eur J Histochem 47 (2003): 385�388.
67 See for example, Scott H. Sicherer et al., �Prevalence of peanut and tree nut allergy in the United States determined by means of a random digit
dial telephone survey: A 5-year follow-up study,� Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, March 2003, vol. 112, n 6, 1203-1207); and Ricki
Helm et al., �Hypoallergenic Foods�Soybeans and Peanuts,� Information Systems for Biotechnology News Report, October 1, 2002.
68 Vazquez et al, “Intragastric and intraperitoneal administration of Cry1Ac protoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis induces systemic and mucosal
antibody responses in mice,” Life Sciences, 64, no. 21 (1999): 1897�1912; Vazquez et al, �Characterization of the mucosal and systemic immune
response induced by Cry1Ac protein from Bacillus thuringiensis HD 73 in mice,� Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 33 (2000):
147�155.
69 R. I. V�zquez, L. Moreno-Fierros, L. Neri-Baz�n, et al., �Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac Protoxin Is a Potent Systemic and Mucosal Adjuvant,�
Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 49 (1999): 578�84. See also Vazquez-Padron, RI. Et al. (2000b) Characterization of the mucosal and
systemic immune response induced by Cry1Ac protein from Bacillus thuringiensis HD 73 in mice. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological
Research 33, 147-155.
70 Nagui H. Fares, Adel K. El-Sayed, �Fine Structural Changes in the Ileum of Mice Fed on Endotoxin Treated Potatoes and Transgenic
Potatoes,� Natural Toxins 6, no. 6 (1998): 219�233.
71 Alberto Finamore, et al, �Intestinal and Peripheral Immune Response to MON810 Maize Ingestion in Weaning and Old Mice,� J. Agric. Food
Chem., 2008, 56 (23), pp 11533�11539, November 14, 2008
72 Washington State Department of Health, �Report of health surveillance activities: Asian gypsy moth control program,� (Olympia, WA:
Washington State Dept. of Health, 1993).
73 M. Green, et al., �Public health implications of the microbial pesticide Bacillus thuringiensis: An epidemiological study, Oregon, 1985-86,�
Amer. J. Public Health 80, no. 7(1990): 848�852.
74 M.A. Noble, P.D. Riben, and G. J. Cook, �Microbiological and epidemiological surveillance program to monitor the health effects of Foray
48B BTK spray� (Vancouver, B.C.: Ministry of Forests, Province of British Columbi, Sep. 30, 1992).
75 A. Edamura, MD, �Affidavit of the Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division. Dale Edwards and Citizens Against Aerial Spraying vs. Her
Majesty the Queen, Represented by the Minister of Agriculture,� (May 6, 1993); as reported in Carrie Swadener, �Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.),�
Journal of Pesticide Reform, 14, no, 3 (Fall 1994).
76 J. R. Samples, and H. Buettner, �Ocular infection caused by a biological insecticide,� J. Infectious Dis. 148, no. 3 (1983): 614; as reported in
Carrie Swadener, �Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.)�, Journal of Pesticide Reform 14, no. 3 (Fall 1994)
77 M. Green, et al., �Public health implications of the microbial pesticide Bacillus thuringiensis: An epidemiological study, Oregon, 1985-86,�
Amer. J. Public Health, 80, no. 7 (1990): 848�852.
78 A. Edamura, MD, �Affidavit of the Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division. Dale Edwards and Citizens Against Aerial Spraying vs. Her
Majesty the Queen, Represented by the Minister of Agriculture,� (May 6, 1993); as reported in Carrie Swadener, �Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.),�
Journal of Pesticide Reform, 14, no, 3 (Fall 1994).
79 Carrie Swadener, �Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.),� Journal of Pesticide Reform 14, no. 3 (Fall 1994).
80 Terje Traavik and Jack Heinemann, �Genetic Engineering and Omitted Health Research: Still No Answers to Ageing Questions, 2006. Cited in
their quote was: G. Stotzky, �Release, persistence, and biological activity in soil of insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis,� found in
Deborah K. Letourneau and Beth E. Burrows, Genetically Engineered Organisms. Assessing Environmental and Human Health Effects (cBoca
Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC, 2002), 187�222.
81 See for example, A. Dutton, H. Klein, J. Romeis, and F. Bigler, �Uptake of Bt-toxin by herbivores feeding on transgenic maize and
consequences for the predator Chrysoperla carnea,� Ecological Entomology 27 (2002): 441�7; and J. Romeis, A. Dutton, and F. Bigler, �Bacillus
thuringiensis toxin (Cry1Ab) has no direct effect on larvae of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae),�
Journal of Insect Physiology 50, no. 2�3 (2004): 175�183.
82 Mesnage R, Clair E, Gress S, Then C, Sz�k�cs A, S�ralini, GE. (2012). Cytotoxicity on human cells of Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac Bt insecticidal
toxins alone or with a glyphosate-based herbicide. J. Appl. Toxicol. doi: 10.1002/jat.2712
83 Aris A, Leblanc S. Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in Eastern Townships of Quebec, Canada.
Reprod Toxicol (2011), doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2011.02.004 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21338670
84 N. Tomlinson of UK MAFF’s Joint Food Safety and Standards Group 4, December 1998 letter to the U.S. FDA, commenting on its draft
document, �Guidance for Industry: Use of Antibiotic Resistance Marker Genes in Transgenic Plants.�
85 Jeffrey M. Smith, �Bt-maize (corn) during pollination, may trigger disease in people living near the cornfield,� Press Release, February 2004,
www.responsibletechnology.org/gmo-dangers/health-risks/articles-about-risks-by-jeffrey-smith/Genetically-Engineered-Foods-May-CauseRising-Food-Allergies-Genetically-Engineered-Corn-June-2007;
and Allen V. Estabillo, �Farmer’s group urges ban on planting Bt corn; says it
could be cause of illnesses,� Mindanews, October 19, 2004 www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/43-2004/5635-farmers-group-urges-ban-onplanting-bt-corn-20102004
86 Mae-Wan Ho, �GM Ban Long Overdue, Dozens Ill & Five Deaths in the Philippines,� ISIS Press Release, June 2, 2006. www.isis.org.uk/GMBanLongOverdue.php
87 Ashish Gupta et. al., �Impact of Bt Cotton on Farmers� Health (in Barwani and Dhar District of Madhya Pradesh),� Investigation Report, Oct�
Dec 2005.
88 Jeffrey M. Smith, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA USA 2007
89 E. Ann Clark, �Food Safety of GM Crops in Canada: toxicity and allergenicity,� GE Alert, 2000.
www.plant.uoguelph.ca/research/homepages/eclark/safety.htm
90 FLRAG of the PHAA of behalf of the PHAA, �Comments to ANZFA about Applications A372, A375, A378 and A379.�
91 Judy Carman, �Is GM Food Safe to Eat?� in R. Hindmarsh, G. Lawrence, eds., Recoding Nature Critical Perspectives on Genetic Engineering
(Sydney: UNSW Press, 2004): 82�93.
92 Judy Carman, �Is GM Food Safe to Eat?� in R. Hindmarsh, G. Lawrence, eds., Recoding Nature Critical Perspectives on Genetic Engineering
(Sydney: UNSW Press, 2004): 82�93.
93 FLRAG, �Comments to ANZFA about Applications A346, A362 and A363,� www.iher.org.au/
94 Doug Gurian-Sherman, �Holes in the Biotech Safety Net, FDA Policy Does Not Assure the Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods,� Center
for Science in the Public Interest, www.cspinet.org/new/pdf/fda_report__final.pdf
95 Bill Freese, �The StarLink Affair, Submission by Friends of the Earth to the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel considering Assessment of
Additional Scientific Information Concerning StarLink Corn,� July 17�19, 2001.
96 FDA Letter, Letter from Alan M. Rulis, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, FDA to Dr. Kent Croon,
Regulatory Affairs Manager, Monsanto Company, Sept 25, 1996. See Letter for BNF No. 34 at
www.fda.gov/Food/Biotechnology/Submissions/ucm161107.htm
97 �Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada; An Expert Panel Report on the Future of
Food Biotechnology prepared by The Royal Society of Canada at the request of Health Canada Canadian Food Inspection Agency and
Environment Canada� The Royal Society of Canada, January 2001. www.canadians.org/food/documents/rsc_feb05.pdf
98 FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP), Open Meeting, July 17, 2001. www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/2001/july/julyfinal.pdf
99 Bill Freese, Crop testing, New Scientist, Letter to the Editor, issue 2530, December 17, 2005
100 M. Cretenet, J. Goven, J. A. Heinemann, B. Moore, and C. Rodriguez-Beltran, �Submission on the DAR for application A549 Food Derived
from High-Lysine Corn LY038: to permit the use in food of high-lysine corn, 2006, www.inbi.canterbury.ac.nz
101 Marc Lapp� and Britt Bailey, �ASA Response,� June 25, 1999, www.environmentalcommons.org/cetos/articles/asaresponse.html
102 Bill Freese, �The StarLink Affair, Submission by Friends of the Earth to the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel considering Assessment of
Additional Scientific Information Concerning StarLink Corn,� July 17-19, 2001
103 Paul P. Groenewegen, Brian W. McBride, John H. Burton, Theodore H. Elsasser. “Bioactivity of Milk from bST-Treated Cows.” J. Nutrition
120, 1990, pp. 514-519
104 Judith C. Juskevich and C. Greg Guyer. “Bovine Growth Hormone: Human Food Safety Evaluation.” Science, vol. 249. August 24, 1990, pp.
875-884
105 Pete Hardin, �rbGH: Appropriate Studies Haven�t Been Done,� The Milkweed, July 2000
106 See for example, Doug Gurian-Sherman, �Holes in the Biotech Safety Net, FDA Policy Does Not Assure the Safety of Genetically Engineered
Foods,� Center for Science in the Public Interest, www.cspinet.org/new/pdf/fda_report__final.pdf
107 S. R. Padgette, N. B.Taylor, D. L. Nida, M. R. Bailey, J. MacDonald, L. R. Holden, R. L. Fuchs, �The composition of glyphosate-tolerant
soybean seeds is equivalent to that of conventional soybeans,� J. Nutr. 126 (1996):702�716.
108 B. G. Hammond, J. L. Vicini, G. F. Hartnell, M. W. Naylor, C. D. Knight, E. H. Robinson, R. L. Fuchs, and S. R. Padgette, �The feeding
value of soybeans fed to rats, chickens, catfish, and dairy cattle is not altered by genetic incorporation of glyphosate tolerance,� J. Nutr. 126
(1996): 717�727.
109 A. Pusztai and S. Bardocz, �GMO in animal nutrition: potential benefits and risks,� Chapter 17, Biology of Nutrition in Growing Animals
(Elsevier, October 2005). earlier
110 Ian F. Pryme and Rolf Lembcke, �In Vivo Studies on Possible Health Consequences of Genetically Modified Food and Feed�with Particular
Regard to Ingredients Consisting of Genetically Modified Plan Materials,� Nutrition and Health 17(2003): 1�8.
111 Andreas Rang, et al, �Detection of RNA variants transcribed from the transgene in Roundup Ready soybean,� Eur Food
Res Technol 220 (2005): 438�443.
112 Ian F. Pryme and Rolf Lembcke, �In Vivo Studies on Possible Health Consequences of Genetically Modified Food and Feed�with Particular
Regard to Ingredients Consisting of Genetically Modified Plan Materials,� Nutrition and Health 17(2003): 1�8.
113 Arpad Pusztai, �Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food,� Nutrition and Health, 2002, Vol 16 Pp 73-84;
Stanley W. B. Ewen and Arpad Pusztai, �Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small
intestine,� Lancet, 1999 Oct 16; 354 (9187): 1353-4; Arpad Pusztai, �Genetically Modified Foods: Are They a Risk to Human/Animal Health?�
June 2001 Action Bioscience www.actionbioscience.org/biotech/pusztai.html; and A. Pusztai and S. Bardocz, �GMO in animal nutrition:
potential benefits and risks,� Chapter 17, Biology of Nutrition in Growing Animals, R. Mosenthin, J. Zentek and T. Zebrowska (Eds.) Elsevier,
October 2005
114 V. E. Prescott, et al, �Transgenic Expression of Bean r-Amylase Inhibitor in Peas Results in Altered Structure and Immunogenicity,� Journal
of Agricultural Food Chemistry (2005): 53.
115 J. Lexchin, L. A. Bero, B. Djulbegovic, and O. Clark, �Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic
review,� BMJ 326 (2003):1167�1176.
116 Mark Friedberg, et al, �Evaluation of Conflict of Interest in Economic Analyses of New Drugs Used in Oncology,� JAMA 282 (1999):1453�
1457.
117 Suzanne Wuerthele quoted here: archive.sare.org/sanet-mg/archives/html-home/23-html/0195.html
118 �Elements of Precaution,� The Royal Society of Canada, January 2001. www.canadians.org/food/documents/rsc_feb05.pdf
119 Friends of the Earth Europe, �Throwing Caution to the Wind: A review of the European Food Safety Authority and its work on genetically
modified foods and crops,� November 2004.
120 European Communities submission to World Trade Organization dispute panel, 28 January 2005, reported in Hidden uncertainties – risks of
GMOs, 23 April 2006, Friends of the Earth / Greenpeace www.non-gm-farmers.com/news_print.asp?ID=2731
121 EU Regulation 178/2002 (Article 30.4)
122 Friends of the Earth Europe, �Throwing Caution to the Wind: A review of the European Food Safety Authority and its work on genetically
modified foods and crops,� November 2004.
123 �Greenpeace exposes Government-Monsanto nexus to cheat Indian farmers: calls on GEAC to revoke BT cotton permission,� Press release,
March 3, 2005, www.greenpeace.org/india_en/news/details?item_id=771071
124 Jeffrey M. Smith, Seeds of Deception, (Iowa: Yes! Books, 2003), 224.
125 �Monsanto Bribery Charges in Indonesia by DoJ and USSEC,� Third World Network, Malaysia, Jan 27, 2005,
www.mindfully.org/GE/2005/Monsanto-Indonesia-Bribery27jan05.htm
126 Jeffrey M. Smith, Seeds of Deception, Yes! Books, Fairfield, Iowa 2003
127 Karen Charman, The Professor Who Can Read Your Mind, PR Watch Newsletter Fourth Quarter 1999, Volume 6, No. 4
128 www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/41-2002/3068-support-for-food-biotechnology-holds-in-the-us-
129 Estimates of increased IGF-1 levels vary considerably. In Mepham et al, �Safety of milk from cows treated with bovine somatotropin,� The
Lancet 2 (1994):197, IGF-1 levels were up to 10 times higher. The methods used may also underestimate IGF-1 levels considerably. See Samuel
S. Epstein, �Unlabeled Milk From Cows Treated With Biosynthetic Growth Hormones: A Case of Regulatory Abdication,� International Journal
of Health Services 26(1996): 173�185; and Samuel S. Epstein, What�s In Your Milk? (Victoria, British Columbia, Canada:Trafford Publishing,
2006), 197�204.
130 For a review of literature linking elevated levels of IGF-1 with increased risks of breast, colon and prostate cancers, see Samuel S. Epstein,
What�s In Your Milk?, 197�204.
131 Gary Steinman, �Mechanisms of Twinning VII. Effect of Diet and Heredity on the Human Twinning Rate,� Journal of Reproductive
Medicine, May 2006; S.E. Echternkamp et al, �Ovarian Follicular Development in Cattle Selected for Twin Ovulations and Births,� Journal of
Animal Science 82 no. 2 (2004): 459�471; and S. E. Echternkamp et al, �Concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I in blood and ovarian
follicular fluid of cattle selected for twins,� Biology of Reproduction, 43(1990): 8�14.
132 Powell D.A.; Blaine K.; Morris S.; Wilson J., Agronomic and consumer considerations for Bt and conventional sweet-corn, British Food
Journal, Volume: 105, Issue: 10, Page: 700-713 (Nov 2003)
133 GM Nation? The findings of the public debate, www.gmnation.org.uk/ut_09/ut_9_6.htm#summary
134 To see the Toronto Star photo in Laidlaw�s book, go to www.gmwatch.org/p1temp.asp?pid=72&page=1 or
www.powerbase.info/index.php/Shane_Morris
135 Corn Fakes, Private Eye, No. 1194, 28 September-11 October 2007 www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/46-2007/7525-award-winningpaper-qa-flagrant-fraudq-cambridge-expert-2692007
136 Tim Lambert, Would you eat wormy corn?, September 7 2007
scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2007/09/would_you_eat_wormy_sweet_corn.php
137 �Genetically modified foods, who knows how safe they are?� CBC News and Current Affairs, September 25, 2006.
138 Mike Zelina, et al., The Health Effects of Genetically Engineered Crops on San Luis Obispo County,� A Citizen Response to the SLO Health
Commission GMO Task Force Report, 2006.
139 Bill Lambrecht, Dinner at the New Gene Caf�, St. Martin’s Press, September 2001, pg 139
Photo credits
Stanley W. B. Ewen and Arpad Pusztai, �Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small
intestine,� Lancet, 1999 Oct 16; 354 (9187): 1353-4.
M. Malatesta, C. Caporaloni, S. Gavaudan, M. B. Rocchi, S. Serafini, C. Tiberi, G. Gazzanelli, �Ultrastructural Morphometrical and
Immunocytochemical Analyses of Hepatocyte Nuclei from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,� Cell Struct Funct. 27 (2002): 173�180
Irina Ermakova, �Experimental Evidence of GMO Hazards,� Presentation at Scientists for a GM Free Europe, EU Parliament, Brussels, June 12,
2007
Irina Ermakova, �Genetically modified soy leads to the decrease of weight and high mortality of rat pups of the first generation. Preliminary
studies,� Ecosinform 1 (2006): 4�9.

Close Accordion