Name: El Paso Back Clinic | Spine Specialists - El Paso, TX
Price range: $$

Wellness

Clinic Wellness Team. A key factor to spine or back pain conditions is staying healthy. Overall wellness involves a balanced diet, appropriate exercise, physical activity, restful sleep, and a healthy lifestyle. The term has been applied in many ways. But overall, the definition is as follows.

It is a conscious, self-directed, and evolving process of achieving full potential. It is multidimensional, bringing together lifestyles both mental/spiritual and the environment in which one lives. It is positive and affirms that what we do is, in fact, correct.

It is an active process where people become aware and make choices towards a more successful lifestyle. This includes how a person contributes to their environment/community. They aim to build healthier living spaces and social networks. It helps in creating a person’s belief systems, values, and a positive world perspective.

Along with this comes the benefits of regular exercise, a healthy diet, personal self-care, and knowing when to seek medical attention. Dr. Jimenez’s message is to work towards being fit, being healthy, and staying aware of our collection of articles, blogs, and videos.

What are Case Reports & Case Series?

by Dr Alex Jimenez DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP | Clinical Case Reports, Clinical Case Series, Functional Medicine

The diagnosis of a variety of diseases has been effectively determined through clinical and experimental data. Research studies provide valuable information on the pathogenesis of many conditions and are often the primary source of information regarding new diseases or conditions. Case reports and case series are first level research studies, offering the most initial insights on a particular health issue through the personal experience of one or more people with a disease or condition. The following article describes the purpose of case reports and case series, and how they provide clinical and experimental data.

Learning Objectives

1. Case reports and case series describe the experience of one or more people with a disease.
2. Case reports and case series are often the first data alerting to a new disease or condition.
3. Case reports and case series have specific limitations:

a. Lack of a denominator to calculate rates of disease
b. Lack of a comparison group
c. Selecting study populations
d. Sampling variation

Case Reports and Case Series

Case reports and case series represent the most basic type of study design, in which researchers describe the experience of a single person (case report) or a group of people (case series). Typically, case reports and case series describe individuals who develop a particular new disease or condition. Case reports and case series can provide compelling reading because they present a detailed account of the clinical experience of individual study subjects. In contrast, studies that evaluate large numbers of individuals typically summarize the data using statistical measures, such as means and proportions.

Example 3.1. A case series describes 15 young women who develop breast cancer; 9 of these women report at least once weekly ingestion of foods packaged with the estrogenic chemical bisphenol A (BPA). Urine testing confirms the presence of BPA among all nine case women.

It is tempting to surmise from these data that BPA might be causally related to breast cancer. However, case reports/case series have important limitations that preclude inference of a causal relationship.

First, case reports/case series lack denominator data that are necessary to calculate the rate of disease. The denominator refers to the population from which the diseased subjects arose. For example, to calculate the incidence proportion or incidence rate of breast cancer among women exposed to BPA, the total number of women who were exposed to BPA or the total number of person-years at risk is needed.

Disease rates are needed for comparison with historically reported disease rates, or with rates from a selected comparison group. Unfortunately, obtaining the necessary denominator data may not be easy. In this example, additional data sources are needed to determine the total number of BPA-exposed women from whom the breast cancer cases arose. The case series data alone cannot be used to calculate the rate of breast cancer because they do not include the total number of women who were exposed to BPA.

A second problem with case report/case series report data is the lack of a comparison group. The 60% prevalence of BPA exposure among women with breast cancer seems unusually high, but what is prevalence of BPA exposure among women without breast cancer? This comparison is critical for addressing the hypothesis that BPA might be a cause of breast cancer.

A third limitation of case reports/case series is that these studies often describe highly select individuals who may not represent the general population. For example, it is possible that the 15 breast cancer cases originated from a single hospital in a community with high levels of air pollution or other potential carcinogens. Under these conditions, a fair estimate of breast cancer incidence among non-BPA exposed women from the same community would be required to make an inference that BPA causes breast cancer.

A fourth limitation of case reports/case series is sampling variation. This concept will be explored in detail later in this book. The basic idea is that there is tremendous natural variation in disease development in humans. The fact that 9 of 15 women with breast cancer reported BPA exposure is interesting; however, this number may be very different in the next case series of 15 women with breast cancer simply due to chance. A precise estimate of the rate of a disease, independent from chance, can be obtained only by increasing the number of diseased subjects.

Recall the list of factors that are used to judge whether a factor may be a cause of disease:

1. Randomized evidence
2. Strength of association
3. Temporal relationship between exposure and outcome
4. Dose-response association
5. Biological plausibility

In general, case reports/case series rely almost exclusively on biological plausibility to make their case for causation. For the BPA and breast cancer case series, there is no randomized evidence, no measure of the strength of association between BPA and breast cancer, no reported dose�response association, and no evidence that BPA exposure preceded the development of breast cancer. The inference for causation derives completely from previous biological knowledge regarding the estrogenic effects of BPA.

Despite limitations of case series data, they may be highly suggestive of an important new association, disease process, or unintended side effect of a medication or treatment.

Example 3.2. In 2007, a case series described three cases of male prepubertal gynecomastia. The report included detailed information on each subjects� age, body size, serum levels of endogenous steroids, and known exposures to exogenous hormones. It was discovered that all three otherwise healthy boys had been exposed to some product containing lavender oil (lotion, shampoo, soap), and that in each case, the gynecomastia resolved upon discontinuation of the product. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated endocrine-disrupting activity of lavender oil. This novel case series data may lead to further investigations to determine whether lavender oil, a common ingredient in commercially available products, may be a cause of gynecomastia.

Example 3.3. A vaccine designed to prevent rotavirus infection was found to cause weakening of the intestinal muscle layers in animals. Following release of the vaccine, a number of cases of intussusception (when one portion of the bowel slides into the next) were reported in children who received the vaccine, with some fatal cases. The strong biological plausibility underlying this initial association, and knowledge that intussusception is otherwise rare in infants, was highly suggestive of a causal relationship and the vaccine was removed from the market.

Information referenced from B. Kestenbaum, Epidemiology and Biostatistics: An Introduction to Clinical Research, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-88433-2_3, � Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009. The scope of our information is limited to chiropractic as well as to spinal injuries and conditions. To discuss the subject matter, please feel free to ask Dr. Jimenez or contact us at 915-850-0900 .

Referenced by Dr. Alex Jimenez

Additional Topics: Wellness

Overall health and wellness are essential towards maintaining the proper mental and physical balance in the body. From eating a balanced nutrition as well as exercising and participating in physical activities, to sleeping a healthy amount of time on a regular basis, following the best health and wellness tips can ultimately help maintain overall well-being. Eating plenty of fruits and vegetables can go a long way towards helping people become healthy.

IMPORTANT TOPIC: EXTRA EXTRA: Treating Sciatica Pain

Amplify The Effectiveness Of Chiropractic Care: Weight Loss Tips

by Dr Alex Jimenez DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP | Weight Loss

Effectiveness: We all know and understand the importance of maintaining a healthy weight. Some individuals do quite nicely at managing their pounds with seemingly little effort, while other struggle constantly.

A recent study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that 78 million American adults suffer from obesity. A person who has sustained an injury or suffers from an illness that affects their back, hips, knees or ankles are especially susceptible to weight gain, because they must deal with limited mobility and the stress of daily pain.

Striving to stay in the ideal weight range for your body type and height provides a variety of health benefits such as adding less pressure on your back and joints, and increasing your range of motion. Patients who receive chiropractic care often enjoy the effectiveness of increased healing by pursuing weight loss.

Successfully fight the battle of the bulge with these four handy weight loss tips to:

Amplify The Effectiveness Of Chiropractic Care

First, Start Small

Replace a couple of negative behaviors with positive ones, and commit to making them stick. Great examples of these are substituting water for soft drinks, eating a high-protein breakfast, or changing out your nightly bowl of ice cream with yogurt.

Simply removing 100 calories a day adds up to a 10 pound weight loss over a year’s time. Small modifications offer the dual benefits of being easier to implement while still showing results.

Next, Keep A Journal

Write down every bite you eat along with the portion size. Listing your food intake provides accountability, which may keep you from noshing on that third slice of pizza or super-sizing those fries.

It also arms you with important intel that will be helpful throughout your weight loss journey. If you hit a plateau, read back through the journal to see what you may have changed over time that caused the scales to stall.

And speaking of scales….

Don’t Live And Cry By The Scales

Often, dieters weigh every day and are elated or depressed based on the number on the scales. That’s a roller coaster way to live, and those emotions can cause calorie laden binges!

Plus, daily weighing is not accurate, as fluctuations in water weight are common. Weigh once a week at the most, at roughly the same time each day. A weekly routine gives you a good idea of your success without the stressful up and down of daily weighing.

Decrease Your Sedentary Ways

Even if you are dealing with an injury or medical condition that limits the ability to exercise, you can still probably be less sedentary than you are now. Again, simplicity is the key.

Walk into the bank instead of using the drive through window, stand up to fold clothes instead of sitting down, and take periodic breaks at your desk to stand for a bit.

Ask your chiropractor about any limitations you need to follow, and request stretching exercises as your personal situation permits. Moving more on a daily basis will aid in shedding those extra pounds and keeping them off long-term.

It’s important for individuals to maintain a normal weight range in order to enjoy a healthy life. Chiropractic patients benefit even more from shedding those extra pounds.

By committing to a healthier lifestyle with fewer pounds to carry around, individuals with back and joint injuries will see greater positive impact from their chiropractic visits. Over time, the combination of a leaner body and chiropractic care will bring greater mobility, less pain, and a decreased chance for re-injury to the patient.

Shea Vaughn Talks “Targeting Obesity”

This article is copyrighted by Blogging Chiros LLC for its Doctor of Chiropractic members and may not be copied or duplicated in any manner including printed or electronic media, regardless of whether for a fee or gratis without the prior written permission of Blogging Chiros, LLC.

Management of Sciatica: Nonsurgical & Surgical Therapies

by Dr Alex Jimenez DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP | Chiropractic, Chiropractic Examination, Clinical Case Reports, Clinical Case Series, Functional Medicine, Sciatica

Consider the following, sciatica is a medical term used to describe a collective group of symptoms resulting from the irritation or compression of the sciatic nerve, generally due to an injury or aggravated condition. Sciatica is commonly characterized by radiating pain along the sciatic nerve, which runs down one or both legs from the lower back. The following case vignette discusses Mr. Winston’s medical condition, a 50-year-old bus driver who reported experiencing chronic, lower back and leg pain associated with sciatica during a 4-week time period. Ramya Ramaswami, M.B., B.S., M.P.H., Zoher Ghogawala, M.D., and James N. Weinstein, D.O., provide a comprehensive analysis of the various treatment options available to treat sciatica, including undergoing lumbar disk surgery and receiving nonsurgical therapy.

On a personal note, as a practicing doctor of chiropractic, choosing the correct treatment care for any type of injury or condition can be a personal and difficult decision. If the circumstances are favorable, the patient may determine what is the best form of treatment for their type of medical issue. While nonsurgical therapies, such as chiropractic care, can often be utilized to improve symptoms of sciatica, more severe cases of sciatica may require surgical interventions to treat the source of the issue. In most cases, nonsurgical therapies should be considered first, before turning to surgical therapies for sciatica.

Case Vignette

A Man with Sciatica Who is Considering Lumbar Disk Surgery

Ramya Ramaswami, M.B., B.S., M.P.H.

Mr. Winston, a 50-year-old bus driver, presented to your office with a 4-week history of pain in his left leg and lower back. He described a combination of severe sharp and dull pain that originated in his left buttock and radiated to the dorsolateral aspect of his left thigh, as well as vague aching over the lower lumbar spine. On examination, passive raising of his left leg off the table to 45 degrees caused severe pain that simulated his main symptom, and the pain was so severe that you could not lift his leg further. There was no leg or foot weakness. His body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 35, and he had mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a result of smoking one pack of cigarettes every day for 22 years. Mr. Winston had taken a leave of absence from his work because of his symptoms. You prescribed 150 mg of pregabalin per day, which was gradually increased to 600 mg daily because the symptoms had not abated.

Now, 10 weeks after the initial onset of his symptoms, he returns for an evaluation. The medication has provided minimal alleviation of his sciatic pain. He has to return to work and is concerned about his ability to complete his duties at his job. He undergoes magnetic resonance imaging, which shows a herniated disk on the left side at the L4�L5 root. You discuss options for the next steps in managing his sciatica. He is uncertain about invasive procedures such as lumbar disk surgery but feels limited by his symptoms of pain.

Treatment Options

Which of the following would you recommend for Mr. Winston?

Undergo lumbar disk surgery.
Receive nonsurgical therapy.

To aid in your decision making, each of these approaches is defended in a short essay by an expert in the field. Given your knowledge of the patient and the points made by the experts, which option would you choose?

Option 1: Undergo Lumbar Disk Surgery
Option 2: Receive Nonsurgical Therapy

1. Undergo Lumbar Disk Surgery

Zoher Ghogawala, M.D.

Mr. Winston�s case represents a common scenario in the management of symptomatic lumbar disk herniation. In this particular case, the patient�s symptoms and the physical examination are consistent with nerve-root compression and inflammation directly from an L4�L5 herniated disk on his left side. The patient does not have weakness but has ongoing pain and has been unable to work for the past 10 weeks despite receiving pregabalin. Two questions emerge: first, does lumbar disk surgery (microdiskectomy) provide outcomes that are superior to those with continued nonoperative therapy in patients with more than 6 weeks of symptoms; and second, does lumbar microdiskectomy improve the likelihood of return to work in patients with these symptoms?

The highest quality data on the topic come from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). The results of the randomized, controlled trial are difficult to interpret because adherence to the assigned treatment strategy was suboptimal. Only half the patients who were randomly assigned to the surgery group actually underwent surgery within 3 months after enrollment, and 30% of the patients assigned to nonoperative treatment chose to cross over to the surgical group. In this study, the patients who underwent surgery had greater improvements in validated patient-reported outcomes. The treatment effect of microdiskectomy was superior to that of nonoperative treatment at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Moreover, in an as-treated analysis, the outcomes among patients who underwent surgery were superior to those among patients who received nonoperative therapy. Overall, the results of SPORT support the use of microdiskectomy in this case.

Results of clinical trials are based on a comparison of treatment options in study populations and may or may not apply to individual patients. SPORT did not specify what type of nonoperative therapy was to be used. Physical therapy was used in 73% of the patients, epidural injections in 50%, and medical therapies (e.g., nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs) in more than 50%. In the case of Mr. Winston, pregabalin has been tried, but physical therapy and epidural glucocorticoid injections have not been attempted. Despite widespread use of physical therapy for the treatment of lumbar disk herniation, the evidence supporting its effectiveness is inconclusive, according to published guidelines of the North American Spine Society. On the other hand, there is evidence that transforaminal epidural glucocorticoid injection provides short-term relief (30 days) in patients with nerve-root symptoms directly related to a herniated disk. Overall, there is evidence, from SPORT and from a randomized trial from the Netherlands published in the Journal, that early surgery between 6 and 12 weeks after the onset of symptoms provides greater alleviation of leg pain and better overall pain relief than prolonged conservative therapy.

The ability to return to work has not been formally studied in comparisons of operative with nonoperative treatments for lumbar disk herniation. Registry data from the NeuroPoint-SD study showed that more than 80% of the patients who were working before disk herniation returned to work after surgery. The ability to return to work may be dependent on the type of vocation, since patients who are manual laborers may need more time to recover to reduce the risk of reherniation.

It is well recognized that many patients who have a symptomatic lumbar disk herniation will have improvement spontaneously over several months. Surgery can alleviate symptoms more quickly by immediately removing the offending disk herniation from the affected nerve root. The risk�benefit equation will vary among individual patients. In the case of Mr. Winston, obesity and mild pulmonary disease might increase the risk of complications from surgery, although in SPORT, 95% of surgical patients did not have any operative or postoperative complication. For Mr. Winston, a patient with pain that has persisted for more than 6 weeks, microdiskectomy is a rational option that is supported by high-quality evidence.

2. Receive Nonsurgical Therapy

James N. Weinstein, D.O.

This case involves a common presentation of low back pain radiating to the buttock and posterolateral thigh that might represent either referred mechanical pain or radiculopathy. Classic radiculopathy resulting from compression of a lower lumbar nerve root (L4, L5, or S1) results in pain that radiates distal to the knee and is often accompanied by weakness or numbness in the respective myotome or dermatome. In this case, the pain is proximal to the knee and is not associated with weakness or numbness. In SPORT, surgery resulted in faster recovery and a greater degree of improvement than nonoperative treatment in patients with pain that radiated distal to the knee and was accompanied by neurologic signs or symptoms. However, since Mr. Winston would not have met the inclusion criteria for SPORT, the results of diskectomy in this case would be somewhat unpredictable. He does not have radiculopathy that radiates below the knee, and he does not have weakness or numbness; nonoperative treatment should be exhausted before any consideration of a surgical procedure that in most cases has not been shown to be effective in patients with this type of presentation. In this issue of the Journal, Mathieson and colleagues report the results of a randomized, controlled trial that showed that pregabalin did not significantly alleviate pain related to sciatica. Mr. Winston has been treated only with pregabalin; therefore, other conservative options should be explored.

Saal and Saal reported that more than 80% of patients with radiculopathy associated with a lumbar disk herniation had improvement in a matter of months with exercise-based physical therapy. In the nonoperative SPORT cohort, patients had significant improvement from baseline, and approximately 60% of those with classic radiculopathy who initially received nonoperative treatment avoided surgery. Mr. Winston has had minimal treatment and has had symptoms for only 10 weeks. He should undergo a course of exercise-based physical therapy and a trial of a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medication and may consider a lumbar epidural glucocorticoid injection. Although there is little evidence of the effectiveness of these nonoperative options alone, the combination of these treatments and the benign natural history of the patient�s condition could result in alleviation or resolution of symptoms. If these interventions � and time � do not resolve his symptoms, surgery could be considered as a final option, but it may not have long-term effectiveness and could in and of itself cause the possibility of more harm than good. Mr. Winston has risk factors, such as obesity and a history of smoking, that have been shown to contribute to poor surgical outcomes of certain spinal procedures.

Mr. Winston has symptoms of back pain that interfere with his quality of life. He would need to understand, through shared decision making, that a nonsurgical approach is likely to be more effective than surgery over time.

Information referenced from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). The scope of our information is limited to chiropractic as well as to spinal injuries and conditions. To discuss the subject matter, please feel free to ask Dr. Jimenez or contact us at 915-850-0900 .

Cited by Dr. Alex Jimenez

Additional Topics: Wellness

blog picture of cartoon paperboy big news

IMPORTANT TOPIC: EXTRA EXTRA: Treating Sciatica Pain

Blank

References

1. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA 2006;296:2441–2450
2. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA 2006;296:2451–2459
3. Kreiner DS, Hwang SW, Easa JE, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Spine J 2014;14:180–191
4. Ghahreman A, Ferch R, Bogduk N. The efficacy of transforaminal injection of steroids for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. Pain Med 2010;11:1149–1168
5. Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, et al. Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2245–2256
6. Ghogawala Z, Shaffrey CI, Asher AL, et al. The efficacy of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: results from the NeuroPoint-SD registry: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;19:555–563
7. Deyo RA, Weinstein JN. Low back pain. N Engl J Med 2001;344:363–370
8. Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, et al. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: eight-year results for the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:3–16
9. Mathieson S, Maher CG, McLachlan AJ, et al. Trial of pregabalin for acute and chronic sciatica. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1111–1120
10. Saal JA, Saal JS. Nonoperative treatment of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc with radiculopathy: an outcome study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14:431–437
11. Pinto RZ, Maher CG, Ferreira ML, et al. Drugs for relief of pain in patients with sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2012;344:e497–e497
12. Pearson A, Lurie J, Tosteson T, et al. Who should have surgery for an intervertebral disc herniation? Comparative effectiveness evidence from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine 2012;37:140–149
13. Weeks WB, Weinstein JN. Patient-reported data can help people make better health care choices. Harvard Business Review. September 21, 2015

Close Accordion

Nutritional Tips Every Chiropractic Patient Should Follow

by Dr Alex Jimenez DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP | Nutrition

Nutritional Tips: Chiropractic care effectively and naturally treats a multitude of conditions and diseases. The overall premise is to return the body to its natural alignment by removing subluxations, which takes care of the root cause of many problems.

Spinal adjustments, however, aren�t necessarily the Holy Grail for total health. It’s essential for chiropractic patients to also make adjustments in their everyday lives. By doing so, they�ll maximize the effects of their chiropractic treatments, and experience better overall health in general.

Nutrition is one of the biggest factors and plays a large role in a patient’s recovery. The old adage “you are what you eat” is true. Feeding the body with vital vitamins and minerals promotes growth and healing. Filling up on fried, fatty foods does the opposite.

Let’s Look At Four Nutritional Tips Every Chiropractic Patient Should Follow:

Watch Your Calories

Individuals recovering from spinal or other injuries heal quicker when they avoid carrying excess weight. This is especially true if the injury has sidelined them from normal physical exercise.

Choose lean cuts of meat and fresh fruits and vegetables, and practice portion control. A diet with few excess calories offers the dual benefit of helping you avoid packing on the pounds, and helping you heal faster.

Pay Attention To Calcium Intake

Bones need calcium for strength, so it should be a priority to consume foods that are rich with it. According to healthconsciousness.com, the four most calcium-rich foods are dark leafy greens, low-fat cheese, milk, and yogurt.

If you are visiting a chiropractor for issues or conditions concerning your bones or nerves, he or she may recommend that you introduce these foods into your diet as soon as possible.

Make Protein A Priority

Muscle injuries are one of the most popular reasons for chiropractic visits. Protein helps build and heal muscle tissue, helping it to renew itself back to a pre-injury state.

If your daily intake of protein is low, it can hinder the healing process and stand in the way of chiropractic visits giving you the maximum results. Fish and lean meats are the foods that offer the highest protein.

Other vegetarian options are tofu, soy beans, eggs, milk, and nuts. Help your muscles rebuild and heal by adding high protein foods into every meal menu.

Stay Hydrated

Why do most of us view water drinking with dread? Its not that bad! If you wish to promote healing, it’s imperative to drink enough water every day.

Water provides an entire slew of benefits, from transporting those important nutrients to where they need to be, to flushing harmful toxins out of the body. Aim for eight glasses of water a day, and try to drink it throughout the day.

Getting into this habit will boost overall health, and promote healing of injuries and other medical conditions.

While it’s a smart goal to try to ingest all the nutrients you need through food and drink, supplements are available to bridge the gap. Before beginning a supplement regimen, talk to you chiropractor for recommendations on the type and dosage that will aid and improve your unique situation.

You may also want to download a smartphone app to track your daily intake of calories, calcium, protein and liquid. There are many available, one being My Fitness Pal.

Easy and free to use, this is a powerful tool to keep you on the right nutritional track.

Making the commitment to chiropractic treatment is a big step in the right direction for your overall health and well-being. Incorporate these nutritional tips to your daily routine in order to get the most out of your chiropractic care.

Good Nutrition & Chiropractic Care Contribute To Overall Well-Being

Assessment and Treatment of Upper Trapezius

by Dr Alex Jimenez DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP | Chiropractic, Functional Medicine, Injury Care

These assessment and treatment recommendations represent a synthesis of information derived from personal clinical experience and from the numerous sources which are cited, or are based on the work of researchers, clinicians and therapists who are named (Basmajian 1974, Cailliet 1962, Dvorak & Dvorak 1984, Fryette 1954, Greenman 1989, 1996, Janda 1983, Lewit 1992, 1999, Mennell 1964, Rolf 1977, Williams 1965).

Clinical Application of Neuromuscular Techniques: Upper Trapezius

Lewit (1999) simplifies the need to assess for shortness by stating, �The upper trapezius should be treated if tender and taut.� Since this is an almost universal state in modern life, it seems that everyone requires MET application to this muscle. Lewit also notes that a characteristic mounding of the muscle can often be observed when it is very short, producing the effect of �Gothic shoulders�, similar to the architectural supports of a Gothic church tower (see Fig. 2.13).

Assessment for Shortness of Upper Trapezius (13) (Fig. 4.30)

Figure 4 30 Assessment of the Relative Shortness of the Right Side Upper Trapezius Image 1

Figure 4.30 Assessment of the relative shortness of the right side upper trapezius. One side is compared with the other (for both the range of unforced motion and the nature of the end-feel of motion) to ascertain the side most in need of MET attention.

Test for upper trapezius for shortness (a) See scapulohumeral rhythm test (Ch. 5) which helps identify excessive activity or inappropriate tone in levator scapula and upper trapezius, which, because they are postural muscles, indicates shortness (Fig 5.13A, B). Greenman (1996) describes a functional �firing sequence� assessment which identifies general imbalance and dysfunction involving the upper and lower fixators of the shoulder (Fig. 4.31).

Figure 4 31 Palpation Assessment for Upper and Lower Fixators of the Shoulder Image 2

Figure 4.31 Palpation assessment for upper and lower fixators of the shoulder, including upper trapezius (Greenman 1996).

The patient is seated and the practitioner stands behind. The practitioner rests his right hand over the right shoulder area to assess firing sequence of muscles. The other hand can be placed either on the mid-thoracic region, mainly on the side being assessed, or spanning the lower back to palpate quadratus firing. The assessment should be performed at least twice so that various hand positions are used for different muscles (as in Fig. 4.31).

Greenman bases his description on Janda (1983), who notes the �correct� sequence for shoulder abduction, when seated, as involving: supraspinatus, deltoid, infraspinatus, middle and lower trapezius and finally contralateral quadratus. In dysfunctional states the most common substitutions are said to involve: shoulder elevation by levator scapulae and upper trapezius, as well as early firing by quadratus lumborum, ipsilateral and contralateral.

Inappropriate activity of the upper fixators results in shortness, and of the lower fixators in weakness and possible lengthening (see Ch. 2 for discussion of postural/phasic, etc. muscle characteristics).

Test for upper trapezius for shortness (b) The patient is seated and the practitioner stands behind with one hand resting on the shoulder of the side to be tested and stabilising it. The other hand is placed on the ipsilateral side of the head and the head/neck is taken into contralateral sidebending without force while the shoulder is stabilised (see Fig. 4.30).

The same procedure is performed on the other side with the opposite shoulder stabilised. A comparison is made as to which sidebending manoeuvre produced the greater range and whether the neck can easily reach 45� of side-flexion in each direction, which it should. If neither side can achieve this degree of sidebend, then both trapezius muscles may be short. The relative shortness of one, compared with the other, is evaluated.

Test for upper trapezius for shortness (c) The patient is seated and the practitioner stands behind with a hand resting over the muscle on the side to be assessed. The patient is asked to extend the arm at the shoulder joint, bringing the flexed arm/elbow backwards. If the upper trapezius is stressed on that side it will inappropriately activate during this movement. Since it is a postural muscle, shortness in it can then be assumed (see discussion of postural muscle characteristics in Ch. 3).

Test of upper trapezius for shortness (d) The patient is supine with the neck fully (but not forcefully) sidebent contralaterally (away from the side being assessed). The practitioner is standing at the head of the table and uses a cupped hand contact on the ipsilateral shoulder (i.e. on the side being tested) to assess the ease with which it can be depressed (moved caudally) (Fig. 4.32).

Figure 4 32 MET Treatment of Right Side Upper Trapezius Muscle Image 3

Figure 4.32 MET treatment of right side upper trapezius muscle. A Posterior fibres, B middle fibres, C anterior fibres. Note that stretching in this (or any of the alternative positions which access the middle and posterior fibres) is achieved following the isometric contraction by means of an easing of the shoulder away from the stabilised head, with no force being applied to the neck and head itself.

There should be an easy �springing� sensation as the practitioner pushes the shoulder towards the feet, with a soft end-feel to the movement. If depression of the shoulder is difficult or if there is a harsh, sudden end-point, upper trapezius shortness is confirmed.

This same assessment (always with full lateral flexion) should be performed with the head fully rotated away from the side being treated, half turned away from the side being treated, and slightly turned towards the side being treated, in order to respectively assess the relative shortness and functional efficiency of posterior, middle and anterior subdivisions of the upper portion of trapezius.

MET Treatment of Chronically Shortened Upper Trapezius

MET treatment of upper trapezius, method (a) (Fig. 4.32) In order to treat all the fibres of upper trapezius, MET needs to be applied sequentially. The upper trapezius is subdivided here into anterior, middle and posterior fibres. The neck should be placed into different positions of rotation, coupled with the sidebending as described in the assessment description above, for precise treatment of the various fibres.

The patient lies supine, arm on the side to be treated lying alongside the trunk, head/neck sidebent away from the side being treated to just short of the restriction barrier, while the practitioner stabilises the shoulder with one hand and cups the ear/mastoid area of the same side of the head with the other:

With the neck fully sidebent and fully rotated contralaterally, the posterior fibres of upper trapezius are involved in the contraction (see below). This will facilitate subsequent stretching of this aspect of the muscle.
With the neck fully sidebent and half rotated, the middle fibres are involved in the contraction.
With the neck fully sidebent and slightly rotated towards the side being treated the anterior fibres of upper trapezius are being treated.

The various contractions and subsequent stretches can be performed with practitioner�s arms crossed, hands stabilising the mastoid area and shoulder.

The patient introduces a light resisted effort (20% of available strength) to take the stabilised shoulder towards the ear (a shrug movement) and the ear towards the shoulder. The double movement (or effort towards movement) is important in order to introduce a contraction of the muscle from both ends simultaneously. The degree of effort should be mild and no pain should be felt. The contraction is sustained for 10 seconds (or so) and, upon complete relaxation of effort, the practitioner gently eases the head/neck into an increased degree of sidebending and rotation, where it is stabilised, as the shoulder is stretched caudally.

When stretching is introduced the patient can usefully assist in this phase of the treatment by initiating, on instruction, the stretch of the muscle (�as you breathe out please slide your hand towards your feet�). This reduces the chances of a stretch reflex being initiated. Once the muscle is being stretched, the patient relaxes and the stretch is held for 10�30 seconds.

CAUTION: No stretch should be introduced from the cranial end of the muscle as this could stress the neck. The head is stabilised at its side-flexion and rotation barrier.

Disagreement

There is some disagreement as to the head/neck rotation position as described in the treatment method above, which calls (for posterior and middle fibres) for sidebending and rotation away from the affected side.

Liebenson (1996), suggests that the patient �lies supine with the head supported in anteflexion and laterally flexed away and rotated towards the side of involvement�.

Lewit (1985b) suggests: �The patient is supine � the therapist fixes the shoulder from above with one hand, sidebending the head and neck with the other hand so as to take up the slack. He then asks the patient to look towards the side away from which the head is bent, resisting the patient�s automatic tendency to move towards the side of the lesion.� (This method is described below.)

The author has used the methods described above with good effect and urges readers to try these approaches as well as those of Liebenson and Lewit, and to evaluate results for themselves.

MET treatment of acutely shortened upper trapezius, method (b) Lewit suggests the use of eye movements to facilitate initiation of PIR before stretching, an ideal method for acute problems in this region.

The patient is supine, while the practitioner fixes the shoulder and the sidebent (away from the treated side) head and neck at the restriction barrier and asks the patient to look, with the eyes only (i.e. not to turn the head), towards the side away from which the neck is bent.

This eye movement is maintained, as is a held breath, while the practitioner resists the slight isometric contraction that these two factors (eye movement and breath) will have created.

On exhalation and complete relaxation, the head/neck is taken to a new barrier and the process repeated. If the shoulder is brought into the equation, this is firmly held as it attempts to lightly push into a shrug. After this 10 second contraction the muscle will have released somewhat and slack can again be taken out as the head is repositioned before a repetition of the procedure commences.

Dr. Alex Jimenez offers an additional assessment and treatment of the hip flexors as a part of a referenced clinical application of neuromuscular techniques by Leon Chaitow and Judith Walker DeLany. The scope of our information is limited to chiropractic and spinal injuries and conditions. To discuss the subject matter, please feel free to ask Dr. Jimenez or contact us at 915-850-0900 .

By Dr. Alex Jimenez

Additional Topics: Wellness

blog picture of cartoon paperboy big news

WELLNESS TOPIC: EXTRA EXTRA: Managing Workplace Stress

Blank

References

1.�Ballou SK, Keefer L. Multicultural considerations in the diagnosis and management of irritable bowel syndrome: a selective summary.�Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol.�2013;25:1127�1133.�[PubMed]

2.�Gonzales Gamarra RG, Ruiz S�nchez JG, Le�n Jim�nez F, Cubas Benavides F, D�az V�lez C. [Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in the adult population of the city of Chiclayo in 2011]�Rev Gastroenterol Peru.�2012;32:381�386.�[PubMed]

3.�Gwee KA, Lu CL, Ghoshal UC. Epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome in Asia: something old, something new, something borrowed.�J Gastroenterol Hepatol.�2009;24:1601�1607.�[PubMed]

4.�Krogsgaard LR, Engsbro AL, Bytzer P. The epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome in Denmark. A population-based survey in adults ? 50 years of age.�Scand J Gastroenterol.�2013;48:523�529.�[PubMed]

5.�Ibrahim NK, Battarjee WF, Almehmadi SA. Prevalence and predictors of irritable bowel syndrome among medical students and interns in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah.�Libyan J Med.�2013;8:21287.[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

6.�Lee YY, Waid A, Tan HJ, Chua AS, Whitehead WE. Rome III survey of irritable bowel syndrome among ethnic Malays.�World J Gastroenterol.�2012;18:6475�6480; discussion p. 6479.�[PMC free article][PubMed]

7.�Ghoshal UC, Abraham P, Bhatt C, Choudhuri G, Bhatia SJ, Shenoy KT, Banka NH, Bose K, Bohidar NP, Chakravartty K, et al. Epidemiological and clinical profile of irritable bowel syndrome in India: report of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology Task Force.�Indian J Gastroenterol.�2008;27:22�28.�[PubMed]

8.�Bures J, Cyrany J, Kohoutova D, F�rstl M, Rejchrt S, Kvetina J, Vorisek V, Kopacova M. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth syndrome.�World J Gastroenterol.�2010;16:2978�2990.�[PMC free article][PubMed]

9.�Dibaise JK, Young RJ, Vanderhoof JA. Enteric microbial flora, bacterial overgrowth, and short-bowel syndrome.�Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.�2006;4:11�20.�[PubMed]

10.�Bouhnik Y, Alain S, Attar A, Flouri� B, Raskine L, Sanson-Le Pors MJ, Rambaud JC. Bacterial populations contaminating the upper gut in patients with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth syndrome.�Am J Gastroenterol.�1999;94:1327�1331.�[PubMed]

11.�Dukowicz AC, Lacy BE, Levine GM. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a comprehensive review.�Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)�2007;3:112�122.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

12.�Posserud I, Stotzer PO, Bj�rnsson ES, Abrahamsson H, Simr�n M. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.�Gut.�2007;56:802�808.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

13.�Ghoshal U, Ghoshal UC, Ranjan P, Naik SR, Ayyagari A. Spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria contaminating the upper gut in patients with malabsorption syndrome from the tropics.�BMC Gastroenterol.�2003;3:9.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

14.�Carrara M, Desideri S, Azzurro M, Bulighin GM, Di Piramo D, Lomonaco L, Adamo S. Small intestine bacterial overgrowth in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.�Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci.�2008;12:197�202.�[PubMed]

15.�Ghoshal UC, Ghoshal U, Das K, Misra A. Utility of hydrogen breath tests in diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in malabsorption syndrome and its relationship with oro-cecal transit time.�Indian J Gastroenterol.�2006;25:6�10.�[PubMed]

16.�Ghoshal UC, Kumar S, Mehrotra M, Lakshmi C, Misra A. Frequency of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and chronic non-specific diarrhea.�J Neurogastroenterol Motil.�2010;16:40�46.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

17.�Pimentel M, Chow EJ, Lin HC. Eradication of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth reduces symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome.�Am J Gastroenterol.�2000;95:3503�3506.�[PubMed]

18.�Sachdeva S, Rawat AK, Reddy RS, Puri AS. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in irritable bowel syndrome: frequency and predictors.�J Gastroenterol Hepatol.�2011;26 Suppl 3:135�138.�[PubMed]

19.�Park H. The role of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome.�J Neurogastroenterol Motil.�2010;16:3�4.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

20.�Ghoshal UC, Shukla R, Ghoshal U, Gwee KA, Ng SC, Quigley EM. The gut microbiota and irritable bowel syndrome: friend or foe?�Int J Inflam.�2012;2012:151085.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

21.�Brown AC. Ulcerative colitis, Crohn�s disease and irritable bowel syndrome patients need fecal transplant research and treatment.�J Crohns Colitis.�2014;8:179.�[PubMed]

22.�Sampath K, Levy LC, Gardner TB. Fecal transplantation: beyond the aesthetic.�Gastroenterology.�2013;145:1151�1153.�[PubMed]

23.�Grace E, Shaw C, Whelan K, Andreyev HJ. Review article: small intestinal bacterial overgrowth–prevalence, clinical features, current and developing diagnostic tests, and treatment.�Aliment Pharmacol Ther.�2013;38:674�688.�[PubMed]

24.�Yakoob J, Abbas Z, Khan R, Hamid S, Awan S, Jafri W. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and lactose intolerance contribute to irritable bowel syndrome symptomatology in Pakistan.�Saudi J Gastroenterol.�2011;17:371�375.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

25.�Gwee KA, Bak YT, Ghoshal UC, Gonlachanvit S, Lee OY, Fock KM, Chua AS, Lu CL, Goh KL, Kositchaiwat C, et al. Asian consensus on irritable bowel syndrome.�J Gastroenterol Hepatol.�2010;25:1189�1205.�[PubMed]

26.�Lacy BE, Gabbard SL, Crowell MD. Pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment of bloating: hope, hype, or hot air?�Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)�2011;7:729�739.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

27.�Harder H, Serra J, Azpiroz F, Passos MC, Aguad� S, Malagelada JR. Intestinal gas distribution determines abdominal symptoms.�Gut.�2003;52:1708�1713.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

28.�Kumar S, Misra A, Ghoshal UC. Patients with irritable bowel syndrome exhale more hydrogen than healthy subjects in fasting state.�J Neurogastroenterol Motil.�2010;16:299�305.�[PMC free article][PubMed]

29.�Hungin AP, Mulligan C, Pot B, Whorwell P, Agr�us L, Fracasso P, Lionis C, Mendive J, Philippart de Foy JM, Rubin G, Winchester C, de Wit N. Systematic review: probiotics in the management of lower gastrointestinal symptoms in clinical practice — an evidence-based international guide.�Aliment Pharmacol Ther.�2013;38:864�886.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

30.�Attar A, Flouri� B, Rambaud JC, Franchisseur C, Ruszniewski P, Bouhnik Y. Antibiotic efficacy in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth-related chronic diarrhea: a crossover, randomized trial.�Gastroenterology.�1999;117:794�797.�[PubMed]

31.�Marcelino RT, Fagundes-Neto U. [Hydrogen test (H2) in the air expired for the diagnosis of small bowel bacterial overgrowth]�Arq Gastroenterol.�1995;32:191�198.�[PubMed]

32.�Santavirta J. Lactulose hydrogen and [14C]xylose breath tests in patients with ileoanal anastomosis.�Int J Colorectal Dis.�1991;6:208�211.�[PubMed]

33.�Ghoshal UC. How to interpret hydrogen breath tests.�J Neurogastroenterol Motil.�2011;17:312�317.[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

34.�Yang CY, Chang CS, Chen GH. Small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with liver cirrhosis, diagnosed with glucose H2 or CH4 breath tests.�Scand J Gastroenterol.�1998;33:867�871.�[PubMed]

35.�Ghoshal UC, Ghoshal U, Ayyagari A, Ranjan P, Krishnani N, Misra A, Aggarwal R, Naik S, Naik SR. Tropical sprue is associated with contamination of small bowel with aerobic bacteria and reversible prolongation of orocecal transit time.�J Gastroenterol Hepatol.�2003;18:540�547.�[PubMed]

36.�Lu CL, Chen CY, Chang FY, Lee SD. Characteristics of small bowel motility in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and normal humans: an Oriental study.�Clin Sci (Lond)�1998;95:165�169.�[PubMed]

37.�Sciarretta G, Furno A, Mazzoni M, Garagnani B, Malaguti P. Lactulose hydrogen breath test in orocecal transit assessment. Critical evaluation by means of scintigraphic method.�Dig Dis Sci.�1994;39:1505�1510.�[PubMed]

38.�Rao SS, Camilleri M, Hasler WL, Maurer AH, Parkman HP, Saad R, Scott MS, Simren M, Soffer E, Szarka L. Evaluation of gastrointestinal transit in clinical practice: position paper of the American and European Neurogastroenterology and Motility Societies.�Neurogastroenterol Motil.�2011;23:8�23.[PubMed]

39.�Yu D, Cheeseman F, Vanner S. Combined oro-caecal scintigraphy and lactulose hydrogen breath testing demonstrate that breath testing detects oro-caecal transit, not small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with IBS.�Gut.�2011;60:334�340.�[PubMed]

40.�Rana SV, Sharma S, Sinha SK, Kaur H, Sikander A, Singh K. Incidence of predominant methanogenic flora in irritable bowel syndrome patients and apparently healthy controls from North India.�Dig Dis Sci.�2009;54:132�135.�[PubMed]

41.�Dridi B, Henry M, El Kh�chine A, Raoult D, Drancourt M. High prevalence of Methanobrevibacter smithii and Methanosphaera stadtmanae detected in the human gut using an improved DNA detection protocol.�PLoS One.�2009;4:e7063.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

42.�Chatterjee S, Park S, Low K, Kong Y, Pimentel M. The degree of breath methane production in IBS correlates with the severity of constipation.�Am J Gastroenterol.�2007;102:837�841.�[PubMed]

43.�Lunia MK, Sharma BC, Sachdeva S. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and delayed orocecal transit time in patients with cirrhosis and low-grade hepatic encephalopathy.�Hepatol Int.�2013;7:268�273.[PubMed]

44.�Resmini E, Parodi A, Savarino V, Greco A, Rebora A, Minuto F, Ferone D. Evidence of prolonged orocecal transit time and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in acromegalic patients.�J Clin Endocrinol Metab.�2007;92:2119�2124.�[PubMed]

45.�Hamilton I, Worsley BW, Cobden I, Cooke EM, Shoesmith JG, Axon AT. Simultaneous culture of saliva and jejunal aspirate in the investigation of small bowel bacterial overgrowth.�Gut.�1982;23:847�853.[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

46.�Corazza GR, Sorge M, Strocchi A, Benati G, Di Sario A, Treggiari EA, Brusco G, Gasbarrini G. Non-absorbable antibiotics and small bowel bacterial overgrowth.�Ital J Gastroenterol.�1992;24:4�9.�[PubMed]

47.�Kuwahara T, Ogura Y, Oshima K, Kurokawa K, Ooka T, Hirakawa H, Itoh T, Nakayama-Imaohji H, Ichimura M, Itoh K, et al. The lifestyle of the segmented filamentous bacterium: a non-culturable gut-associated immunostimulating microbe inferred by whole-genome sequencing.�DNA Res.�2011;18:291�303.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

48.�Beumer RR, de Vries J, Rombouts FM. Campylobacter jejuni non-culturable coccoid cells.�Int J Food Microbiol.�1992;15:153�163.�[PubMed]

49.�Fromm H, Sarva RP, Ravitch MM, McJunkin B, Farivar S, Amin P. Effects of jejunoileal bypass on the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids, bacterial flora in the upper small intestine, and absorption of vitamin B12.�Metabolism.�1983;32:1133�1141.�[PubMed]

50.�Yoshida T, McCormick WC, Swell L, Vlahcevic ZR. Bile acid metabolism in cirrhosis. IV. Characterization of the abnormality in deoxycholic acid metabolism.�Gastroenterology.�1975;68:335�341.[PubMed]

51.�Bj�rneklett A, Fausa O, Midtvedt T. Bacterial overgrowth in jejunal and ileal disease.�Scand J Gastroenterol.�1983;18:289�298.�[PubMed]

52.�Vanner S. The small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Irritable bowel syndrome hypothesis: implications for treatment.�Gut.�2008;57:1315�1321.�[PubMed]

53.�Kinross JM, von Roon AC, Holmes E, Darzi A, Nicholson JK. The human gut microbiome: implications for future health care.�Curr Gastroenterol Rep.�2008;10:396�403.�[PubMed]

54.�Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia: an overview.�Am J Med.�2009;122:S3�S13.�[PubMed]

55.�Pimentel M, Wallace D, Hallegua D, Chow E, Kong Y, Park S, Lin HC. A link between irritable bowel syndrome and fibromyalgia may be related to findings on lactulose breath testing.�Ann Rheum Dis.�2004;63:450�452.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

56.�Simr�n M, Stotzer PO. Use and abuse of hydrogen breath tests.�Gut.�2006;55:297�303.[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

57.�Gasbarrini A, Lauritano EC, Gabrielli M, Scarpellini E, Lupascu A, Ojetti V, Gasbarrini G. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: diagnosis and treatment.�Dig Dis.�2007;25:237�240.�[PubMed]

58.�Ghoshal UC, Srivastava D, Verma A, Misra A. Slow transit constipation associated with excess methane production and its improvement following rifaximin therapy: a case report.�J Neurogastroenterol Motil.�2011;17:185�188.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

59.�Bala L, Ghoshal UC, Ghoshal U, Tripathi P, Misra A, Gowda GA, Khetrapal CL. Malabsorption syndrome with and without small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a study on upper-gut aspirate using 1H NMR spectroscopy.�Magn Reson Med.�2006;56:738�744.�[PubMed]

60.�Haboubi NY, Lee GS, Montgomery RD. Duodenal mucosal morphometry of elderly patients with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: response to antibiotic treatment.�Age Ageing.�1991;20:29�32.�[PubMed]

61.�Shindo K, Machida M, Koide K, Fukumura M, Yamazaki R. Deconjugation ability of bacteria isolated from the jejunal fluid of patients with progressive systemic sclerosis and its gastric pH.�Hepatogastroenterology.�1998;45:1643�1650.�[PubMed]

62.�Wanitschke R, Ammon HV. Effects of dihydroxy bile acids and hydroxy fatty acids on the absorption of oleic acid in the human jejunum.�J Clin Invest.�1978;61:178�186.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

63.�Shanab AA, Scully P, Crosbie O, Buckley M, O�Mahony L, Shanahan F, Gazareen S, Murphy E, Quigley EM. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: association with toll-like receptor 4 expression and plasma levels of interleukin 8.�Dig Dis Sci.�2011;56:1524�1534.�[PubMed]

64.�Ghoshal UC, Park H, Gwee KA. Bugs and irritable bowel syndrome: The good, the bad and the ugly.�J Gastroenterol Hepatol.�2010;25:244�251.�[PubMed]

65.�Barbara G, Stanghellini V, Brandi G, Cremon C, Di Nardo G, De Giorgio R, Corinaldesi R. Interactions between commensal bacteria and gut sensorimotor function in health and disease.�Am J Gastroenterol.�2005;100:2560�2568.�[PubMed]

66.�Cherbut C, Aub� AC, Blotti�re HM, Galmiche JP. Effects of short-chain fatty acids on gastrointestinal motility.�Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl.�1997;222:58�61.�[PubMed]

67.�Ramakrishna BS, Roediger WE. Bacterial short chain fatty acids: their role in gastrointestinal disease.�Dig Dis.�1990;8:337�345.�[PubMed]

68.�Dumoulin V, Moro F, Barcelo A, Dakka T, Cuber JC. Peptide YY, glucagon-like peptide-1, and neurotensin responses to luminal factors in the isolated vascularly perfused rat ileum.�Endocrinology.�1998;139:3780�3786.�[PubMed]

69.�Balsari A, Ceccarelli A, Dubini F, Fesce E, Poli G. The fecal microbial population in the irritable bowel syndrome.�Microbiologica.�1982;5:185�194.�[PubMed]

70.�Nobaek S, Johansson ML, Molin G, Ahrn� S, Jeppsson B. Alteration of intestinal microflora is associated with reduction in abdominal bloating and pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.�Am J Gastroenterol.�2000;95:1231�1238.�[PubMed]

71.�Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT. The control and consequences of bacterial fermentation in the human colon.�J Appl Bacteriol.�1991;70:443�459.�[PubMed]

72.�Camilleri M. Probiotics and irritable bowel syndrome: rationale, mechanisms, and efficacy.�J Clin Gastroenterol.�2008;42 Suppl 3 Pt 1:S123�S125.�[PubMed]

73.�Spiller R. Probiotics: an ideal anti-inflammatory treatment for IBS?�Gastroenterology.�2005;128:783�785.�[PubMed]

74.�Ford AC, Spiegel BM, Talley NJ, Moayyedi P. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.�Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.�2009;7:1279�1286.�[PubMed]

75.�Cuoco L, Salvagnini M. Small intestine bacterial overgrowth in irritable bowel syndrome: a retrospective study with rifaximin.�Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol.�2006;52:89�95.�[PubMed]

76.�Di Stefano M, Corazza GR. Treatment of small intestine bacterial overgrowth and related symptoms by rifaximin.�Chemotherapy.�2005;51 Suppl 1:103�109.�[PubMed]

77.�Pimentel M, Lembo A, Chey WD, Zakko S, Ringel Y, Yu J, Mareya SM, Shaw AL, Bortey E, Forbes WP. Rifaximin therapy for patients with irritable bowel syndrome without constipation.�N Engl J Med.�2011;364:22�32.�[PubMed]

78.�Hwang L, Low K, Khoshini R, Melmed G, Sahakian A, Makhani M, Pokkunuri V, Pimentel M. Evaluating breath methane as a diagnostic test for constipation-predominant IBS.�Dig Dis Sci.�2010;55:398�403.�[PubMed]

79.�Low K, Hwang L, Hua J, Zhu A, Morales W, Pimentel M. A combination of rifaximin and neomycin is most effective in treating irritable bowel syndrome patients with methane on lactulose breath test.�J Clin Gastroenterol.�2010;44:547�550.�[PubMed]

80.�Bengmark S. Colonic food: pre- and probiotics.�Am J Gastroenterol.�2000;95:S5�S7.�[PubMed]

81.�Quigley EM, Quera R. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: roles of antibiotics, prebiotics, and probiotics.�Gastroenterology.�2006;130:S78�S90.�[PubMed]

82.�Xiao SD, Zhang DZ, Lu H, Jiang SH, Liu HY, Wang GS, Xu GM, Zhang ZB, Lin GJ, Wang GL. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of heat-killed Lactobacillus acidophilus LB in patients with chronic diarrhea.�Adv Ther.�2003;20:253�260.�[PubMed]

83.�O’Mahony L, McCarthy J, Kelly P, Hurley G, Luo F, Chen K, O�Sullivan GC, Kiely B, Collins JK, Shanahan F, et al. Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium in irritable bowel syndrome: symptom responses and relationship to cytokine profiles.�Gastroenterology.�2005;128:541�551.�[PubMed]

84.�Tsuchiya J, Barreto R, Okura R, Kawakita S, Fesce E, Marotta F. Single-blind follow-up study on the effectiveness of a symbiotic preparation in irritable bowel syndrome.�Chin J Dig Dis.�2004;5:169�174.[PubMed]

85.�Kim YG, Moon JT, Lee KM, Chon NR, Park H. [The effects of probiotics on symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome]�Korean J Gastroenterol.�2006;47:413�419.�[PubMed]

86.�Park JS, Yu JH, Lim HC, Kim JH, Yoon YH, Park HJ, Lee SI. [Usefulness of lactulose breath test for the prediction of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in irritable bowel syndrome]�Korean J Gastroenterol.�2010;56:242�248.�[PubMed]

87.�Mann NS, Limoges-Gonzales M. The prevalence of small intestinal bacterial vergrowth in irritable bowel syndrome.�Hepatogastroenterology.�2009;56:718�721.�[PubMed]

88.�Scarpellini E, Giorgio V, Gabrielli M, Lauritano EC, Pantanella A, Fundar� C, Gasbarrini A. Prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in children with irritable bowel syndrome: a case-control study.�J Pediatr.�2009;155:416�420.�[PubMed]

89.�Nucera G, Gabrielli M, Lupascu A, Lauritano EC, Santoliquido A, Cremonini F, Cammarota G, Tondi P, Pola P, Gasbarrini G, et al. Abnormal breath tests to lactose, fructose and sorbitol in irritable bowel syndrome may be explained by small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.�Aliment Pharmacol Ther.�2005;21:1391�1395.�[PubMed]

90.�Reddymasu SC, Sostarich S, McCallum RW. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in irritable bowel syndrome: are there any predictors?�BMC Gastroenterol.�2010;10:23.�[PMC free article]�[PubMed]

91.�Lombardo L, Foti M, Ruggia O, Chiecchio A. Increased incidence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth during proton pump inhibitor therapy.�Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.�2010;8:504�508.�[PubMed]

92.�Parodi A, Dulbecco P, Savarino E, Giannini EG, Bodini G, Corbo M, Isola L, De Conca S, Marabotto E, Savarino V. Positive glucose breath testing is more prevalent in patients with IBS-like symptoms compared with controls of similar age and gender distribution.�J Clin Gastroenterol.�2009;43:962�966.[PubMed]

93.�Rana SV, Sinha SK, Sikander A, Bhasin DK, Singh K. Study of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in North Indian patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a case control study.�Trop Gastroenterol.�2008;29:23�25.�[PubMed]

94.�Majewski M, McCallum RW. Results of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth testing in irritable bowel syndrome patients: clinical profiles and effects of antibiotic trial.�Adv Med Sci.�2007;52:139�142.[PubMed]

95.�Lupascu A, Gabrielli M, Lauritano EC, Scarpellini E, Santoliquido A, Cammarota G, Flore R, Tondi P, Pola P, Gasbarrini G, et al. Hydrogen glucose breath test to detect small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a prevalence case-control study in irritable bowel syndrome.�Aliment Pharmacol Ther.�2005;22:1157�1160.[PubMed]

Close Accordion

Research Studies on SIBO in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

by Dr Alex Jimenez DC, APRN, FNP-BC, CFMP, IFMCP | Chiropractic, Functional Medicine

Irritable bowel syndrome, or IBS, is a prevalent condition characterized by abdominal pain or discomfort, bloating, connected to altered stool form (such as diarrhea and constipation) as well as passage. Approximately 4 percent to 30 percent of individuals world-wide suffer from IBS. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, or SIBO, which was clinically demonstrated in patients with structural abnormalities in the gut, such as ileo-transverse anastomosis, stricture, fistula, slow motility and reduced gut defense, may also be characterized by abdominal pain or discomfort, bloating, flatulence and loose motion. It’s been recognized that SIBO may occur in the absence of structural abnormalities. These patients may be incorrectly diagnosed with IBS, or irritable bowel syndrome.

How common is SIBO diagnosed in IBS?

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth has been described as the excessive presence of bacteria, forming 10⁵ units per milliliter on culture of their intestine aspirate. As this is an invasive test, lots of noninvasive techniques like lactulose and glucose hydrogen breath tests (LHBT and GHBT) are broadly used to diagnose SIBO. This issue has been recognized among people with IBS. In a variety of research studies, frequency of SIBO among patients presenting IBS varied from 4 percent to 78 percent, according to Table ?1, more so among patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS. Not only quantitative increase (SIBO) but qualitative change from the gut bacteria (dysbiosis) was reported among patients with IBS. Research studies utilizing antibiotics and probiotics have caused disagreement to care for this disease with lately transplantation which led to a paradigm shift. Nonetheless, it’s essential to understand the wide-variability in frequency of SIBO among people with IBS. A wide-variability in frequency may indicate it is vital to evaluate the evidence carefully to determine whether the association between IBS and SIBO is under-projected in previous research studies.

Table 1 Summary of Prevalence of SIBO in IBS Image 1

The research studies are examined by people on discordance with the connection between IBS and SIBO as well as their strength and weakness, such as evidence on exploitation of gut flora on indications of IBS and other issues.

Assessment of Studies on SIBO in IBS

Table ?1 summarizes the outcomes among patients with IBS from research studies on individuals with SIBO. As can be noted in the table, the frequency of people with IBS and SIBO varied from 4 percent to 78 percent and from 1 percent and 40 percent among controls. Frequency of individuals with SIBO and IBS was greater than among controls. It might be concluded that SIBO is correlated with IBS. It’s essential to assess the explanations in various research studies.

Critical Evaluation of Studies on SIBO in IBS

Can IBS phenotype determine frequency of SIBO?

IBS is a state that’s heterogeneous. The sub-types may be diarrhea or constipation-predominant or may be alternating. Patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS have organic cause including SIBO compared to other types of IBS. In a study on 129 patients with non-diarrheal IBS, 73 with long-term diarrhea, for example diarrhea-predominant IBS, and 51 healthy controls, frequency of SIBO with GHBT was 11 (8.5 percent), 16 (22 percent) and 1 (2%), respectively. Similar findings are reported in various studies. Diarrheal IBS needs to be evaluated in comparison to other sorts of IBS for SIBO. Research studies that contained percentage of individuals are extremely likely to reveal frequency of SIBO.

Bloating is a symptom commonly reported among patients with IBS. Frequency of bloating has been reported to vary from Asia by 26 percent to 83 percent in research studies on IBS. The pathogenesis of bloating may be correlated with increased quantity of gas in the gut, its abnormal source and improved gut sense in response to distension of the gut. Patients with SIBO may have increased amount of gas inside the gut, so it’s plausible to believe IBS patients with bloating that is noticeable are expected to have SIBO. There is limited data with this specific circumstance. Evidence also demonstrated that both fasting along with post-substrate (e.g., sugar, lactulose) breath hydrogen is considerably higher compared to individuals with IBS compared to controls. Probiotics and antibiotics, which are demonstrated to reduce gas, are demonstrated to ease bloating. It has been noted that treatment can revert hydrogen breath tests back to normal. Patients with IBS, flatulence and bloating should be evaluated for SIBO. More data is involved with this issue.

Can techniques used to diagnose SIBO determine its frequency?

Several techniques are used to diagnose SIBO; including GHBT LHBT,¹⁴C breath test, and culture of aspirate. The principle of hydrogen breath tests is summarized in Figure 1. Dietary carbohydrates produce hydrogen in the gut. In patients with SIBO, the bacteria in the small bowel ferment these carbohydrates, producing hydrogen, which gets absorbed and is exhaled in the breath.

Figure 1

Hydrogen breath test involves giving patients a load of carbohydrate (generally in the sort of glucose and lactulose) and measuring expired hydrogen concentrations in a period of time. Identification of SIBO using hydrogen breath test depends upon the bodily principle of patients with SIBO, glucose may be fermented by bacteria in the intestine resulting in production of hydrogen gas that is consumed and exhaled in expired air (Figure ?1, A1). By contrast, lactulose, which may function as a non-absorbable disaccharide, will produce an early summit due to fermentation in the small intestine (normally within 90-min) or two summit (as a consequence of small intestine fermentation and minute from colon), if SIBO is present (Figure ?1, B2 and B3). There are limits in hydrogen breath test for identification of SIBO. There may be similarities in patients with problems and SIBO employing rapid transit making differentiation difficult. An ancient summit can be positive in people with gut transit time. By way of instance, in a study from India, median oro-cecal transit interval was 65 minutes (variety 40-110 moments) in healthy subjects. In another study from Taiwan, mean transit interval was 85 min. It’s been substantiated in Western individuals recently by simultaneously using LHBT and radio-nuclide method to gauge gut transport. Double summit standards for evaluation of SIBO using LHBT is quite insensitive. Sensitivity of GHBT to diagnose SIBO is 44 percent contemplating the culture of gut aspirate as a regular standard. As a result, it’s estimated that the researchers who used a historic summit standards in LHBT could discover a greater frequency of SIBO among people with IBS along with controls. In contrast, those who would use either GHBT or double summit benchmark in LHBT might locate a minimum frequency of SIBO alike in patients with IBS and controls. It is well worth noting from Table ?1 that the frequency of SIBO among people with IBS and controls on LHBT (early summit standards) varied from 34.5 percent to 78 percent and 7 percent to 40 percent, respectively; in contrast with the frequency GHBT varied from 8.5 percent to 46 percent and 2 percent to 18percent.

Fifteen percent of people might have methanogenic flora in the gut. Methanobrevibacter smithii, Methanobrevibacter stadmanae and perhaps several of those coliform bacteria are methanogens. In these areas, only hydrogen breath tests may not diagnose SIBO, estimation of methane may also be demanded (Figure ?1). Table ?1 shows that 8.5 percent to 26 percent of IBS sufferers and 0 percent to 25 percent of controls exhaled methane inside their breath. Whether methane was not expected in them, SIBO could not have been diagnosed. Methane was not estimated, which could have resulted in underestimation of frequency of SIBO as outlined in a proportion of the research study. Methane production in excess is connected to constipation. Consequently, methane estimation in breath, which is inaccessible in several commercially available hydrogen breath test machines, is particularly vital in patients employing constipation-predominant IBS. Some could have slow transit through the small intestine making prolonged testing as a lot of hours required and many people may not want to undergo such testing. However, a period of testing for them may overlook SIBO’s identification.

The jejunal aspirate culture has traditionally been used as the gold standard to diagnose SIBO, according to Figure ?2. On the other hand, the limitations of this test include invasiveness in addition to the challenges posed by attempting to civilization all strains and species. In fact, usage of air during endoscopy might lead to a false negative impact as anaerobes do not rise when these are exposed to oxygen. Furthermore, a massive percentage of germs are not cultured. By contrast, single lumen catheter passed through the nose or through the biopsy channel of endoscope, may lead to contamination with oro-pharyngeal flora supplying false positive result. Therefore, we left a double-lumen catheter to prevent these oro-pharyngeal contamination (Figure ?2). Studies on SIBO one of patients with IBS using qualitative civilization of small bowel aspirate are scanty (Table ?1). A study by Posserud et al reported that a frequency of SIBO of 4 percent among people with IBS. Taking the result of study using GHBT, the sensitivity of 44 percent to diagnose the intestine aspirate appears to have the incidence of SIBO . More studies are essential on this issue.

Figure 2

Figure 3

¹³C and�¹⁴C based tests have also been developed based on the bacterial metabolism of D-xylose (Figure ?3). Of acids containing¹³C and�¹⁴C may be used to diagnose SIBO. The glycocholic acid breath test contains the managing of the bile acid¹⁴C glycocholic acid, as well as the discovery of¹⁴CO₂, which may be increased in SIBO (Figure 3), according to the clinical and experimental data from the various research studies on SIBO associated with IBS. While evidence may appear conclusive, further research studies may be required to properly determine the results.

Information referenced from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and the National University of Health Sciences. The scope of our information is limited to chiropractic and spinal injuries and conditions. To discuss the subject matter, please feel free to ask Dr. Jimenez or contact us at 915-850-0900 .